Novel strategies to promote resolution of inflammation to treat lower extremity artery disease

Cholinesterase and Inflammation: Exploring Its Role and Associations with Inflammatory Markers in Patients with Lower Extremity Artery Disease

Background: Inflammation is a major driver of atherosclerotic diseases including lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Serum cholinesterase (ChE) has been shown to impact cardiovascular health and regulate inflammatory processes. Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between serum ChE levels and inflammatory markers in patients with hemodynamically relevant iliac artery stenosis, assessing its potential role in the inflammatory processes of lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). Methods: In the following retrospective data analysis, we investigated 150 patients with hemodynamically relevant iliac artery stenosis as documented by a delta peak systolic velocity (δPSV) ≥ 1.4 m/s and investigated the possible influence of ChE on established inflammatory markers, such as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and hemoglobin-to-platelet ratio (HPR), along with other routine laboratory or vascular parameters. Results: ChE levels differed significantly between patients with stable claudication (Fontaine stage II) and critical ischemia (Fontaine stages III and IV): 7.76 mg/dL (6.55-8.7 mg/dL) vs. 6.77 mg/dL (5.85-7.48 mg/dL), p = 0.004. Using the spearman correlation coefficient, testing of NLR and ChE revealed a highly significant inverse correlation, with a coefficient of -0.303 (p < 0.001). Additionally, a weak inverse correlation was observed between PLR and ChE, with a coefficient of -0.162 (p = 0.049). Patients with an elevated body mass index (BMI) showed increased levels of serum ChE, with a spearman correlation coefficient of 0.298 (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The observed correlations in this study depict active inflammation in LEAD with an emphasis on patients with critical ischemia. Serum ChE could serve as a potential biomarker for inflammation in patients with LEAD, particularly in distinguishing between stable claudication and critical ischemia. Future research is needed to explore the role of ChE as a complementary biomarker, offering insights into the cholinergic regulation of inflammation in LEAD.

Influences of resolvin D1 and D2 on the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a Chinese community-based cohort study

Background

Although cellular and animal studies have reported that resolvin D1 (RvD1) and resolvin D2 (RvD2) are mechanisms involved in the development of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), the impact of RvD1 and RvD2 on the risk of T2DM at a population level remains unclear.

Methods

We included 2755 non-diabetic adults from a community-based cohort in China and followed them for seven years. Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association of RvD1 and RvD2 with T2DM probability. Time-dependent receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the predictive performance of RvD1 and RvD2 for the risk of T2DM based on the Chinese CDC T2DM prediction model (CDRS).

Results

A total of 172 incident T2DM cases were identified. Multivariate-adjusted HRs (95% CI) for T2DM across quartiles of RvD1 levels (Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4) were 1.00, 1.64 (1.03-2.63), 1.80 (1.13-2.86) and 1.61 (1.01-2.57), respectively. Additionally, body mass index (BMI) showed a significant effect modification in the association of RvD1 with incident T2DM (P _interaction = 0.026). After multivariate adjustment, the HR (95% CI) for T2DM in the fourth compared with the first quartile of RvD2 was 1.94 (95% CI: 1.24-3.03). Time-dependent ROC analysis showed that the area under time-dependent ROC curves of the "CDRS+RvD1+RvD2" model for the 3-, 5- and 7-year risk of T2DM were 0.842, 0.835 and 0.828, respectively.

Conclusions

Higher RvD1 and RvD2 levels are associated with a higher risk of T2DM at the population level.