Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Telemedicine in family planning care part 2 - Abortion

This Clinical Recommendation provides evidence-informed, person-centered, and equity-driven guidance to optimize medication abortion management via telemedicine in the US. Key recommendations include: We recommend telemedicine medication abortion with or without pre- or posttreatment testing as a safe option before 12 0/7 weeks of gestation. No-test telemedicine medication abortion (NTMA) and hybrid models are shown to be safe and effective (GRADE 1B). We recommend over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents as the first line for pain management for telemedicine medication abortion with consideration of opioids as needed when providing telemedicine medication abortion care (GRADE 1C). We recommend principles of noncoercive person-centered communication be applied to meet the abortion counseling needs of the person receiving care (GRADE 1B). We suggest assessing the person's desire for contraceptive counseling at the time of telemedicine medication abortion and, depending on the preference of the person receiving care, either defer it to a later time to allow for deliberation and increased autonomy or provide contraceptive counseling if desired (GRADE 2C). We recommend assessing telemedicine medication abortion completion using a standardized patient symptom checklist (such as the sample validated checklist in Table 2) two weeks after mifepristone ingestion in conjunction with a home pregnancy test (GRADE 1C). This document builds upon the Society of Family Planning Committee Statement: Telemedicine in family planning care part 1 - Background and overarching principles and parallels recommendations outlined in the Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Telemedicine in family planning care part 3 - Contraception. Readers are encouraged to review parts 1 and 3 for this additional context.

Telemedicine Follow-up After Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol for telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. Study Design: The study was designed to assess the feasibility of planned telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. We compared these follow-up rates with those after planned in-person follow-up of medication management of early pregnancy loss and planned telemedicine follow-up after medication abortion. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients initiating medication management of early pregnancy loss <13w0d gestation and medication abortion ≤10w0d with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol between April 1, 2020, and March 28, 2021. As part of a new clinical protocol, patients could opt for telemedicine follow-up one week after treatment and a home urine pregnancy test 4 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was completed follow-up as per clinical protocol. We also examined outcomes related to complications across telemedicine and in-person follow-up groups. Results: Of patients reviewed, 181 were eligible for inclusion; 75 had medication management of early pregnancy loss, and 106 had medication abortion. Thirty-six out of 75 patients elected for telemedicine follow-up after early pregnancy loss. Of patients scheduled for telemedicine follow-up, 29/36 (81%, 95% CI: 64-92) with early pregnancy loss and 64/69 (93%, 95% CI: 84-98) undergoing medication abortion completed follow-up as per protocol (p = 0.06). Completed follow-up was also similar among patients undergoing medication management of early pregnancy loss who planned for in-person follow-up (p = 0.135). Complications were rare and did not differ across early pregnancy loss and medication abortion groups. Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up is a feasible alternative to in-person assessment after medication management of early pregnancy loss.

Medication Abortion Follow-Up Rates in a Rural Population Before and After Introduction of a Remote Follow-Up Option

Background: Medication abortion (MAB) follow-up historically involves visiting a health care facility for ultrasonography or laboratory testing. In rural states such as New Mexico, many patients travel hours for MAB, making two visits burdensome. Studies demonstrate feasibility, safety, and patient preference for remote follow-up. Materials and Methods: We evaluated whether MAB follow-up by telephone had noninferior loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) rates compared with ultrasonography or laboratory follow-up in a rural population. This was a retrospective chart review of University of New Mexico MAB LTFU rates after changing to telephone follow-up (home group, n = 136). Patients were propensity-matched in a 1:2 ratio to a historical cohort (health care group, n = 272) to eliminate significant differences. We defined LTFU as no contact within 50 days. We evaluated complications requiring intervention, possible ongoing pregnancy, completion of the home follow-up protocol (7- and 30-day calls, high-sensitivity urine pregnancy test [UPT]), follow-up by intended method (home or health care), and number of call attempts. Results: LTFU rates for the home group (n = 23, 17%) were noninferior to the health care group (n = 60, 22%, p = 0.24). Rates of complications requiring intervention (p = 0.83) and possible ongoing pregnancy (p = 0.72) among the home group were similar to the health care group. Ninety-seven (71%) home group patients completed the initial call, 79 (58%) completed the UPT, and 86 (69%) completed the 30-day call. Ninety-five (70%) home group patients followed up by intended method, comparable with the health care group (n = 199, 73%, p = 0.56). Staff made a median of 3 (interquartile range: 2-4) calls per home group patient. Conclusions: Remote MAB LTFU rates were noninferior to in-person LTFU rates.

Self-testing for pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Urine pregnancy tests are often inaccessible in low-income settings. Expanded provision of home pregnancy testing could support self-care options for sexual and reproductive health and rights. We conducted a systematic review of pregnancy self-testing effectiveness, values and preferences and cost.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE and four trial registries were searched through 2 November 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included trials and observational studies that compared urine self-testing for pregnancy to health worker-led pregnancy testing on effectiveness outcomes; quantitative and qualitative studies describing values and preferences of end users and health workers and costs of pregnancy self-testing.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.

RESULTS

For effectiveness, four randomised trials following 5493 individuals after medical abortion showed no difference or improvements in loss to follow-up with home pregnancy self-testing compared with return clinic visits. One additional trial of community health workers offering home pregnancy tests showed a significant increase in pregnancy knowledge and antenatal counselling among 506 clients. Eighteen diverse values and preferences studies found support for pregnancy self-testing because of quick results, convenience, confidentiality/privacy, cost and accuracy. Most individuals receiving pregnancy self-tests for postabortion home management preferred this option. No studies reported cost data.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy self-testing is acceptable and valued by end users. Effectiveness data come mostly from articles on postabortion care, and cost data are lacking. Greater availability of pregnancy self-tests, including in postabortion care and CHW programs, may lead to improved health outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021231656.

Comparison of two home pregnancy tests for self-confirmation of medication abortion status: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate individuals' ability to perform and comprehend low-sensitivity and multilevel urine pregnancy tests during medication abortion follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a pilot study of individuals using mifepristone and misoprostol for medication abortion through 63-days gestation. We randomly assigned participants to use a 1000 mIU/mL low-sensitivity pregnancy test or a five-level multilevel pregnancy test. Seven days after mifepristone, participants performed their test and completed a questionnaire. One week later, participants performed another test if day 7 low-sensitivity test had been positive or day 7 multilevel test had not shown a one-level drop. We assessed comprehension of abortion status based on participants' final test interpretation, and defined correct comprehension when patient report of pregnancy status was consistent with pregnancy test result. We also assessed usability with a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (0 'very easy'; 100 'very difficult') and satisfaction.

RESULTS

We enrolled and randomized 88 participants to low-sensitivity (n = 43) and multilevel (n = 45) test groups. Comprehension was correct in 38/39 (97%) and 41/45 (91%) of low-sensitivity and multilevel test users, respectively (p = 0.37). When the test indicated a possible ongoing pregnancy, all three low-sensitivity test users and two of three multilevel test users accurately comprehended their results. Participants rated ease of use as 7.5 (range 0-68) for low-sensitivity and 9.0 (range 0-52) for multilevel (p = 0.24) tests. Most participants were likely or very likely to recommend use of their test (32/36 [89%] low-sensitivity and 42/44 [95%] multilevel test users, p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients could comprehend and use low-sensitivity and multilevel tests during medication abortion follow-up with similar satisfaction.

IMPLICATIONS

Individuals are able to independently use both the low-sensitivity and multilevel tests for medication abortion follow-up. Both are acceptable for medication abortion follow-up without in-person contact, but future, larger studies to compare comprehension of both tests may be necessary.

Follow-up strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to 10 weeks' gestation: a systematic review with meta-analyses

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of in-clinic and remote/self-assessment, as well as different remote/self-assessments, for confirming the success of medical abortion at ≤10⁺⁰ weeks' gestation.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid Embase Classic and Embase; Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead-of-Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily; and the Cochrane Library. We also consulted experts in this field for any ongoing or missed trials.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials published in English from 2000 onward, comparing in-clinic assessment with ultrasound to remote or self-assessment or comparing different remote or self-assessment strategies to confirm the success of medical abortion of pregnancies up to and including 10⁺⁰ weeks gestation, reporting any of the following outcomes: "missed ongoing pregnancy," "correct implementation of the follow-up strategy," patient satisfaction/preference, "adherence to follow-up strategy," "unscheduled visits/telephone calls to the abortion service," and surgical intervention.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

One author assessed the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane Collaboration checklist for randomized controlled trials. All outcomes were analyzed as risk ratios and meta-analysed in Review Manager 5.3 using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method and a fixed effect model. The overall quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE.

RESULTS

Four randomized controlled trials (n = 5761) compared in-clinic to remote self-assessment and found no clinically significant differences apart from higher preference rates for remote follow-up, especially in the remote follow-up groups. The quality of this evidence was compromised by attrition, no blinding, inconsistency, indirectness, and low event rates. Two randomized controlled trials (n = 1125) compared different remote assessment strategies (using urine pregnancy tests) and also found no clinically significant differences apart from a clinically significantly lower rate of unscheduled visits to the abortion service in the remote follow-up group using a multilevel urine pregnancy test compared to remote follow-up using a high-sensitivity urine pregnancy test. The quality of this evidence was compromised by small event rates, lack of blinding, indirectness and high attrition rates.

CONCLUSION

The published data support offering women who have had a medical abortion up to and including 10⁺⁰ weeks' gestation the choice of self-assessment, remote assessment, or clinic follow-up.

Telemedicine for Family Planning: A Scoping Review

Telemedicine has the potential to increase access to family planning. The most common application involved the use of text message reminders and mobile apps. Text messaging increased knowledge in a variety of settings, but had no effect on contraceptive uptake and use. Two randomized studies found that text messaging improved continuation of oral contraceptives and injectables. Telemedicine provision of medication abortion included both clinic-to-clinic and direct-to-patient models of care. Telemedicine provision of medication abortion has been found to be equally safe and effective as in-person provision. Some measures of satisfaction are higher with telemedicine. Telemedicine may improve access to early abortion.

Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of first-trimester medical abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For many women, the need for multiple clinical visits is a barrier to medical abortion.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed the effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home versus routine clinic follow up after medical abortion.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched databases such as MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL to find studies published in 1991-2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies included women of reproductive age who had undergone a medical abortion that was completed at home. The intervention and self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion done by urine pregnancy tests kits by women at home was compared with routine medical follow up at a clinic.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two researchers completed the study selection, data extraction, critical appraisal, and assessment of the evidence. The outcomes were successful complete abortions, side effects and complications, and acceptability. We performed meta-analyses when possible and GRADE to ascertain the certainty of the evidence. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017055316).

MAIN RESULTS

Four randomised controlled trials (RCTs; n = 5493) met our inclusion criteria. The pooled analysis from all studies showed no significant difference in complete abortion rates between self-assessment and routine clinic follow up: RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.99-1.01. The ongoing pregnancy rates were similar and the pooled results for the safety outcomes showed no significant differences between the groups. There was a significantly greater preference for self-assessment as the follow-up method.

CONCLUSIONS

The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion completed at home are not inferior to routine clinic follow up.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

The effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of self-assessment of the outcome of medical abortion are not inferior to routine clinic follow up.

A harm-reduction model of abortion counseling about misoprostol use in Peru with telephone and in-person follow-up: A cohort study

BACKGROUND

In Peru, abortion is legal only to preserve the life and health of the woman. A non-profit clinic system in Peru implemented a harm-reduction model for women with unwanted pregnancy that included pre-abortion care with instructions about misoprostol use and post-abortion care; they started offering telephone follow-up for clients in 2011. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the harm-reduction model, and to compare outcomes by type of follow-up obtained.

METHODS

Between January 2012 and March 2013, 500 adult women seeking harm-reduction services were recruited into the study. Telephone surveys were conducted approximately four weeks after their initial harm-reduction counseling session with 262 women (response rate 52%); 9 participants were excluded. The survey focused on whether women pursued an abortion, and if so, what their experience was. Demographic and clinical data were also extracted from clinic records.

RESULTS

Eighty-six percent of participants took misoprostol; among those taking misoprostol, 89% reported a complete abortion at the time of the survey. Twenty-two percent obtained an aspiration after taking misoprostol and 8% self-reported adverse events including hemorrhage without transfusion, infection, or severe pain. Among women who took misoprostol, 46% reported receiving in-person follow-up (in some cases both telephone and in-person), 34% received telephone only, and 20% did not report receiving any form of follow-up. Those who had in-person follow-up with the counselor were most likely to report a complete abortion (<0.001). Satisfaction with both types of follow-up was very high, with 81%-89% reporting being very satisfied.

CONCLUSIONS

Liberalization of restrictive abortion laws is associated with improvements in health outcomes, but the process of legal reform is often lengthy. In the interim, giving women information about evidence-based regimens of misoprostol, as well as offering a range of follow-up options to ensure high quality post-abortion care, may reduce the risks associated with unsafe abortion.

Results of a pilot study in the U.S. and Vietnam to assess the utility and acceptability of a multi-level pregnancy test (MLPT) for home monitoring of hCG trends after assisted reproduction

Background

To evaluate the utility and acceptability of using multi-level pregnancy tests (MLPTs) at home to monitor hCG trends following assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Methods

One hundred and four women presenting for ART at either Stanford Medicine Fertility and Reproductive Health Clinic (Stanford, CA) or Hung Vuong Hospital (Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam) participated in this pilot study. Women were asked to perform the MLPT at home, primarily on days when they were also scheduled to receive standard clinic-based serum hCG testing. These tests were administered up to 6 times over the 6-week period following embryo transfer or intrauterine insemination (IUI). Concordance of serial hCG readings for each time point was assessed by comparing trends in urine MLPT results with trends in serum hCG. Stable or increasing hCG level was interpreted as an indication of a progressing pregnancy, while a declining hCG was interpreted as a lack of established or progressing pregnancy. At study end, all participants were asked about the acceptability and convenience of using the MLPT at home for monitoring hCG trends following ART.

Results

Data from both urine and serum testing are available for 156 of 179 clinic visits (87.2%). There was high concordance of serial trend results between the two types of tests: among the 156 sets of serum and urine hCG data points, 150 (96.2%) showed a matching trend in hCG pattern and 6 (3.8%) resulted in a discordant trend. Seventy-three percent of women reported being satisfied or very satisfied with using the MLPTs at home. Almost all (96.6%) said that the MLPT was easy or very easy to use.

Conclusion

The MLPT offers women and health care providers a client-friendly diagnostic tool to detect very early pregnancy and monitor its progress.

Trial registration

This study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01846403 (May 1, 2013), and NCT01919502 (August 5, 2013).

Is self-assessment of medical abortion using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test combined with a checklist and phone text messages feasible in South African primary healthcare settings? A randomized trial

Objective

To evaluate feasibility of self-assessment of medical abortion outcome using a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test, checklist and text messages. The study assessed whether accurate self-assessment required a demonstration of the low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test or if verbal instructions suffice.

Methods

This non-inferiority trial enrolled 525 adult women from six public sector abortion clinics. Eligible women were undergoing medical abortion at gestations within 63 days. Consenting women completed a baseline interview, received standard care with mifepristone and home-administration of misoprostol. All were given a low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test and checklist for use 14 days later, sent text reminders, and asked to attend in-clinic follow-up after two weeks. Women were randomly assigned 1:1 to an instruction-only group (n = 262; issued with pre-scripted instructions on the low-sensitivity pregnancy test), or a demonstration group (n = 263; performed practice tests guided by lay health workers). The primary outcome was accurate self-assessment of incomplete abortion, defined as needing additional misoprostol or vacuum aspiration. Analysis was by intention to treat and a non-inferiority margin was set to six percentage points. Women’s acceptability of their abortion procedure and preferences for follow-up were also assessed.

Results

Follow-up was 81% for abortion outcome, confirmed in-clinic at two weeks or self-reported within six months. Non-inferiority of instruction-only to a demonstration was inconclusive for accurate self-assessment (risk difference for instruction-only –demonstration: -2.5%; 95%CI: -9% to 4%). Comparing instruction-only to demonstration groups, 99% and 100% found the pregnancy test easy to do; and 91% and 93% respectively chose the pregnancy test, checklist and text messages for abortion outcome assessment in the future.

Conclusion

Routine self-assessment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test, checklist and text messages is feasible and preferred by women attending South African primary care abortion clinics. Counselling with additional emphasis on prompt recognition of ongoing pregnancies is recommended.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02231619

Self-administered multi-level pregnancy tests in simplified follow-up of medical abortion in Tunisia

Background

This study was conducted to assess the efficacy and acceptability of using a multi-level pregnancy test (MLPT) combined with telephone follow-up for medical abortion in Tunisia, where the majority of providers are midwives.

Methods

Four hundred and four women with gestational age ≤ 70 days’ LMP seeking medical abortion at six study sites were enrolled in this open-label trial. Participants administered a baseline MLPT at the clinic prior to mifepristone administration and were asked to take a second MLPT at home and to call in its results before returning the day of their scheduled follow-up visit 10-14 days later.

Results

Almost all women with follow-up (97.1 %, n = 332/342) had successful abortions without the need for surgical intervention. The MLPT worked extremely well among women ≤63 days’ LMP in ruling out ongoing pregnancy (negative predictive value (NPV) =100 % (n = 298/298)) and also detecting women with ongoing pregnancies (sensitivity = 100 %; 2/2) as needing follow-up due to non-declining hCG. Among women 64-70 days’ LMP, the test also worked well in ruling out ongoing pregnancy (NPV = 96.9 % (n = 31/32) but not as well in terms of sensitivity (50 %), with only one of two ongoing pregnancies detected by MLPT as needing follow-up. Most women (95.1 %) found the MLPT to be very easy or easy to use and would consider using the MLPT again (97.4 %) if needed.

Conclusions

Self-administered pre and post MLPT are very easy for women to use and accurate in assessing medical abortion success up to 63 days’ LMP. MLPT use for medical abortion follow-up has the potential to facilitate task sharing services and eliminate the burden of routine in-person follow-up visits for the large majority of women. Additional research is warranted to explore the accuracy of the MLPT in identifying ongoing pregnancy among women with gestational ages > 63 days.

Trial registration

This study was registered on May 13, 2010, on clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01150279.

Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion

OBJECTIVES

Compare proportion lost to follow-up, successful abortion, and staff effort in women who choose office or telephone-based follow-up evaluation for medical abortion at a teaching institution.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a chart review of all medical abortions provided in the first three years of service provision. Women receiving mifepristone and misoprostol could choose office follow-up with an ultrasound evaluation one to two weeks after mifepristone or telephone follow-up with a scheduled telephone interview at one week post abortion and a second telephone call at four weeks to review the results of a home urine pregnancy test.

RESULTS

Of the 176 medical abortion patients, 105 (59.7%) chose office follow-up and 71 (40.3%) chose telephone follow-up. Office evaluation patients had higher rates of completing all required follow-up compared to telephone follow-up patients (94.3% vs 84.5%, respectively, p=.04), but proportion lost to follow-up was similar in both groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, respectively, p=1.0). Medical abortion efficacy was 94.0% and 92.5% in women who chose office and telephone follow-up, respectively. We detected two (1.2%) ongoing pregnancies, both in the office group. Staff rescheduled 15.0% of appointments in the office group. For the telephone follow-up cohort, staff made more than one phone call to 43.9% and 69.4% of women at one week and four weeks, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Proportion lost to follow-up is low in women who have the option of office or telephone follow-up after medical abortion. Women who choose telephone-based evaluation compared to office follow-up may require more staff effort for rescheduling of contact, but overall outcomes are similar.

IMPLICATIONS

Although women who choose telephone evaluation may require more rescheduling of contact as compared to office follow-up, having alternative follow-up options may decrease the proportion of women who are lost to follow-up.