Cervical preparation with laminaria tents improves induction-to-delivery interval in second- and third-trimester medical termination of pregnancy

Fetal death: Expert consensus of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists

Fetal death is defined as the spontaneous cessation of cardiac activity after 14 weeks gestational age (GA). Regarding prevention of fetal death in the general population, it is not recommended to counsel or prescribe rest, aspirin, vitamin A, vitamin D, or micronutrient supplementation; systematically look for nuchal cord during prenatal screening ultrasound; or perform systematic antepartum monitoring by cardiotocography for the sole purpose of reducing the risk of fetal death. It is recommended to offer vaccination against influenza in epidemic periods and against SARS-CoV-2. Regarding evaluation in the event of fetal death, it is recommended that a fetal autopsy and anatomopathologic examination of the placenta be performed; chromosomal analysis be performed by microarray testing, rather than by conventional karyotype (with postnatal sampling of the fetal placental surface preferred for genetic purposes); testing for antiphospholipid antibodies be performed, with systematic Kleihauer-Betke testing and for irregular agglutinins; and summary consultation to discuss these examination results be offered. Regarding announcement and support, it is recommended that fetal death be announced without ambiguity, using simple words adapted to each situation, after which the couple should be supported with empathy across the different stages of their care. Regarding patient management in cases of fetal death, it is recommended that: in the absence of risks for disseminated intravascular coagulation or maternal demise, the patient's wishes regarding the timing between the fetal death diagnosis and labor induction should be considered; return home is possible, according to the patient's wishes; in all situations except maternal life-threatening emergencies, the preferred mode of delivery is vaginal, regardless of previous cesarean section(s); mifepristone 200 mg be prescribed at least 24 h before induction; and perimedullary analgesia be initiated at the start of induction if requested by the patient, regardless of GA. Of note, there is insufficient evidence to recommend either the administration route (i.e., vaginal or oral) of misoprostol or prostaglandin type. Regarding the risk of recurrence after unexplained fetal death: the incidence does not appear to be increased in subsequent pregnancies; in cases with a history of fetal death due to vascular problems, low-dose aspirin is recommended to reduce perinatal morbidity (otherwise, evidence is insufficient to recommend the prescription of aspirin); no optimal delay in initiating another pregnancy should be recommended based solely on a history of fetal death; fetal heart rate monitoring is not indicated based solely on a history of fetal death; although systematic labor induction is not recommended, induction may be considered depending on the context and parental request, and considering fetal age, benefits, and risks, especially before 39 weeks GA. Note that if the cause of fetal death is identified, management should be adjusted on a case-by-case basis. Regarding fetal death in a twin pregnancy, it is recommended that the surviving twin be examined immediately upon fetal death diagnosis; in a dichorionic twin pregnancy, preterm delivery induction is not recommended; in a monochorionic twin pregnancy, the surviving twin should be immediately evaluated for signs of acute fetal anemia, with weekly ultrasound monitoring for the first month, though immediate labor induction is not recommended.

[Fetal death: Expert consensus from the College of French Gynecologists and Obstetricians]

Fetal death is defined as the spontaneous cessation of cardiac activity after fourteen weeks of amenorrhea. In France, the prevalence of fetal death after 22 weeks is between 3.2 and 4.4/1000 births. Regarding the prevention of fetal death in the general population, it is not recommended to counsel for rest and not to prescribe vitamin A, vitamin D nor micronutrient supplementation for the sole purpose of reducing the risk of fetal death (Weak recommendations; Low quality of evidence). It is not recommended to prescribe aspirin (Weak recommendation; Very low quality of evidence). It is recommended to offer vaccination against influenza in epidemic periods and against SARS-CoV-2 (Strong recommendations; Low quality of evidence). It is not recommended to systematically look for nuchal cord encirclements during prenatal screening ultrasounds (Strong Recommendation; Low Quality of Evidence) and not to perform systematic antepartum monitoring by cardiotocography (Weak Recommendation; Very Low Quality of Evidence). It is not recommended to ask women to perform an active fetal movement count to reduce the risk of fetal death (Strong Recommendation; High Quality of Evidence). Regarding evaluation in the event of fetal death, it is suggested that an external fetal examination be systematically offered (Expert opinion). It is recommended that a fetopathological and anatomopathological examination of the placenta be carried out to participate in cause identification (Strong Recommendation. Moderate quality of evidence). It is recommended that chromosomal analysis by microarray testing be performed rather than conventional karyotype, in order to be able to identify a potentially causal anomaly more frequently (Strong Recommendation, moderate quality of evidence); to this end, it is suggested that postnatal sampling of the placental fetal surface for genetic purposes be preferred (Expert Opinion). It is suggested to test for antiphospholipid antibodies and systematically perform a Kleihauer test and a test for irregular agglutinins (Expert opinion). It is suggested to offer a summary consultation, with the aim of assessing the physical and psychological status of the parents, reporting the results, discussing the cause and providing information on monitoring for a subsequent pregnancy (Expert opinion). Regarding announcement and support, it is suggested to announce fetal death without ambiguity, using simple words and adapting to each situation, and then to support couples with empathy in the various stages of their care (Expert opinion). Regarding management, it is suggested that, in the absence of a situation at risk of disseminated intravascular coagulation or maternal vitality, the patient's wishes should be taken into account when determining the time between the diagnosis of fetal death and induction of birth. Returning home is possible if it's the patient wish (Expert opinion). In all situations excluding maternal life-threatening emergencies, the preferred mode of delivery is vaginal delivery, regardless the history of cesarean section(s) history (Expert opinion). In the event of fetal death, it is recommended that mifepristone 200mg be prescribed at least 24hours before induction, to reduce the delay between induction and delivery (Low recommendation. Low quality of evidence). There are insufficient data in the literature to make a recommendation regarding the route of administration (vaginal or oral) of misoprostol, neither the type of prostaglandin to reduce induction-delivery time or maternal morbidity. It is suggested that perimedullary analgesia be introduced at the start of induction if the patient asks, regardless of gestational age. It is suggested to prescribe cabergoline immediately in the postpartum period in order to avoid lactation, whatever the gestational age, after discussing the side effects of the treatment with the patient (Expert opinion). The risk of recurrence of fetal death after unexplained fetal death does not appear to be increased in subsequent pregnancies, and data from the literature are insufficient to make a recommendation on the prescription of aspirin. In the event of a history of fetal death due to vascular issues, low-dose aspirin is recommended to reduce perinatal morbidity, and should not be combined with heparin therapy (Low recommendation, very low quality of evidence). It is suggested not to recommend an optimal delay before initiating another pregnancy just because of the history of fetal death. It is suggested that the woman and co-parent be informed of the possibility of psychological support. Fetal heart rate monitoring is not indicated solely because of a history of fetal death. It is suggested that delivery not be systematically induced. However, induction can be considered depending on the context and parental request. The gestational age will be discussed, taking into account the benefits and risks, especially before 39 weeks. If a cause of fetal death is identified, management will be adapted on a case-by-case basis (expert opinion). In the event of fetal death occurring in a twin pregnancy, it is suggested that the surviving twin be evaluated as soon as the diagnosis of fetal death is made. In the case of dichorionic pregnancy, it is suggested to offer ultrasound monitoring on a monthly basis. It is suggested not to deliver prematurely following fetal death of a twin. If fetal death occurs in a monochorionic twin pregnancy, it is suggested to contact the referral competence center, in order to urgently look for signs of acute fetal anemia on ultrasound in the surviving twin, and to carry out weekly ultrasound monitoring for the first month. It is suggested not to induce birth immediately.

Cervical ripening with laminaria tents prior to second trimester induction of labor

BACKGROUND

Induction abortion in the second trimester may be favored in some instances, such as in women with compounding medical conditions or when skilled providers are not available. Various methods of pre-induction cervical preparation have been used to shorten the length of induction and decrease the risk of complications. The benefits of cervical preparation with laminaria before D&E have been well studied, but the benefits of laminaria before medical induction are less clear.

OBJECTIVE

To determine if overnight cervical preparation with laminaria tents shortens delivery interval in women undergoing 2nd trimester induction of labor (IOL) with misoprostol.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study comparing overnight intracervical laminaria placement followed by misoprostol to misoprostol alone for 2nd trimester IOL between 1/2000 and 12/2010. Women were excluded if the reason for IOL was preterm labor or preterm premature rupture of membranes or if misoprostol was not used as the primary induction agent. The primary outcome was time from misoprostol administration to delivery.

RESULTS

126 women were analyzed including 36 (29%) who received laminaria + misoprostol and 90 (71%) who received misoprostol alone. Women in the laminaria + misoprostol group were significantly older (30 yrs [14-44] vs. 27 yrs [17-43], p = .029). Induction for fetal anomaly (92% vs. 34%, p ≤ .001) and the use of feticide (56% vs. 13%, p ≤ .001) were more common in the laminaria + misoprostol group. The mean time to delivery in the laminaria + misoprostol group was 6 h longer compared to the misoprostol only group; 19 ± 8 h compared to 13 ± 12hrs (p = .007). There was no difference in fetal to placental delivery time (p = .329), total misoprostol dose (p = .182), or length of hospitalization (p = .144) however, significantly more women completed abortion at 24 hrs in the misoprostol alone group (90% vs. 61%, p ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of laminaria tents for overnight cervical preparation does not expedite delivery times in patients undergoing 2nd trimester IOL with misoprostol.

Cervical Dilators Used Concurrently With Misoprostol to Shorten Labor in Second-Trimester Termination of Pregnancy: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the use of cervical dilators concurrently with misoprostol to shorten labor in second-trimester medical termination of pregnancy.

METHODS

This multicenter randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy of cervical dilators inserted concurrently with misoprostol with that of misoprostol, alone, to shorten labor for women undergoing termination of pregnancy between 15 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was the proportion of women with a duration of labor exceeding 12 hours. Secondary outcomes included median duration of labor, time to amniotomy, side effects, complications, NPRS (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) score, and women's distress as measured by the IES-R (Impact of Event Scale-Revised). These outcomes also were studied separately in the nulliparous subgroup. To demonstrate a reduction of 50% of the proportion of women with a duration of labor exceeding 12 hours in the dilator group, with a power of 80% and a 2-sided 0.05 significance level, a sample of 268 women (134 in each group) was required.

RESULTS

Between December 2017 and September 2019, this study enrolled and analyzed 347 women: 174 in the dilator group and 173 in the control group, including 87 and 93 nulliparous patients, respectively. Sociodemographic and obstetric characteristics were similar between groups. The proportion of women with labor exceeding 12 hours was not different between groups (49/174 [28.2%] in the dilator group vs 53/173 [30.6%] in the control group [ P =.61] for the whole population, and 37/87 [42.5%] vs 42/93 [45.2%] [ P =.72], respectively, among nulliparous patients). Median duration of labor was 8.5 hours in the dilator group compared with 9.2 hours in the control group ( P =.65) for the whole population, and 10.5 hours compared with 11.8 hours, respectively, among nulliparous patients ( P =.33). Median time to amniotomy was 3.6 hours in the dilator group compared with 5.0 hours in the control group ( P =.08) for the whole population, and 3.5 hours compared with 6.7 hours, respectively, among nulliparous patients ( P =.003). Side effects, complications, NPRS score, and IES-R score were similar between groups.

CONCLUSION

Cervical dilators inserted concurrently with misoprostol did not reduce the proportion of women whose labor exceeded 12 hours compared with misoprostol alone.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT03194230.

Labour induction for termination of pregnancy with severe fetal anomalies after 24 weeks' gestation: a case series and systematic review of the literature

PURPOSE

Under some circumstances, individuals choose to undergo pregnancy termination for foetal anomalies in the second half of pregnancy. This report provides objective information on the clinical management of such cases and a systematic review of the literature on labour induction outcomes for third-trimester abortion using mifepristone-misoprostol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study is a case series describing outcomes for labour induction abortion for foetal anomalies, at gestational age 24 weeks and beyond. A systematic review was performed, searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. Two independent authors reviewed and quality assessed the data from the articles.

RESULTS

During a two-year period, 15 patients met inclusion criteria. Fourteen patients received mifepristone and misoprostol, and one received oxytocin. All delivered vaginally. Thirteen patients delivered within 24 hours of the first misoprostol dose, and half delivered within 12 hours. The average interval from misoprostol initiation to foetal expulsion was 15.5 hours in our series. The systematic review identified nine articles for inclusion, all retrospective studies. Labour induction protocols for mifepristone-misoprostol, reporting of gestational age, and key comparisons varied greatly.

CONCLUSIONS

The case series illustrates successful termination of pregnancy primarily using combined mifepristone-misoprostol. Certainty of current evidence is low, based on the GRADE framework. Future research is necessary on third-trimester outcomes with mifepristone-misoprostol.

Mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-alone regimen for medication abortion at ≥24 weeks' gestation

OBJECTIVE

To compare time from misoprostol initiation to fetal expulsion for mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol-alone regimens of medication abortion performed at ≥24 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective study of medication abortion performed at ≥24 weeks' gestation between May 2016 and January 2018 at one site, comparing outcomes of patients receiving mifepristone-misoprostol versus misoprostol alone during two periods. All patients received feticidal injection and laminaria; the mifepristone-misoprostol group also received mifepristone 200 mg orally around the time of initial laminaria. Beginning 24-72 h later (depending on cervical assessment), both groups received misoprostol buccally every two hours.

RESULTS

Analyses included 257 patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group and 152 patients in the misoprostol-alone group. Median time from misoprostol initiation to fetal expulsion was similar between groups (4.8 h vs. 4.9 h; p = 0.43). Patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group received less misoprostol overall (median [IQR]: 800 mcg [800-1200 mcg] vs. 1200 mcg [800-1600 mcg]; p < 0.01) and fewer patients received a second round of laminaria (n = 56, 22% vs. n = 58, 33%; p < 0.01) than the misoprostol-alone group. Seven patients (2%) were transferred to a hospital for complications; this proportion did not vary by regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of mifepristone was not associated with a reduction in induction interval at ≥24 weeks. However, patients in the mifepristone-misoprostol group received a lower total dose of misoprostol and were less likely to require two days of laminaria. The clinical significance of these differences is unclear, but may have implications for patient experience. Both regimens had low rates of complications.

IMPLICATIONS

A randomized controlled trial comparing the mifepristone-misoprostol and misoprostol-alone regimens at ≥24 weeks is needed, as is evidence on patient perspectives on these regimens. Given the existing evidence, either regimen is reasonable.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Effect of the addition of osmotic dilators to medical induction of labor abortion: A before-and-after study

OBJECTIVES

The main objective of this study was to assess the induction-to-delivery interval with or without the use of osmotic dilators for induced abortion. As secondary objectives, women outcomes were assessed.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective single-center observational before and after study reviewed records from a university hospital maternity unit from 2002 through 2016 and included all women undergoing abortion for medical reasons at and after 14 weeks of gestation. Two groups were compared: group "no dilators", which used first misoprostol without dilators, and group "dilators", which used osmotic dilators before misoprostol administration. The main outcome was the induction-to-delivery interval.

RESULTS

The study included 491 women: 383 in group "no dilators" and 108 in group "dilators". The induction-delivery interval was significantly lower in the group "dilators" compared to "no dilators" (427.7 min vs 639.7 min, P < 0.001), as was the cumulative misoprostol dose (990 μg vs 1449 μg, P < 0.001). The delivery rate within 6 h was significantly higher in the "dilators" group compared to "no dilators" group (50.0% vs 29.8%, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

The use of osmotic dilators for cervical ripening before administration of misoprostol for induced abortion appears to be effective in reducing the induction-delivery interval.

Single versus multiple cervical dilation by osmotic dilator before induction of labor for second-trimester abortion

AIM

In this study, we aimed to investigate whether there was a significant prognostic difference between single and multiple cervical dilations when inducing second-trimester abortion.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of 238 pregnant women who underwent termination of pregnancy at 12-21 weeks of gestation at Osaka University Hospital in Osaka, Japan, between January 2010 and May 2018. Termination of pregnancy was performed by vaginal administration of 1 mg gemeprost every 3 h for up to five doses per day after uterine cervical dilation using lamicel.

RESULTS

The women were categorized into two groups: 191 women had a delivery time of <24 h, whereas 47 had delivery times >24 h. Contrasting the groups, there were significant differences with regard to numbers of primiparas (88 [46.1%] and 32 [68.1%], respectively) and lamicel exchanges ± SD (1.9 ± 0.67 for <24 h and 2.4 ± 0.87 for >24 h, respectively). Additionally, we compared the prognosis of primiparas that received just a single lamicel with that of primiparas that had ≥2 exchanged, but no significant differences were noted in the number of patients with a delivery time of >24 h and the number of used gemeprost.

CONCLUSION

Primipara is a risk factor for delayed delivery time of induced abortion. However, increasing the number of exchanged lamicel did not significantly reduce the delivery time; therefore, it should be performed as minimally as possible.

[Methods of induction of labor in termination of pregnancy after 22weeks: About 3procedures]

OBJECTIVES

To propose a protocol for induction of labor to terminate pregnancy after 22weeks of amenorrhea allowing to decrease the duration of labor and of hospitalization but also, allowing to reduce the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death, to improve the experience of the patients and to limit the cost.

METHODS

We realized a retrospective single-center study including 269patients and comparing three protocols, with and without laminaria and with various intervals mifepristone-misoprostol (14 and 38hours). The outcome measures were the misoprostol-delivery interval, the delivery time and the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death.

RESULTS

We showed that the misoprostol-delivery interval and the delivery time were comparable for the three periods of our study, even after decrease of 24hours of the mifepristone-misoprostol interval and in the absence of laminaria. The misoprostol-delivery interval was between 7h30 and 8h35 between protocols (P=0.055). The delivery time was between 5:18pm and 6:48pm between protocols (P=0.252). The early administration of misoprostol allowed the patients to give birth earlier (P=0.001). Finally, we showed that the increase of the size and the number of laminarias were risk factors of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death (respectively P=0.013 and P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

The absence of laminaria and the reduction of the interval mifepristone-misoprostol of 24hours do not change the time to delivery and allow to reduce the duration of hospitalization, the number of emergency pretreatment-induced fetal death and the cost of the TOP.

[Fetal death beyond 14 weeks of gestation: induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity]

The objective of this review was to assess benefits and harms of different management options for induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity in case of fetal death beyond of 14 weeks of gestation. In second-trimester, the data are numerous but low methodological quality. In terms of efficiency (induction-expulsion time and uterine evacuation within 24 hours rate) and tolerance in the absence of antecedent of caesarean section, the best protocol for induction of labor in the second-trimester of pregnancy appears to be mifepristone 200mg orally followed 24-48 hours later by vaginal administration of misoprostol 200 to 400 μg every 4 to 6 hours. In third-trimester, there is very little data. The circumstances are similar to induction of labor with living fetus. A term or near term, oxytocin and dinoprostone have a marketing authorization in this indication but misoprostol may be an alternative as the Bishop score and dose of induction of labor with living fetus. In case of previous caesarean section, the risk of uterine rupture is increased in case of a medical induction of labor with prostaglandins. The lowest effective doses should be used (100 to 200 μg every 4 to 6 hours). Prior cervical preparation by the administration of mifepristone and possibly the use of laminar seems essential in this situation.

Labor induction outcomes in third-trimester stillbirths

OBJECTIVE

To describe the management of third-trimester stillbirth at a single institution, stratifying induction intervals and adverse outcomes by method.

METHODS

Women diagnosed with fetal demise at 28weeks or later and admitted to an academic hospital between January 2007 and September 2010 were identified. A chart review extracted demographics, history, induction method, delivery interval, and adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-four women were included, with a median gestational age of 35.5weeks (range, 28-40weeks). Ten women had undergone at least 1 prior cesarean. Induction methods included misoprostol alone or for cervical ripening; oxytocin and amniotomy; transcervical Foley catheter; and mifepristone. Overall, 88% of patients delivered within 24hours; median time to fetal delivery was 11hours 20minutes (range, 7minutes to 57hours 12minutes). Adverse outcomes included intrapartum fever and postpartum hemorrhage. In total, 98% of patients, including those with prior cesarean, had a successful vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of third-trimester induction method for management of stillbirth, the majority of women experience safe delivery within 24hours. The descriptive data imply that misoprostol-only inductions might confer the shortest induction intervals; however, further prospective trials are needed to identify the optimal misoprostol regimen for women with third-trimester stillbirth.

Interruption of nonviable pregnancies of 24-28 weeks' gestation using medical methods: release date June 2013 SFP guideline #20133

The need to interrupt a pregnancy between 24 and 28 weeks of gestation is uncommon and is typically due to fetal demise or lethal anomalies. Nonetheless, treatment options become more limited at these gestations, when access to surgical methods may not be available in many circumstances. The efficacy of misoprostol with or without mifepristone has been well studied in the first and earlier second trimesters of pregnancy, but its use beyond 24 weeks' gestation is less well described. This document attempts to synthesize the existing evidence for the use of misoprostol with or without mifepristone to induce labor for nonviable pregnancies at gestations of 24-28 weeks. The composite evidence suggests that a regimen combining mifepristone and misoprostol may shorten the time to expulsion, though the overall success rates are similar to those seen with misoprostol-only regimens.

Management of fetal death with placenta previa

Management of second- and third-trimester fetal death in the presence of placenta previa is a dilemma for obstetricians. We herein describe a case of fetal death occurring at 23 weeks' gestation in the presence of placenta previa. Three weeks of expectant management failed to reduce uteroplacental blood perfusion evaluated with pulsatility index of the uterine artery. Labor was then induced with gemeprost vaginal pessary following overnight laminaria pretreatment. Vaginal delivery was achieved with total blood loss of 1900 ml. Homologous blood transfusion was obviated owing to autologous blood that had been stored during the waiting period.