1
|
Hale N, Lee J, de Jong J, Smith MG, Khoury AJ. Contraceptive Method Use Among a Population-Based Cohort During the South Carolina Choose Well Initiative. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e248262. [PMID: 38656576 PMCID: PMC11043899 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.8262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Evaluating the impact of statewide contraceptive access initiatives is necessary for informing health policy and practice. Objective To examine changes in contraceptive method use among a cohort of women of reproductive age in South Carolina during the Choose Well contraceptive access initiative. Design, Setting, and Participants In this cohort study, baseline data from the initial Statewide Survey of Women administered from October 1, 2017, to April 30, 2018, to a probability-based sample of women of reproductive age in South Carolina and a peer state (Alabama) were linked with 3 follow-up surveys given in 2019, 2020, and 2021. Responses about contraception use from the initial survey were compared with responses across follow-up surveys using the regression-based differences-in-differences method. Data analysis was performed from October 2023 to February 2024. Exposure The South Carolina Choose Well contraceptive access initiative seeks to fill contraceptive access gaps and increase provision of a full range of contraceptive methods through engagement with a wide range of health care organizations across the state. Main Outcomes and Measures Changes in contraceptive method use, including long-acting reversible contraception (LARC), intrauterine devices (IUDs), implants, short-acting hormonal injection, and barrier or other methods between the baseline survey (2017-2018) and 3 subsequent surveys (2019-2021). Results A total of 1344 female participants (mean [SD] age, 34 [7] years) completed the first survey (667 in Alabama and 677 in South Carolina). Use of LARC significantly increased in South Carolina (119 [17.6%] to 138 [21.1%]) compared with Alabama (120 [18.0%] to 116 [18.1%]; P = .004). Use of IUDs increased in South Carolina (95 [14.0%] to 114 [17.4%]) compared with Alabama (92 [13.8%] to 102 [15.9%]; P = .003). These associations persisted in the adjusted analysis, with a significant increase in the odds of LARC (adjusted odds ratio, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.06-1.44) and IUD (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.06-1.32) use at follow-up in South Carolina compared with Alabama. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of 1344 participants, increases in the use of IUDs in South Carolina were noted after the implementation of the South Carolina Choose Well initiative that were not observed in a peer state with no intervention. Our findings may provide support in favor of statewide contraceptive access initiatives and their role in promoting access to reproductive health services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hale
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women’s Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City
| | - Jusung Lee
- College for Health, Community and Policy, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio
| | - Jordan de Jong
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women’s Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City
| | - Michael G. Smith
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women’s Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City
| | - Amal J. Khoury
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women’s Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ngumbau N, Unger JA, Wandika B, Atieno C, Beima-Sofie K, Dettinger J, Nzove E, Harrington EK, Karume AK, Osborn L, Sharma M, Richardson BA, Seth A, Udren J, Zanial N, Kinuthia J, Drake AL. Mobile solutions to Empower reproductive life planning for women living with HIV in Kenya (MWACh EMPOWER): Protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0300642. [PMID: 38557692 PMCID: PMC10984530 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Women living with HIV (WLWH) face unique reproductive health (RH) barriers which increase their risks of unmet need for contraception, contraceptive failure, unintended pregnancy, and pregnancy-related morbidity and mortality and may prevent them from achieving their reproductive goals. Patient-centered counseling interventions that support health care workers (HCWs) in providing high-quality RH counseling, tailored to the needs of WLWH, may improve reproductive health outcomes. METHODS AND DESIGN We are conducting a non-blinded cluster randomized controlled trial (cRCT) of a digital health intervention for WLWH (clinicaltrials.gov #NCT05285670). We will enroll 3,300 WLWH seeking care in 10 HIV care and treatment centers in Nairobi and Western Kenya. WLWH at intervention sites receive the Mobile WACh Empower intervention, a tablet-based RH decision-support counseling tool administered at baseline and SMS support during two years of follow-up. WLWH at control sites receive the standard of care FP counseling. The decision-support tool is a logic-based tool for family planning (FP) counseling that uses branching logic to guide RH questions based on participants' reproductive life plans, tailoring counseling based on the responses. Follow-up SMSs are based in the Information-Motivation-Behavioral (IMB) Skills model of behavioral change and are tailored to participant characteristics and reproductive needs through separate SMS "tracks". Follow-up visits are scheduled quarterly for 2 years to assess plans for pregnancy, pregnancy prevention, and contraceptive use. The primary outcome, FP discontinuation, will be compared using an intent-to-treat analysis. We will also assess the unmet need for FP, dual method use, viral load suppression at conception and unintended pregnancy. DISCUSSION The Mobile WACh Empower intervention is innovative as it combines a patient-centered counseling tool to support initial reproductive life decisions with longitudinal SMS for continued RH support and may help provide RH care within the context of provision of HIV care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Ngumbau
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jennifer A. Unger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America
| | - Brenda Wandika
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Celestine Atieno
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Kristin Beima-Sofie
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Julia Dettinger
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Emmaculate Nzove
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Elizabeth K. Harrington
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
- Department of Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Agnes K. Karume
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Lusi Osborn
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Monisha Sharma
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Barbra A. Richardson
- Departments of Biostatistics, Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Aparna Seth
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Jenna Udren
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Noor Zanial
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - John Kinuthia
- Department of Research & Programs, Kenyatta National Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Alison L. Drake
- Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hale N, Dehlendorf C, Smith MG, Stapleton J, McCartt P, Khoury AJ. Contraceptive counseling, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation among women in the U.S. southeast. Contraception 2024; 132:110365. [PMID: 38215919 DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/14/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We used the validated Person-Centered Contraceptive Counseling (PCCC) scale to examine experiences with counseling and associations between counseling quality, method satisfaction, and planned method continuation at the population level in two southeastern states. STUDY DESIGN We used data from the Statewide Survey of Women, a probability-based sample of reproductive-aged women in Alabama and South Carolina in 2017/18. We included women using a contraceptive method and reporting a contraceptive visit in the past year (n = 1265). Respondents rated their most recent provider experience across four PCCC items. Regression analyses examined relationships between counseling quality and outcomes of interest, and path analysis examined the extent to which method satisfaction mediated the effects of counseling quality on planned continuation. RESULTS Over half of participants (54%) reported optimal contraceptive counseling. Optimal counseling was associated with method satisfaction (aPR = 1.16; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.04-1.29) in adjusted models. Optimal counseling was marginally associated with planned discontinuation in the bivariate analysis but was attenuated in the adjusted model (aPR = 1.07; 95% CI = 0.98-1.18). In the path analysis, counseling quality influenced method satisfaction (0.143 (0.045), p = 0.001) which influenced planned continuation, controlling for PCCC (0.74 (0.07), p < 0.001). The total indirect effect of counseling quality on planned continuation was significant (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001), and a residual direct effect from counseling quality to planned continuation was noted (0.106 (0.03), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Counseling quality is independently associated with method satisfaction at the population level. The effect of counseling on planned continuation is partially mediated by method satisfaction. IMPLICATIONS Interventions to support person-centered contraceptive counseling promise to improve quality of care, patient experience with care, and reproductive outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Hale
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States.
| | - Christine Dehlendorf
- Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Michael G Smith
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Jerod Stapleton
- Department of Health, Behavior and Society, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
| | - Paezha McCartt
- Ballad Health, Office of Population Health, Johnson City, TN, United States
| | - Amal J Khoury
- Center for Applied Research and Evaluation in Women's Health and Department of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gomez AM, Bennett AH, Arcara J, Stern L, Bardwell J, Cadena D, Chaudhri A, Davis L, Dehlendorf C, Frederiksen B, Labiran C, McDonald-Mosley R, Rice WS, Stein TB, Valladares ES, Kavanaugh ML, Marshall C. Estimates of use of preferred contraceptive method in the United States: a population-based study. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2024; 30:100662. [PMID: 38304390 PMCID: PMC10831268 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2023.100662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2024]
Abstract
Background In the U.S. and globally, dominant metrics of contraceptive access focus on the use of certain contraceptive methods and do not address self-defined need for contraception; therefore, these metrics fail to attend to person-centeredness, a key component of healthcare quality. This study addresses this gap by presenting new data from the U.S. on preferred contraceptive method use, a person-centered contraceptive access indicator. Additionally, we examine the association between key aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Methods We fielded a nationally representative survey in the U.S. in English and Spanish in 2022, surveying non-sterile 15-44-year-olds assigned female sex at birth. Among current and prospective contraceptive users (unweighted n = 2119), we describe preferred method use, reasons for non-use, and differences in preferred method use by sociodemographic characteristics. We conduct logistic regression analyses examining the association between four aspects of person-centered healthcare access and preferred contraceptive method use. Findings A quarter (25.2%) of current and prospective users reported there was another method they would like to use, with oral contraception and vasectomy most selected. Reasons for non-use of preferred contraception included side effects (28.8%), sex-related reasons (25.1%), logistics/knowledge barriers (18.6%), safety concerns (18.3%), and cost (17.6%). In adjusted logistic regression analyses, respondents who felt they had enough information to choose appropriate contraception (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 3.31; 95% CI 2.10, 5.21), were very (AOR 9.24; 95% CI 4.29, 19.91) or somewhat confident (AOR 3.78; 95% CI 1.76, 8.12) they could obtain desired contraception, had received person-centered contraceptive counseling (AOR 1.72; 95% CI 1.33, 2.23), and had not experienced discrimination in family planning settings (AOR 1.58; 95% CI 1.13, 2.20) had increased odds of preferred contraceptive method use. Interpretation An estimated 8.1 million individuals in the U.S. are not using a preferred contraceptive method. Interventions should focus on holistic, person-centered contraceptive access, given the implications of information, self-efficacy, and discriminatory care for preferred method use. Funding Arnold Ventures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anu Manchikanti Gomez
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Ariana H. Bennett
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Jennet Arcara
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Lisa Stern
- Coalition to Expand Contraceptive Access, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Christine Dehlendorf
- Person-Centered Reproductive Health Program, Departments of Family & Community Medicine, Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | - Whitney S. Rice
- Center for Reproductive Health Research in the Southeast, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Tara B. Stein
- New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA
| | | | | | - Cassondra Marshall
- Sexual Health and Reproductive Equity Program, School of Social Welfare, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
- School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|