Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion

Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Telemedicine in family planning care part 2 - Abortion

This Clinical Recommendation provides evidence-informed, person-centered, and equity-driven guidance to optimize medication abortion management via telemedicine in the US. Key recommendations include: We recommend telemedicine medication abortion with or without pre- or posttreatment testing as a safe option before 12 0/7 weeks of gestation. No-test telemedicine medication abortion (NTMA) and hybrid models are shown to be safe and effective (GRADE 1B). We recommend over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents as the first line for pain management for telemedicine medication abortion with consideration of opioids as needed when providing telemedicine medication abortion care (GRADE 1C). We recommend principles of noncoercive person-centered communication be applied to meet the abortion counseling needs of the person receiving care (GRADE 1B). We suggest assessing the person's desire for contraceptive counseling at the time of telemedicine medication abortion and, depending on the preference of the person receiving care, either defer it to a later time to allow for deliberation and increased autonomy or provide contraceptive counseling if desired (GRADE 2C). We recommend assessing telemedicine medication abortion completion using a standardized patient symptom checklist (such as the sample validated checklist in Table 2) two weeks after mifepristone ingestion in conjunction with a home pregnancy test (GRADE 1C). This document builds upon the Society of Family Planning Committee Statement: Telemedicine in family planning care part 1 - Background and overarching principles and parallels recommendations outlined in the Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendation: Telemedicine in family planning care part 3 - Contraception. Readers are encouraged to review parts 1 and 3 for this additional context.

Telemedicine Follow-up After Medication Management of Early Pregnancy Loss

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the feasibility of a new protocol for telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. Study Design: The study was designed to assess the feasibility of planned telemedicine follow-up after medication management of early pregnancy loss. We compared these follow-up rates with those after planned in-person follow-up of medication management of early pregnancy loss and planned telemedicine follow-up after medication abortion. We conducted a retrospective cohort study, including patients initiating medication management of early pregnancy loss <13w0d gestation and medication abortion ≤10w0d with a combination of mifepristone and misoprostol between April 1, 2020, and March 28, 2021. As part of a new clinical protocol, patients could opt for telemedicine follow-up one week after treatment and a home urine pregnancy test 4 weeks after treatment. Our primary outcome was completed follow-up as per clinical protocol. We also examined outcomes related to complications across telemedicine and in-person follow-up groups. Results: Of patients reviewed, 181 were eligible for inclusion; 75 had medication management of early pregnancy loss, and 106 had medication abortion. Thirty-six out of 75 patients elected for telemedicine follow-up after early pregnancy loss. Of patients scheduled for telemedicine follow-up, 29/36 (81%, 95% CI: 64-92) with early pregnancy loss and 64/69 (93%, 95% CI: 84-98) undergoing medication abortion completed follow-up as per protocol (p = 0.06). Completed follow-up was also similar among patients undergoing medication management of early pregnancy loss who planned for in-person follow-up (p = 0.135). Complications were rare and did not differ across early pregnancy loss and medication abortion groups. Conclusions: Telemedicine follow-up is a feasible alternative to in-person assessment after medication management of early pregnancy loss.

Medical management of early pregnancy loss with mifepristone and misoprostol in emergency departments compared to a Complex Family Planning office: Implementation of a COVID-19 institutional policy change

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the implementation of mifepristone and misoprostol for medical management of early pregnancy loss (EPL) in emergency departments (EDs) by comparing efficacy, complication, and follow-up rates for patients treated in EDs to the Complex Family Planning (CFP) outpatient office.

STUDY DESIGN

In COVID-19's first wave, we expanded medical management of EPL to our EDs. This retrospective study evaluated 72 patients receiving mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL from April 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021, comparing treatment success, safety outcomes, and follow-up rates by location.

RESULTS

Thirty-three (46%) patients received care in the ED and 39 (54%) at CFP. Treatment success was lower in EDs (23, 70%) compared to CFP (34, 87%), but after adjusting for insurance status and pregnancy type (miscarriage, uncertain viability, unknown location), this was not significant: adjusted odds ratio 0.48 (95% CI 0.13-1.81). More ED patients underwent emergent interventions (3 vs 0) including two emergent uterine aspirations, one uterine artery embolization, and two blood transfusions. Two cases were attributed to misdiagnosis (cesarean scar and cervical ectopic pregnancies interpreted as incomplete miscarriages) and one to guideline nonadherence. No complications occurred in the CFP group. Follow-up rates were over 80% in both groups. More ED patients engaged in telehealth follow-up (67% vs 18%, p ≤ 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this small sample, we observed a trend toward less successful treatment in the ED compared to the CFP office. Both correctly making uncommon diagnoses and adhering to new guidelines presented implementation challenges.

IMPLICATIONS

Implementing mifepristone and misoprostol for EPL in our EDs achieved lower rates of pregnancy resolution compared to outpatient management. Complex uncommon diagnoses and implementing new care pathways in EDs may have contributed to complications and highlighted opportunities for improvement. Additional studies are needed to further quantify safety outcomes for EPL management in EDs.

Medication Abortion Follow-Up Rates in a Rural Population Before and After Introduction of a Remote Follow-Up Option

Background: Medication abortion (MAB) follow-up historically involves visiting a health care facility for ultrasonography or laboratory testing. In rural states such as New Mexico, many patients travel hours for MAB, making two visits burdensome. Studies demonstrate feasibility, safety, and patient preference for remote follow-up. Materials and Methods: We evaluated whether MAB follow-up by telephone had noninferior loss-to-follow-up (LTFU) rates compared with ultrasonography or laboratory follow-up in a rural population. This was a retrospective chart review of University of New Mexico MAB LTFU rates after changing to telephone follow-up (home group, n = 136). Patients were propensity-matched in a 1:2 ratio to a historical cohort (health care group, n = 272) to eliminate significant differences. We defined LTFU as no contact within 50 days. We evaluated complications requiring intervention, possible ongoing pregnancy, completion of the home follow-up protocol (7- and 30-day calls, high-sensitivity urine pregnancy test [UPT]), follow-up by intended method (home or health care), and number of call attempts. Results: LTFU rates for the home group (n = 23, 17%) were noninferior to the health care group (n = 60, 22%, p = 0.24). Rates of complications requiring intervention (p = 0.83) and possible ongoing pregnancy (p = 0.72) among the home group were similar to the health care group. Ninety-seven (71%) home group patients completed the initial call, 79 (58%) completed the UPT, and 86 (69%) completed the 30-day call. Ninety-five (70%) home group patients followed up by intended method, comparable with the health care group (n = 199, 73%, p = 0.56). Staff made a median of 3 (interquartile range: 2-4) calls per home group patient. Conclusions: Remote MAB LTFU rates were noninferior to in-person LTFU rates.

The Provision of Abortion Care via Telehealth in the United States: A Rapid Review

INTRODUCTION

The recent Supreme Court decision Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health that has overruled Roe v. Wade has resulted in severe limitations of abortion access throughout the United States. Telehealth has been put forth as one solution for improving access for reproductive health care, including abortion services. Telehealth has demonstrated safety and efficacy in several health care disciplines; however, its use for abortion care and services has not been explored and synthesized.

METHODS

As part of a larger review on telehealth and general reproductive health, our team identified a moderate amount of literature on telehealth and abortion care. We conducted a rapid review searching for eligible studies in MEDLINE, Embase, and CINAHL. Information was extracted from each included study to explore 4 key areas of inquiry: (1) clinical effectiveness, (2) patient and provider experiences, (3) barriers and facilitators, and (4) the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.

RESULTS

Twenty-five studies on the use of telehealth for providing abortion services published between 2011 and 2022 were included. Telehealth for medical abortion increased during the COVID-19 pandemic and was found to be safe and clinically effective, with high patient satisfaction. Overall, telehealth improved access and removed barriers for patients including lack of transportation. Legal restrictions in certain states were cited as the primary barriers. Studies contained limited information on the perspectives and experiences of health care providers and diverse patient populations.

DISCUSSION

Abortion care via telehealth is safe and effective with high satisfaction and may also remove barriers to care including transportation and fear. Removing restrictions on telehealth for the provision of abortion services may further improve access to care and promote greater health equity.

Vaginal Bleeding Before 20 Weeks Gestation

Conditions that often present with vaginal bleeding before 20 weeks are common and can cause morbidity and mortality. Clinically stable patients can choose their management options. Clinically unstable patients require urgent procedural management: uterine aspiration, dilation and evacuation, or surgical removal of an ectopic pregnancy. Septic abortion requires prompt procedural management, intravenous antibiotics, and intravenous fluids. Available data on prognosis with expectant management of pre-viable rupture of membranes in the United States are poor for mothers and fetuses.

Implications of using home urine pregnancy tests versus facility-based tests for assessment of outcome following medication abortion provided via telemedicine

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether planning high-sensitivity urine pregnancy tests (HSPT) rather than facility-based tests for medication abortion follow-up may increase risk of unplanned clinical visits or procedural completion of the abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from the TelAbortion Project, a 5-year study assessing the safety and feasibility of providing mifepristone and misoprostol by telemedicine and mail in the United States. We categorized participants by whether the pretreatment follow-up plan included HSPT at home 3-5 weeks after treatment or facility-based tests (ultrasound or serum human chorionic gonadotropin) within 2 weeks after treatment. We used multivariable logistic regression to compare likelihood of post-treatment unplanned, abortion-related clinical visits and procedural intervention in these groups.

RESULTS

Of 1324 patients who planned HSPT follow-up and 576 who planned facility-based tests, 85% and 83%, respectively, provided outcome information. Post-treatment clinical visits were less frequent in the HSPT group (19%) than in the facility-based test group (79%); most of the latter were to obtain the planned test. However, unplanned, abortion-related visits were significantly more common in the HSPT group (adjusted risk difference: 6.5%; p < 0.01). The likelihood of procedural completion did not differ by group. Planned follow-up test was not associated with delay in procedural completion or detection of ongoing pregnancy.

CONCLUSIONS

Follow-up of medication abortion with home HSPT was associated with fewer post-treatment clinical visits, modestly more unplanned, abortion-related clinical visits, and no increase in the risk of procedural interventions or delayed identification or management of treatment failures. This option is an appropriate follow-up approach after medication abortion.

IMPLICATIONS

Use of home high-sensitivity pregnancy tests rather than facility-based tests for outcome assessment after medication abortion is associated with a modest increase in unplanned clinical visits but does not lead to an increase in procedural interventions or delays identification and management of treatment failure.

Update on medication abortion follow-up options: many sizes to fit all

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To assess the efficacy, benefits, and limitations of available and emerging follow-up options for medication abortion.

RECENT FINDINGS

Medication abortion follow-up does not have to be a 'one size fits all' protocol. From most to least invasive, follow-up options include facility-based ultrasound, laboratory-based repeat serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) testing, urine hCG testing (high sensitivity, low sensitivity, and multilevel pregnancy tests), self-assessment with symptom evaluation, and no intervention. Provider or facility-dependent follow-up, including ultrasound and serum testing are effective, but have several limitations, including needing to return to a facility and cost. Remote, client-led follow-up options, such as urine pregnancy testing and symptoms evaluation, are well tolerated and effective for ruling out the rare outcome of ongoing pregnancy after medication abortion and have several advantages. Advantages include being inexpensive and flexible. However, it is important to note that low-sensitivity and multilevel pregnancy tests are not available in all settings. In studies evaluating client-led follow-up with urine pregnancy tests, ongoing pregnancies were identified over half the time with symptoms alone.

SUMMARY

Guidelines from several professional organizations have aligned with the evidence and no longer recommend routine office-based follow-up. To ensure care is person-centered, providers should offer follow-up options that align with the comfort, logistical ability, and values of the client.

Self-testing for pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Urine pregnancy tests are often inaccessible in low-income settings. Expanded provision of home pregnancy testing could support self-care options for sexual and reproductive health and rights. We conducted a systematic review of pregnancy self-testing effectiveness, values and preferences and cost.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis using the Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHL, LILACS and EMBASE and four trial registries were searched through 2 November 2020.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

We included trials and observational studies that compared urine self-testing for pregnancy to health worker-led pregnancy testing on effectiveness outcomes; quantitative and qualitative studies describing values and preferences of end users and health workers and costs of pregnancy self-testing.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two independent reviewers used standardised methods to search, screen and code included studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration and Evidence Project tools. Meta-analysis was conducted using random effects models. Findings were summarised in GRADE evidence profiles and synthesised qualitatively.

RESULTS

For effectiveness, four randomised trials following 5493 individuals after medical abortion showed no difference or improvements in loss to follow-up with home pregnancy self-testing compared with return clinic visits. One additional trial of community health workers offering home pregnancy tests showed a significant increase in pregnancy knowledge and antenatal counselling among 506 clients. Eighteen diverse values and preferences studies found support for pregnancy self-testing because of quick results, convenience, confidentiality/privacy, cost and accuracy. Most individuals receiving pregnancy self-tests for postabortion home management preferred this option. No studies reported cost data.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy self-testing is acceptable and valued by end users. Effectiveness data come mostly from articles on postabortion care, and cost data are lacking. Greater availability of pregnancy self-tests, including in postabortion care and CHW programs, may lead to improved health outcomes.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42021231656.

Medication Abortion With Pharmacist Dispensing of Mifepristone

Medication abortion with pharmacist-dispensed mifepristone is effective, with a low prevalence of adverse events, and patients are satisfied with the model of care.

To estimate effectiveness and acceptability of medication abortion with mifepristone dispensed by pharmacists.

"False positive" urine pregnancy test results after successful medication abortion

OBJECTIVE

To examine the proportion of high-sensitivity urine pregnancy test (HSPT) results that were positive by time after successful medication abortion.

STUDY DESIGN

We used data from an ongoing study that provides mifepristone and misoprostol for medication abortion by direct-to-patient telemedicine and mail. Providers evaluated abortion outcomes by patient interview and clinical tests per clinical judgment and participant preference. We identified all participants enrolled July 2016 to September, 2020 who had an HSPT result and no indication of viable pregnancy after treatment. We used logistic regression to examine the association between the timing of the initial post-treatment HSPT, gestational age, and the proportion of HSPTs that gave a positive result.

RESULTS

Of the 472 participants in our analysis, 88 (19%) had positive initial HSPTs. The proportions that were positive at ≤20 days, 21 to 27 days, 28 to 34 days, and ≥35 days after mifepristone ingestion was 14 of 29 (48%), 15 of 58 (26%), 49 of 258 (19%), and 10 of 127 (8%), respectively (p < 0.001). Gestational age at mifepristone ingestion was not significantly related to positive HSPT results (p = 0.28). Multivariable logistic regression confirmed both findings and did not identify a statistically significant interaction between these variables. In the 67 participants who relied solely on further HSPTs to confirm abortion outcome, the median interval between the initial positive test and first negative test was 14 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The proportion of participants with positive HSPTs declined with time after successful medication abortion. However, nearly one-fifth of participants with complete abortion had positive tests 4 weeks after treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

HSPTs provide an inexpensive, convenient option for confirming success of medication abortion at home. However, a substantial minority of patients without ongoing pregnancy have positive HSPT results. Development of a symptom-based strategy for medication abortion outcome assessment without any confirmatory tests should be a priority.

Comparison of two home pregnancy tests for self-confirmation of medication abortion status: A randomized trial

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate individuals' ability to perform and comprehend low-sensitivity and multilevel urine pregnancy tests during medication abortion follow-up.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a pilot study of individuals using mifepristone and misoprostol for medication abortion through 63-days gestation. We randomly assigned participants to use a 1000 mIU/mL low-sensitivity pregnancy test or a five-level multilevel pregnancy test. Seven days after mifepristone, participants performed their test and completed a questionnaire. One week later, participants performed another test if day 7 low-sensitivity test had been positive or day 7 multilevel test had not shown a one-level drop. We assessed comprehension of abortion status based on participants' final test interpretation, and defined correct comprehension when patient report of pregnancy status was consistent with pregnancy test result. We also assessed usability with a 100-mm Visual Analogue Scale (0 'very easy'; 100 'very difficult') and satisfaction.

RESULTS

We enrolled and randomized 88 participants to low-sensitivity (n = 43) and multilevel (n = 45) test groups. Comprehension was correct in 38/39 (97%) and 41/45 (91%) of low-sensitivity and multilevel test users, respectively (p = 0.37). When the test indicated a possible ongoing pregnancy, all three low-sensitivity test users and two of three multilevel test users accurately comprehended their results. Participants rated ease of use as 7.5 (range 0-68) for low-sensitivity and 9.0 (range 0-52) for multilevel (p = 0.24) tests. Most participants were likely or very likely to recommend use of their test (32/36 [89%] low-sensitivity and 42/44 [95%] multilevel test users, p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients could comprehend and use low-sensitivity and multilevel tests during medication abortion follow-up with similar satisfaction.

IMPLICATIONS

Individuals are able to independently use both the low-sensitivity and multilevel tests for medication abortion follow-up. Both are acceptable for medication abortion follow-up without in-person contact, but future, larger studies to compare comprehension of both tests may be necessary.

Barriers and Enablers to Family Physicians' Provision of Early Pregnancy Loss Management in the United States

BACKGROUND

Early pregnancy loss (EPL) is a common experience. Treatment options include expectant management, medication, and uterine aspiration. Although family physicians can offer comprehensive EPL treatment in their office-based settings, few actually do. This study explored the postresidency provision of EPL management and factors that inhibit or enable providing this care among family physicians trained in early abortion during residency.

METHODS

Using an exploratory sequential mixed-methods design, we studied a sample of family physicians trained in early abortion during residency. We initially interviewed a subset trained in uterine aspiration during residency, then surveyed the entire sample. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using grounded theory; results informed survey development. On survey responses, we used Pearson χ² to examine the association between certain variables and provision of EPL care options.

RESULTS

Most of the 15 interview and 231 survey respondents provided expectant management of EPL. Of the survey respondents, 47.2% provided medication management and 11.4% manual vacuum aspiration. Key challenges and facilitators involved referral, training, ultrasound access, and managing systems-level issues. In bivariate analyses, providing prenatal care, offering abortion care, access to ultrasound, and competency were positively associated with providing EPL management options (p < .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical training alone is insufficient to expand access to comprehensive EPL care in family medicine office-based settings. Supporting family physicians during and after residency with training and technical assistance to address barriers to care may strengthen their abilities to champion practice change and expand access to comprehensive EPL management options.

Special ambulatory gynecologic considerations in the era of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and implications for future practice

The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has altered medical practice in unprecedented ways. Although much of the emphasis in obstetrics and gynecology to date has been on the as yet uncertain effects of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy and on changes to surgical management, the pandemic has broad implications for ambulatory gynecologic care. In this article, we review important ambulatory gynecologic topics such as safety and mental health, reproductive life planning, sexually transmitted infections, and routine screening for breast and cervical cancer. For each topic, we review how care may be modified during the pandemic, provide recommendations when possible on how to ensure continued access to comprehensive healthcare at this time, and discuss ways that future practice may change. Social distancing requirements may place patients at higher risk for intimate partner violence and mental health concerns, threaten continued access to contraception and abortion services, affect prepregnancy planning, interrupt routine screening for breast and cervical cancer, increase risk of sexually transmitted infection acquisition and decrease access to treatment, and exacerbate already underlying racial and minority disparities in care and health outcomes. We advocate for increased use of telemedicine services with increased screening for intimate partner violence and depression using validated questionnaires. Appointments for long-acting contraceptive insertions can be prioritized. Easier access to patient-controlled injectable contraception and pharmacist-provided hormonal contraception can be facilitated. Reproductive healthcare access can be ensured through reducing needs for ultrasonography and laboratory testing for certain eligible patients desiring abortion and conducting phone follow-up for medication abortions. Priority for in-person appointments should be given to patients with sexually transmitted infection symptoms, particularly if at risk for complications, while also offering expedited partner therapy. Although routine mammography screening and cervical cancer screening may be safely delayed, we discuss society guideline recommendations for higher-risk populations. There may be an increasing role for patient-collected human papillomavirus self-samples using new cervical cancer screening guidelines that can be expanded considering the pandemic situation. Although the pandemic has strained our healthcare system, it also affords ambulatory clinicians with opportunities to expand care to vulnerable populations in ways that were previously underutilized to improve health equity.

Medication Abortion Up to 70 Days of Gestation

Medication abortion, also referred to as medical abortion, is a safe and effective method of providing abortion. Medication abortion involves the use of medicines rather than uterine aspiration to induce an abortion. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved medication abortion regimen includes mifepristone and misoprostol. The purpose of this document is to provide updated evidence-based guidance on the provision of medication abortion up to 70 days (or 10 weeks) of gestation. Information about medication abortion after 70 days of gestation is provided in other ACOG publications [1].

Telemedicine for Family Planning: A Scoping Review

Telemedicine has the potential to increase access to family planning. The most common application involved the use of text message reminders and mobile apps. Text messaging increased knowledge in a variety of settings, but had no effect on contraceptive uptake and use. Two randomized studies found that text messaging improved continuation of oral contraceptives and injectables. Telemedicine provision of medication abortion included both clinic-to-clinic and direct-to-patient models of care. Telemedicine provision of medication abortion has been found to be equally safe and effective as in-person provision. Some measures of satisfaction are higher with telemedicine. Telemedicine may improve access to early abortion.

Comparing telemedicine to in-clinic medication abortions induced with mifepristone and misoprostol

Objective

The objective was to compare the practical aspects of providing medication abortions through telemedicine and in-person clinic visits so that clinics can use this information when planning to add this service.

Study design

We conducted a comparative retrospective chart review comparing telemedicine medication abortions to a control group matched for date seen. We extracted and compared demographics, use of dating ultrasound, outcomes and unscheduled visits or communications with staff and physicians.

Results

During the study period, we provided 4340 medication abortions, of which 182 (4.2%) were provided through by telemedicine; 199 patients met the criteria to be in the control group. The mean age was 28.7 years for telemedicine patients and 28.1 years for in-person patients (p = .38). The mean gestational ages were also similar, 48.2 days for telemedicine patients and 46.5 days for in-person patients (p = .03). Only 33 (18.1%) of telemedicine patients had dating ultrasounds compared to 199 (100%) of in-clinic patients (p < .001). The proportions of documented completed abortions (164/182, 90.1% and 179/199, 89.9%, p = .76) were similar, as were the proportions of aspirations for completion (6/182, 3.3% and 9/199, 4.5%, p = .54) and the proportions lost to follow-up (5.5% and 6.6%, p = .66). There were 10 complications in each group (5.5% of telemedicine patients and 5.0% of in-clinic patients) (p > 0.5). Unscheduled communications with office assistants were greater in the telemedicine patients than the in-person patients (84/182, 46.2% vs. 43/199, 21.6% in-person, p < .001).

Conclusion

We found that telemedicine patients required more unscheduled communications and received ultrasounds far less often compared to in-clinic patients.

Implications

We could provide telemedicine without the need for ultrasound to most women. Larger studies without routine ultrasound use are needed to validate our findings. Unscheduled communication with clinic staff was more frequent with telemedicine medication abortion patients. This information may help clinics when planning to add this service.

Follow-up Rates and Contraceptive Choices after Medical Abortion in Adolescents at Cook County Hospital

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine follow-up rates for adolescent patients who underwent medical abortion compared with adult patients, identify patient factors associated with follow-up, and evaluate contraceptive choices at the time of follow-up.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A retrospective cohort study of adolescent patients (ages 15-19 years) who underwent first-trimester medical abortions at John H. Stroger, Jr. Hospital of Cook County from 2014 through 2017.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Rate of follow-up after medical abortion, demographic factors associated with higher follow-up rates, and contraceptive choices by adolescents at follow-up encounters.

RESULTS

During the study period, 8111 medication abortions were performed in our clinic. Adolescents accounted for 446 of these patients (446/8111; 5.5%). Among adolescents, the follow-up rate was 231/446 (51.8%). We determined the follow-up rates among a random sample of patients ages 20-24 years (n = 494) and 25-39 years (n = 397) to be 213/494 (43.1%), and 161/397 (40.5%), respectively. African American adolescents were significantly less likely to follow-up compared with their Hispanic and white counterparts (relative risk, 0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.89). Those enrolled in college were significantly more likely to follow-up compared with those who reported lower levels of education (relative risk, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-1.9). Only 2.5% of adolescents reported ever using a tier 1 contraception option before presenting for an abortion and among those who did follow-up, only 18% chose a tier 1 option for ongoing pregnancy prevention.

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of our adolescent study population is at risk for undetected failed medical abortion and subsequent unplanned pregnancy.

Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review

Background

Telemedicine is increasingly being used to access abortion services.

Objective

To assess the success rate, safety, and acceptability for women and providers of medical abortion using telemedicine.

Search strategy

We searched PubMed, EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Web of Science up until 10 November 2017.

Study criteria

We selected studies where telemedicine was used for comprehensive medical abortion services, i.e. assessment/counselling, treatment, and follow up, reporting on success rate (continuing pregnancy, complete abortion, and surgical evacuation), safety (rate of blood transfusion and hospitalisation) or acceptability (satisfaction, dissatisfaction, and recommendation of the service).

Data collection and analysis

Quantitative outcomes were summarised as a range of median rates. Qualitative data were summarised in a narrative synthesis.

Main results

Rates relevant to success rate, safety, and acceptability outcomes for women ≤10⁺⁰ weeks’ gestation (GW) ranged from 0 to 1.9% for continuing pregnancy, 93.8 to 96.4% for complete abortion, 0.9 to 19.3% for surgical evacuation, 0 to 0.7% for blood transfusion, 0.07 to 2.8% for hospitalisation, 64 to 100% for satisfaction, 0.2 to 2.3% for dissatisfaction, and 90 to 98% for recommendation of the service. Rates in studies also including women >10⁺⁰GW ranged from 1.3 to 2.3% for continuing pregnancy, 8.5 to 20.9% for surgical evacuation, and 90 to 100% for satisfaction. Qualitative studies on acceptability showed no negative impacts for women or providers.

Conclusion

Based on a synthesis of mainly self‐reported data, medical abortion through telemedicine seems to be highly acceptable to women and providers, success rate and safety outcomes are similar to those reported in literature for in‐person abortion care, and surgical evacuation rates are higher.

Tweetable abstract

A systematic review of medical abortion through telemedicine shows outcome rates similar to in‐person care.

A systematic review of medical abortion through telemedicine shows outcome rates similar to in‐person care.

Low-sensitivity urine pregnancy testing to assess medical abortion outcome: A systematic review

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to summarize data on the accuracy and acceptability of a strategy for identifying ongoing pregnancy after medical abortion treatment using a low-sensitivity pregnancy test (LSPT).

STUDY DESIGN

We searched PubMed to identify studies that evaluated the use of a single posttreatment LSPT for detection of ongoing pregnancy after treatment with mifepristone and misoprostol. We extracted, assessed and summarized data from each study.

RESULTS

We found 10 studies that evaluated 6 LSPTs with human chorionic gonadotropin detection thresholds of 1000, 1500 or 2000 mIU/mL. The three earliest studies compared the pregnancy test strategy to standard assessment in the same women; the sensitivity of a positive or invalid LSPT result for detecting ongoing pregnancy ranged from 67% to 100%. Three randomized trials found no significant difference in detection of ongoing pregnancy between the LSPT strategy and routine in-person follow-up. Four noncomparative studies found that of the 12 women who had ongoing pregnancies diagnosed after performing an LSPT, 8 (67%) had positive or invalid LSPT results. Across the 10 studies, 30 of the 59 total ongoing pregnancies (51%) were identified based on symptoms without a positive or invalid LSPT result. Women expressed satisfaction with the LSPT strategy. Risk of bias in the seven later studies was high.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite their limitations, most studies showed that the LSPT strategy had moderate sensitivity for identifying ongoing pregnancy and can enable the majority of medical abortion patients to assess treatment outcome at home. However, the LSPT itself had a limited role in the detection of treatment failures in the studies.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

The LSPT strategy shows promise for reducing the need for in-person follow-up after medical abortion. A range of home-based options should be validated to meet the varied needs of women and abortion providers in diverse settings.