Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017

Intrauterine Devices: Take Up and Discontinuation in a Time of Change

OBJECTIVES

Intrauterine devices (IUDs) are a highly effective form of contraception. This paper examines who is more likely to use an IUD, who is more likely to discontinue IUD use due to dissatisfaction, and reasons for dissatisfaction, just before and after the Supreme Court's Dobbs decision that eliminated the federal right to abortion.

METHODS

This study analyzes data from the 2017-2019 and 2022-2023 National Survey of Family Growth. Changes in IUD prevalence and removal for dissatisfaction were estimated. Logistic regression was used to examine IUD use and discontinuation due to dissatisfaction. Respondents' reasons for discontinuation were explored.

RESULTS

IUD use increased very slightly but significantly, from 11.6 to 13.0%. Education, age, race, insurance status, living in a rural area, having given birth, and wanting any/more children were significant predictors of IUD use. The percentage of women who discontinued IUD use due to dissatisfaction decreased significantly, from 33.2 to 22.2%. Education and race/ethnicity were significant predictors of IUD removal. Most women who discontinued use due to dissatisfaction reported side effects.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

IUDs are an increasingly important contraceptive method in the post-Dobbs era. However, we need to keep an eye on possible patient problems with the devices, particularly side effects such as pain, bleeding, and device migration, and educate patients on these possible side effects in advance of inserting an IUD. We also need to maintain users' ability to remove their IUDs if its benefits no longer outweigh its side effects, to preserve patient autonomy and well-being.

Changes in male permanent contraception as partner access to long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) increases: an analysis of the National Survey for Family Growth, 2006-2010 versus 2017-2019

OBJECTIVE

Male permanent contraception (PC), that is, vasectomy, is an effective way of preventing pregnancy. In the United States, male PC use has historically been concentrated among higher-educated/higher-income males of White race. In the last decade, use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) has increased dramatically. We sought to understand how sociodemographic patterns of male PC have changed in the context of rising LARC use.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined the nationally representative male public use files of the National Survey for Family Growth (NSFG) across five survey waves. Our outcome was primary contraceptive use at last sexual encounter within 12 months. Using four-way multinomial logistic regressions (male PC, female PC, LARC, lower-efficacy methods), we compared sociodemographic factors predictive of male PC use versus reported partner LARC use between 2006-2010 (early) and 2017-2019 (recent) waves.

RESULTS

We included 15 964 participants. From 2006 to 2019, there were absolute declines in male PC from 8.0% to 6.8%, while male-reported partner LARC use increased three-fold, from 3.4% to 11.0%. Among the highest economic strata, use of LARC converged with male PC. In adjusted analyses, high income significantly associated with male PC use in the early wave (OR 4.6 (1.4, 14.8)), but no longer in the recent wave (OR 0.9 (0.2, 4.2)). Marital status remained a significant but declining predictor of male PC across survey waves, and instead, by 2019, number of children newly emerged as the strongest predictor of male PC use.

CONCLUSION

Sociodemographic variables associated with vasectomy use are evolving, especially among high-income earners.

Pregnancy after Tubal Sterilization in the United States, 2002 to 2015

BACKGROUND

Tubal sterilization is the most commonly used method of contraception in the United States. Because contraceptive effectiveness influences contraceptive selection, we examined typical use failure rates after tubal sterilization in the United States.

METHODS

We estimated rates of pregnancy after tubal sterilization using data from four waves of the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG), representative samples of U.S. women aged 15 to 44 years, collected in 2002, 2006 to 2010, 2011 to 2013, and 2013 to 2015. Survey weighting was used in survival analysis to examine time to first pregnancy after tubal sterilization. Data from these participants were censored after a tubal reversal procedure, infertility treatment, hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy. Reported pregnancy rates after tubal sterilization procedures were examined by using Kaplan-Meier curves and then multivariable Cox proportional-hazards models to examine the effects of age at tubal sterilization, race/ethnicity, education, Medicaid funding, and postpartum versus interval procedures.

RESULTS

Pregnancy after tubal sterilization was reported by 2.9 to 5.2% of participants across NSFG waves. In the most recent survey wave (2013 to 2015), the estimated percentage of participants with pregnancies within the first 12 months after a tubal sterilization procedure was 2.9%; at 120 months after tubal sterilization, the estimated percentage with a pregnancy was 8.4%. At all the time points examined, pregnancy after tubal sterilization was less common after postpartum procedures than after interval procedures; however, this difference was not evident in multivariable models. In multivariable models, chance of pregnancy decreased with age at time of tubal sterilization. Race/ethnicity, education, and Medicaid funding were not consistently associated with pregnancy after tubal sterilization.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that there may be nontrivial rates of pregnancy after tubal sterilization.

Neighborhood-level racialized socioeconomic deprivation and contraceptive use in the United States, 2011-2019

INTRODUCTION

The social and structural environments where people live are understudied in contraceptive research. We assessed if neighborhood measures of racialized socioeconomic deprivation are associated with contraceptive use in the United States.

METHODS

We used restricted geographic data from four waves of the National Survey of Family Growth (2011-2019) limited to non-pregnant women ages 15-44 who had sex in the last 12 months. We characterized respondent neighborhoods (census tracts) with the Index of Concentration at the Extremes (ICE), a measure of spatial social polarization, into areas of concentrated privilege (predominantly white residents living on high incomes) and deprivation (predominantly people of color living on low incomes). We used multivariable binary and multinomial logistic regression with year fixed effects to estimate adjusted associations between ICE tertile and contraceptive use and method type. We also assessed for an interactive effect of ICE and health insurance type.

RESULTS

Of the 14,396 respondents, 88.4% in neighborhoods of concentrated deprivation used any contraception, compared to 92.7% in the most privileged neighborhoods. In adjusted models, the predicted probability of using any contraception in neighborhoods of concentrated deprivation was 2.8 percentage points lower than in neighborhoods of concentrated privilege, 5.0 percentage points higher for barrier/coital dependent methods, and 4.3 percentage points lower for short-acting methods. Those with Medicaid were less likely to use any contraception than those with private insurance irrespective of neighborhood classification.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the salience of structural factors for contraceptive use and the need for continued examination of structural oppressions to inform health policy.

Postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use among active-duty, female US Army soldiers

BACKGROUND

Postpartum use of long-acting reversible contraception has been found to be effective at increasing interpregnancy intervals, reducing unintended pregnancies, and optimizing health outcomes for mothers and babies. Among female active-duty military service members, reproductive planning may be particularly important, yet little is known about postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use among active-duty soldiers.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to (1) quantify postpartum uptake of long-acting reversible contraception among active-duty female US Army soldiers and (2) identify demographic and military-specific characteristics associated with use.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study used longitudinal data of all digitally recorded health encounters for active-duty US Army soldiers from 2014 to 2017. The servicewomen included in our analysis were aged 18 to 44 years with at least one delivery and a minimum of 4 months of total observed time postdelivery within the study period. We defined postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use as initiation of use within the delivery month or in the 3 calendar months following delivery and identified likely immediate postpartum initiation via the proxy of placement recorded during the same month as delivery. We then evaluated predictors of postpartum long-acting reversible contraception use with multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 15,843 soldiers. Of those, 3162 (19.96%) initiated the use of long-acting reversible contraception in the month of or within the 3 months following delivery. Fewer than 5% of these women used immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Among women who initiated postpartum long-acting reversible contraceptive use, 1803 (57.0%) received an intrauterine device, 1328 (42.0%) received an etonogestrel implant, and 31 received both (0.98%). Soldiers of younger age, self-reported White race, and those who were married or previously married were more likely to initiate long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period. Race-stratified analyses showed that self-reported White women had the highest use rates overall. When compared with these women, the adjusted odds of postpartum use among self-reported Black and Asian or Pacific Islander women were 18% and 30% lower, respectively (both P<.001). There was also a trend of decreasing postpartum use with increasing age within each race group. Differences observed between age groups and race identities could partially be attributed to differential use of permanent contraception (sterilization), which was found to be significantly more prevalent among both women aged 30 years or older and among women who identified as Black.

CONCLUSION

Among active-duty US Army servicewomen, 1 in 5 used postpartum long-acting reversible contraception, and fewer than 5% of these women used an immediate postpartum method. Within this population with universal healthcare coverage, we observed relatively low rates of use and significant differences in the uptake of effective postpartum long-acting contraceptive methods across self-reported race categories.

Mapping Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Interventions to the Social Ecological Model: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) is one option for preventing unintended pregnancies and short interpregnancy intervals. Efforts to increase access to contraception may benefit from applying the social ecological model (SEM), a framework that considers individual, interpersonal, organizational, community, and policy influences on behavior. We aimed to summarize findings from interventions on LARC use and map interventions to SEM levels.

METHODS

We conducted a scoping review of the 2010-2020 literature in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase databases to summarize interventions that did and did not increase LARC use. Although increasing LARC use is not an appropriate goal from a reproductive autonomy standpoint, it is the stated goal of much of the research conducted to date and typically indicates an improvement in access. We mapped these interventions to SEM levels and categorized their strategies: cost support, patient counseling, administrative support, provider training, and other.

RESULTS

Of 27 interventions reviewed, 17 (63%) increased LARC use. We observed a greater proportion of interventions that increased LARC uptake among those with strategies implemented at policy (8/10 [80%]) or organizational (14/19 [74%]) SEM levels compared with interventions implemented at other SEM levels. When both individual and organizational SEM-level components were implemented, five of six interventions (83%) increased uptake. All five interventions with both organizational- and policy-level components increased LARC use. Among the 27 interventions, patient counseling (n = 12) and cost support (n = 12) were common strategies. Five of 12 interventions (42%) involving patient counseling and 11 of 12 (92%) involving cost support increased LARC use.

CONCLUSIONS

Organizational and policy SEM components and cost support strategies were most prevalent in interventions that increased LARC use. Future interventions to improve access to contraception, while respecting patient autonomy, could incorporate more than one SEM level.

Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception usage: Results from the National Survey of Family Growth

OBJECTIVE

The authors aimed to identify factors associated with long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) usage.

METHODS

The current cross-sectional study used data from the National Survey of Family Growth from 2011 to 2019. Respondents aged 15 to 44 years were included. Those with previous sterilization, infertility, or pregnant were excluded. The outcome evaluated was use of a LARC.

RESULTS

Of 61 543 814 women, 44 287 911 (72.0%) met inclusion criteria. The rate of LARC use was 13.4%. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of LARC usage were married/living with a partner (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 1.18 [95% CI, 1.02-1.37]), perceived good health (aRR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.13-1.84]), year of survey 2017 to 2019 (aRR, 1.53, [95% CI, 1.28-1.83]), one or two past pregnancies (aRR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.24-2.12]) or three or more past pregnancies (aRR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.22-2.28]), age at first live birth <20 years (aRR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.20-2.08]) or 20 to 24 years (aRR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.13-1.87]), age at onset of sexual activity 13-19 years (aRR, 1.50 [95% CI, 1.26-1.78]), and a 0- to 5-month period of nonintercourse in the past year (aRR, 1.63 [95% CI, 1.40-1.90]). Factors associated with decreased LARC usage were age ≥ 35 years (aRR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.65-0.85]), being non-Hispanic Black (aRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.62-0.89]) or non-Hispanic other (aRR, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.59-0.88]), intending to have children (aRR, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.57-0.74]), and never being sexually active (aRR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.06-0.16]).

CONCLUSIONS

Using a nationally representative sample of women in the United States, the authors identified modifiable factors associated with LARC use. Results may be used to plan interventional trials to increase LARC usage.

Patient concerns about accessing sexual and reproductive health services outside of primary care: A survey in rural and urban settings in the Pacific Northwest

OBJECTIVES

While primary care providers are a major source of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services in the United States, particularly in rural areas, not all primary care settings offer a full range of SRH services. We aimed to understand primary care patient concerns regarding accessing SRH services, including abortion care, outside of their primary care clinic and if those concerns differed by urban or rural setting.

STUDY DESIGN

An anonymous survey was distributed over a 2-week period between December 2019 to March 2020 to all adult patients in four primary care clinics in Idaho, Washington, and Wyoming. The survey assessed patient concerns regarding accessing SRH services outside of their primary care clinic and their willingness to travel to access SRH services.

RESULTS

The overall response rate was 69% (745/1086). Over 85% of respondents identified at least one concern to seeking SRH services outside of a primary care setting, with cost, insurance coverage, length of wait time, and lack of an established relationship being the most frequently reported concerns. A majority of respondents were willing to travel a maximum of 1 hour for most SRH services. Respondents from rural-serving clinics were significantly more likely to be willing to travel longer amounts of time for medication abortion, aspiration abortion, and intrauterine device placement.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight that a majority of both urban and rural primary care patients have concerns regarding accessing SRH services outside of their primary care clinic and are unwilling to travel more than 1 hour to access most SRH services.

IMPLICATIONS

A majority of primary care patients have concerns regarding accessing SRH services outside of primary care settings. Health care policy changes should aim to strengthen the SRH services available in primary care settings to alleviate the burdens primary care patients face in accessing SRH services outside of their primary care clinic, particularly for rural populations.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Intrauterine Contraception and Tubal Ligation

BACKGROUND

Tubal ligation remains common in the USA, especially among low-income patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of intrauterine contraceptives (IUC) to laparoscopic tubal ligation for Medicaid clients.

DESIGN

We partnered with patient and clinician stakeholders to conduct a retrospective cohort study using California Medicaid claims for patients who had an IUC placed or laparoscopic tubal ligation performed in 2008-2014, excluding procedures performed within 42 days of a birth. We applied log-linear (Poisson) event-history regression models for clustered person-period data to adjust for sociodemographic variables and pre-procedure health status when examining associations between these contraceptive procedures and claims related to contraceptive failure, complications, and pain in the first year post-procedure.

KEY RESULTS

We identified 35,705 patients who had a levonorgestrel IUC placed, 23,628 patients who had a copper IUC placed, and 23,965 patients who underwent laparoscopic tubal ligation. In unadjusted analyses, rates of pregnancy within 1 year were similar following levonorgestrel IUC (2.40%) or copper IUC placement (2.99%) or tubal ligation (2.64%). In adjusted analyses, compared to tubal ligation, pregnancy was less common following placement of a levonorgestrel IUC (adj IRR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.82) and similar with placement of a copper IUC (adj IRR 0.92, 95% CI 0.82-1.05). Procedural complications such as infection (0.35% vs. 2.91%) were significantly less common with IUC placement than tubal ligation. Claims for pelvic and abdominal pain decreased in frequency with time since all procedures; 6 to 12 months post-procedure, pelvic pain claims were less common after levonorgestrel IUC (adj IRR 0.69, 95% CI 0.65-0.73) or copper IUC placement (adj IRR 0.70, 95% CI 0.66-0.75) than tubal ligation.

CONCLUSIONS

IUC appears at least as effective as laparoscopic tubal ligation at 1-year post-procedure with lower rates of infection and pelvic pain 6 to 12 months post-procedure.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03438682.

Patterns in Contraceptive Use Among Women of Mexican Origin in the United States and in Mexico

OBJECTIVE

To examine current contraceptive use by parity among four ethnicity and nativity groups: non-Latina White women in the United States, Mexican-American women in the United States, foreign-born women of Mexican origin in the United States, and Mexican women in Mexico.

METHODS

We combined nationally representative data from sexually active women, aged 15-44 years, and not seeking pregnancy from the U.S. National Survey of Family Growth and the Mexican National Survey of Demographic Dynamics. This is a secondary binational analysis. Using multivariable logistic regression, we estimated the prevalence of moderately or most effective contraceptive method use (compared with least effective or no contraceptive method) by ethnicity and nativity and tested the interaction between ethnicity and nativity and parity.

RESULTS

Compared with non-Latina White women, women of Mexican origin had lower odds of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] [95% CI] Mexican-American women: 0.69 [0.54-0.87]; foreign-born women: 0.67 [0.48-0.95]; Mexican women in Mexico: 0.59 [0.40-0.87]). Among parous women, the adjusted probability of using a moderately or most effective contraceptive method was approximately 65% among all four groups. Contraceptive method use did not differ by parity among non-Latina White women. However, parous Mexican-American women were 1.5 times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods than nulliparous Mexican-American women (adjusted probability 66.1% vs 42.7%). Parous foreign-born women were 1.8 times more likely to use most or moderately effective contraceptive methods than their nulliparous counterparts (64.5% vs 36.0%), and parous Mexican women in Mexico were three times more likely to use moderately or most effective contraceptive methods (65.2% vs 21.5%).

CONCLUSION

Findings suggest that access to effective contraception is limited outside the context of childbearing for women of Mexican origin in the United States and, to an even larger extent, in Mexico.

"I just had to pay the money and be supportive": A qualitative exploration of the male-partner role in contraceptive decision-making in Salt Lake City, Utah family planning clinics

OBJECTIVES

Peers and intimate partners can influence contraceptive decision-making and use. We aimed to explore the male-partner role in contraceptive decision-making, and describe ideal male-partner roles and how they relate to contraceptive use, specifically uptake of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

STUDY DESIGN

We used a phenomenological approach to explore cis-hetero partner involvement in contraceptive decision-making and conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews with 30 cisgender women and 30 cisgender men in heterosexual relationships who presented to Salt Lake City family planning clinics. Participants, stratified by sex assigned at birth and current contraceptive method (LARC vs non-LARC), described the male-partner's role in the most recent contraceptive decision and discussed how ideal-partner involvement could look in contraceptive decision-making. We iteratively developed a codebook and identified dominant themes using a constant content and comparative analysis.

RESULTS

We did not identify thematic differences by LARC vs non-LARC users. Participants universally considered that contraceptive responsibility falls on women. At the time of the interviews, both men and women indicated a strong desire to prevent pregnancy, and felt that men's actual contributions to decision-making were limited. Themes around gendered-differences of contraceptive knowledge, responsibility and risk, and sexual priorities emerged, as well as inadequate knowledge and contraception options for men. In analyzing discussion around ideal partner support, participants suggested emotional, financial, and logistical support options and placed high importance on interpersonal communication.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to use a method of LARC did not influence sentiments around male-partner involvement or stated desire for partner involvement. Limited contraceptive knowledge and male options restrict the contraceptive decision-making role and contraceptive engagement for men, although participants suggested other supportive options.

IMPLICATIONS

This work suggests the desire of both men and women for men to participate in contraceptive decision-making, but their role remains limited. Future interventions focused on comprehensive contraceptive education and modeling of communication strategies for men are tangible steps to support men in this role.

Barriers for multiparous women to using long-term contraceptive methods in Southeast Asia: case study in Philippines and Indonesia

Background

Multiparous women are supposed to be able to end their reproductive cycle to decrease population growth. This study aimed to analyze barriers for multiparous women to use long-term contraceptive methods (LTCM) in the Philippines and Indonesia.

Methods

The study population was women aged 15–49 years old who have given birth to a live baby > 1 in the Philippines and Indonesia. The weighted sample size was 12,085 Philippines women and 25,543 Indonesian women. To identify variables associated with the use of LTCM, we analyzed place of residence, age group, education level, marital status, employment status, and wealth status. The final step employed multinomial logistic regression.

Results

In both countries, the results showed that variables associated with non-user LTCM were younger women, living in rural areas with poor education. Women without partner and unemployed had higher probability to not use LTCM. Finally, low wealth status had a higher probability than the richest multiparous to not use LTCM.

Conclusion

The study concluded that there were six barriers for multiparous women to use LTCM in the Philippines and Indonesia. The six obstacles were living in rural areas, being younger, poor education, single, unemployed, and low wealth.

Results of the National Contraception Survey Conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción (2020)

Background: The National Contraception Survey conducted by Sociedad Española de Contracepción intends to know the sexual and contraceptive habits of Spanish women of reproductive age. Methods: A descriptive and cross-sectional study with random sample selection was conducted with women aged from 14 to 49 years old in July and August 2020. Results: A total of 1801 women participated in the study, of which 78.7% used some contraception method during their sexual relationships. The most frequently used methods were condoms (31.3%) and combined oral contraceptives (18.5%) at their last sexual encounter. A total of 25.7% used both condoms and pills, especially younger women and those who had no steady partners (p < 0.001). Use of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptives continues to be low, although a slight increase in their use is observed, and they are recommended for 50% of the users who need contraception. Counselling on contraception was provided to 64.3% of the women, mainly by their gynaecologists. Regarding the decision to use a contraceptive method, the one suggested by health professionals was more influential, although this was not the case for women aged less than 20 years old (p < 0.001). A total of 38.4% of the women have used emergency oral contraception at least once and 66.8% of those who do not make continuous use of contraception methods do so out of personal choice. Conclusions: It is necessary to deepen work on counselling and awareness among the population towards the use of efficient contraceptive methods that prevent unplanned pregnancies.

Delivery at Catholic hospitals and postpartum contraception use, five US states, 2015-2018

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate whether the prevalence of postpartum contraceptive use was lower among people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.

METHODS

We linked 2015-2018 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey data from five states to hospital information from the corresponding birth certificate file. People with a live birth self-reported their use of contraception methods on the PRAMS survey at 2-6 months postpartum, which we coded into two dichotomous (yes vs. no) outcomes for use of female sterilization and highly-effective contraception (female/male sterilization, intrauterine device, implant, injectable, oral contraception, patch, or ring). We conducted multilevel log-binomial regression to examine the relationship between birth hospital type and postpartum contraception use adjusting for confounders.

RESULTS

Prevalence of female sterilization for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital was 51% lower than that of their counterparts delivering at a non-Catholic hospital (adjusted prevalence ratio: 0.49; 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.65).

CONCLUSION

We found lower use of postpartum female sterilization, but no difference in highly effective contraception overall, for people who delivered at a Catholic hospital compared to a non-Catholic hospital.

Postpartum permanent contraception: updates on policy and access

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe barriers to provision of postpartum permanent contraception at patient, hospital, and insurance levels.

RECENT FINDINGS

Permanent contraception remains the most commonly used form of contraception in the United States with the majority of procedures performed during birth-hospitalization. Many people live in regions with a high Catholic hospital market share where individual contraceptive plans may be refused based on religious doctrine. Obesity should not preclude an individual from receiving a postpartum tubal ligation as recent studies find that operative time is clinically similar with no increased risk of complications in obese compared with nonobese people. The largest barrier to provision of permanent contraception remains the federally mandated consent for sterilization for those with Medicaid insurance. State variation in enforcement of the Medicaid policy additionally contributes to unequal access and physician reimbursement. Although significant barriers exist in policy that will take time to improve, hospital-based interventions, such as listing postpartum tubal ligation as an 'urgent' procedure or scheduling interval laparoscopic salpingectomy prior to birth-hospitalization discharge can make a significant impact in actualization of desired permanent contraception for patients.

SUMMARY

Unfulfilled requests for permanent contraception result in higher rates of unintended pregnancies, loss of self-efficacy, and higher costs. Hospital and federal policy should protect vulnerable populations while not preventing provision of desired contraception.

Knowledge and Attitudes About Sterilization and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception

OBJECTIVES

To describe understanding of the irreversible nature of permanent contraception and knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among individuals seeking and not seeking permanent contraception.

METHODS

We performed a cross-sectional survey among patients with Medicaid insurance attending an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in [location]. The survey consisted of 20 true/false and Likert questions assessing knowledge and perceptions about permanent contraception and LARC. Sixty-seven participants were needed to detect a small-to-medium Cohen's effect size f² = 0.20, with 95% power and alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Ninety potential participants were contacted and 67 were recruited. Forty-three participants desired permanent contraception and 24 did not. Approximately half of all participants were not aware that permanent contraception is irreversible. Participants who desired permanent contraception had lower LARC knowledge scores (62% correct versus 70%, p = 0.042) and more negative perceptions about LARC (54% versus 38%, p = 0.048). Fewer participants desiring permanent contraception identified LARC efficacy as equal to permanent contraception (32% versus 83%, p < 0.01), and fewer would consider using LARC (intrauterine device: 23% versus 58%, p < 0.01; implant: 16% versus 46%, p < 0.01). These differences persisted in multivariable models adjusting for age, gravidity, and parity.

CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE

Individuals who desire permanent contraception may not be aware of its permanence, or of equally effective alternatives. They were also found to have more negative perceptions of LARC in our sample. Additional research is needed to understand factors underlying these differences. Counseling practices should be tailored to ensure accurate knowledge about permanent contraception and LARC for all people seeking to avoid pregnancy.