Cancer and contraception

Clinical strategies for management of abnormal uterine bleeding: hormonal and nonhormonal interventions in women at risk for venous thromboembolism

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the medical management of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in women at risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE), with a focus on six key principles to consider when initiating hormonal therapies for this patient population. Case studies are used to illustrate these principles in practice, emphasizing the importance of assessing the patient's thrombotic risk and selecting appropriate therapies to effectively manage AUB while minimizing the risk of VTE.

RECENT FINDINGS

While estrogen and certain high-dose progestins are known to elevate VTE risk, evidence suggests that progestin-only formulations and lower-dose hormonal therapies may not significantly increase this risk, even in vulnerable populations. Antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid are effective in reducing menstrual blood loss without the risk of thromboembolic complications.

SUMMARY

There is wide variability in the thrombotic risks associated with the various hormonal and nonhormonal therapies available for managing AUB. A thorough evaluation of a patient's VTE risk factors and preferences is essential for effectively managing AUB in women at risk for thrombotic events.

Society of Family Planning Committee Statement: Contraceptive considerations for individuals with cancer and cancer survivors part 1 - Key considerations for clinical care Joint with the Society of Gynecologic Oncology

With increasing trends in both cancer diagnosis and survivorship, a growing number of individuals impacted by cancer need high-quality contraceptive counseling. Individuals with cancer and cancer survivors have individualized needs with respect to sexual activity, fertility desires, and contraceptive preferences. Clinicians should provide person-centered contraceptive care that supports individual autonomy in decision-making, is tailored to the individual's expressed preferences and values, and includes cancer-specific considerations. While pregnancy prevention is generally recommended during cancer treatment, pregnancy may occur before or during treatment and require person-centered counseling. No test reliably rules out pregnancy potential in cancer survivors; clinicians should offer to discuss contraception with individuals who are pregnancy-capable before cancer treatment. Clinicians should counsel individuals about common risks and complications that may impact contraceptive choice, as cancer and chemotherapy can cause (1) vascular injury, which can increase the risk of venous thromboembolism, (2) anemia, and (3) bone loss increasing the risk of fractures. Clinicians should counsel individuals with cancer that it is safe for them to use emergency contraception. Clinicians should be aware that individuals experiencing intimate partner violence and other marginalized populations, including adolescents and young adults and gender-diverse individuals, have unique needs requiring a person-centered approach to contraceptive care complicated by cancer. Access to the full spectrum of contraceptive methods should be prioritized for individuals with cancer and cancer survivors, accommodating individual preferences and health status. This document is part 1 of a three-part series that updates the Society of Family Planning's 2012 Cancer and contraception clinical guidance. Its companion documents, Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Contraceptive considerations for individuals with cancer and cancer survivors part 2 - Breast, ovarian, uterine, and cervical cancer and Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Contraceptive considerations for individuals with cancer and cancer survivors part 3 - Skin, blood, gastrointestinal, liver, lung, central nervous system, and other cancers, build upon this document and focus on actionable, clinical recommendations.

Female reproductive health in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult cancer survivors

An estimated 500,000 cancer survivors of reproductive age in the United States will live to experience the long-term consequences of cancer treatment. Therefore, a focused aspect of cancer care has appropriately shifted to include quality of life in survivorship. Infertility is a late effect of therapy that affects 12% of female survivors of childhood cancer receiving any cancer treatment in large cohort studies and results in a 40% decreased likelihood of pregnancy in young adults of ages 18-39 years. Nonfertility gynecologic late effects such as hypoestrogenism, radiation-induced uterine and vaginal injury, genital graft-versus-host disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplant, and sexual dysfunction also significantly affect quality of life in survivorship but are underdiagnosed and require consideration. Several articles in the special edition "Reproductive Health in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivorship" address infertility, genital graft-versus-host disease, and psychosexual functioning in survivorship. This review article focuses on other adverse gynecologic outcomes of cancer therapies including hypogonadism and hormone replacement therapy, radiation-induced uterovaginal injury, vaccination and contraception, breast and cervical cancer screening, and pregnancy considerations in survivorship.

Non-physician's challenges in sexual and reproductive health care provision for women of reproductive age with cancer: a scoping review of barriers and facilitators

PURPOSE

The American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice guidelines recommend that non-physicians such as nurses, social workers, and psychologists should be prepared to discuss fertility and sexual concerns with patients. However, literature showed that the utilization rate of sexual and reproductive care for women with cancer remained low. We conducted a scoping review to describe non-physicians' roles, barriers, and facilitators providing sexual and reproductive health (SRH) care to women of reproductive age with cancer.

METHODS

We searched six databases for articles that met the following criteria: (1) English language; (2) original research; (3) non-physician providers; (4) women with cancer under age 50. We categorized barriers and facilitators at the system-, individual-, and clinical encounter-levels from providers' and patients' perspectives.

RESULTS

We included 27 studies from 3451 retrieved articles. The majority of studies have a focus on fertility preservation or sexuality (n = 25). At the system level, the main barriers for non-physicians were lack of SRH care guidelines and collaborating experts. Concerns for patients included socioeconomic and geographic constraints in obtaining care. At the encounter level, providers and patients lacked experience discussing SRH. At the individual level, providers' lack of knowledge in SRH treatment options and interprofessional collaboration and patients' lack of awareness about treatment effects hindered SRH discussions. Facilitators include the availability of SRH programs and specialists, and rapport between providers and patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Supporting non-physicians to provide SRH services to women with cancer requires investment in clinical guidelines, interprofessional collaboration, and training in patient communication.

Factors Associated with Unplanned Pregnancy Among Cancer Survivors

Background: Approximately half of all pregnancies in the United States are unintended. However, women who are diagnosed with cancer in their reproductive years may be a unique population. This study examines the prevalence of and identifies factors associated with unplanned pregnancy among cancer survivors. Methods: Female cancer survivors aged 22-45 years, diagnosed between ages 20-35 years and at least 2 years postdiagnosis, and women with no history of cancer were interviewed about their reproductive histories, including pregnancy intention. Using a random matching process, comparison women were assigned an artificial age at cancer diagnosis equal to that of her cancer survivor match. An adjusted Cox model was fit examining time to unintended pregnancy after cancer for each of 1,000 matches. Cox proportional hazards models were also fit to assess associations between participant characteristics and unplanned pregnancy after cancer among survivors. Results: Cancer survivors (n = 1,282) and comparison women (n = 1,073) reported a similar likelihood of having an unplanned pregnancy in models adjusted for race, income, history of sexually-transmitted infection, and history of unplanned pregnancy before diagnosis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.06, 95% simulation interval 0.85-1.36). After adjusting for confounders, unplanned pregnancy among survivors was associated with age <30 years at diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.79, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.44), black race (HR: 1.55, 95% CI: 1.13-2.12; referent: white), receiving fertility counseling (aHR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.04-1.92), and having at least one child before diagnosis (aHR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05-1.97). Conclusion: Cancer survivors and comparison women had similar likelihood of unplanned pregnancy. Rates of unplanned pregnancy after cancer were not higher for cancer survivors compared with comparison women, but 46.4% of survivors with a postcancer pregnancy reported an unplanned pregnancy. Cancer patients may benefit from patient-centered guidelines and counseling before cancer treatment that covers both risks of infertility and risks of unplanned pregnancy.

Sexual Health: A Nursing Approach to Supporting the Needs of Young Adult Cancer Survivors

Sexual health is an important aspect of survivorship for young adult (YA) cancer survivors, who frequently experience physical and psychosocial changes related to sexuality and intimacy during and after treatment for cancer. This article provides an overview of common sexual issues in this population, reviews the integral role that oncology nursing assessment and intervention can play in optimizing patients' sexual well-being and quality of life, and describes specific strategies for incorporating the sexual health needs of YA cancer survivors into the nursing plan of care.

Options for Prevention and Management of Menstrual Bleeding in Adolescent Patients Undergoing Cancer Treatment: ACOG Committee Opinion, Number 817

ABSTRACT

Obstetrician-gynecologists frequently are consulted either before the initiation of cancer treatment to request menstrual suppression or during an episode of severe heavy bleeding to stop bleeding emergently. Adolescents presenting emergently with severe uterine bleeding usually require only medical management; surgical management rarely is required. Surgical management should be considered for patients who are not clinically stable, or for those whose conditions are not suitable for medical management or have failed to respond appropriately to medical management. When used continuously, combined hormonal contraceptives are effective for producing amenorrhea, although complete amenorrhea cannot be guaranteed. The risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer is compounded by multiple factors, including presence of metastatic or fast-growing, biologically aggressive cancers; hematologic cancers; treatment-related factors such as surgery or central venous catheters; and the number and type of comorbid conditions. Although as a group, patients undergoing cancer treatment are at elevated risk of venous thromboembolism compared with the general population, this risk may be extremely elevated for certain patients and existing guidance on risk stratification should be consulted. The decision to use estrogen in patients with cancer should be tailored to the individual patient after collaborative consideration of the risk-benefit ratio with the patient and the health care team; the patient should be closely monitored for known adverse effects such as liver toxicity and venous thromboembolism.

ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4)

The 4th International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4) took place in October 2018, in Lugano, Switzerland, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY3 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities were also identified. This article summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Executive Summary of the Early-Onset Breast Cancer Evidence Review Conference

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention launched the Bring Your Brave campaign to increase knowledge about early-onset breast cancer, defined as breast cancer in women aged 18-45 years. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists convened a panel of experts in breast disease from the Society for Academic Specialists in General Obstetrics and Gynecology to review relevant literature, validated tools, best practices, and practice guidelines as a first step toward developing educational materials for women's health care providers about early-onset breast cancer. Panel members conducted structured literature reviews, which were then reviewed by other panel members and discussed at an in-person meeting of stakeholder professional and patient advocacy organizations in April 2019. This article summarizes the relevant literature, existing guidance, and validated tools to guide health care providers in the prevention, early detection, and special considerations of early-onset breast cancer. Substantive knowledge gaps were noted and summarized to provide guidance for future research.

Pediatric hematology and oncology fellow education in sexual and reproductive health: A survey of fellowship program directors in the United States

PURPOSE

Pediatric oncology clinicians identify a need for increased sexual and reproductive health (SRH) education with adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. By surveying pediatric oncology fellowship directors, this study clarifies the state of current fellowship education about SRH for the AYA patient.

METHODS

A survey was sent to all pediatric oncology fellowship program directors (PDs) in the United States consisting of 13 questions pertaining to three primary SRH domains: sexual health, fertility, and safe sex practices. Descriptive statistics and χ² were used in data analyses.

RESULTS

Sixty-three PDs responded to the survey (91% response rate). Of these, 88% reported having formal instruction regarding fertility, 41% reported curriculum regarding contraception and 30% reported some education regarding sexual health. The curriculum "being too full" was identified as a barrier to education on fertility (29%), sexual health (40%), and safe sex practices (38%). Not being a required or expected part of the program was more likely to be endorsed as a barrier for sexual health (26%) and safe sex practices (30%) compared with fertility (8%) (P < 0.005). Lack of experts to teach was a more frequently endorsed barrier to education on sexual health (47%) compared with either fertility (23%) or safe sex practices (25%) (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identifies important gaps in oncology fellow education about SRH. Future research must explore optimal education strategies that are feasible and acceptable by PDs and fellow learners, and effective in optimizing AYA SRH care.

Understanding Barriers to Contraception Screening and Referral in Female Adolescents and Young Adults with Cancer

Background: Contraception screening and referral occur infrequently in cancer care for young women of reproductive age. Barriers to contraception screening and referral in this setting have not been thoroughly identified. Objectives: We sought to understand oncology clinicians' current practices and perceptions of barriers to screening and referring young women for adequate contraception during cancer treatment. Methods: We conducted individual semi-structured interviews with 19 oncology clinicians whom we recruited from an urban, northeast medical center. Participants included physicians, advanced practice clinicians, and nurses in surgical and medical oncology. The interview guide addressed core components of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework, and subsequent directed content analysis identified themes indicative of barriers to contraception screening and referral. Findings: Participants varied significantly in their current contraception screening practices; many conflated early pregnancy diagnosis or pregnancy avoidance counseling with contraception, whereas others described inaccurate contraceptive recommendations for specific clinical scenarios. Participants also lacked clarity of roles and responsibilities within the oncologic care team for contraception and assumed that another team member had addressed contraception. Participants perceived themselves to lack adequate education about contraception, which precluded contraception discussions. Conclusion: We recommend cancer centers consider these possible barriers to contraception screening and referral by promoting development of institutional guidelines to standardize contraception screening and referral, clarifying roles and responsibilities for contraception discussions within the care team, and expanding oncology clinician education on contraception. National professional organizations should work to expand guidelines to inform and support this process in clinical practice.

Fertility optimization in women with cancer: from preservation to contraception

Advances in the early diagnosis and treatment of cancer have reduced mortality rates and improved patient survival. For this reason, professionals from different areas have strived to implement actions to increase patient quality-of-life during and after cancer treatment. Among these measures, integral attention in reproductive health is one of the main points for the inclusion, safety, and autonomy of female patients. The approach to fertility in these cases should include counseling on fertility preservation and contraceptive options. Oocyte/embryo freezing is an effective technique that does not delay the start of cancer treatment, since controlled ovarian stimulation can be initiated at any stage of the menstrual cycle. At the same time, contraceptive counseling should be conducted based on the eligibility criteria established by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. However, there is still a lack of studies on (i) the suitability of contraceptives to patients of reproductive age with relatively frequent tumors (lymphoma, leukemia, bone cancer), and (ii) the use of contraceptive concurrently with chemotherapeutic agents. Therefore, the choice of contraceptive method should consider other factors such as tumor type, thrombogenic risk factors linked to cancer/chemotherapy, immunosuppression, blood disorders (thrombocytopenia/anemia), bone mass reduction, metabolic/cardiovascular effects, and drug interaction.

A Practical Guide to Gynecologic and Reproductive Health in Women Undergoing Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

Optimum care of female transplant recipients requires gynecologic care at several stages through the allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) process. Sex-based considerations in women post-HCT span gynecologic sequelae of transplant along with assessment and maintenance of optimal sexual and gynecologic health. Pre-HCT, managing menstruation and abnormal uterine or genital bleeding, considering fertility preservation, and assessing for sexually transmitted infections, including human papillomavirus (HPV)-related disease and cervical cancer, enhance women's health. While inpatient during transplant when women are thrombocytopenic, menstrual bleeding requires suppression. Whenever graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is assessed, screening for genital GVHD merits consideration. After the first 100 days, periodic assessments include obtaining a menstrual history, assessing ovarian function, and reviewing current hormonal use and contraindications to hormonal methods. Regular assessment for primary ovarian insufficiency, dyspareunia, and intimacy guides provision of contraception and hormone replacement options. As part of ongoing screening for genital GVHD and HPV-related disease, including sexually transmitted infections, periodic pelvic examinations are performed. Once successful long-term survival is achieved, planning for fertility may be considered. This article offers a comprehensive approach to these aspects of gynecologic care of patients throughout the trajectory of HCT and beyond into survivorship. We review the effects of HCT treatment on sexual health, ovarian function, and resulting menstrual changes and fertility challenges. Identification, treatment, and prevention of subsequent malignancies, including breast cancer, are discussed, with a focus on regular assessment of genital HPV disease and GVHD in long-term follow-up.

Efficacy of a web-based women's health survivorship care plan for young breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

Breast cancer survivorship care plans (SCP) have limited content addressing women's health issues. This trial tested if young breast cancer survivors who receive a web-based, women's health SCP were more likely to improve on at least one of the four targeted issues (hot flashes, fertility-related concerns, contraception, and vaginal symptoms) compared to attention controls.

METHODS

A randomized controlled trial recruited female survivors ages 18-45 at diagnosis, 18-50 at enrollment, completed primary cancer treatment, and had a significant women's health issue: moderate or higher fertility-related concerns; ≥ 4 hot flashes/day with ≥ 1 of moderate severity; ≥ 1 moderate vaginal atrophy symptoms; or not contracepting/using less effective methods. Survivors underwent stratified, block randomization with equal allocation to intervention and control groups. The intervention group accessed the online SCP; controls accessed curated resource lists. In intention-to-treat analysis, the primary outcome of improvement in at least one issue by 24 weeks was compared by group.

RESULTS

182 participants (86 intervention, 96 control), mean age 40.0 ± 5.9 and 4.4 ± 3.2 years since diagnosis, were randomized. 61 intervention group participants (70.9%) improved, compared to 55 controls (57.3%) (OR 1.82, 95% CI 0.99-3.4, p = 0.057). The following issue-specific improvements were observed in the intervention versus control arms: fertility-related concerns (27.9% vs. 14.6%, OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.1-4.8); hot flashes (58.5% vs. 55.8%, OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.57-2.2); vaginal symptoms (42.5% vs. 40.7%, OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.6-2.0); contraception (50% vs. 42.6%, OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.74-2.5).

CONCLUSIONS

In young breast cancer survivors, a novel, web-based SCP did not result in more change in the primary outcome of improvement in at least one of the four targeted women's health issues, than the attention control condition. The intervention was associated with improved infertility concerns, supporting efficacy of disseminating accessible, evidence-based women's health information to this population.

A qualitative study of sexual and reproductive health communication with adolescent and young adult oncology patients

BACKGROUND

Adolescent and young adult patients with cancer (AYAs) identify sexual and reproductive health (SRH) as an important but often neglected aspect of their comprehensive cancer care. The purpose of this study was to explore AYA perceptions and experiences of SRH communication with oncology clinicians.

METHODS

Twenty-three AYA patients and survivors ages 15-25 years from a large academic oncology center participated in semistructured qualitative interviews investigating their experiences discussing SRH issues, including specific topics discussed, conversation barriers and facilitators, suggestions for clinicians on how to improve conversations, and education and resource needs. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed, and coded using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Interviews with AYAs revealed two primary themes-a need for oncology clinicians to discuss SRH and critical gaps in current SRH communication practices. AYAs reported a need for improved SRH communication for the purposes of general education, addressing specific SRH issues experienced, and understanding the long-term impact of cancer and treatment on SRH. The current communication gaps are exacerbated by patient discomfort initiating conversations and the presence of family members. AYAs shared six key recommendations for clinicians on how to improve SRH communication.

CONCLUSIONS

AYAs identify a role for oncology clinicians in discussing SRH as a primary aspect of comprehensive health care during cancer treatment and in survivorship; however, multiple gaps and barriers interfere with such discussions. Future efforts must focus on clinician education and training in SRH as well as education and intervention opportunities for AYAs to optimize the care provided.

Contraceptive utilization and counseling among breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

To explore contraceptive counseling and utilization among breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

We enrolled reproductive-aged women with a history of breast cancer for a cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited via the Athena Breast Health Network and via the Young Survival Coalition's social media postings. Descriptive statistics were calculated to understand utilization of and feelings about contraceptive methods before, during, and after breast cancer treatment.

RESULTS

Data presented here are from an online survey of 150 breast cancer survivors who completed the survey. Seventy-one percent (n = 105) of respondents reported being sexually active and not pregnant during their primary cancer treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and/or radiation). Of these, 90% (n = 94) reported using any form of contraceptive, and the most common method was condoms (n = 55, 52%). Respondents reported that safety concerns had the biggest influence on their contraception method choice. Sixty-one percent (n = 92) reported receiving contraceptive counseling by their oncologist either before or after treatment; however, 49% (n = 45) of those did not receive a specific recommendation for a contraceptive method. Of respondents who reported receiving contraceptive counseling from their gynecologist, 44% (n = 35) reported that their gynecologist specifically recommended a copper intrauterine device (IUD). The majority of respondents (n = 76, 52%) wanted their oncologist to discuss contraceptive options with them and preferred to receive this counseling at the time of diagnosis (n = 81, 57%).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer survivors in this study remained sexually active across the cancer care continuum and predominantly used condoms as their contraceptive method during treatment. Breast cancer patients would prefer contraceptive counseling from their oncologist at the time of their cancer diagnosis.

IMPLICATION FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Education efforts in the future should focus on initiatives to improve comprehensive contraceptive counseling at the time of diagnosis by an oncologist.

Contraception in cancer survivors - an expert review Part I. Breast and gynaecological cancers

Objective: The efficacy of treatment for many cancers has increased dramatically in recent decades and there are a growing number of cancer survivors who need effective contraception. In this paper, a group of experts from the European Society of Contraception set out to define the most frequent cancers in women and summarise the guidelines, reviews and studies that provide information and guidance on contraception for each cancer. Methods: Epidemiological studies were analysed to determine the frequency of cancers in women of reproductive age. A narrative review was performed for each cancer, collecting data about the treatment of the disease, its impact on fertility, and the efficacy, health risks, possible benefits and contraindications of the contraceptive methods available. The recommendations were then summarised. Results: Owing to a large amount of information, the results are presented in two parts. Part 1 includes contraception after breast and gynaecological cancers. Part 2 summarises the findings and recommendations regarding contraception in women with skin, gastrointestinal, haematological and endocrine cancers.

Barriers and facilitators to sexual and reproductive health communication between pediatric oncology clinicians and adolescent and young adult patients: The clinician perspective

BACKGROUND

Sexual and reproductive health (SRH) is identified by adolescent and young adult (AYA) patients with cancer as an important but often neglected aspect of their comprehensive cancer care. The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes and perceptions of pediatric oncology clinicians towards discussing SRH with AYAs, and to understand perceived barriers to effective communication in current practice.

PROCEDURE

Pediatric oncology clinicians (physicians, certified nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) participated in semi-structured qualitative interviews investigating attitudes about SRH communication with AYAs and barriers to such conversations. Twenty-two clinicians participated from seven institutions in the Northeastern United States. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded using a thematic analysis approach.

RESULTS

Interviews with pediatric oncology clinicians revealed the following five primary themes: the role for pediatric oncology clinicians to discuss SRH, the focus of current SRH conversations on fertility, the meaning of "sexual health" as safe sex and contraception only, clinician-reported barriers to SRH conversations, and the need for education and support. Communication barriers included lack of knowledge/experience, lack of resources/referrals, low priority, parents/family, patient discomfort, clinician discomfort, time, and lack of rapport. Clinicians identified resource and support needs, including formal education and SRH education materials for patients and families.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the study participants identified a role for pediatric oncology clinicians in SRH care for AYA patients with cancer, multiple barriers interfere with such discussions taking place on a regular basis. Future efforts must focus on resource development and provider education and training in SRH to optimize the care provided to this unique patient population.

Use of emergency contraception among female young adult cancer survivors

OBJECTIVE

To test whether emergency contraception use in reproductive-aged cancer survivors is higher than in the general U.S. population and evaluate factors associated with use among survivors.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study compared emergency contraception use between cancer survivors in the Reproductive Window Study on ovarian function after cancer and in the general population in the 2006-2010 National Survey for Family Growth. In a cross-sectional analysis of survivors, multivariable models were used to test associations between participant characteristics and emergency contraception use.

SETTING

Not applicable.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 616 female cancer survivors aged 18-40.

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Self-reported emergency contraception use.

RESULT(S)

The mean age of survivors was 33.4 ± 4.7, at a mean 7.5 years since diagnosis. Breast cancer (22%), Hodgkin lymphoma (18%), and leukemia (8%) were the most common cancers. Since diagnosis, 156 (25.3%) used emergency contraception, 60% because of not otherwise using contraception. Age-adjusted prevalence of use was higher in survivors than in the general population (28.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 24.7-31.9] vs. 12.0% [95% CI 11.1-12.9]). In multivariable analysis among survivors, nonwhite race (prevalence ratio [PR] 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.8), breast cancer (PR 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-1.0), partnered relationship (PR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.9), and older age (age 36-40 vs. 31-35; PR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0) were associated with emergency contraception.

CONCLUSION(S)

Female young adult cancer survivors were significantly more likely to use emergency contraception compared with the general population. Populations including nonwhite survivors have a higher risk, suggesting differences in family planning care. Strategies to improve contraception and decrease the need for emergency contraception are needed.

Pregnancy and Cancer Treatment: Developing a Standardized Testing Policy and Procedure

Systematic gaps for pregnancy screening and testing of patients with cancer persist. Absent or inconsistent guidelines and policies are barriers to standardized practice. Awareness among oncology nurses is needed to promote safe cancer care, prevent patient harm, and uphold patient-centered care.

Contraception: the Need for Expansion of Counsel in Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Cancer Care

Little is known about oncology provider recommendations regarding best practices in contraception use during cancer treatment and through survivorship for adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients. This review examined the literature to identify related studies on contraception recommendations, counseling discussions, and methods of contraception in the AYA oncology population. A literature review was conducted using PubMed, including all peer-reviewed journals with no publication date exclusions. A systematic review of the literature was conducted using combinations of the following phrases or keywords: "oncology OR cancer" AND "contraception, family planning, contraceptive devices, contraceptive agents, intrauterine devices OR IUD, vaccines, spermatocidal agents, postcoital, immunologic, family planning, vasectomy, tubal ligation, sterilization" AND "young adult OR adolescent" AND "young adult AND adolescent". Reviewers assessed articles using the "Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies" which considers: (1) selection bias; (2) study design; (3) confounders; (4) blinding; (5) data collection methods; and (6) withdrawals and dropouts. A total of five articles were included and all studies were quantitative. Results showed no consistent recommendations among providers, references to guidelines, or methods of contraceptive types. Provider guidelines for discussions with AYA patients should be expanded to provide comprehensive, consistent, and quality cancer care in the AYA population.

Best Practices in Counseling Young Female Cancer Survivors on Reproductive Health

In the United States, there are more than 400,000 girls and young women of reproductive-age with a history of cancer. Cancer treatments including surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and radiation can adversely impact their reproductive health. This review discusses infertility, contraception, and adverse pregnancy and child health outcomes in reproductive-aged cancer survivors, to increase awareness of these health risks for survivors and their health care providers. Infertility rates are modestly higher, while rates of using contraception and using highly effective contraceptive methods are lower in cancer survivors than in women without a history of cancer. During pregnancy, preterm births are also more common in survivors, resulting in more low-birth-weight offspring. Children of cancer survivors do not have more childhood cancers, birth defects, or chromosomal abnormalities than the general population, with the exception of families with hereditary cancer. Reproductive risks in survivors depend on cancer treatment exposures. For example, women with prior abdominal or pelvic radiation have additional risks of spontaneous abortions, small-for-gestational-age offspring and stillbirths, while those with prior chest radiation or anthracycline exposures have higher risks of cardiomyopathy. To help survivors achieve their reproductive goals safely, family planning and preconception counseling are central to survivorship care.

Contraceptive counseling in reproductive-aged women treated for breast cancer at a tertiary care institution: a retrospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to assess the frequency of documented contraceptive and fertility preservation counseling for women treated for breast cancer.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a chart analysis of female breast cancer patients (n=211) ages 18-45 years receiving chemotherapy treatment at Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Center from 2010 to 2014. Primary outcomes of contraceptive counseling and fertility preservation counseling documentation were assessed for frequency. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy testing, contraception use and pregnancy during treatment.

RESULTS

Among the total sample (n=211), sexual activity was documented in 24% of patients (n=51). Fifty-one percent (n=108) of patients received pregnancy testing prior to initiation of treatment. Past contraception use was documented in 74% of patients (n=156) and current contraception use in 25% (n=53). Twenty-six percent of patients received fertility preservation counseling alone (n=54), 10% received contraceptive counseling alone (n=22), and 12% received both types of counseling (n=25). Patients were three times more likely to receive contraceptive counseling if using contraception at diagnosis [odds ratio (OR) 3.1, confidence interval (CI) 1.1-9.1, p=.04], and older women were significantly less likely to receive counseling (OR 0.2, CI 0.1-1.0, p=.04). Two patients became pregnant and had an abortion during treatment (1%), and neither patient was using contraception nor received contraceptive or fertility preservation counseling.

CONCLUSIONS

Documentation of fertility preservation counseling occurs more frequently than contraceptive counseling, but both occur suboptimally. Lack of documentation does not allow us to conclude that counseling did not occur, but it suggests the need to improve documentation and increase awareness of contraceptive needs and counseling.

IMPLICATIONS

Women undergoing breast cancer treatment do not consistently receive counseling on contraception or fertility preservation as a part of their care. Efforts are needed to ensure that women treated for breast cancer routinely receive counseling about fertility preservation and contraceptive options.

Unintended Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of Contraception Use and Counseling in Women With Cancer

BACKGROUND

Women with past or current cancer diagnoses can benefit from planning pregnancies to optimize maternal health and birth outcomes.
.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review is to identify unmet needs for family planning services among women with cancer by describing the prevalence of contraception counseling, contraception use, unintended pregnancy, and abortion.
.

METHODS

Using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines, 16 studies were included.
.

FINDINGS

Women with cancer experience unintended pregnancy and abortion throughout their care. Not all women reported receiving contraception counseling, and many reported inconsistencies between contraception counseling desired and received. A prominent theme was uncertainty about fertility status. Use of highly effective contraceptive methods was low to moderate in eight patient populations.

Filling the Gap for Early-Stage Breast Cancer Follow-Up: An Overview for Primary Care Providers

Earlier detection and newer treatments now make breast cancer highly survivable, and breast cancer survivors are the largest female cancer survivor group in the United States. With earlier detection, more women are being diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer and need follow-up care. With the increasing number of breast cancer survivors, there is a projected shortage in the workforce of oncology specialists to care for these women. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that breast cancer follow-up care can be provided by an oncologist or primary care provider, as long as the primary care provider has spoken to the oncologist about appropriate follow-up care. Several studies have shown that primary care providers and oncologists have comparable outcomes for follow-up care of women with early-stage breast cancer. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) are considered the gold standard for breast cancer treatment and follow-up. These guidelines are clear and straightforward. Using knowledge of the NCCN Guidelines, primary care providers can fill the gap for follow-up care of women with early-stage breast cancer.

Reproductive counseling, contraception, and unplanned pregnancy in fertile women treated by gynecologic oncologists

We sought to identify how gynecologic oncologists approach reproductive counseling for their fertile, reproductive age patients, and their experience with unplanned pregnancies. Members of the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) were surveyed electronically regarding consistency of counseling patterns of contraception and fertility concerns, most and least common contraceptive methods utilized, referral patterns, and incidence of unplanned pregnancy. Of the 1424 SGO members identified, 261 participated in the questionnaire, yielding a response rate of 18%. Eighty-two percent of respondents agreed unplanned pregnancy is a potential problem, but only 57% believed their patients understood unplanned pregnancy is possible during treatment. Half of respondents report "always" in terms of frequency that contraception is addressed among their high-risk patients. After adjustment for gender, we found that the odds of reporting providing fertility counseling were nearly three times higher among attendings as compared to fellows [AOR = 2.72; 95% CI = (1.44, 5.12), three times higher in women as compared to men [AOR = 2.80; 95% CI = (1.46, 5.38)], as well as in individuals 50 + years as compared to those < 40 years old [AOR = 4.91; 95% CI = (2.05, 11.74)]. Ninety-six percent reported < 5 unplanned pregnancies, to their knowledge, in the previous five years of clinical practice. Most providers acknowledge that unplanned pregnancy is a potential risk in fertile gynecologic oncology patients, but only half believe their patients understand an unplanned pregnancy is possible. An opportunity exists to provide more directed counseling regarding fertility during and after cancer therapy, and to educate patients and providers regarding more reliable, long acting contraceptive methods.

Pregnancy screening prior to chemotherapy administration

A retrospective case notes review was performed to determine compliance with screening for undetected pregnancy prior to commencement of chemotherapy at Flinders Medical Centre. All female patients aged 18-55 who commenced chemotherapy between January and December 2014 were included. During the first 12 months, for women identified as having childbearing potential, pre-chemotherapy pregnancy screening was performed only in 40% of patients under 40 years and in 20.5% of the entire age range.

Development of a smart IUD launcher for prevention of uterine perforation

Intrauterine contraception is a widely used, highly effective and reversible means of birth control. One potential disadvantage with the use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) is the risk of uterine perforation. During the process of IUD insertion, there is a possibility to perforate the wall of the uterus during which health workers might injure the fundus of the uterus, due to inadequate knowledge or insufficient training. This paper discusses the development of a smart IUD launcher insertion system that would be used to prevent perforation of the uterine wall by detecting a specific distance to the wall for the safe release of the IUD using a sensor. Several launcher prototypes were developed prior to the final version of the IUD launcher. The results from testing experiments, that have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the proposed device, show that the sensor is able to detect a distance up to 5 mm and is also capable of detecting the distance to the target even in high viscosity liquid. The developed prototype promises a solution for more accurate IUD insertion that could be used as a training module for health care providers, helping remove fear from using this long-lasting contraceptive method and promote an affordable modern contraceptive method to society.

Sexual Dysfunction in Young Adult Survivors of Childhood Cancer

BACKGROUND

Disruption of psychosexual development and sexual dysfunction are well recognized as profoundly distressing long-term side effects of pediatric cancer treatment. However, little is known about the specific sexual problems facing young adult survivors of childhood cancer (YASCC) and their unmet clinical needs. In this study, we aimed to utilize qualitative methods to characterize sexual dysfunction in YASCC and identify survivor-reported unmet clinical need regarding sexual health information and care.

PROCEDURE

Semistructured interviews were conducted with 22 YASCC (ages 18-31; 10 men, 12 women) reporting sexual dysfunction. Interviews were conducted in English by phone or in person. All interviews were audiorecorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using a thematic analysis approach. Inductive open-coding procedures identified participants' experiences with sexual dysfunction and clinical care needs. Themes were identified by grouping pattern-forming codes in the data.

RESULTS

Interviews with YASCC reporting sexual dysfunction revealed five overarching themes including interruption of adolescent psychosocial development, physical and psychological problems with sexual function, altered perceptions of body image, concern about fertility, and inadequate clinical support.

CONCLUSIONS

The experiences described by YASCC provide valuable insight into the nature of sexual dysfunction in this population and their clinical care needs. These data provide the framework for future research on sexual dysfunction screening measures, patient-physician communication, and effective interventions to address sexual dysfunction in YASCC.

Menstrual management and reproductive concerns in adolescent and young adult women with underlying hematologic or oncologic disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Heavy menstrual bleeding is common among adolescent and young adult women, and can affect health-related quality of life. The cause of heavy menstrual bleeding is not uncommonly because of an underlying hematologic or oncologic disease process, which substantially influences the way patients are counseled and treated.

RECENT FINDINGS

Options for menstrual management are more numerous today than ever before and range from minimizing monthly blood loss to suppressing the cycle altogether. However, an underlying bleeding disorder or malignancy can introduce many nuances and limits in individual patient care, which this review highlights. Additionally, because survival rates for adolescent and young adult cancers are improving, more of these patients are planning for lives after their disease, which may include starting or adding to a family. Options for fertility preservation during cancer therapy regimens are solidifying and both primary practitioners and subspecialists should be aware of the possibilities.

SUMMARY

Patients with underlying hematologic or oncologic disease require management of menstrual bleeding, but also deserve a comprehensive evaluation and counseling regarding their individualized contraceptive needs and fertility preservation options during their reproductive years. This review employs the latest evidence from current literature to help guide clinicians caring for this unique demographic.

Unintended pregnancy during the first year after breast cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVES

Young women experience high levels of anxiety and distress during cancer diagnosis and therapy, and it can be devastating to become pregnant in this vulnerable state. Pregnancy during cancer treatment is strongly discouraged, as radiotherapy and chemotherapy administered during the first trimester of pregnancy result in increased congenital malformations.

METHODS

In this study, we analysed an unselected, consecutive cohort of young breast cancer (BC) patients with regard to unintended pregnancy during the first year after BC diagnosis. We analysed all patients who were ≤40 years of age at initial BC diagnosis (n = 100, mean age at diagnosis: 35.9 years), according to data from the Basel Breast Cancer Database. The frequency of unintended pregnancy was assessed, and particular attention was given to patients' obstetric and reproductive history.

RESULTS

Forty-two percent of the cohort (mean age 36.5 years) were identified as not at risk of unintended pregnancy during the first year after BC diagnosis. However, 58% of the cohort (mean age 35.6 years) were using an ineffective contraceptive method and thus were at risk of unintended pregnancy. The rate of unintended pregnancy was 3.5% in this group (two patients). Oncologists should be aware that the use of reliable contraception should be discussed before starting, and also during, adjuvant therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Oncologists should consider actively referring young BC patients to a gynaecologist to ensure proper contraceptive counselling.

Documentation of Pregnancy Risk Assessment and Pregnancy Among Women Presenting for Gynecologic Oncology Consultation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to describe pregnancy risk assessment, reproductive goals, and incidence of pregnancy among the reproductive age population seen by gynecologic oncologists at a tertiary care center.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted among 18- to 45-year-old women evaluated by a gynecologic oncologist from January 2000 to December 2011. Data abstracted included the following: diagnosis, cancer treatment, parity, pregnancy risk factors (eg, menstrual patterns, sexual activity, and use of contraception), reproductive goals, type of referral, and pregnancy. Descriptive statistics were used to describe the characteristics of the population.

RESULTS

Five hundred seventeen women were eligible and included in the review. Median age was 31 years with most common diagnoses being cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, and premalignant disease. Most patients are multiparous. Seventy percent were treated surgically, with 58% experiencing surgical sterility. Completeness of reproductive data documented at initial visit included the following: 47% with a contraception plan, 54% sexual activity/practices, and 37% with personal reproductive goals reviewed. Fifteen patients were pregnant at the initial visit, and 21 patients pregnant during follow-up, representing 43 pregnancies (9 patients had more than 1 pregnancy). For those maintaining fertility after the initial visit, there was a median (range) of 2 (0-25) visits with 32% documenting a contraception plan at follow-up visits.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient's reproductive goals and risk factors for pregnancy are inconsistently addressed during initial consultation with the gynecologic oncologist. This lack of consistency potentially increases patients' risk for unplanned pregnancy during evaluation and treatment of a gynecologic cancer diagnosis and potentially results in a missed opportunity for fertility preservation. Planned and unplanned pregnancy occurs in this population at a rate similar to that of US women of reproductive age, underscoring the need for reproductive counseling in this population.

Contraceptive Practices Among Female Cancer Survivors of Reproductive Age

OBJECTIVE

To compare rates of contraception between reproductive-aged cancer survivors and women in the general U.S.

POPULATION

Among survivors, the study examined factors associated with use of contraception and emergency contraception.

METHODS

This study analyzed enrollment data from an ongoing national prospective cohort study on reproductive health after cancer entitled the Fertility Information Research Study. We compared current contraceptive use in survivors with that of the general population ascertained by the 2006-2010 National Survey for Family Growth. Log-binomial regression models estimated relative risks for characteristics associated with use of contraception, World Health Organization tiers I-II (sterilization and hormonal) contraceptive methods, and emergency contraception in survivors.

RESULTS

Data from 295 survivors (mean age 31.6±5.7 years, range 20-44 years) enrolled in this prospective study (85% response rate) were examined. Age-adjusted rates of using tiers I-II contraceptive methods were lower in survivors than the general population (34% [28.8-40.0] compared with 53% [51.5-54.5], P<.01). Only 56% of survivors reported receiving family planning services (counseling, prescription or procedure related to birth control) since cancer diagnosis. In adjusted analysis, receipt of family planning services was associated with both increased use of tiers I-II contraceptive methods (relative risk 1.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-1.5) and accessing emergency contraception (relative risk 5.0, 95% CI 1.6-16.3) in survivors.

CONCLUSION

Lower rates of using tiers I-II contraceptive methods were found in reproductive-aged cancer survivors compared with the general population of U.S. women. Exposure to family planning services across the cancer-care continuum may improve contraception use among these women.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01843140.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

Cancer and pregnancy: an overview for obstetricians and gynecologists

A relatively rare occurrence, pregnancy-associated cancer affects approximately 1 in 1000 pregnancies. Optimizing treatment of the cancer and minimizing harm to the fetus are often dependent on the extent of disease, treatment options required, and the impact on the pregnancy as well as the gestational age of pregnancy. When malignancy is diagnosed, the obstetrician-gynecologist plays a key role in the diagnosis, initial evaluation, and coordination of patient care. Furthermore, the obstetrician-gynecologist may be asked to assist in fertility planning for young women with a new diagnosis of cancer and may be responsible for addressing questions about family-planning needs and the safety of future pregnancy. Therefore, the purpose of this article was to provide the obstetrician-gynecologist with a relevant overview of the current literature regarding concurrent pregnancy and cancer diagnoses, management options, including maternal and neonatal outcomes, as well as the future needs of young women diagnosed with cancer who desire fertility preservation.

Contraception and hormonal management in the perimenopause

This literature review focuses on contraception in perimenopausal women. As women age, their fecundity decreases but does not disappear until menopause. After age 40, 75% of pregnancies are unplanned and may result in profound physical and emotional impact. Clinical evaluation must be relied on to diagnose menopause, since hormonal levels fluctuate widely. Until menopause is confirmed, some potential for pregnancy remains; at age 45, women's sterility rate is 55%. Older gravidas experience higher rates of diabetes, hypertension, and death. Many safe and effective contraceptive options are available to perimenopausal women. In addition to preventing an unplanned and higher-risk pregnancy, perimenopausal contraception may improve abnormal uterine bleeding, hot flashes, and menstrual migraines. Long-acting reversible contraceptives, including the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS), the etonogestrel subdermal implant (ESI), and the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD), provide high efficacy without estrogen. LNG-IUS markedly decreases menorrhagia commonly seen in perimenopause. Both ESI and LNG-IUS provide endometrial protection for women using estrogen for vasomotor symptoms. Women without cardiovascular risk factors can safely use combined hormonal contraception. The CDC's Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use informs choices for women with comorbidities. No medical contraindications exist for levonorgestrel emergency-contraceptive pills, though obesity does decrease efficacy. In contrast, the Cu-IUD provides reliable emergency and ongoing contraception regardless of body mass index (BMI).

Contraception after cancer treatment: describing methods, counseling, and unintended pregnancy risk

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to describe contraceptive methods utilized by young female cancer survivors and determine whether pretreatment fertility counseling decreases unintended pregnancy risk.

METHODS

One thousand and forty-one nongynecologic cancer survivors between 18 and 40 years of age responded to a survey of reproductive health, contraceptive methods utilized and history of fertility counseling before cancer treatment. Subjects who had resumed menstrual bleeding following treatment and had not undergone surgical sterilization were defined at risk of unintended pregnancy if they reported unprotected vaginal intercourse in the prior month but did not desire conception. Statistical methods utilized were Student's t test and χ(2).

RESULTS

Overall, 918 women (88%) received treatment with potential to affect fertility (chemotherapy, radiation or sterilizing surgery). Of 476 women younger than 40 years old who still had menses, 58% did not want to conceive; of these 275 women, 21% reported unprotected intercourse in the prior month and were defined at risk of unintended pregnancy. This compares to the 7.3% risk of unintended pregnancy reported by the National Center for Health Statistics. Increasing age was associated with greater risk of unintended pregnancy (odds ratio 1.07, p=.006). The following contraceptive methods were reported: barrier (25.5%), hormonal (24.5%), tubal ligation (21.3%) vasectomy (17.5%), intrauterine device (7.2%) and other (4.0%). Sixty-seven percent of women received pretreatment fertility counseling. Counseling prior to treatment did not decrease risk of unintended pregnancy (p=.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Sexually active cancer survivors are at threefold increased risk of unintended pregnancy compared to the US population. Contraceptive counseling in this high-risk population is recommended posttreatment.

IMPLICATIONS

Sexually active cancer survivors are at considerable risk of unintended pregnancy. Patient report of pretreatment counseling regarding fertility was not associated with a decline in risk of unintended pregnancy, highlighting the importance of clear recommendations regarding content and timing of counseling.

Cancer-related coagulopathy (Trousseau's syndrome): review of the literature and experience of a single center of internal medicine

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) occurs roughly in one out of five cancer patients and is the second cause of death in this population. When all cancer patients are considered together, a sevenfold increased risk for VTE has been calculated. Over the last 20 years, a number of risk factors have been recognized. These have been used in several risk assessment models aimed at identifying high-risk patients who are therefore candidates for thromboprophylaxis. An easily applicable and reliable risk score is based on the cancer site, hemoglobin levels, pre-chemotherapy platelet and leukocyte counts as well as body mass index. The additional measurement of two biomarkers, namely D-dimer and soluble P-selectin, may improve estimates of the cumulative VTE probability. A variable incidence of VTE has been determined in patients with specific types of malignancy, with the highest odds in those with pancreatic cancer followed by head and neck tumors. In terms of histotype, the risk of VTE is significantly higher in patients with adenocarcinoma than in those with squamous cell carcinoma and in patients with high-grade versus low-grade tumors. Cancer therapy may also be responsible for VTE; specifically, the presence of an indwelling central venous catheter, immunomodulatory drugs such as thalidomide and lenalidomide, monoclonal antibodies, such as bevacizumab, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and hormonal therapy with tamoxifen place patients at higher risk. The pathogenesis of cancer-related VTE is poorly understood but is likely to be multifactorial. "Virchow's triad," comprising stasis consequent to a decreased blood flow rate, an enhanced blood clotting tendency such as accompanies inflammation and growth factor expression, and structural modifications in blood vessel walls, is thought to play a central role in the induction of VTE. The prophylaxis and treatment of VTE are based on well-established drugs such as vitamin K antagonists and unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparins as well as on an expanding group of new oral anticoagulants, including fondaparinux, rivaroxaban, apixaban and dabigatran. Furthermore, aspirin has been shown to prevent arterial thrombosis and to reduce the rate of major vascular events. Guidelines for the general management of VTE in cancer patients and in those with an indwelling central venous catheter have been recently developed with the aim of selecting the most rational therapeutic approach for each clinical situation. The main features of VTE based on our own observations of 92 cancer patients and 159 patients with non-neoplastic disease are briefly described herein.