The use of vaginal misoprostol for second-trimester pregnancy termination in women with previous single cesarean section

Induced Abortion After Previous Caesarean Section: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Previous caesarean section (CS) is increasingly common among women undergoing induced abortion.

AIMS

To map and analyse existing literature on abortion safety, outcomes and management in those with previous CS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Four databases were systematically searched from inception to July 2024. Primary human studies in English reporting on outcomes, safety or management of first- or second-trimester medical (MToP) or surgical (SToP) abortion in women with previous CS were included. Uterine rupture incidence was analysed cumulatively in the first and secondtrimesters by the number of CS and the type of prostaglandin used. Data on the efficacy and safety of MToP and SToP, including studies reporting on the management of abortion in the setting of abnormal placentation, were collected and analysed by theme.

RESULTS

In total, 164 articles met inclusion criteria. Incidence of uterine rupture in first-trimester MToP was 0 of 2194 cases, in second-trimester misoprostol MToP in those with 1 previous CS was 0.5% (10/1910) and 2.2% (18/835) in women with ≥ 2 CS (p < 0.001). Mifepristone priming did not increase the rupture rate in second-trimester MToP (p = 0.77). Previous CS was a modest risk factor for retained products after MToP across both trimesters (OR 1.48, CI 1.29-1.70).

CONCLUSION

Medical and surgical abortion in the first and second trimester appears safe in women with prior CS; however, risks include uterine rupture, need for surgical intervention and haemorrhage from undiagnosed placenta accreta. Further research and guidance are needed on managing abortion after previous classical CS, ≥ 3 previous CS and those with abnormally invasive placenta.

Comparing the outcomes of termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus using intravaginal misoprostol between women with and without previous cesarean section

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of termination of pregnancy with live fetuses in the second trimester (14-28 weeks), using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h, between women with previous cesarean section (PCS) and no previous cesarean section (no PCS).

METHODS

A comparative study was conducted on a prospective database of pregnancy termination in the second trimester, Chiang Mai university hospital. Inclusion criteria included: (1) singleton pregnancy; (2) gestational age between 14 and 28 weeks; and (3) pregnancy with a live fetus and medically indicated for termination. The participants were categorized into two groups; PCS and no PCS group. All were terminated using misoprostol 400 mcg intravaginal every 6 h. The main outcomes were induction to fetal delivery interval and success rate, defined as fetal delivery within 48 h.

RESULTS

A total of 238 women, including 80 PCS and 158 no PCS, were recruited. The success rate of fetal delivery within 48 h between both groups was not significantly different (91.3% vs. 93.0%; p-value 0.622). The induction to fetal delivery interval were not significantly different (1531 vs. 1279 min; p-value > 0.05). Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. The rates of most adverse effects of misoprostol were similar. One case (1.3%) in the PCS group developed uterine rupture during termination, ending up with safe and successful surgical removal and uterine repair.

CONCLUSION

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for second trimester termination of pregnancy with PCS and those with no PCS, with similar success rate and induction to fetal delivery interval. Gestational age was an independent factor for the success rate and required dosage of misoprostol. Uterine rupture could occur in 1.3% of PCS, implying that high precaution must be taken for early detection and proper management.

SYNOPSIS

Intravaginal misoprostol is highly effective for termination of second trimester pregnancy with a live fetus, with a comparable success rate between women with and without previous cesarean section, with a 1.3% risk of uterine rupture among women with previous cesarean section.

Mifepristone priming and subsequent misoprostol for second trimester medical abortion in women with previous caesarean delivery

AIMS

To assess clinical outcomes and complications in women with ≥1 prior caesarean delivery (CS) during mid-pregnancy medical abortion with misoprostol following mifepristone priming.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective analysis of abortions at 13-28 weeks gestation using sequential mifepristone and misoprostol at a single centre from 1/2008-12/2018. Procedural outcomes were compared between cases with no prior CS, one prior and ≥2 prior CS.

RESULTS

There were 1399 consecutive women who underwent a medical abortion, with 304 (21.7%) having ≥1 prior lower segment CS (241 one, 49 two, 12 three, one four) and one a prior classical CS. Median gestation was 19 weeks (interquartile range (IQR) 17-21) among nulliparas, multiparas with no prior CS and multiparas with prior CS, P = 0.505. Compared with nulliparas (median procedural duration 10.8 h, IQR 7.5-16.5; adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) = 1.20 95%CI 1.04-1.40, P = 0.015), multiparas with prior CS had a shorter procedural duration (9.5 h, IQR 6.5-13.5) while multiparas with no CS had the shortest duration (7.0 h, IQR 5.0-9.8; aHR = 2.28 95%CI 2.01-2.58, P < 0.001). Complications were more frequent with prior CS: estimated blood loss (medians: 100 cc no CS vs 150 cc ≥1 CS, P = 0.002), blood loss >1000 cc (3.6% no CS vs 7.2% ≥1 CS; odds ratio (OR) = 2.11 95%CI 1.23-3.62, P = 0.007) and placental retention (17.3% no CS vs 25.3% ≥1 CS; adjusted OR = 1.44 95%CI 1.05-1.99, P = 0.024). Uterine rupture occurred in 4/304 women with ≥1 prior CS (1.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Mifepristone-misoprostol abortion in women with prior CS is generally safe but associated with an increased risk of procedural complications. Lowering of the misoprostol dosage with prior CS may reduce uterine rupture, although this hypothesis requires ongoing research.

ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 205: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) refers to a planned attempt to deliver vaginally by a woman who has had a previous cesarean delivery, regardless of the outcome. This method provides women who desire a vaginal delivery the possibility of achieving that goal-a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). In addition to fulfilling a patient's preference for vaginal delivery, at an individual level, VBAC is associated with decreased maternal morbidity and a decreased risk of complications in future pregnancies as well as a decrease in the overall cesarean delivery rate at the population level (). However, although TOLAC is appropriate for many women, several factors increase the likelihood of a failed trial of labor, which in turn is associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity when compared with a successful trial of labor (ie, VBAC) and elective repeat cesarean delivery (). Therefore, assessing the likelihood of VBAC as well as the individual risks is important when determining who is an appropriate candidate for TOLAC. Thus, the purpose of this document is to review the risks and benefits of TOLAC in various clinical situations and to provide practical guidelines for counseling and management of patients who will attempt to give birth vaginally after a previous cesarean delivery.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Practice Bulletin No. 184: Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) refers to a planned attempt to deliver vaginally by a woman who has had a previous cesarean delivery, regardless of the outcome. This method provides women who desire a vaginal delivery the possibility of achieving that goal-a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery (VBAC). In addition to fulfilling a patient's preference for vaginal delivery, at an individual level, VBAC is associated with decreased maternal morbidity and a decreased risk of complications in future pregnancies as well as a decrease in the overall cesarean delivery rate at the population level (1-3). However, although TOLAC is appropriate for many women, several factors increase the likelihood of a failed trial of labor, which in turn is associated with increased maternal and perinatal morbidity when compared with a successful trial of labor (ie, VBAC) and elective repeat cesarean delivery (4-6). Therefore, assessing the likelihood of VBAC as well as the individual risks is important when determining who is an appropriate candidate for TOLAC. Thus, the purpose of this document is to review the risks and benefits of TOLAC in various clinical situations and to provide practical guidelines for counseling and management of patients who will attempt to give birth vaginally after a previous cesarean delivery.

Myoma and myomectomy: Poor evidence concern in pregnancy

AIM

Summarize the results of the many, but often underpowered, studies on pregnancy complicated by myoma or myomectomy.

METHODS

Survey of the electronic PubMed database for the last two decades was conducted. We selected reviews, meta-analyses, case series, case reports, clinical studies only with statistical analysis, and guidelines from scientific societies.

RESULTS

Delaying childbearing leads to an increased incidence of pregnancy complicated by fibroids or previous myomectomy. Approximately 10-30% of pregnant women with myomas develop complications during gestation, at delivery and in puerperium. Submucosal, retroplacental, large and multiple myomas have a greater risk of complications. Cervical myomas, although rare, need careful management. The location and size of the fibroids should be assessed from the first trimester. Despite the increased risk of cesarean section, fibroids are not a contraindication to labor, unless they obstruct the birth canal or other obstetric conditions coexist. Myomectomy during pregnancy, in selected cases, is feasible and safe. Myomectomy cannot be considered a prophylactic measure prior to conception, but has to be individualized. Uterine rupture after myomectomy generally occurs in the third trimester or during labor and some associated risk factors have been identified. There is no consensus on the optimal interval between myomectomy and conception.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy in patients with fibroids or previous myomectomy should be considered as high risk, requiring a maternal-fetal medicine specialist. To date available literature is inconsistent on evidence-based management. Further research is needed for definitive recommendations.

Misoprostol use for second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with one or more previous cesarean deliveries

OBJECTIVE

To establish the safety and efficacy of misoprostol for second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with one or more previous cesarean deliveries.

METHODS

In a retrospective study, data were reviewed from women attending a reproductive health clinic in Bloemfontein, South Africa, for second-trimester termination between 2010 and 2013. The study group, comprising women with one or more previous cesareans, was compared with a control group, comprising women with no previous cesarean or uterine scarring. Procedure-specific information was compared, including misoprostol use, termination duration, need for other methods (e.g. oxytocin), placenta delivery, termination outcome, and bleeding.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 268 women: 231 (86.2%) with one and 37 (13.8%) with two previous cesareans. The control group comprised 266 women. Incomplete abortion was recorded in 223 (85.4%) of 261 women in the study group and 213 (80.4%) of 265 in the control group. The number of women with retained placenta was higher in the study than in the control group (158/261 [60.5%] vs 146/265 [55.1%]; P<0.001). Severe bleeding was observed only in the control group (7/266 [2.6%]). No uterine rupture was observed.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol was safe for second-trimester termination among women with previous cesareans; however, the efficacy of the local regimen was reduced owing to high placental retention.

Cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a scarred uterus: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review and metaanalysis was to determine the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

Data sources were PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS, Google Scholar, and clinicaltrials.gov (1983 through 2015). Eligibility criteria were cohort or cross-sectional studies that reported on efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents in patients with previous cesarean delivery. Efficacy was determined based on the proportion of patients achieving vaginal delivery and vaginal delivery within 24 hours following administration of a cervical ripening agent. Safety was assessed by the risk of uterine rupture and complications such as retained placental products, blood transfusion requirement, and endometritis, when available, as secondary outcomes. Of the 176 studies identified, 38 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 17 studies were descriptive and 21 studies compared the efficacy and safety of cervical ripening agents between patients with previous cesarean and those with no previous cesarean. From included studies, we abstracted data on cervical ripening agents and estimated the pooled risk differences and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. To account for between-study heterogeneity, we estimated risk ratios based on underlying random effects analyses. Publication bias was assessed via funnel plots and across-study heterogeneity was assessed based on the I(2) measure.

RESULTS

The most commonly used agent was PGE1. In descriptive studies, PGE1 was associated with a vaginal delivery rate of 96.8%, of which 76.3% occurred within 24 hours, uterine rupture in 0.8%, retained placenta in 10.8%, and endometritis in 3.9% in patients with ≥1 cesarean. In comparative studies, the use of PGE1, PGE2, and mechanical methods (laminaria and dilation and curettage) were equally efficacious in achieving vaginal delivery between patients with and without prior cesarean (risk ratio, 0.99, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.00; risk ratio, 1.00, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.02; and risk ratio, 1.00, and 95% confidence interval, 0.98-1.01; respectively). In patients with history of ≥1 cesarean the use of PGE1 was associated with higher risk of uterine rupture (risk ratio, 6.57; 95% confidence interval, 2.21-19.52) and retained placenta (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-1.43) compared to women without a prior cesarean. However, the risk of uterine rupture among women with history of only 1 cesarean (0.47%) was not statistically significant (risk ratio, 2.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.39-14.32), whereas among those with history of ≥2 cesareans (2.5%) was increased as compared to those with no previous cesarean (0.08%) (risk ratio, 17.55; 95% confidence interval, 3.00-102.8). Funnel plots did not demonstrate any clear evidence of publication bias. Across-study heterogeneity ranged from 0-81%.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and metaanalysis provides evidence that PGE1, PGE2, and mechanical methods are efficacious for achieving vaginal delivery in women with previous cesarean delivery. The use of prostaglandin PGE1 in the second trimester was not associated with significantly increased risk for uterine rupture among women with only 1 cesarean; however, this risk was substantially increased among women with ≥2 cesareans although the absolute risk appeared to be relatively small.

How much misoprostol is safe? - First reported case of second-trimester uterine rupture after a single low dose

With the rising rate of caesarean births, the scenario of fetal demise occurring in a woman with previous caesarean births is becoming more prevalent. The optimal mode of management of intrauterine fetal demise in women with multiple caesarean births presents a challenge for the obstetricians due to absence of a definite protocol with good efficacy, safety and acceptability in these women. The risks of hysterotomy have to be balanced against the risk of uterine rupture with induction. Misoprostol is one of the most common drugs being used in mid-trimester miscarriage but with variable doses. The reports of uterine rupture with previous caesarean scar are rare and have occurred with different doses, making it difficult to counsel women regarding maternal risks. It is difficult to conduct a randomised control trial to address this issue due to limited number of patients and therefore no drug or dosage can be recommended with certainty. We present a unique and first case of second-trimester uterine rupture in a woman with three previous caesarean births and intrauterine fetal demise, after a single low dose of 25 μg vaginal misoprostol. This highlights the need for further research in context of misoprostol dosage in women with more than two previous caesarean births having second-trimester induction of labour.

Comparison of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations after FIGO's misoprostol dosage recommendation in 2012

OBJECTIVE

To compare the safety and efficacy of two misoprostol regimens for mid-trimester pregnancy terminations.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of 263 cases of pregnancy terminations with misoprostol between 12 and 24 weeks was performed. Group 1 (total 129 patients) consisted of patients who were given 200 mcg vaginal misoprostol every 4 h until the abortion, whereas Group 2 patients (total 134 patients) were given misoprostol as in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics's (FIGO) 2012 recommendation. In case of a previous cesarean section doses were halved in both groups. Primary outcomes of the study were the time to abortion and the total drug dose used. Secondary outcome was the rate of complications.

RESULTS

Total dose and time to abortion did not differ between the groups. As for complications, one patient (%0.8) in group 1 developed HELLP syndrome and had hysterotomy. One patient (%0.8) in group 2 had uterine rupture and had total hysterectomy. Two patients in both groups considered failure of induction and terminated with surgery (hysterotomy). Groups did not show difference in induction failure rates.

CONCLUSIONS

We respect the presence of dose recommendation stated by the FIGO and found similar results with our recent protocol. Other misoprostol regimens used worldwide should also be compared with this guideline in order to improve its efficacy.

Buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration for the induction of first and second trimester abortions

OBJECTIVES

To compare the effectiveness, side effects, and patient satisfaction of buccal versus vaginal misoprostol administration in first and second trimester induced abortions.

METHODS

In first trimester, women received oral mifepristone followed by misoprostol either by buccal or vaginal route. In second trimester, women received oral mifepristone followed by repeated doses of misoprostol either by buccal or vaginal route. A comparative analysis using SPSS was done.

RESULTS

In first trimester, success rate of medical abortion was 96 % in buccal group and 88 % in vaginal group. Nausea was the most common adverse effect which was similar in both groups. In second trimester, success rate was 96 % in buccal group and 80 % in vaginal group. A statistically higher incidence of nausea was noticed in buccal group. Patient satisfaction level was almost similar in both the groups in both trimesters.

CONCLUSIONS

Buccal and vaginal routes of misoprostol administration have similar efficacy and patient satisfaction level for first and second trimester induced abortions. Hence, buccal route may serve as an alternative to vaginal misoprostol.

[Use of misoprostol for induction of labor in case of fetal death or termination of pregnancy during second or third trimester of pregnancy: Efficiency, dosage, route of administration, side effects, use in case of uterine scar]

OBJECTIVE

Study, based on the literature, of the use of misoprostol for induction of labor in cases of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy and define the different mode of administration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bibliographic review using the Medline and Pubmed databases and the guidelines of the international professional societies. Selection of papers in French and English. Keywords used: misoprostol, termination of pregnancy, mid and third trimester, scarred uterus, previous cesarean section, uterine rupture.

RESULTS

Misoprostol is effective for induction of labor in case of second or third fetal death or termination of pregnancy. Comparing to oral route, vaginal route reduces the induction-expulsion time and the rate of patients remaining undelivered in the first 24 hours without increasing side effects. Oral route is a possible alternative if preferred by the patient. Sublingual route seems interesting but data are limited. The use of moderate doses (800-2400 μg/day) every 3 to 6 hours seems to be the best compromise between efficiency and tolerance. It is not possible to recommend a specific dosing schedule. The risk of uterine rupture in case of previous cesarean section justifies the use of minimum effective dose for these patients. In this case, it is recommended not to exceed a dose of 100 μg for each dose. The induction-birth period and doses of misoprostol required to induce labor are reduced when combined with mifepristone administered 36 to 48 hours before.

CONCLUSION

Misoprostol is effective and safe for induction of labor in case of second or third trimester fetal death or termination of pregnancy.

Silent uterine rupture with the use of misoprostol for second trimester termination of pregnancy : a case report

Uterine rupture is an uncommon, but a life-threatening, complication following second trimester medical termination of pregnancy (TOP). The reported cases have been in both the scarred and unscarred uterus (Rajesh et al. 2002, Drey et al. 2006, and Dickinson). A 27-year-old with two previous deliveries, no previous caesarean section, no history of induced abortions, and no gynaecological operations. She presented with amenorrhoea, and according to her last normal menstruation, she was 10 weeks and 5 days. Ultrasound was done, and it reported 16 weeks and 5 days. She asked for TOP. According to the clinic's protocol, misoprostol 800 mcg (4 tabs) were given to be used vaginally as a loading dose and another three to be taken orally after that. In the following day when she attended the clinic for follow up, a manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). A manual vacuum aspiration was indicated as an incomplete abortion. During the procedure, a uterine rupture was found in the uterine lower segment. A laparotomy was done and a lineal uterine rupture was found and sutured. The patient had a good postoperative recovery and was discharged from hospital after four days. The clinician dealing with second trimester terminations should be aware of the possibility of having a uterine rupture, especially in patients with a uterine scar in order to make an early diagnosis.

Pregnancy termination using vaginal misoprostol in women with more than one caesarean section

We set out to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the proposed misoprostol regimen in women with previous multiple caesarean sections. This was a retrospective cohort study of 21 women with more than one caesarean section who underwent termination of pregnancy (TOP) with 400 mug of vaginal misoprostol followed by 200 mug/6 h (max 800 mug). The complete abortion rate was 12/21 (57.14%) and six (28.57%) women had an incomplete abortion. Three TOPs (14.29%) failed. In the first trimester group, only 3/9 (33.34%) aborted completely, while (9/12) 75% second trimester patients aborted completely. There were no major complications. The proposed regimen is considered safe and reasonably effective in second trimester TOPs in women with previous multiple caesarean sections. In first trimester patients, the possibility of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) should be discussed during counselling, or a higher dose should be used as the effectiveness is low.

Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review

The proportion of US abortions performed in the second trimester has varied little since 1992. Although 30 years of cumulative data corroborate the safety of dilation and evacuation (D&E), the most commonly used method of second-trimester abortion in the United States, both D&E and alternative induction regimens continue to evolve such that the traditional safety gap between medical and surgical regimens has narrowed. Providers now have options that allow them to either expedite D&E by diminishing the cervical-ripening period or reduce induction abortion intervals during medical induction.

Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation

Roughly 11% of induced abortions in the United States are performed after 14 weeks of gestation, most commonly by dilation and evacuation (D&E). For a D&E procedure, the cervix must be dilated sufficiently to allow passage of operative instruments and products of conception without injuring the uterus or cervical canal. Preoperative preparation of the cervix reduces the risk of cervical laceration and uterine perforation. The cervix may be prepared with osmotic dilators, prostaglandin analogues, or both. Osmotic dilators currently available in the United States include Dilapan-S, Lamicel, and laminaria. Laminaria tents are made from dehydrated seaweed and require 12-24 h to achieve greatest dilation. The synthetic products, Dilapan-S and Lamicel, achieve maximum effect within 6 h. Dilapan-S achieves greater dilation than the others and, thus, requires fewer dilators to be placed but may be more difficult to remove. For same day procedures, Dilapan-S and Lamicel are preferable to laminaria. A single set of one to several dilators is usually adequate for D&E before 20 weeks of gestation. Additional sets over 1-2 days may be needed in challenging cases. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue, is sometimes used instead of osmotic dilators; however, the data to support such use are limited. Misoprostol is inferior to overnight dilation with laminaria for cervical priming prior to D&E. Misoprostol use as an adjunct to overnight osmotic dilation is only marginally beneficial for priming beyond 16 weeks and does not truly demonstrate any benefit before 19 weeks of gestation. Limited data demonstrate the safety of misoprostol prior to D&E in patients with a uterine scar. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative cervical preparation to decrease the risk of complications when performing a D&E prior to 20 weeks of gestation. The three currently available osmotic dilators (laminaria, Lamicel, and Dilapan-S) are safe and effective for this use. Since no single protocol has been found to be superior, clinical judgment is warranted when selecting a method of preoperative cervical preparation.