Patients' attitudes and experiences related to receiving contraception during abortion care

Long-acting reversible contraceptive preference and initiation among clinic-based and telemedicine medication abortion patients at one academic health system in California

OBJECTIVES

To examine possible differences in postabortion long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) preference and initiation among clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined electronic medical records among 576 medication abortion patients at one health system in California between 2020 and 2022.

RESULTS

Overall, 25% of patients preferred LARC and 21% initiated LARC. Among those who preferred LARC, 77% initiated LARC. No statistically significant differences were found in LARC preference or initiation across medication abortion modalities.

CONCLUSIONS

In this health system, clinic-based medication abortion and telemedicine medication abortion patients did not differ in postabortion LARC preference or initiation.

Kenya's 2010 abortion law impacts contraceptive use and fertility rates

INTRODUCTION

Prior research suggested that liberation of abortion laws in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) was associated with fewer abortion complications and deaths. However, few studies have examined the association of abortion law liberalization with modern contraceptive use and fertility rates  among women in SSA. In this study, we assessed the impact of Kenya's 2010 abortion law liberalization on modern contraceptive use and number of recent births (births in the past 5 years ) among women of reproductive age in Kenya.

METHODS

Data from three rounds of the Demographic and Health Surveys (2003-2016) for Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda were used for the analysis. We used the differences-in-differences estimator to assess the impact of the policy change in Kenya using Tanzania and Uganda as the control group. We performed multivariable logistic and Poisson regressions to estimate the adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and adjusted prevalence rate ratios (aPRR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for modern contraceptive use and number of recent births respectively.

RESULTS

A weighted sample of 117,163 women aged 15-49 years was used for the analyses. Modern contraceptive use increased from 25.4% and 19.4% to 39.1% and 27.2% for the intervention and control groups, respectively, in the post-intervention period. In contrast, the mean number of recent births declined from 0.71 and 0.88 to 0.63 and 0.80 for the intervention and control group, respectively in the post-intervention period. We found that Kenya's 2010 abortion law liberalization was associated with more people using modern contraception (aOR, 1.22; 95% CI 1.11, 1.34) and fewer recent births (aPRR, 0.95; 95% CI 0.91, 0.98).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that Kenya's 2010 abortion law was surprisingly associated with higher use of modern contraceptives. Reforming restrictive abortion laws may indirectly improve use of contraceptives in Sub Saharan African countries.

Abortion patients' perspectives on enhancing a telemedicine model of post-abortion contraception: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Access to post-abortion contraception (PAC) is critical for reducing unintended pregnancies and supporting reproductive decision-making. Patients often face challenges in identifying, accessing and initiating their preferred contraceptive methods post-abortion. This may be particularly so with telemedicine models of care with absence of in-person appointments, and reduced opportunities to provide some contraceptive methods. This qualitative service evaluation explored patients' perspectives on PAC consultations and decision-making to inform future PAC service models in the era of telemedicine.

METHODS

Qualitative interviews with 15 patients who had telemedicine medical abortion at home up to 12 weeks' gestation. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Contraceptive discussions during pre-abortion consultations were valued for supporting informed choices about future contraceptive use. Decision-making was influenced by previous contraception experiences, emotional state at the time of abortion and concerns about contraceptive 'failure'. Some preferred non-hormonal methods due to past negative experiences with hormonal contraceptives. However, limited information about 'natural' contraceptive methods and concerns about discussing these with healthcare professionals were described. Barriers to accessing preferred methods, particularly long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), included reduced availability of appointments and caring responsibilities. Fast-tracked appointments for LARC fitting post-abortion were valued. The need for flexible PAC consultations and access after abortion, for example, remote consultations complemented by personalised interactions with sexual and reproductive health experts, was emphasised.

CONCLUSION

The findings highlight the need for flexible and more accessible PAC service models in the era of telemedicine care to ensure timely access to preferred contraceptive methods.

Contraception Initiation after Early Abortion in a Family Medicine Setting: A Retrospective Chart Review

OBJECTIVES

Early abortion increasingly is provided in the primary care setting, allowing improved access, continuity of care, and contraception, if desired. We aimed in this retrospective chart review to describe postabortion contraception provision in a family medicine office.

METHODS

Participants were those patients who obtained an induced abortion during an 11-year period at a family medicine office. We documented contraception provision within 30 days of abortion and used simple proportions, Fisher exact tests, and χ2 tests to describe differences in contraceptive provision by type of abortion and continuity status.

RESULTS

Most of the patients who underwent abortions (254/353, 72%) had documentation of a contraceptive method within 30 days of abortion, which was similar for patients who had either a medication (124/166, 75%) or an aspiration abortion (130/187, 70%, P = 0.71). The most common contraceptives were contraceptive pills (104/353, 29%) or intrauterine devices (68/353, 19%). Patients who chose a tier 1 method were more likely to have a procedure abortion (50/87, 57%), whereas patients who chose a tier 2 method were likely to have a medication abortion (83/160, 52%). Fewer than half (45%, 158/353, P = 0.0002) were continuity patients and established patients in the primary care office. Most tier 1 contraceptive users were continuity patients (49/87, 60%), whereas most patients without a contraceptive method were noncontinuity patients (72/99, 73%).

CONCLUSIONS

The primary care setting is uniquely equipped for providing early abortion and postabortion contraception. Although the providers offered all contraceptive options to eligible patients, continuity patients were more likely to receive more effective contraception in their primary care office.

Contraceptive plans and purchase after an induced abortion: A nationwide register study from Finland

OBJECTIVES

To examine the types of hormonal contraceptive methods chosen at the time of the abortion, and how they correspond to post-abortion hormonal contraceptive purchase.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a prospective register-based study. We identified the present cohort of 8428 women undergoing induced abortion between July 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018, using the Prescription Centre, Social Insurance Institution database and the Finnish National Register of Induced Abortions. From the Register of Induced Abortions, we gathered information on planned post-abortion contraception. The redeemed prescriptions of hormonal contraception were identified from the Prescription Centre until December 31, 2019. We analyzed the hormonal contraceptive methods planned at the time of the abortion, and how they corresponded to hormonal contraceptive purchase during the 1-year follow-up. We also assessed factors (age, socioeconomic status, education, civil status, and reproductive history) affecting post-abortion contraceptive purchase by using Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

At the time of the abortion, 83% (n = 7023) of the women were planning to start using hormonal contraception. Planning any hormonal contraception at the time of the abortion was associated with a higher probability to purchase hormonal contraception after the abortion (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 2.30, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 2.07-2.55), especially in cases of the vaginal ring (IRR 42.66, 95% CI 33.89-53.71) and contraceptive patch (IRR 156.33, 95% CI 111.31-219.55). The following variables were associated with lower incidence rates for purchasing hormonal contraception after the abortion: educational level of bachelor at the highest or missing information on education, civil status as married or divorced, and history of delivery or induced abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of women undergoing abortion plan to use hormonal contraceptive method for post-abortion contraception. Planning any hormonal contraceptive method at the time of an induced abortion is an important predictor of purchasing the method within the year after the abortion.

IMPLICATIONS

Hormonal contraceptive purchase after an abortion is associated with pre-abortion contraceptive planning. Many background factors for not purchasing hormonal contraception can be identified, which may guide counseling dedicated to these groups.

Feasibility and acceptability of virtual group contraceptive counseling prior to abortion care

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of virtual group contraceptive counseling in the abortion care setting.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients seeking abortion care at an urban university hospital were invited to participate in this cohort study. Prior to their clinical appointments, groups of two to six patients participated in 45-minute virtual contraceptive counseling visits facilitated by study staff. Contraceptive method use, effectiveness, and side effects were reviewed according to group interest. Participant satisfaction scores were collected immediately following the sessions. After their appointments, providers estimated the time spent on contraceptive counseling during the clinical visit.

RESULTS

Of 195 patients approached, 86 (44%) were enrolled. Fifty-seven (66%) enrolled patients completed a session. The most common reason for declining enrollment was concern about the time commitment. Most (93%) participants reported being "satisfied" or "very satisfied" overall, and 96% would recommend group contraceptive counseling to a friend. Providers reported that compared to typical counseling, participants required a shorter amount of time during the clinical visit than nonparticipants (time spent <5 minutes: 74% vs 54%).

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual group contraceptive counseling for patients seeking abortion was feasible and acceptable in this study. Group virtual visits may reduce provider time burden, add value when virtual care delivery is desired or required, and deserve further study.

IMPLICATIONS

Family planning clinics can consider incorporating virtual group counseling as a person-centered and efficient approach to contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion care.

"I can be pro-abortion and pro-birth": Opportunities and challenges for full spectrum care among doulas in Georgia

Background

The work of full spectrum doulas (i.e., non-medically trained care workers offering support before, during, and after pregnancy including abortion)-is increasingly important as abortion access decreases across the U.S. Few studies have examined the work of community-based doulas in restrictive abortion settings or how they might further incorporate full spectrum care. As part of the community-engaged mixed methods Georgia Doula Study, this analysis examines the scope of work of community-based doulas regarding full spectrum and abortion services, doula opinions on full spectrum and abortion work, and potential barriers and facilitators for full spectrum doula care in metro-Atlanta, Georgia.

Methods

From October 2020 to February 2022, the team recruited 20 community-based doulas with 8 who provide full spectrum services including abortion. Surveys covered demographics, doula scope of work, family planning attitudes, and abortion stigma. Survey data were analyzed using descriptive and bivariate statistics. In-depth interviews further explored those topics. They were de-identified and thematically analyzed using a semi-deductive approach.

Results

The findings are organized around five themes: (1) doulas of all kinds center reproductive autonomy; (2) abortion doulas play important roles in reproductive autonomy; (3) doulas have mixed feelings about contraceptive counseling; (4) abortion doulas provide diverse services carrying numerous benefits in a stigmatized environment; and (5) abortion doulas experience challenges including stigma but they offer solutions. All but two doulas in this study were interested in learning how to incorporate contraception and abortion services in their current scope of work, and most participants supported the role of full spectrum doulas.

Conclusion

This analysis highlights the experiences of abortion and full spectrum doulas, reactions of the larger doula community to those services, and facilitators and barriers to full spectrum doula care in a restrictive abortion setting. There are urgent needs and opportunities for full spectrum doulas to offer life-protecting services to pregnant people across the U.S. and globally. Coordination efforts for U.S. abortion care post-Roe v. Wade must include community-based doulas, who are largely open to aiding abortion clients through education, connection to care, and emotional support.

Improving experience of medical abortion at home in a changing therapeutic, technological and regulatory landscape: a realist review

OBJECTIVE

To inform UK service development to support medical abortion at home, appropriate for person and context.

DESIGN

Realist review SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Peer-reviewed literature from 1 January 2000 to 9 December 2021, describing interventions or models of home abortion care. Participants included people seeking or having had an abortion.

INTERVENTIONS

Interventions and new models of abortion care relevant to the UK.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Causal explanations, in the form of context-mechanism-outcome configurations, to test and develop our realist programme theory.

RESULTS

We identified 12 401 abstracts, selecting 944 for full text assessment. Our final review included 50 papers. Medical abortion at home is safe, effective and acceptable to most, but clinical pathways and user experience are variable and a minority would not choose this method again. Having a choice of abortion location remains essential, as some people are unable to have a medical abortion at home. Choice of place of abortion (home or clinical setting) was influenced by service factors (appointment number, timing and wait-times), personal responsibilities (caring/work commitments), geography (travel time/distance), relationships (need for secrecy) and desire for awareness/involvement in the process. We found experiences could be improved by offering: an option for self-referral through a telemedicine consultation, realistic information on a range of experiences, opportunities to personalise the process, improved pain relief, and choice of when and how to discuss contraception.

CONCLUSIONS

Acknowledging the work done by patients when moving medical abortion care from clinic to home is important. Patients may benefit from support to: prepare a space, manage privacy and work/caring obligations, decide when/how to take medications, understand what is normal, assess experience and decide when and how to ask for help. The transition of this complex intervention when delivered outside healthcare environments could be supported by strategies that reduce surprise or anxiety, enabling preparation and a sense of control.

Preferences for contraceptive counseling and access among abortion patients at an independent clinic in Texas

OBJECTIVE

Abortion clinics frequently offer contraceptive counseling, but it is unclear if this is in line with patient preferences or satisfies an unmet need. Our objective was to examine preferences for contraceptive counseling and access among abortion patients in a legally restrictive setting.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, 181 patients at an abortion clinic in Dallas, Texas completed anonymous, self-administered surveys from June-July 2018. We analyzed data descriptively.

RESULTS

46.5% of patients offered the survey agreed to participate. 33.1% of respondents preferred to obtain birth control from somewhere near their home. 29.3% preferred to obtain birth control from the same physician they visit for other health care needs. 81.8% were uninterested in contraceptive counseling at their abortion visit. Of these, 52.0% did not want to follow up for contraceptive counseling or services.

CONCLUSION

Among study participants, most lacked interest in contraceptive counseling at the time of their abortion visit. Those interested in follow up preferred a resource handout over other options, such as a follow-up visit or phone call.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

A patient-centered approach elicits patient preferences for contraceptive care and honors them by facilitating access when requested, such as through comprehensive resources and referrals.

Contraceptive plans before preoperative assessment and at procedure in surgical abortion patients

OBJECTIVE

To describe changes in contraceptive method plans pre-appointment, after counseling, and post-procedure in patients having an abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We reviewed electronic medical records of University of California, Davis Health patients who had an operating room abortion from January 2015 to December 2016. We excluded persons with procedures for fetal anomaly or demise. We extracted patient demographics and contraceptive plans reported at each encounter (telephone intake, pre-operative appointment, and day of abortion). We evaluated individual contraceptive plans across the encounters, identified patient characteristics that contributed to plan change, and created a multivariable logistic regression model for predictors of contraception method plan change from telephone intake to post-procedure.

RESULTS

The 747 patients had a mean gestational age of 16 4/7 ± 5 0/7 weeks with 244 (32.7%) <15 weeks and 235 (31.5%) ≥20 weeks. At telephone intake, 273 (36.4%) wanted a long-acting method (139 [50.9%] intrauterine device [IUD]; 99 [36.3%] implant; 35 [12.3%] unspecified), 11 (3.9%) permanent contraception, and 248 (33.2%) a less effective or no method; 215 (28.8%) stated they were undecided. Most (357/433 [82.4%]) patients who planned a reversible method based on the telephone intake obtained that or a similar method. Of the 273 patients planning a long-acting method, 258 (94.5%) received an IUD (158 [40.9%]) or implant (100 [36.6%]). Of the 215 undecided patients, 88 (40.9%) received an IUD and 55 (25.6%) an implant. No demographic factors predicted a change in method plan.

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients will receive the method they initially identified at the telephone intake after an abortion, especially those planning an IUD or implant. Undecided patients are commonly open to discussing options.

Peri-abortion contraceptive counseling: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To assess the effects of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions.

Methods

We performed a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effect of different types of peri-abortion contraceptive counseling interventions and were published as original papers in scientific journals. The literature search was performed in June 2021 in PubMed, Central Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Google Scholar; without restrictions in language or publication date. Two independent authors identified studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted the data. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. Whenever possible, meta-analyses were performed. The protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).

Results

Eleven RCTs were eligible for inclusion (published from 2004 to 2017), from which nine compared enhanced versus standard counseling. Pooled estimates showed that, compared to standard counseling, enhanced counseling was associated with a higher incidence of effective contraceptive use (>3 months) (relative risk [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09–1.16), although no significant difference was found in the incidence of long-acting reversible contraceptive use (RR, 1.25; 95% CI, 0.68–2.29), contraceptive uptake (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98–1.15), and obstetric event occurrence (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.57–1.47). Certainty of evidence was very low for all outcomes. In addition, two studies compared contraceptive counseling provided by physicians versus that provided by non-physicians, which did not show significant differences.

Conclusions

Enhanced contraceptive counseling may favor effective contraceptive use but may not affect the rate of obstetric event occurrence. Also, the studies did not find a difference in the effects of counseling interventions given by different providers. Since evidence certainty was very low, future well-designed RCTs are needed to make informed decisions.

Registration

The study protocol was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020187354).

Impact of contraceptive counseling on Texans who can and cannot receive no-cost post-abortion contraception

OBJECTIVE

To assess optimal timing, patient satisfaction, and 1-year contraceptive continuation associated with contraceptive counseling among Texans who could and could not receive no-cost long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) via a specialized funding program.

STUDY DESIGN

In this prospective study conducted between October 2014 and March 2016, we evaluated participants' desire for contraceptive counseling during abortion visits, impact of counseling on change in contraceptive preference, satisfaction with counseling, and 1-year postabortion contraceptive continuation. We stratified participants into 3 groups by income, insurance status, and eligibility for no-cost LARC: (1) low-income eligible, (2) low-income ineligible, and (3) higher-income and/or insured ineligible. We examined the association between contraceptive counseling rating and 1-year method continuation by program eligibility and post-abortion contraceptive type.

RESULTS

Among 428 abortion patients, 68% wanted to receive contraceptive counseling at their first abortion visit. Counseling led to a contraceptive preference change for 34%. Of these, 21% low-income eligible participants received a more effective method than initially desired, 10% received a less effective method, and 69% received the method they initially desired. No low-income ineligible participants received a more effective method than they initially desired, 55% received a less effective method, and 45% received the method they initially desired. Five percent of higher-income eligible participants received a more effective method than they initially desired, 48% received a less effective method, and 47% received the method they initially desired. Highest counseling rating was reported by 51%. Compared to those providing a lower rating in each group, highest counseling rating was significantly associated with lower 1-year contraceptive discontinuation for low-income eligible participants (aHR 0.34, 95% CI 0.14, 0.81), but not for low-income ineligible (aHR 1.56, 95% CI 0.83, 2.91) and higher-income (aHR 0.73, 95% CI 0.47,1.13) participants. Additionally, 1-year contraceptive continuation was associated with highest counseling rating (OR 1.72, 95% CI 1.09, 2.72) and post-abortion LARC use (OR 11.70, 95% CI 6.37, 21.48) in unadjusted models, but only postabortion LARC in adjusted models (aOR 1.55, 95% CI 0.90, 2.66 for highest counseling rating vs. aOR 11.83, 95% CI 6.29, 22.25 for postabortion LARC use).

CONCLUSIONS

In Texas, where access to affordable postabortion contraception is limited, high quality contraceptive counseling is associated with 1-year contraceptive continuation only among those eligible for no-cost methods.

IMPLICATIONS

State policies which restrict access to affordable post-abortion contraception limit the beneficial impact of patient-centered counseling and impede patients' ability to obtain their preferred method.

The effect of mobile video training for healthcare providers on long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among adolescents and young women

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess whether improving providers' education by video training using a mobile phone could affect providers' knowledge and attitude toward long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs), and thus further affect adolescents' and young nulliparous women's decisions to use LARCs. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, INTERVENTION, AND MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: This prospective case-control study was performed between 2019 and 2020. A total of 40 healthcare providers participated, of which 20 received "LARC First" video training, whereas the other 20 served as the control group and received no training. Surveys were conducted of 244 adolescents and young women who were consulted by these 2 groups of healthcare providers before abortion surgery. The data were used to analyze the relationship between providers' knowledge scores and the percentage of women who received counseling on LARCs decided to use LARCs, and what percentage continued to do so 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Providers from the study group scored higher in LARC knowledge than the control group. Compared to the control group, women in the study group reported receiving more counseling on LARCs (81.4% vs 7.9%) and more often chose to use LARCs (24.6% vs 2.4%). Twelve months later, there was no significant difference in contraceptive continuation between study and control groups, but study group participants were more likely to be using LARCs (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Video training for providers improved both their knowledge and willingness to recommend LARCs and increased the probability of adolescent and young nulliparous women using these methods to reduce unintended pregnancy.

Contraception Choice Among Those Seeking Abortion for Fetal Indication or Management of Pregnancy Loss

OBJECTIVE

To compare contraception choices of those who are undergoing abortion procedures for fetal indications or surgical management of pregnancy loss with those who are having abortions for another indication.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study at University of California, Irvine, from December 1, 2017, through December 31, 2018, and included gestational ages up to 24 0/7 weeks. We abstracted data from electronic medical records and analyzed them using descriptive statistics, χ2, Fisher exact tests, and a multivariate logistic regression model for primary outcome (whether a contraception method was chosen) and secondary outcome (whether a long-active reversible contraception was chosen).

RESULTS

Those with fetal indication were less likely to choose contraception than those with other indication (68/134, 50.7% vs 142/158, 89.9%, P<.001), and among those choosing contraception those with fetal indication were less likely to choose long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (19/68, 27.9% vs 94/142, 66.2%, P<.001). Differences remained significant in multivariable analysis that controlled for age, gestational age in weeks, race, parity, procedure type, and comorbidities (among those with fetal indication for choosing any contraception: adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.11, 95% CI 0.05-0.23; choosing LARC: aOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.39).

CONCLUSION

Only half of those seeking abortion for a fetal indication or surgical management of pregnancy loss were interested in contraception.

Acceptance of HPV vaccination at the abortion visit at a clinic in New York City in 2017 to 2018

OBJECTIVES

Human Papillomavirus vaccination remains a public health concern. Our primary objective was to examine whether eligible people, in an underimmunized population, seeking abortion find the abortion visit an acceptable opportunity to receive the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine. Our secondary objectives include comparing vaccine acceptors to vaccine decliners on knowledge and attitudinal factors related to the HPV vaccine.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a cross sectional study in which we offered free HPV vaccine series initiation and completion to eligible patients presenting for abortion services at an outpatient health center. We administered surveys to both vaccine acceptors and decliners, to assess utilization of health services, knowledge of the HPV vaccine, and reasons for not having initiated or completed the vaccine series previously.

RESULTS

101 study participants were offered HPV vaccination; 50 participants accepted and 51 participants declined. All participants completed the survey. Seven of fifty vaccine acceptors completed the vaccine series. Vaccine acceptance was associated with new knowledge that HPV causes cervical cancer. (acceptors = 72.0%, decliners = 52.9%, p = 0.05) The most common reason among both groups for not previously initiating the vaccine was "No one offered it to me" (acceptors = 58.0%, decliners = 53.5%, p = 0.46). A considerable number of participants had not previously heard of the HPV vaccine, 44% of those who accepted, and 35.3% of those who declined (p = 0.64) vaccination at the time of their abortion.

CONCLUSION

The abortion visit offers an important opportunity to start or to finish the HPV vaccine series. Most patients are receptive to receiving additional services and were never previously offered the HPV vaccine. Practices and policies aimed at utilizing missed opportunities for HPV vaccine catch up can increase HPV vaccine prevalence among young adult women to reduce lifetime risk for cervical cancer.

IMPLICATIONS

The abortion visit may be an opportunity for HPV vaccination catch up in an underimmunized population. Abortion providers may consider offering patients other preventive health care services.

Exploring the physician's role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion in the US

OBJECTIVE

We explored how physicians conceptualize their role in contraceptive counseling at the time of abortion, including identifying clinician attitudes that may lead to patients' perceptions of contraceptive coercion.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted individual semi-structured interviews using questions based on components of the Theory of Planned Behavior. We recruited physician abortion providers using purposeful sampling to attain diversity in practice setting and geographic practice region. We analyzed transcribed interviews using initial and values coding methods.

RESULTS

We interviewed 39 participants across the United States, who primarily self-reported as White female obstetrician gynecologists (OB/GYNs) aged 25 to 44. Over half of participants practiced in an academic setting. Participants perceived providing patient education and taking a patient-centered approach as part of their role in contraceptive counseling. Participants also believed it was their responsibility to prevent unintended pregnancies and subsequent abortions among their patients. External motivations behind this belief included wanting patients to avoid the challenges of obtaining another abortion, particularly in states with multiple abortion restrictions. Internal motivations included valuing professional goal attainment, discomfort with abortion, and abortion stigma. When physicians counseled about contraception, many expressed preferences toward methods of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and an emphasis on contraception provision for adolescents and women with prior abortions.

CONCLUSIONS

Physicians providing abortions strive to use a patient-centered approach to contraceptive counseling. However, many continue to be motivated by the goal of avoiding a subsequent abortion which patients may perceive as coercion towards contraceptive uptake.

IMPLICATIONS

Considering contraceptive counseling as a means to prevent subsequent abortion may lead to coercive practices, especially with specific patient populations. Moral codes and abortion stigma influence physicians' counseling practices and physicians must examine their personal values and motivations behind recommending contraception after an abortion.

Time Trends in Massachusetts Adolescents' Postabortion Contraceptive Uptake

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to assess uptake of postabortion contraception across changes in insurance regulations and insurance type used on the day of abortion, accounting for demographic characteristics and consent type (parental vs. judicial) for abortion among Massachusetts adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective record review of 1,375 minors (≤17 years) presenting for their first lifetime surgical abortion at a statewide network of abortion clinics between 2010 and 2016. Postabortion contraceptive method was defined as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) placed onsite, short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) provided onsite, or no method received.

RESULTS

The proportion of minors leaving with no method dropped from 38% in 2010 to 21% in 2016, while LARC placement increased from 19% to 45%. No difference was observed by consent type. Both LARC and SARC were more prevalent among minors with Medicaid or private insurance compared to those not using insurance on the day of abortion. In a multinomial regression model accounting for consent type and demographic characteristics, minors who received care during the final epoch of the study (relative risk ratio [RRR] = 3.30; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.23-4.88) or used private insurance (RRR = 3.91; 95% CI: 2.24-6.84) or Medicaid (RRR = 5.54; 95% CI: 3.37-9.11) on the day of service had significantly higher relative risk of receiving LARC versus no method (p < .001), with similar results for LARC versus SARC.

CONCLUSIONS

Postabortion contraceptive uptake changed over time. Disparately low LARC uptake among minors not using insurance to pay for their abortions highlights a need to ensure equitable access to all methods, regardless of ability to pay.

Contraception After Surgical Abortion in Patients With Opioid Use Disorder

OBJECTIVES

This study describes the prevalence of medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) among surgical abortion patients, evaluates long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) uptake after surgical abortion among patients on MOUD, and identifies predictors of immediate postabortion LARC uptake among individuals on MOUD.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of data from a retrospective observational cohort study of LARC uptake immediately after surgical abortion up to 21^0/7 weeks gestation at Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts between October 2012 and April 2017. We estimated proportions and analyzed predictors of LARC uptake among women on MOUD using logistic regression analysis to control for possible confounders.

RESULTS

During the study period, 26,858 patients had an abortion procedure; 768 (2.9%; 95% confidence interval, 2.7%-3.1%) used MOUD. In the primary study, controlling for demographic factors, MOUD was not an independent predictor of LARC uptake. In this analysis, patients on MOUD differed demographically from non-MOUD users and were significantly more likely to initiate a LARC method immediately after their procedure: 30.1% versus 25.3% (p = .002), including 22.7% who obtained an intrauterine device and 7.4% who obtained an implant. Among patients on MOUD, a prior live birth and public insurance predicted LARC uptake at the time of abortion.

CONCLUSION

Women on MOUD had higher postabortion LARC uptake compared with those not on MOUD in a setting with easy access to postabortion LARC. Public insurance coverage for abortion was associated with LARC uptake among women on MOUD.

Women's Postabortion Contraceptive Preferences and Access to Family Planning Services in Mississippi

BACKGROUND

Women's preferences for postabortion contraceptive care vary, and some may experience difficulties realizing their preferences owing to health systems-level barriers. We assessed Mississippi women's interest in postabortion contraceptive counseling and method use and the extent to which their method preferences were met.

METHODS

In 2016, women ages 18 to 45 completed a self-administered survey at their abortion consultation visit in Mississippi and a follow-up phone survey 4-8 weeks later. Thirty-eight participants were selected for in-depth interviews. We computed the percentage of women who were interested in contraceptive counseling, initiating a method, and who obtained a method at the clinic. We also calculated the percentage who were using their preferred method after abortion and the main reasons they were not using this method. We analyzed transcripts using a theme-based approach.

RESULTS

Of 323 women enrolled, 222 (69%) completed the follow-up survey. Of those completing follow-up, more than one-half (58%) reported that their consultation or abortion visit was the best time for contraceptive counseling, and 69% wanted to initiate contraception at the clinic. Only 10% obtained a method on site, and in-depth interview respondents reported they could not afford or did not like the options available. At the follow-up survey, 23% of respondents were using their preferred method. Women cited cost or lack of insurance coverage and difficulties scheduling appointments with community clinicians as reasons for not using their preferred method.

CONCLUSIONS

Mississippi women have a large unmet demand for postabortion contraception. Policies that support on-site provision of contraception at abortion facilities would help women to realize their contraceptive preferences.

Specialist follow-up contraceptive support after abortion-Impact on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions: A randomised controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of specialist contraceptive support after abortion on effective contraceptive use at six months and subsequent abortions within two years.

METHODS

Multicentre randomised controlled trial among women undergoing induced abortion in three London boroughs. Allocation was through electronically concealed stratified randomisation by centre, blinding clinicians and participants to arm allocation until interventions. Control group received standard care, comprising advice to follow up with their general practitioner or contraceptive clinic as needed. Intervention group additionally received specialist contraceptive support via telephone or face-to-face consultation at 2-4 weeks and 3 months post-abortion. Primary outcome was rate of effective contraceptive use at six months post-abortion. Secondary outcomes were subsequent abortions within two years.

RESULTS

569 women were recruited between October 2011 and February 2013, randomised to intervention (282) and control (287) groups; 290 (142 intervention, 148 control) were available for primary outcome analysis. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference between the two groups in effective contraceptive use after abortion (62%, vs 54%, p = 0·172), long-acting contraceptive use (42% versus 32%, p = 0·084), and subsequent abortion (similar rates, at 1 year: 10%, p = 0·895, between 1-2 years: 6%, p = 0·944). Per-protocol analysis showed those who received the complete intervention package were significantly more likely to use effective contraception (67% versus 54%, p = 0·048), in particular long-acting contraception (49% versus 32%, p = 0·010) and showed a non-significant reduction in subsequent abortions within 2 years (at 1 year: 5% versus 10%, p = 0·098; and between 1-2 years: 3% versus 6%, p = 0·164, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Structured specialist support post-abortion did not result in significant use of effective contraception at six months or reduction in subsequent abortions within two years. Participants engaging with the intervention showed positive effect on effective contraception at six months post-abortion. The potential benefit of such intervention may become evident through further studies with increased patient participation.

Prevalence and correlates of postabortion long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young women (24 and below) in Nepal: Strategy in the search for improvements

Introduction

Postabortion contraceptive use differs across countries, suggesting the need for country-level research to identify barriers and suggest appropriate interventions. This study aimed to identify the prevalence and correlates of postabortion long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among women aged 24 or younger in Nepal.

Methods

This is a cohort study using Health Management Information System (HMIS) data where individual case records of women seeking induced abortion or postabortion care were documented using structured HMIS 3.7 records. Analysis was performed on the individual case records of 20,307 women 24 years or younger who received induced abortion or postabortion care services in the three-year period from July 2014 to June 2017 at 433 public and private health facilities.

Findings

Overall, LARC uptake during the study period was 11% (IUD: 3% and implant: 8%). The odds of LARC acceptance was higher for young women (24 and below) who belonged to Brahmin/Chhetri (AOR = 1.23; 95% CI: 1.02–1.47) and Janajatis (AOR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.01–1.43) as compared to Dalits; young women who had an induced abortion (AOR = 3.75; 95% CI: 1.75–8.06) compared with postabortion care; and those receiving service from public sector health facilities (AOR = 4.00; 95% CI: 2.06–7.75) compared with private sector health facilities.

Conclusion

The findings from this study indicate the need to focus on barriers to acceptance of LARC among several groups of young women (24 and below) receiving abortion care in Nepal: Dalits, Madhesis and Muslims; nulliparous women; and those receiving services at private sector health facilities.

Contraceptive Practices, Preferences, and Barriers Among Abortion Clients in North Carolina

OBJECTIVES

Abortion clinics provide an ideal setting for women to receive contraceptive care because the women served may not have other contacts with the health system and are at risk for unintended pregnancies. The objective of this study was to understand practices, preferences, and barriers to use of contraception for women obtaining abortions at clinics in North Carolina.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of abortion clients and facilities at 10 abortion clinics in North Carolina. We collected data on contraceptive availability at each clinic. We collected individual responses on women's experiences obtaining contraception before the current pregnancy and their intentions for future use of contraception.

RESULTS

From October 2015 to February 2016, 376 client surveys were completed at 9 clinics, and 10 clinic surveys were completed. Almost one-third of women (29%) reported that they had wanted to use contraception in the last year but were unable. Approximately three-fourths of respondents (76%) stated that they intend to use contraception after this pregnancy. Approximately one-fifth of women stated that would like to use long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) after this abortion. Only the clinics that accepted insurance for abortion and other services provided LARC at the time of the abortion (40%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a unique, statewide view into the contraceptive barriers for women seeking abortion in North Carolina. Addressing the relatively high demand for LARC after abortion could help significantly reduce unintended pregnancy and recourse to abortion in North Carolina.

Advance notice of contraceptive availability at surgical abortion: a pilot randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

With advance notice about the availability and effectiveness of contraceptive methods, abortion patients have more time and information for decision-making. We assessed the impact of an informational telephone call prior to the surgical abortion visit on patient contraceptive knowledge.

METHODS

This was a pilot randomised controlled trial. Prior to their abortion visit, participants were randomised to the intervention message, a standardised notification about the availability, effectiveness and safety of long-acting (LARC) and short-acting reversible contraception (SARC) on the day of the abortion, or to the control message, a reiteration of appointment logistics without information about contraception. At the visit, participants completed a pre-procedure survey to assess contraceptive knowledge and usefulness of the intervention. The primary outcome was knowledge of LARC availability immediately after surgical abortion. A secondary outcome was contraceptive method uptake.

RESULTS

We enrolled 234 subjects. The pre-visit telephone notification improved knowledge that LARC is available immediately after surgical abortion (71.3% vs 50.9%, P<0.01). Participants in both study arms found the telephone notifications useful. Post-abortion contraceptive method choice did not differ between study arms.

CONCLUSIONS

Advance notice about contraception was acceptable to surgical abortion patients and improved their contraceptive knowledge.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02836561.

Telephone or integrated contraception counselling before abortion: impact on method choice and receipt

BACKGROUND

Incorporating thorough contraception counselling into an abortion consultation is challenging. We compared contraceptive choices and methods received between two counselling models: (1) telephone counselling separate from the abortion consultation and (2) face-to-face counselling integrated into the consultation.

METHODS

We obtained de-identified data on demographic characteristics and contraceptive methods that had been chosen and received by women who had an abortion at British Pregnancy Advisory Service between 2011 and 2014 and had a choice of counselling models. We compared the characteristics of women who chose each model of counselling and the contraceptive methods they chose and received using Fisher's exact test, and used logistic regression to explore associations between counselling model and choice and receipt of Tier 1 contraceptive methods (intrauterine contraception, implant, sterilisation), controlling for covariates.

RESULTS

The sample included 18 573 women. Women choosing telephone counselling were more likely to be non-White (34% vs 22%, P<0.001), to report prior difficulty obtaining contraception (40% vs 3%, P<0.001), and to have not used contraception at conception (37.1% vs 33.8%, P<0.001). Overall, 93% of women chose a contraceptive method after counselling. Telephone counselling was significantly associated with both choosing and receiving a Tier 1 method (OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.66 to 1.96 and OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.71, respectively). Fewer women who had telephone counselling received a less effective method (eg, condom, diaphragm) compared with those who chose integrated counselling (6.0% vs 19.2%, P<0.001).

DISCUSSION

Telephone-based contraception counselling separate from the abortion consultation may serve some women better than integrated counselling, particularly those reporting past difficulty obtaining contraception.

Reported contraceptive use in the month of becoming pregnant among U.S. abortion patients in 2000 and 2014

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to determine whether types of contraceptive methods used by abortion patients in the month they became pregnant changed between 2000 and 2014.

STUDY DESIGN

We used secondary data from the 2000 (n=10,015) and 2014 (8177) Abortion Patient Surveys. Patients were asked which contraceptive methods they had last used and when they had stopped or if they were still using them. The main outcome variable was type of contraceptive method used in the month the pregnancy began. We used bivariate logistic regressions to assess changes in the demographic and contraceptive use profiles of abortion patients.

RESULTS

In both years, slightly more than half of patients reported that they had used a contraceptive method in the month they became pregnant, though the decline from 54% in 2000 to 51% in 2014 was statistically significant (p=.011). The methods most commonly reported to have been used in the month the pregnancy began were condoms (28% and 24% in 2000 and 2014, p<.001) followed by the pill (14% and 13%, p=.12). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of abortion patients who reported using long-acting reversible methods in the month they got pregnant (0.1% in 2000 vs. 1% in 2014, p<.001), and the estimated number of abortions attributed to these users was greater in 2014 than in 2000 (9500 vs. 1800).

CONCLUSIONS

Contraceptive use patterns of abortion patients were similar in both time periods, and changes in method use mirrored changes in contraceptive use among the larger population of women.

IMPLICATIONS

Postabortion contraception counseling has the potential to help nonusers find methods that meet their preferences and to help women better use their current methods.

Does the Use of Unreliable Contraceptive Methods Increase the Number of Abortions? Results from a National Survey of Women in the United States

In this study the authors assessed the association between the types contraceptive use (unreliable or traditional methods vs. modern methods) and number of abortions among a nationally representative sample of abortion patients in the United States from the Abortion Patients Survey 2008. Unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios were calculated to determine the association between unreliable contraceptive methods and number of abortions. Results from the unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios revealed that women who used modern methods of contraception were more likely to have had previous abortions compared to women who did not use contraceptives and those who used traditional methods of contraception. Implications for practice, policy, and the role of social workers are discussed.

An exploration of perceived contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion

OBJECTIVE

To explore patient experiences of contraceptive coercion by healthcare providers at time of abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a qualitative study of English-speaking women seeking abortion services at a hospital-based clinic. We used the Integrated Behavioral Model and the Reproductive Autonomy Scale to inform our semi-structured interview guide; the Scale provides a framework of reproductive coercion as a lack of autonomy or power to decide about and control decisions relating to reproduction. We enrolled participants until thematic saturation was achieved. Two coders used modified grounded theory to analyze transcribed interviews with Nvivo 11.0 (Κ=0.81).

RESULTS

The 31 women we interviewed from June 2016 to March 2017 were all in the first trimester, and predominantly young (mean age 27±5 years), non-Hispanic Black (52%) and Medicaid-insured (68%). Some participants (42%) reported feeling "pressured" into choosing some form of contraception. A subset of participants (26%) voiced that providers seemed to prefer LARC methods or were "pushing" a specific method. Several participants perceived pressure to choose any method due to providers' preference to prevent repeat abortions. Conversely, participants who were offered a range of methods through the use of decision aids and who were given time to deliberate demonstrated more reproductive autonomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost half of participants perceived a form of coercion around their contraceptive counseling. Coercion manifested in perceived provider preference for specific methods or immediate initiation of a method. Participant narratives involving decision aids to offer a range of methods and time for deliberation demonstrated greater reproductive autonomy and less coercion. Abortion stigma may mediate potentially coercive interactions between patients and providers.

IMPLICATIONS

This qualitative study explored contraceptive coercion at the time of abortion. Findings highlighted provider pressure to initiate contraception, LARC preference, and abortion stigma. Offering many methods and opportunity for deliberation supported autonomy and satisfaction. Findings inform ongoing efforts to improve contraceptive counseling and promote reproductive autonomy, while addressing unintended pregnancies.

High abortion rate in Martinique (F.W.I.) in spite of a large contraceptive availability. What are the determinants?

INTRODUCTION

Despite a similar health insurance coverage and access to contraception, Martinique F.W.I. has a higher rate of abortion than continental France (25.6 versus 15.3 per thousand respectively). The reasons are still largely unknown. A different contraceptive pattern, a lower use of emergency contraception in Martinique may be involved. We sought to explore the contraceptive pattern, to evaluate the use of emergency contraception and the reasons leading to an unwanted pregnancy among women seeking for an abortion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An anonymous cross-sectional survey about the contraceptive use in the year and in the month before abortion, the use of emergency contraception and the reasons why, to patients' point of view, they became pregnant albeit not willing it was proposed to women seeking for an abortion in the dedicated unit of the university hospital of Martinique.

RESULTS

Six hundred patients were included. A total of 83.7% of patients declared having a regular contraceptive use during the year preceding. Just before abortion, 61.1% of women had no contraception or a low reliable method (fertility awareness, withdrawal…). Lack of recognition of pregnancy risk was the main reason leading to abortion, accounting for 51.1% of cases, explaining a low use of emergency contraception (13.8%), whereas a difficult access to contraception was rarely quoted. Emergency contraception was used in 27.8% of relevant situations.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient estimation of pregnancy risk is the main reason leading to unwanted pregnancy. Availability of emergency contraception does not reduce the risk.

Contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion: experiences of women and health professionals in a hospital or community sexual and reproductive health context

Objective

To examine experiences of contraceptive care from the perspective of health professionals and women seeking abortion, in the contexts of hospital gynaecology departments and a specialist sexual and reproductive health centre (SRHC).

Materials and methods

We conducted in-depth semistructured interviews with 46 women who had received contraceptive care at the time of medical abortion (gestation≤9 weeks) from one SRHC and two hospital gynaecology-department-based abortion clinics in Scotland. We also interviewed 25 health professionals (nurses and doctors) involved in abortion and contraceptive care at the same research sites. We analysed interview data thematically using an approach informed by the Framework method, and comparison was made between the two clinical contexts.

Results

Most women and health professionals felt that contraceptive counselling at abortion was acceptable and appropriate, if provided in a sensitive, nonjudgemental way. Participants framed contraceptive provision at abortion as significant primarily as a means of preventing subsequent unintended conceptions. Accounts of contraceptive decision making also presented tensions between the priorities of women and health professionals, around ‘manoeuvring’ women towards contraceptive uptake. Comparison between clinical contexts suggests that women's experiences may have been more positive in the SRHC setting.

Conclusions

Whilst abortion may be a theoretically and practically convenient time to address contraception, it is by no means an easy time to do so and requires considerable effort and expertise to be managed effectively. Training for those providing contraceptive care at abortion should explicitly address potential conflicts between the priorities of health professionals and women seeking abortion.

Implications

This paper offers unique insight into the detail of women and health professionals' experiences of addressing contraception at the time of medical abortion. The comparison between hospital and community SRHC contexts highlights best practise and areas for improvement relevant to a range of settings.

Motivational interviewing to improve postabortion contraceptive uptake by young women: development and feasibility of a counseling intervention

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to develop and test a postabortal contraception counseling intervention using motivational interviewing (MI) and to determine the feasibility, impact and patient acceptability of the intervention when integrated into an urban academic abortion clinic.

STUDY DESIGN

A single-session postabortal contraception counseling intervention for young women aged 15-24 years incorporating principles, skills and style of MI was developed. Medical and social work professionals were trained to deliver the intervention, their competency was assessed, and the intervention was integrated into the clinical setting. Feasibility was determined by assessing ability to approach and recruit participants, ability to complete the full intervention without interruption and participant satisfaction with the counseling.

RESULTS

We approached 90% of eligible patients and 71% agreed to participate (n=20). All participants received the full counseling intervention. The median duration of the intervention was 29 min. Immediately after the intervention and at the 1-month follow-up contact, 95% and 77% of participants reported that the session was helpful, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MI counseling can be tailored to the abortion setting. It is feasible to train professionals to use MI principles, skills and style and to implement an MI-based contraception counseling intervention in an urban academic abortion clinic. The sessions are acceptable to participants.

IMPLICATIONS

The use of motivational interviewing in contraception counseling may be an appropriate and effective strategy for increasing use of contraception after abortion. This study demonstrates that this patient-centered, directive and collaborative approach can be developed into a counseling intervention that can be integrated into an abortion clinic.

Choice of the levonorgestrel intrauterine device, etonogestrel implant or depot medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception after aspiration abortion

OBJECTIVE

Women who have abortions are at high risk of contraception discontinuation and subsequent unintended pregnancy. The objective of this analysis was to identify factors associated with choice of highly effective, long-acting, progestin-only contraceptive methods after abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

Women presenting for surgical abortion who selected the levonorgestrel intrauterine device (IUD), the progestin implant or the progestin injection (depot medroxyprogesterone acetate or DMPA) as their postabortion contraceptives were recruited to participate in a 1-year prospective cohort study. We used multivariable multinomial logistic regression to identify factors associated with choosing long-acting reversible contraceptives (IUD or implant) compared to DMPA.

RESULTS

A total of 260 women, aged 18-45 years, enrolled in the study, 100 of whom chose the IUD, 63 the implant and 97 the DMPA. The women were 24.9 years old on average; 36% were black, and 29% were Latina. Fifty-nine percent had had a previous abortion, 66% a prior birth, and 55% were undergoing a second-trimester abortion. In multivariable analyses, compared with DMPA users, women who chose the IUD or the implant were less likely to be currently experiencing intimate partner violence (IPV); reported higher stress levels; weighed more; and were more likely to have finished high school, to have used the pill before and to report that counselors or doctors were helpful in making the decision (all significant at p<.05, see text for relative risk ratios and confidence intervals.) In addition, women who chose the IUD were less likely to be black (p<.01), and women who chose the implant were more likely to report that they would be unhappy to become pregnant within 6 months (p<.05) than DMPA users.

CONCLUSION

A variety of factors including race/ethnicity, past contraceptive use, feelings towards pregnancy, stress and weight were different between LARC and DMPA users. Notably, current IPV was associated with choice of DMPA over the IUD or implant, implying that a desire to choose a hidden method may be important to some women and should be included in counseling.

IMPLICATIONS

In contraceptive counseling, after screening for IPV, assessing patient's stress and taking a history about past contraceptive use, clinicians should discuss whether these factors might affect a patient's choice of method.

Prevalence of Abortion and Contraceptive Practice among Women Seeking Repeat Induced Abortion in Western Nigeria

BACKGROUND

Induced abortion contributes significantly to maternal mortality in developing countries yet women still seek repeat induced abortion in spite of availability of contraceptive services. The aim of this study is to determine the rate of abortion and contraceptive use among women seeking repeat induced abortion in Western Nigeria.

METHOD

A prospective cross-sectional study utilizing self-administered questionnaires was administered to women seeking abortion in private hospitals/clinics in four geopolitical areas of Ogun State, Western Nigeria, from January 1 to December 31 2012. Data were analyzed using SPSS 17.0.

RESULTS

The age range for those seeking repeat induced abortion was 15 to 51 years while the median age was 25 years. Of 2934 women seeking an abortion, 23% reported having had one or more previous abortions. Of those who had had more than one abortion, the level of awareness of contraceptives was 91.7% while only 21.5% used a contraceptive at their first intercourse after the procedure; 78.5% of the pregnancies were associated with non-contraceptive use while 17.5% were associated with contraceptive failure. The major reason for non-contraceptive use was fear of side effects.

CONCLUSION

The rate of women seeking repeat abortions is high in Nigeria. The rate of contraceptive use is low while contraceptive failure rate is high.

Impact of a theory-based video on initiation of long-acting reversible contraception after abortion

OBJECTIVE

Adoption of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) (ie, the intrauterine device or the contraceptive implant) immediately after abortion is associated with high contraceptive satisfaction and reduced rates of repeat abortion. Theory-based counseling interventions have been demonstrated to improve a variety of health behaviors; data on theory-based counseling interventions for postabortion contraception are lacking.

STUDY DESIGN

Informed by the transtheoretical model of behavioral change, a video intervention was developed to increase awareness of, and dispel misconceptions about, LARC methods. The intervention was evaluated in a randomized controlled trial among women aged 18-29 years undergoing surgical abortion at a clinic in Chicago, IL. Participants were randomized 1:1 to watch the intervention video or to watch a stress management video (control), both 7 minutes in duration. Contraceptive methods were supplied to all participants free of charge. Rates of LARC initiation immediately after abortion were compared.

RESULTS

Rates of LARC initiation immediately after abortion were not significantly different between the 2 study arms; 59.6% in the intervention and 51.6% in the control arm chose a LARC method (P = .27).

CONCLUSION

This study resulted in an unexpectedly high rate of LARC initiation immediately after abortion. High rates of LARC initiation could not be attributed to a theory-based counseling intervention.

Plan A: postabortion contraception

More than 1 million abortions are performed annually in the United States. Women presenting for abortion care are often motivated by the pregnancy to use effective contraception; they are also at high risk for repeat unintended pregnancy. For these reasons, abortion represents an optimal time to initiate effective contraception. There is strong evidence that most methods of contraception, including intrauterine devices and the contraceptive implant, should be initiated at the time of the abortion procedure. Most women ovulate within the first month after an abortion. If provision of contraception is delayed, women are less likely to use effective contraception and more likely to have a repeat unintended pregnancy. Although some methods of permanent contraception can be safely performed at the time of abortion, federal and state laws often restrict these procedures being performed concurrently. Contraceptive counseling and provision at the time of abortion are important strategies to decrease rates of unintended pregnancy.

Knowledge and attitudes towards use of long acting reversible contraceptives among women of reproductive age in Lubaga division, Kampala district, Uganda

BACKGROUND

Uganda has one of the highest total fertility rates globally and in Sub-Saharan Africa. Her high fertility is mainly attributed to the high unmet need for family planning. Use of Long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) is low (13%) in Uganda yet they are the most cost-effective contraceptives. This study aimed to assess the reproductive aged women's knowledge, attitudes, and factors associated with use of LARC.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 565 women (15-49 years) attending private and public health facilities in Lubaga division, Kampala district. Semi-structured questionnaires were used to measure knowledge, attitudes and factors associated with use of LARC; Intra-Uterine Devices, Implants and Injectables. The outcome variable was current use of LARC. A generalized linear regression model was run in STATA version12.0. Prevalence Risk Ratios for associations between current LARC use and independent factors were obtained and regarded significant at 95% CI with p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Mean age (SD) and current use of LARC was 26.34 (5.35) and 31.7% respectively. Factors associated with current use of LARC were; previous use adj.PRR 2.89; (95% CI 2.29, 3.81), knowledge of implant administration site adj.PRR 1.83; (95% CI 1.17, 2.87), and perception that; male partner decisions positively influence their contraceptive choices adj.PRR 1.49; (95% CI 1.18, 1.88). Contrary, perception that LARC should be used by married women was negatively associated with use of LARC adj.PRR 0.63; (95% CI 0.44, 0.90).

CONCLUSION

Knowledge about site of administration, previous use of LARC and women's attitude that male partners' choice influence their contraceptive decisions were positively associated with current use of LARC. Contrary, the attitude that LARC was for married women was negatively associated with its use. This study suggests a need to strengthen client education about LARC to dispel possible myths and to consider integrating male partner's decision making in contraceptive choices for women.

Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations

OBJECTIVES

Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) by US women is low despite their suitability for most women of reproductive age and in a variety of clinical contexts. This study examined obstetrician-gynecologists' practices and opinions about the use of IUDs in adolescents, nulliparous women and other patient groups, as well as for emergency contraception.

DESIGN

A survey questionnaire was sent to a computer-generated sample of 3000 fellows who were reflective of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College) membership.

RESULTS

After exclusions from the 1552 returned surveys (51.7% response rate), 1150 eligible questionnaires were analyzed. Almost all obstetrician-gynecologists (95.8%) reported providing IUDs, but only 66.8% considered nulliparous women, and 43.0% considered adolescents appropriate candidates. Even among obstetrician-gynecologists who recalled reading a College publication about IUDs, only 78.0% and 45.0% considered nulliparous women and adolescents appropriate candidates, respectively. Few respondents (16.1%) had recommended the copper IUD as emergency contraception, and only 73.9% agreed that the copper IUD could be used as emergency contraception. A total of 67.3% of respondents agreed that an IUD can be inserted immediately after an abortion or miscarriage. Fewer (43.5%) agreed that an IUD can be inserted immediately postpartum, and very few provide these services (11.4% and 7.2%, respectively). Staying informed about practice recommendations for long-acting reversible contraception was associated with broader provision of IUDs.

CONCLUSIONS

Although most obstetrician-gynecologists offer IUDs, many exclude appropriate candidates for IUD use, both for emergency contraception and for long-term use, despite evidence-based recommendations.

IMPLICATIONS

This study shows that obstetrician-gynecologists still do not offer IUDs to appropriate candidates, such as nulliparous women and adolescents, and rarely provide the copper IUD as emergency contraception.

Immediate versus delayed initiation of the contraceptive patch after abortion: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Immediate start of the contraceptive patch has not been studied in women after surgical abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

Women presenting for surgical abortion who had chosen the transdermal patch for contraception were randomized to either delayed start of the patch (beginning the Sunday after their abortion) or immediate start (directly observed application of the patch in the clinic). Subjects were contacted at 2 and 6 months to assess contraceptive use.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-eight women were randomized, and the follow-up rate was 71% at 2 months and 53% at 6 months. Method continuation did not differ by timing of initiation. At 2 months, 71% in the delayed-start group and 74% in the immediate-start group were using the patch [p=.6, with a difference of 3.1%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=-17.2% to +11.2%]. At 6 months, 55% in the delayed-start group and 43% in the immediate-start group were using the patch (p=.13, with a difference of 11.9%, 95% CI=-19.2% to +34%).

CONCLUSION

Immediate initiation of the contraceptive patch after surgical abortion was not associated with increased use of patch at 2 or 6 months.

Immediate post-abortion insertion of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) in a diverse urban population

Ethnic minority women have a higher incidence of unintended pregnancy and abortion than Caucasian women, with significant individual and social implications. Post-abortion intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) use may reduce future unintended pregnancy. This was a retrospective review of 265 women undergoing abortion at a Los Angeles County Reproductive Options Clinic. Demographic factors, reproductive history, and post-abortion contraceptive choice were evaluated and analyzed. The population was predominantly Latina (73%) and single, with a mean age of 27. Immediate post-abortion IUC insertion was chosen by 48% overall and more frequently by Latinas (55%) than by African Americans (33%) or Asians (43%) (p = 0.02). IUC use increased with age, undesired future fertility, increasing gravidity, and history of previous abortion in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, IUC use increased with Latina ethnicity and increasing gravidity. In a clinic serving low-income urban women in Los Angeles, post-abortal IUC uptake is highest among Latinas and those with prior pregnancies. Future research should examine reasons for and barriers to IUC uptake in diverse communities and methods to improve post-abortion IUC uptake to prevent subsequent unintended pregnancies.