Contraceptive method use among HIV-positive women in a US urban outpatient clinic: an exploratory cross-sectional study

Reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Black women living with HIV account for a higher proportion of new HIV diagnoses than other groups. These women experience restricted access to reproductive services and inadequate support from healthcare providers because their position in society is based on their sexual health and social identity in the context of this stigmatizing chronic disease. By recognizing the analytical relevance of intersectionality, the reproductive decision-making of Black women can be explored as a social phenomenon of society with varied positionality.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to synthesize the evidence about the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV in high-income countries from the beginning of the HIV epidemic to the present.

METHODS

This systematic review was guided by the JBI evidence synthesis recommendations. Searches were completed in seven databases from 1985 to 2021, and the review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD420180919).

RESULTS

Of 3503 records, 22 studies were chosen for synthesis, including 19 observational and three qualitative designs. Nearly, all studies originated from the United States; the earliest was reported in 1995. Few studies provided detailed sociodemographic data or subgroup analysis focused on race or ethnicity. Influencing factors for reproductive decision-making were organized into the following seven categories: ethnicity, race, and pregnancy; religion and spirituality; attitudes and beliefs about antiretroviral therapy; supportive people; motherhood and fulfillment; reproductive planning; and health and wellness.

CONCLUSION

No major differences were identified in the reproductive decision-making of Black women living with HIV. Even though Black women were the largest group of women living with HIV, no studies reported a subgroup analysis, and few studies detailed sociodemographic information specific to Black women. In the future, institutional review boards should require a subgroup analysis for Black women when they are included as participants in larger studies of women living with HIV.

Long-acting reversible contraception knowledge, attitudes and use among HIV-infected and -uninfected women and their providers

OBJECTIVE(S)

To describe differences in contraceptive knowledge, attitudes and use among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women served by an academic medical center in New York City and to describe gaps in knowledge and practice of gynecologic and HIV clinicians providing care at the same clinic sites where patients completed surveys.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a survey comparing contraceptive knowledge, attitudes, reproductive histories and long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) use in HIV-infected and -uninfected women. We also conducted a survey to elicit clinician demographic characteristics and education, contraceptive practice patterns and their knowledge of current contraceptive guidelines. We surveyed clinicians and patients at five ambulatory sites.

RESULTS

We screened 90% of patients approached. All 257 women who were eligible completed a survey. These included 107 (42%) HIV-infected women and 150 (58%) HIV-uninfected women. HIV-infected women were older, were more likely to be black/African-American, were less likely to be Latina, were more likely to receive public assistance and had lower educational attainment. HIV-infected women reported lower lifetime LARC use (12% vs. 28%) and higher recent condom use (58% vs. 25%) than HIV-uninfected women. Both groups reported similar attitudes toward intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants. HIV clinicians were less likely to have had training in or discuss LARC methods with their patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HIV-infected women were less likely to be current (last 30 days) or ever LARC users, despite having similar attitudes toward IUDs and implants, compared to HIV-uninfected women. HIV providers had lower levels of knowledge of HIV-specific contraceptive guidelines compared with gynecology practitioners.

IMPLICATIONS

HIV-infected women and their providers share a knowledge gap regarding LARC. Increased interdisciplinary collaboration may help mitigate the resulting disparities in access to highly effective contraception in HIV-infected women. Knowledge of HIV-specific contraceptive guidelines and ability to place contraceptive implants were low among all surveyed providers, suggesting need for additional training.