Improving assessment of demand for postpartum tubal ligation among publicly insured women in Texas

Changes in contraceptive method mix following the Colorado Family Planning Initiative

OBJECTIVES

To describe the changes in contraceptive method use and mix among Colorado Title X clients following the 2009 Colorado Family Planning Initiative (CFPI), which allowed Colorado Title X providers to offer all contraceptive methods without medically unnecessary barriers.

STUDY DESIGN

Using data on all visits to Colorado Title X clinics between 2007 and 2016 for women aged 10-49 years, we described trends in contraceptive method use by age group and race/ethnicity prior to and following the implementation of CFPI.

RESULTS

The implementation of CFPI saw an abrupt increase in Title X visits. Visits subsequently declined steeply for non-Hispanic White clients while visits by Hispanic clients remained at elevated levels. During CFPI, the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives increased while the use of oral contraceptive pills decreased. Nonetheless, oral contraceptive pills remained the most common method used by Title X clients throughout the study period. Changes in the method mix varied by age and race/ethnicity. Method switching was relatively uncommon among established Title X clinic users.

CONCLUSIONS

CFPI, which removed financial barriers to the most expensive methods, was associated with increases in the use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and changes in method mix that varied by age group and race/ethnicity.

IMPLICATIONS

CFPI removed barriers to previously inaccessible methods that contributed to changes in the method mix at Title X clinics. That these changes were not uniform across ages and race/ethnicities emphasize that subgroup variation in family planning policy impact stems from heterogeneity in barriers to care and method-specific unmet demand.

Tubal Sterilization and Cervical Cancer Underscreening in the United States

Background: Tubal sterilization is more commonly utilized by racial/ethnic minority groups and has been implicated in underscreening for cervical cancer. The objective is to determine if prior tubal sterilization is a risk factor for cervical cancer underscreening. Methods: National Survey of Family Growth dataset from 2015 to 2019 used for analysis; data were weighted to represent the 72 million women in the U.S. population aged 22-49. Chi-square tests, Fisher exact tests, and logistic regression were used for analysis. The primary predictor variable was tubal sterilization which was categorized into no previous sterilization, sterilization completed <5 years ago, and sterilization completed ≥5 years ago. The outcome variable was underscreened versus not underscreened. Other predictor variables included age, household income as a percent of federal poverty level, previous live birth, primary care provider, and insurance status. Results: Prevalence of tubal sterilization completed 5 or more years ago was 12.5% and varied by most measured characteristics in univariate analyses. Approximately 8% of women were underscreened for cervical cancer. In multivariable analyses, women with a tubal sterilization 5 or more years ago had 2.64 times the odds (95% confidence interval = 1.75-4.00) of being underscreened for cervical cancer compared with women who did not have a tubal sterilization. Conclusions: Approximately 4.3 million women ages 22-49 in the United States are potentially underscreened for cervical cancer and women with previous tubal ligation ≥5 years ago are more likely to be underscreened. These results may inform the need for culturally sensitive public health messages informing people who have had these procedures about the need for continued screening.

Assessing the Barriers to Postpartum Tubal Ligation Among Multiparous Women

Background: Unmet demands for postpartum tubal ligation are estimated to be greater than the actual number of tubal ligations done, especially in low-resource settings. Through this study, we therefore assessed the barriers to postpartum tubal ligation in the developing world.

Materials and Methods: It is a prospective cohort study including 3671 multiparous women from northern India. Recruited patients were given survey questionnaires during their antenatal and postpartum period which evaluated the patient-related, healthcare facility-related and social factors which were the determining factors for the unfulfillment of their desire for permanent sterilization.

Results: Out of the recruited population, 1576 women wished to undergo tubal ligation. Following attrition, a total of 1024 were followed up prospectively. Of them, sterilization was successfully done only in 309 (30.18%) participants. A large proportion of mothers had their demand unmet (715 mothers; 69.82%). Out of them, 505 (70.63%) women stated that tubal ligation was not done because they did not deliver by Caesarean section. Insufficient counselling regarding tubal ligation was quoted by 325 (45.45%) mothers. Majority of the participants denied tubal ligation as they were not given enough information about the procedure (589 participants; 82.38%). While 568 (79.44%) mothers had changed their mind after delivery, 257 (35.94%) thought that their health was not fit to undergo the procedure and 213 (29.79%) mothers wanted more children in the future. We found that there was strong opposition from their male partners (56.78%).

Conclusion: Postpartum tubal ligation is of paramount importance in women with completed families, especially in developing countries. This prospective study addressed the barriers to tubal ligation, which would help combat future unintended pregnancies.