1
|
Fleurant E, McCloskey L. Medication Abortion: A Comprehensive Review. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2023; 66:706-724. [PMID: 37910067 DOI: 10.1097/grf.0000000000000812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of evidence-based guidelines for medication abortion in the first trimester. We discuss regimens, both FDA-approved and other clinical-based protocols, and will briefly discuss novel self-managed abortion techniques taking place outside the formal health care system. Overview of patient counseling and pain management are presented with care to include guidance on "no touch" regimens that have proven both feasible and effective. We hope that this comprehensive review helps the health care community make strides to increase access to abortion in a time when reproductive health care is continuously restricted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erin Fleurant
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Northwestern McGaw Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dextromethorphan as a novel nonopioid adjunctive agent for pain control with medication abortion: A randomized controlled trial. Contraception 2023; 118:109908. [PMID: 36332661 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2022.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2021] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate efficacy and satisfaction of dextromethorphan as a non-narcotic adjuvant to current analgesic regimens for medication abortion. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial. We randomized eligible participants (N = 156) 1:1 to adjunctively take dextromethorphan (loading dose 60 mg and two subsequent 30 mg doses at 2 and 5 hours after misoprostol administration) or placebo combined with usual-care nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications ± opioids for pain. Participants reported pain scores and satisfaction using a secure texting application at 2, 5, 8, and 24 hours after misoprostol administration. Our primary outcome was worst pain score and total analgesic use. RESULTS Baseline demographics of enrolled participants were similar between randomization arms. Worst pain scores for participants receiving dextromethorphan versus placebo (8.0 vs 7.0, p = 0.06) did not differ. Total milligram usage of ibuprofen (800 mg vs 610 mg, p =.62), acetaminophen (1000 mg vs 1300 mg, p = 0.62), and opioids (10 mg vs 15 mg, p = 0.51) did not differ between the randomization groups. Participants randomized to placebo were significantly more likely to be satisfied with their pain control (91% vs 75%, p = 0.02). CONCLUSION Dextromethorphan used adjunctively with standard analgesics did not reduce pain associated with medication abortion. Participants who received dextromethorphan reported decreased satisfaction with their pain control. IMPLICATIONS Dextromethorphan used adjunctively with commonly used analgesic regimens did not reduce medication abortion associated pain. Many participants did not use analgesics as counseled, and nearly 25% used no analgesia during medication abortion.
Collapse
|
3
|
Devane C, Renner RM, Munro S, Guilbert É, Dunn S, Wagner MS, Norman WV. Implementation of mifepristone medical abortion in Canada: pilot and feasibility testing of a survey to assess facilitators and barriers. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:126. [PMID: 31720004 PMCID: PMC6839244 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-019-0520-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2019] [Accepted: 10/17/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Direct primary care provision of first-trimester medical abortion could potentially address inequitable abortion access in Canada. However, when Health Canada approved the combination medication Mifegymiso® (mifepristone 200 mg/misoprostol 800 mcg) for medical abortion in July 2015, we hypothesized that the restrictions to distribution, prescribing, and dispensing would impede the uptake of this evidence-based innovation in primary care. We developed and pilot-tested a survey related to policy and practice facilitators and barriers to assess successful initiation and ongoing clinical provision of medical abortion service by physicians undertaking mifepristone training. Additionally, we explored expert, stakeholder, and physician perceptions of the impact of facilitators and barriers on abortion services throughout Canada. METHODS In phase 1, we developed a survey using 2 theoretical frameworks: Greenhalgh's conceptual model for the Diffusion of Innovations in health service organizations (which we operationalized) and Godin's framework to assess the impact of professional development on the uptake of new practices operationalized in Légaré's validated questionnaire. We finalized questions in phase 2 using the modified Delphi methodology. The survey was then tested by an expert panel of 25 nationally representative physician participants and 4 clinical content experts. Qualitative analysis of transcripts enriched and validated the content by identifying these potential barriers: physicians dispensing the medication, mandatory training to become a prescriber, burdens for patients, lack of remuneration for mifepristone provision, and services available in my community. To assess the usability and reliability of the online survey, in phase 3, we pilot-tested the survey for feasibility. RESULTS We developed and tested a 61-item Mifepristone Implementation Survey suitable to study the facilitators and barriers to implementation of mifepristone first-trimester medical abortion practice by physicians in Canada. CONCLUSIONS Our team operationalized Greenhalgh's theoretical framework for Diffusion of Innovations in health systems to explore factors influencing the implementation of first-trimester medical abortion provision. This process may be useful for those evaluating other health system innovations. Identification of facilitators and barriers to implementation of mifepristone practice in Canada and knowledge translation has the potential to inform regulatory and health system changes to support and scale up facilitators and mitigate barriers to equitable medical abortion provision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney Devane
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Regina M. Renner
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Sarah Munro
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
| | - Édith Guilbert
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Institut national de santé publique du Québec, Quebec City, QC Canada
| | - Sheila Dunn
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON Canada
| | - Marie-Soleil Wagner
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC Canada
| | - Wendy V. Norman
- Contraception and Abortion Research Team, Women’s Health Research Institute, BC Women’s Hospital and Health Center, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC Canada
- Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Department of Family Practice, Women’s Health Research Institute, University of British Columbia, E202-4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC V6H 3N1 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Le Lous M, Gallinand AC, Laviolle B, Peltier L, Nyangoh Timoh K, Lavoué V. Serum hCG threshold to assess medical abortion success. EUR J CONTRACEP REPR 2019; 23:458-463. [PMID: 30601107 DOI: 10.1080/13625187.2018.1539162] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The main aim of the study was to establish a threshold for serum human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) level that ruled out ongoing pregnancy after induced medical abortion (MA). The secondary aim was to discover risk factors for the need for uterine aspiration. METHODS This prospective study included women who underwent MA with mifepristone-misoprostol at ≤9 weeks of gestation between 2012 and 2014. Serum hCG levels were measured 14-21 days after MA. The main outcome measure, ongoing pregnancy, was defined as the presence of an embryo with cardiac activity on transvaginal ultrasonography after MA. The receiver operating characteristic curve was plotted to determine the optimal serum hCG threshold. Risk factors for the need for uterine aspiration were calculated using multivariate logistic regression and expressed as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS The study included 814 women. Mean gestational age was 46.5 ± 7.4 days for ongoing pregnancies and 44.2 ± 4.8 days for MA success (p = .43). The ongoing pregnancy rate after MA was 0.9%. A serum hCG threshold ≥900 IU/l to diagnose ongoing pregnancy gave 100% sensitivity and 81.5% specificity, compared with 85.7% sensitivity and 83.5% specificity using a threshold ≥1000 IU/l. Independent risk factors for uterine aspiration requirement were: gravidity (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.1, 13.2; p = .001), gestational age >6 weeks (OR 6.0; 95% CI 1.8, 6.0; p = .006) and previous surgical abortion (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.1, 5.2; p < .001). CONCLUSION Serum hCG measurement <900 IU/l, 14-21 days after MA, is an efficient strategy for excluding ongoing pregnancy after first trimester MA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maela Le Lous
- a Département de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud , Rennes , France.,b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France
| | - Anne-Claire Gallinand
- a Département de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud , Rennes , France.,b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France
| | - Bruno Laviolle
- b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France.,c Service de Pharmacologie, CIC Inserm , CHU de Rennes, Pontchaillou , Rennes , France
| | - Lucas Peltier
- b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France.,d Service de Biochimie , CHU de Rennes, Pontchaillou , Rennes , France
| | - Krystel Nyangoh Timoh
- a Département de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud , Rennes , France.,b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France
| | - Vincent Lavoué
- a Département de Gynécologie, Obstétrique et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU de Rennes, Hôpital Sud , Rennes , France.,b Faculté de Médecine , Université de Rennes 1 , Rennes , France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Jones HE, O’Connell White K, Norman WV, Guilbert E, Lichtenberg ES, Paul M. First trimester medication abortion practice in the United States and Canada. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0186487. [PMID: 29023594 PMCID: PMC5638562 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0186487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of abortion facilities from professional networks in the United States (US, n = 703) and Canada (n = 94) to estimate the prevalence of medication abortion practices in these settings and to look at regional differences. Administrators responded to questions on gestational limits, while up to five clinicians per facility reported on 2012 medication abortion practice. At the time of fielding, mifepristone was not approved in Canada. 383 (54.5%) US and 78 (83.0%) Canadian facilities participated. In the US, 95.3% offered first trimester medication abortion compared to 25.6% in Canada. While 100% of providers were physicians in Canada, just under half (49.4%) were advanced practice clinicians in the US, which was more common in Eastern and Western states. All Canadian providers used misoprostol; 85.3% with methotrexate. 91.4% of US providers used 200 mg of mifepristone and 800 mcg of misoprostol, with 96.7% reporting home misoprostol administration. More than three-quarters of providers in both countries required an in-person follow-up visit, generally with ultrasound. 87.7% of US providers routinely prescribed antibiotics compared to 26.2% in Canada. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs were the most commonly reported analgesic, with regional variation in opioid narcotic prescription. In conclusion, medication abortion practice follows evidence-based guidelines in the US and Canada. Efforts to update practice based on the latest evidence for reducing in-person visits and increasing provision by advanced practice clinicians could strengthen these services and reduce barriers to access. Research is needed on optimal antibiotic and analgesic use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi E. Jones
- Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, CUNY School of Public Health, New York, New York, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Katharine O’Connell White
- Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, United States of America
- Dept. of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Boston University/Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Wendy V. Norman
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Edith Guilbert
- Institut National de Santé Publique du Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - E. Steve Lichtenberg
- Family Planning Medical Associates Medical Group, Chicago, Illinois, United States of America
| | - Maureen Paul
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Upadhyay UD, Kimport K, Belusa EKO, Johns NE, Laube DW, Roberts SCM. Evaluating the impact of a mandatory pre-abortion ultrasound viewing law: A mixed methods study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0178871. [PMID: 28746377 PMCID: PMC5528259 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178871] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2017] [Accepted: 04/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since mid-2013, Wisconsin abortion providers have been legally required to display and describe pre-abortion ultrasound images. We aimed to understand the impact of this law. METHODS We used a mixed-methods study design at an abortion facility in Wisconsin. We abstracted data from medical charts one year before the law to one year after and used multivariable models, mediation/moderation analysis, and interrupted time series to assess the impact of the law, viewing, and decision certainty on likelihood of continuing the pregnancy. We conducted in-depth interviews with women in the post-law period about their ultrasound experience and analyzed them using elaborative and modified grounded theory. RESULTS A total of 5342 charts were abstracted; 8.7% continued their pregnancies pre-law and 11.2% post-law (p = 0.002). A multivariable model confirmed the law was associated with higher odds of continuing pregnancy (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 1.01-1.50). Decision certainty (aOR = 6.39, 95% CI: 4.72-8.64) and having to pay fully out of pocket (aOR = 4.98, 95% CI: 3.86-6.41) were most strongly associated with continuing pregnancy. Ultrasound viewing fully mediated the relationship between the law and continuing pregnancy. Interrupted time series analyses found no significant effect of the law but may have been underpowered to detect such a small effect. Nineteen of twenty-three women interviewed viewed their ultrasound image. Most reported no impact on their abortion decision; five reported a temporary emotional impact or increased certainty about choosing abortion. Two women reported that viewing helped them decide to continue the pregnancy; both also described preexisting decision uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS This law caused an increase in viewing rates and a statistically significant but small increase in continuing pregnancy rates. However, the majority of women were certain of their abortion decision and the law did not change their decision. Other factors were more significant in women's decision-making, suggesting evaluations of restrictive laws should take account of the broader social environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ushma D. Upadhyay
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Katrina Kimport
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Elise K. O. Belusa
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Nicole E. Johns
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, United States of America
| | - Douglas W. Laube
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America
| | - Sarah C. M. Roberts
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health (ANSIRH), Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, Oakland, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wood SF, Borkowski L, Strasser J, Allina A. For Medication Abortion, Science Should Guide Policy. Womens Health Issues 2016; 26:357-60. [PMID: 27234213 DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2016] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Susan F Wood
- Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC; Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC.
| | - Liz Borkowski
- Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC; Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Julia Strasser
- Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC; Department of Health Policy and Management, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Amy Allina
- Jacobs Institute of Women's Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Continuing pregnancy after mifepristone and “reversal” of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2015; 92:206-11. [DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2015] [Revised: 05/27/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Dehlendorf CE, Fox EE, Ali RF, Anderson NC, Reed RD, Lichtenberg ES. Medication abortion failure in women with and without previous cesarean delivery. Contraception 2015. [PMID: 26226101 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between previous cesarean delivery and medication abortion failure and the association between parity and failure. METHODS Data were abstracted from 2035 consecutive charts of women who underwent medication abortion in 2011. All women were at 63 days gestation or less and received mifepristone 200mg orally and misoprostol 800 mcg buccally. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess the relationship between failure, defined as requiring either curettage or additional medication, and prior cesarean delivery. We also examined the relationship between failure and parity. RESULTS Follow-up was available on 1609 (79%) patients. Overall, 4.5% of patients experienced failure. Neither cesarean delivery nor parity was associated with failure; 6.5% of women with prior cesarean delivery experienced failure, compared to 3.7% of nulliparous women [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-3.87]. With regard to parity, 4.7% of women with two or more previous births experienced failure, compared to 3.7% of nulliparous women (aOR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.54-2.14). CONCLUSION We did not find significant associations between prior cesarean delivery and failure or parity and failure. A previous study of patients who had received a less effective regimen reported significant associations between cesarean delivery and failure and parity and failure. While our results do not rule out the possibility of modest associations due to our limited statistical power, they are reassuring relative to previous findings. IMPLICATIONS Our results suggest that if there are differences in women's odds of medication abortion failure by obstetric history, such differences are unlikely to be large. Providers and patients may factor this information into decision making about methods of pregnancy termination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine E Dehlendorf
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences; University of California, San Francisco, Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics.
| | - Edith E Fox
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110
| | - Rose F Ali
- Family Planning Associates Medical Group
| | - Nora C Anderson
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110
| | - Reiley D Reed
- University of California, San Francisco, Department of Family & Community Medicine, 1001 Potrero Ave., San Francisco, CA, USA 94110
| | - E Steve Lichtenberg
- Family Planning Associates Medical Group; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kimport K, Weitz TA. Constructing the meaning of ultrasound viewing in abortion care. SOCIOLOGY OF HEALTH & ILLNESS 2015; 37:856-869. [PMID: 25688650 DOI: 10.1111/1467-9566.12237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
As ultrasound scanning becomes increasingly routine in abortion care, scholars and activists have forwarded claims about how viewing the ultrasound image will affect pregnant women seeking abortion, speculating that it will dissuade them from abortion. These accounts, however, fail to appreciate how viewing is a social process. Little research has investigated how ultrasound workers navigate viewing in abortion care. We draw on interviews with twenty-six ultrasound workers in abortion care for their impressions and practices around ultrasound viewing. Respondents reported few experiences of viewing dissuading women from abortion, but did report that it had an emotional effect on patients that they believed was associated with gestational age. These impressions informed their practices, leading many to manage patient viewing based on the patient's gestational age. Other aspects of their accounts, however, undercut the assertion that the meaning of ultrasound images is associated with gestation and show the pervasiveness of cultural ideas associating developing foetal personhood with increasing gestational age. Findings demonstrate the social construction of ultrasound viewing, with implications in the ongoing contestation over abortion rights in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Kimport
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Tracy A Weitz
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
Medical abortion is a safe, convenient, and effective method for terminating an early unintended pregnancy. Medical abortion can be performed up to 63 days from the last menstrual period and may even be used up to 70 days for women who prefer medical abortion over surgical abortion. Counseling on the adverse effects and expectations for medical abortion is critical to success. Medical abortion can be performed in a clinic without special equipment, and it is perceived as more "natural" than a surgical abortion by many women. Follow-up for medical abortion can be simplified to include only serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurements when necessary, although obtaining an ultrasound remains the criterion standard. Pain associated with medical abortion is best treated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory medications, possibly in combination with opioid analgesics. Medical abortion can contribute to continuity of care for women who wish to remain with their primary care providers for management of their abortion.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kimport K, Weitz TA, Foster DG. Beyond political claims: women's interest in and emotional response to viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2014; 46:185-191. [PMID: 25209369 DOI: 10.1363/46e2414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Revised: 05/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/27/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT In the United States, abortion opponents have supported legislation requiring that abortion patients be offered the opportunity to view their preprocedure ultrasound. Little research has examined women's interest in and emotional response to such viewing. METHODS Data from 702 women who received abortions at 30 facilities throughout the United States between 2008 and 2010 were analyzed. Mixed-effects multinomial logistic regression analysis was used to determine which characteristics were associated with being offered and choosing to view ultrasounds, and with reporting positive or negative emotional responses to viewing. Grounded theory analytic techniques were used to qualitatively describe women's reports of their emotional responses. RESULTS Forty-eight percent of participants were offered the opportunity to view their ultrasound, and nulliparous women were more likely than others to receive an offer (odds ratio, 2.3). Sixty-five percent of these women (31% overall) chose to view the image; nulliparous women and those living in a state that regulates viewing were more likely than their counterparts to do so (1.7 and 2.5, respectively). Some 213 women reported emotional responses to viewing; neutral emotions (fine, nothing) were the most commonly reported ones, followed by negative emotions (sad, guilty, upset) and then positive emotions (happy, excited). Women who visited clinics with a policy of offering viewing had increased odds of reporting a negative emotion (2.6). CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound viewing appears not to have a singular emotional effect. The presence of state regulation and facility policies matters for women's interest in and responses to viewing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrina Kimport
- Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bracken H, Lohr PA, Taylor J, Morroni C, Winikoff B. RU OK? The acceptability and feasibility of remote technologies for follow-up after early medical abortion. Contraception 2014; 90:29-35. [DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2013] [Revised: 03/25/2014] [Accepted: 03/26/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
14
|
Jones RK, Jerman J. Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011. PERSPECTIVES ON SEXUAL AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH 2014; 46:3-14. [PMID: 24494995 DOI: 10.1363/46e0414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 159] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Following a long-term decline, abortion incidence stabilized between 2005 and 2008. Given the proliferation of state-level abortion restrictions, it is critical to assess abortion incidence and access to services since that time. METHODS In 2012-2013, all facilities known or expected to have provided abortion services in 2010 and 2011 were surveyed. Data on the number of abortions were combined with population data to estimate national and state-level abortion rates. Incidence of abortions was assessed by provider type and caseload. Information on state abortion regulations implemented between 2008 and 2011 was collected, and possible relationships with abortion rates and provider numbers were considered. RESULTS In 2011, an estimated 1.1 million abortions were performed in the United States; the abortion rate was 16.9 per 1,000 women aged 15-44, representing a drop of 13% since 2008. The number of abortion providers declined 4%; the number of clinics dropped 1%. In 2011, 89% of counties had no clinics, and 38% of women of reproductive age lived in those counties. Early medication abortions accounted for a greater proportion of nonhospital abortions in 2011 (23%) than in 2008 (17%). Of the 106 new abortion restrictions implemented during the study period, few or none appeared to be related to state-level patterns in abortion rates or number of providers. CONCLUSIONS The national abortion rate has resumed its decline, and no evidence was found that the overall drop in abortion incidence was related to the decrease in providers or to restrictions implemented between 2008 and 2011.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Jones
- Rachel K. Jones is senior research associate, at the Guttmacher Institute, New York..
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Patient viewing of the ultrasound image prior to abortion. Contraception 2013; 88:666-70. [PMID: 24028750 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2013] [Revised: 07/10/2013] [Accepted: 07/13/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little research has investigated women's interest in and factors associated with viewing their ultrasound image in abortion care. STUDY DESIGN Using medical records for all abortion care visits in 2011 (n = 15,575) at an urban abortion provider, we determined the proportion of women who chose to view by sociodemographic and pregnancy-related characteristics. We used bivariate and multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression models to examine associations between individual-level factors and the decision to view. RESULTS A total of 42.6% of women chose to view. Identifying as nonwhite, being under age 25, being at or below the federal poverty level, and having medium or low decision certainty about the abortion were associated with increased odds of viewing. Being age 30 and over, having previously been pregnant and being more than 9 weeks gestation were associated with decreased odds of viewing. CONCLUSIONS Many women seeking abortion care want to view their ultrasound image when offered the opportunity.
Collapse
|
17
|
Grossman DA, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Potter JE, Schmertmann CP. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Am J Public Health 2012; 103:73-8. [PMID: 23153158 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2012.301097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We assessed the effect of a telemedicine model providing medical abortion on service delivery in a clinic system in Iowa. METHODS We reviewed Iowa vital statistic data and billing data from the clinic system for all abortion encounters during the 2 years prior to and after the introduction of telemedicine in June 2008 (n = 17,956 encounters). We calculated the distance from the patient's residential zip code to the clinic and to the closest clinic providing surgical abortion. RESULTS The abortion rate decreased in Iowa after telemedicine introduction, and the proportion of abortions in the clinics that were medical increased from 46% to 54%. After telemedicine was introduced, and with adjustment for other factors, clinic patients had increased odds of obtaining both medical abortion and abortion before 13 weeks' gestation. Although distance traveled to the clinic decreased only slightly, women living farther than 50 miles from the nearest clinic offering surgical abortion were more likely to obtain an abortion after telemedicine introduction. CONCLUSIONS Telemedicine could improve access to medical abortion, especially for women living in remote areas, and reduce second-trimester abortion.
Collapse
|
18
|
Grindlay K, Yanow S, Jelinska K, Gomperts R, Grossman D. Abortion Restrictions in the U.S. Military: Voices from Women Deployed Overseas. Womens Health Issues 2011; 21:259-64. [DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2011.04.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2010] [Revised: 04/19/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
19
|
Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2010; 83:504-10. [PMID: 21570546 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2010.08.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2010] [Revised: 08/03/2010] [Accepted: 08/31/2010] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Requiring a follow-up visit with ultrasound evaluation to confirm completion after medication abortion can be a barrier to providing the service. STUDY DESIGN The PubMed (including MEDLINE), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and POPLINE databases were systematically searched in October and November 2009 for studies related to alternative follow-up modalities after first-trimester medication abortion to diagnose ongoing pregnancy or retained gestational sac. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value compared with ultrasound or clinician's exam. We also calculated the proportion of cases in each study with a positive screening test. RESULTS Our search identified eight articles. The most promising modalities included serum human chorionic gonadotropin measurements, standardized assessment of women's symptoms combined with low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing and telephone consultation. These follow-up modalities had sensitivities ≥90%, negative predictive values ≥99% and proportions of "screen-positives" ≤33%. CONCLUSIONS Alternatives to routine in-person follow-up visits after medication abortion are accurate at diagnosing ongoing pregnancy. Additional research is needed to demonstrate the accuracy, acceptability and feasibility of alternative follow-up modalities in practice, particularly of home-based urine testing combined with self-assessment and/or clinician-assisted assessment.
Collapse
|
20
|
Guthrie K. Care closer to home. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24:579-91. [PMID: 20605530 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2010] [Accepted: 03/30/2010] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
In 2008, in total there were 202 158 abortions performed in England and Wales and 13 817 in Scotland, unfortunately one of the most common gynaecological procedures. 'Care closer to home' applied to this service, as part of a holistic integrated care pathway, can improve access and choice and reduce cost whilst continuing to focus on clinical quality and safety and work towards reducing the number of primary and repeat abortions. Whilst constraints remain within Law, there are ways to change services to help reduce barriers to access not just to abortion but also the essential allied interventions of contraception, sexual health and counselling and support. The first will be reflected in the number of women able to have their abortions earlier, therefore more safely and at lesser cost. It would build on service changes to date, which has allowed women more choice of the method of abortion. The integration of contraceptive services should impact positively on the currently high level of repeat abortions. Bringing care closer to home, into the communities within which women spend their lives, is an important strategy in addressing the quality agenda in abortion care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Guthrie
- The Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare Partnership, Conifer House, 32-36 Prospect St, Hull HU2 8PX, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bennett IM, Baylson M, Kalkstein K, Gillespie G, Bellamy SL, Fleischman J. Early abortion in family medicine: clinical outcomes. Ann Fam Med 2009; 7:527-33. [PMID: 19901312 PMCID: PMC2775627 DOI: 10.1370/afm.1051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical innovations have made it more feasible to incorporate early abortion into family medicine, yet the outcomes of early abortion procedures in this setting have not been well studied. We wished to assess the outcomes of first-trimester medication and aspiration abortion procedures by family physicians. METHODS Prospective observational cohort study conducted from August 2001 to February 2005 of 2,550 women who sought pregnancy termination in 4 clinical practices of family medicine departments and 1 private office/training site. RESULTS The rate of successful uncomplicated procedures for medication was 96.5% (95.5%-97.1% [corrected] confidence interval [CI], 95.5%-97.0%) and for aspiration was 99.9% (CI, 99.3%-1). Adverse events and complications of medication abortions were failed procedure (ongoing pregnancy; n = 19, 1.45%); incomplete abortion (n = 16, 1.22%); hemorrhage (n = 9, 0.69%); and patient request for aspiration (n = 1, 0.08%). One (0.08%) missed ectopic pregnancy was seen among patients receiving medication. Four types of adverse outcomes were encountered with aspiration: incomplete abortion requiring re-aspiration (n = 21, 1.83%); hemorrhage during the procedure (n = 4, 0.35%); missed ectopic pregnancy (n = 3, 0.26%); and minor endometritis (n = 1, 0.09%). Missed ectopic pregnancies were successfully treated in the inpatient setting without mortality (overall hospitalization rate of 0.16 of 100). All other complications were managed within outpatient family medicine sites. Rates of complication did not vary by experience of physician or by site of care (residency vs private practice). CONCLUSIONS Complications of medication and aspiration procedures occurred at a low rate, and most were minor and managed without incident.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian M Bennett
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, 2nd Floor Gates Pavilion, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4283, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Current world literature. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2009; 21:450-5. [PMID: 19724169 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0b013e3283317d6c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|