1
|
Cirino T, Pinto L, Iwan M, Dougha A, Lučić B, Kraljević A, Navoyan Z, Tevosyan A, Yeghiazaryan H, Khondkaryan L, Abelyan N, Atoyan V, Babayan N, Iwashita Y, Kimura K, Komasaka T, Shishido K, Nakamura T, Asada M, Jain S, Zakharov AV, Wang H, Liu W, Chupakhin V, Uesawa Y. Consensus Modeling Strategies for Predicting Transthyretin Binding Affinity from Tox24 Challenge Data. Chem Res Toxicol 2025. [PMID: 40371923 DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrestox.5c00018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/16/2025]
Abstract
Transthyretin (TTR) is a key transporter of the thyroid hormone thyroxine, and chemicals that bind to TTR, displacing the hormone, can disrupt the endocrine system, even at low concentrations. This study evaluates computational modeling strategies developed during the Tox24 Challenge, using a data set of 1512 compounds tested for TTR binding affinity. Individual models from nine top-performing teams were analyzed for performance and uncertainty using regression metrics and applicability domains (AD). Consensus models were developed by averaging predictions across these models, with and without consideration of their ADs. While applying AD constraints in individual models generally improved external prediction accuracy (at the expense of reduced chemical space coverage), it had limited additional benefit for consensus models. Results showed that consensus models outperformed individual models, achieving a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 19.8% on the test set, compared to an average RMSE of 20.9% for the nine individual models. Outliers consistently identified in several of these models indicate potential experimental artifacts and/or activity cliffs, requiring further investigation. Substructure importance analysis revealed that models prioritized different chemical features, and consensus averaging harmonized these divergent perspectives. These findings highlight the value of consensus modeling in improving predictive performance and addressing model limitations. Future work should focus on expanding chemical space coverage and refining experimental data sets to support public health protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thalita Cirino
- Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences Department, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Luis Pinto
- Independent Researcher, Montreal H2Y 3Z2, Canada
| | - Mateusz Iwan
- Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan 20156, Italy
| | - Alexis Dougha
- BFA, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 8251, Inserm U1133, Paris 75013, France
| | - Bono Lučić
- Ruđer Bosković Institute, Zagreb 10000, Croatia
| | - Antonija Kraljević
- Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Computing and Electrical Engineering, University of Mostar, Mostar 88000, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zaven Navoyan
- Toxometris.ai., Glendale, California 91204 United States
| | - Ani Tevosyan
- Toxometris.ai., Glendale, California 91204 United States
| | | | - Lusine Khondkaryan
- Toxometris.ai., Glendale, California 91204 United States
- Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Yerevan 0014, Armenia
| | | | - Vahe Atoyan
- Toxometris.ai., Glendale, California 91204 United States
| | - Nelly Babayan
- Toxometris.ai., Glendale, California 91204 United States
- Institute of Molecular Biology, NAS RA, Yerevan 0014, Armenia
| | - Yuma Iwashita
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Kyosuke Kimura
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Tomoya Komasaka
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Koki Shishido
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Taichi Nakamura
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Mizuho Asada
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| | - Sankalp Jain
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS-NIH), Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
| | - Alexey V Zakharov
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS-NIH), Rockville, Maryland 20850, United States
| | - Haobo Wang
- Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Ministry of Education), Dalian Key Laboratory on Chemicals Risk Control and Pollution Prevention Technology, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
| | - Wenjia Liu
- Key Laboratory of Industrial Ecology and Environmental Engineering (Ministry of Education), Dalian Key Laboratory on Chemicals Risk Control and Pollution Prevention Technology, School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China
| | - Vladimir Chupakhin
- Cheminformatics Solutions, Simulations Plus, Lancaster, California 93534, United States
| | - Yoshihiro Uesawa
- Department of Medical Molecular Informatics, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo 204-8588, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Huizenga JM, Truong L, Semprini L. Rapid determination of chemical losses in a microplate bioassay using fluorescence spectroscopy. ANALYTICAL METHODS : ADVANCING METHODS AND APPLICATIONS 2025; 17:514-524. [PMID: 39655654 PMCID: PMC11806944 DOI: 10.1039/d4ay01980f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2025]
Abstract
The increase in production and innovation of chemicals that humans interface with has enhanced the need for rapid toxicity testing of new and existing chemicals. This need, along with efforts to reduce animal testing, has led to the development of high-throughput bioassays typically conducted in microplates. These bioassays offer time and resource advantages over traditional animal models; however, significant chemical losses can occur in microplates. Current methods for measuring chemical losses in microplates require extensive sample preparation and highly sensitive instruments. We propose the use of fluorescence spectroscopy to measure chemical losses in high-throughput bioassays as a low resource alternative to the existing methods. A fluorescent plate reader was used to develop methods for quantifying the aqueous concentrations of two chemicals, 2-hydroxynaphthalene and acridine, in microwells of a 96-well microplate. A high-throughput, 5 day embryonic zebrafish bioassay was used as the model bioassay for method development. Chemical losses were attributed to a combination of photodegradation, sorption, and uptake by the zebrafish embryos, kinetics of which were derived from a pseudo-first order model. Chemical uptake amount was calculated to be approximately 50% and 21% of the total chemical amount added for 2-hydroxynaphthalene and acridine, respectively. Unexpected cranial deformities were observed in the embryonic zebrafish, suggesting further investigation of potential additive toxicity of the ultraviolet radiation exposure from fluorescence measurements and chemical exposure is needed. Nonetheless, this novel method provides a rapid, low resource approach to measuring chemical losses in microplates that can be extended to a variety of autofluorescent chemicals and microplate-based bioassays.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliana M Huizenga
- School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, 105 SW 26th St, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
- Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, USA.
| | - Lisa Truong
- Department of Environmental and Molecular Toxicology, Oregon State University, USA.
| | - Lewis Semprini
- School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, 105 SW 26th St, Corvallis, OR, 97331, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baze A, Wiss L, Horbal L, Biemel K, Asselin L, Richert L. Comparison of in vitro thyroxine (T4) metabolism between Wistar rat and human hepatocyte cultures. Toxicol In Vitro 2024; 96:105763. [PMID: 38142784 DOI: 10.1016/j.tiv.2023.105763] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
In vitro assays remain relatively new in exploring human relevance of liver, in particular nuclear receptor-mediated perturbations of the hypothalamus-pituitary-thyroid axis seen in rodents, mainly in the rat. Consistent with in vivo data, we confirm that thyroid hormone thyroxine metabolism was 9 times higher in primary rat hepatocytes (PRH) than in primary human hepatocytes (PHH) cultured in a 2D sandwich (2Dsw) configuration. In addition, thyroxine glucuronide (T4-G) was by far the major metabolite formed in both species (99.1% in PRH and 69.7% in PHH) followed by thyroxine sulfate (T4-S, 0.7% in PRH and 18.1% in PHH) and triiodothyronine/reverse triiodothyronine (T3/rT3, 0.2% in PRH and 12.2% in PHH). After a 7-day daily exposure to orphan receptor-mediated liver inducers, T4 metabolism was strongly increased in PRH, almost exclusively through increased T4-G formation. These results were consistent with the inductions of glucuronosyltransferase Ugt2b1 and canalicular transporter Mrp2. PHH also responded to activation of the three nuclear receptors, with mainly induction of glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1 and canalicular transporter MRP2. Despite this, T4 disappearance rate and secreted T4 metabolites were only slightly increased in PHH. Overall, our data highlight that cryopreserved hepatocytes in 2Dsw culture allowing long-term exposure and species comparison are of major interest in improving liver-mediated human safety assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Baze
- KaLy-Cell SAS, 20A rue du Général Leclerc, 67115 Plobsheim, France
| | - Lucille Wiss
- KaLy-Cell SAS, 20A rue du Général Leclerc, 67115 Plobsheim, France
| | - Liliia Horbal
- Pharmacelsus GmbH, Science Park 2, 66123 Saarbrüken, Germany
| | - Klaus Biemel
- Pharmacelsus GmbH, Science Park 2, 66123 Saarbrüken, Germany
| | - Laure Asselin
- KaLy-Cell SAS, 20A rue du Général Leclerc, 67115 Plobsheim, France
| | - Lysiane Richert
- KaLy-Cell SAS, 20A rue du Général Leclerc, 67115 Plobsheim, France; Zylan SAS, 8 rue de la Haute Corniche, 67210 Obernai, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Foster MJ, Patlewicz G, Shah I, Haggard DE, Judson RS, Paul Friedman K. Evaluating structure-based activity in a high-throughput assay for steroid biosynthesis. COMPUTATIONAL TOXICOLOGY (AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS) 2022; 24:1-23. [PMID: 37841081 PMCID: PMC10569244 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
Data from a high-throughput human adrenocortical carcinoma assay (HT-H295R) for steroid hormone biosynthesis are available for >2000 chemicals in single concentration and 654 chemicals in multi-concentration (mc). Previously, a metric describing the effect size of a chemical on the biosynthesis of 11 hormones was derived using mc data referred to as the maximum mean Mahalanobis distance (maxmMd). However, mc HT-H295R assay data remain unavailable for many chemicals. This work leverages existing HT-H295R assay data by constructing structure-activity relationships to make predictions for data-poor chemicals, including: (1) identification of individual structural descriptors, known as ToxPrint chemotypes, associated with increased odds of affecting estrogen or androgen synthesis; (2) a random forest (RF) classifier using physicochemical property descriptors to predict HT-H295R maxmMd binary (positive or negative) outcomes; and, (3) a local approach to predict maxmMd binary outcomes using nearest neighbors (NNs) based on two types of chemical fingerprints (chemotype or Morgan). Individual chemotypes demonstrated high specificity (85-98%) for modulators of estrogen and androgen synthesis but with low sensitivity. The best RF model for maxmMd classification included 13 predicted physicochemical descriptors, yielding a balanced accuracy (BA) of 71% with only modest improvement when hundreds of structural features were added. The best two NN models for binary maxmMd prediction demonstrated BAs of 85 and 81% using chemotype and Morgan fingerprints, respectively. Using an external test set of 6302 chemicals (lacking HT-H295R data), 1241 were identified as putative estrogen and androgen modulators. Combined results across the three classification models (global RF model and two local NN models) predict that 1033 of the 6302 chemicals would be more likely to affect HT-H295R bioactivity. Together, these in silico approaches can efficiently prioritize thousands of untested chemicals for screening to further evaluate their effects on steroid biosynthesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Foster
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
- National Student Services Contractor, Oak Ridge Associated Universities
| | - G Patlewicz
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
| | - I Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
| | - D E Haggard
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
| | - R S Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
| | - K Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, 27711, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
van der Zalm AJ, Barroso J, Browne P, Casey W, Gordon J, Henry TR, Kleinstreuer NC, Lowit AB, Perron M, Clippinger AJ. A framework for establishing scientific confidence in new approach methodologies. Arch Toxicol 2022; 96:2865-2879. [PMID: 35987941 PMCID: PMC9525335 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-022-03365-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 98] [Impact Index Per Article: 32.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Robust and efficient processes are needed to establish scientific confidence in new approach methodologies (NAMs) if they are to be considered for regulatory applications. NAMs need to be fit for purpose, reliable and, for the assessment of human health effects, provide information relevant to human biology. They must also be independently reviewed and transparently communicated. Ideally, NAM developers should communicate with stakeholders such as regulators and industry to identify the question(s), and specified purpose that the NAM is intended to address, and the context in which it will be used. Assessment of the biological relevance of the NAM should focus on its alignment with human biology, mechanistic understanding, and ability to provide information that leads to health protective decisions, rather than solely comparing NAM-based chemical testing results with those from traditional animal test methods. However, when NAM results are compared to historical animal test results, the variability observed within animal test method results should be used to inform performance benchmarks. Building on previous efforts, this paper proposes a framework comprising five essential elements to establish scientific confidence in NAMs for regulatory use: fitness for purpose, human biological relevance, technical characterization, data integrity and transparency, and independent review. Universal uptake of this framework would facilitate the timely development and use of NAMs by the international community. While this paper focuses on NAMs for assessing human health effects of pesticides and industrial chemicals, many of the suggested elements are expected to apply to other types of chemicals and to ecotoxicological effect assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - João Barroso
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Patience Browne
- Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development, Hazard Assessment and Pesticides Programmes, Environmental Directorate, Paris, France
| | - Warren Casey
- National Institutes of Health, Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institutes of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - John Gordon
- U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, Directorate for Health Sciences, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Tala R Henry
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Nicole C Kleinstreuer
- National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Anna B Lowit
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Monique Perron
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Svingen T, Schwartz CL, Rosenmai AK, Ramhøj L, Johansson HKL, Hass U, Draskau MK, Davidsen N, Christiansen S, Ballegaard ASR, Axelstad M. Using alternative test methods to predict endocrine disruption and reproductive adverse outcomes: do we have enough knowledge? ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION (BARKING, ESSEX : 1987) 2022; 304:119242. [PMID: 35378198 DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2022] [Revised: 03/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are a matter of great concern. They are ubiquitous in the environment, are considered harmful to humans and wildlife, yet remain challenging to identify based on current international test guidelines and regulatory frameworks. For a compound to be identified as an EDC within the EU regulatory system, a plausible link between an endocrine mode-of-action and an adverse effect outcome in an intact organism must be established. This requires in-depth knowledge about molecular pathways regulating normal development and function in animals and humans in order to elucidate causes for disease. Although our knowledge about the role of the endocrine system in animal development and function is substantial, it remains challenging to predict endocrine-related disease outcomes in intact animals based on non-animal test data. A main reason for this is that our knowledge about mechanism-of-action are still lacking for essential causal components, coupled with the sizeable challenge of mimicking the complex multi-organ endocrine system by methodological reductionism. Herein, we highlight this challenge by drawing examples from male reproductive toxicity, which is an area that has been at the forefront of EDC research since its inception. We discuss the importance of increased focus on characterizing mechanism-of-action for EDC-induced adverse health effects. This is so we can design more robust and reliable testing strategies using non-animal test methods for predictive toxicology; both to improve chemical risk assessment in general, but also to allow for considerable reduction and replacement of animal experiments in chemicals testing of the 21st Century.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terje Svingen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark.
| | | | | | - Louise Ramhøj
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| | | | - Ulla Hass
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| | - Monica Kam Draskau
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| | - Nichlas Davidsen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| | - Sofie Christiansen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| | | | - Marta Axelstad
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, DK-2800, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramaprasad ASE, Smith MT, McCoy D, Hubbard AE, La Merrill MA, Durkin KA. Predicting the binding of small molecules to nuclear receptors using machine learning. Brief Bioinform 2022; 23:6563938. [PMID: 35383362 PMCID: PMC9116378 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbac114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Nuclear receptors (NRs) are important biological targets of endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Identifying chemicals that can act as EDCs and modulate the function of NRs is difficult because of the time and cost of in vitro and in vivo screening to determine the potential hazards of the 100 000s of chemicals that humans are exposed to. Hence, there is a need for computational approaches to prioritize chemicals for biological testing. Machine learning (ML) techniques are alternative methods that can quickly screen millions of chemicals and identify those that may be an EDC. Computational models of chemical binding to multiple NRs have begun to emerge. Recently, a Nuclear Receptor Activity (NuRA) dataset, describing experimentally derived small-molecule activity against various NRs has been created. We have used the NuRA dataset to develop an ensemble of ML-based models to predict the agonism, antagonism, binding and effector binding of small molecules to nine different human NRs. We defined the applicability domain of the ML models as a measure of Tanimoto similarity to the molecules in the training set, which enhanced the performance of the developed classifiers. We further developed a user-friendly web server named 'NR-ToxPred' to predict the binding of chemicals to the nine NRs using the best-performing models for each receptor. This web server is freely accessible at http://nr-toxpred.cchem.berkeley.edu. Users can upload individual chemicals using Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System, CAS numbers or sketch the molecule in the provided space to predict the compound's activity against the different NRs and predict the binding mode for each.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martyn T Smith
- Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - David McCoy
- Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Alan E Hubbard
- Divisions of Environmental Health Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Michele A La Merrill
- Department of Environmental Toxicology, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Kathleen A Durkin
- Molecular Graphics and Computation Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hilton GM, Adcock C, Akerman G, Baldassari J, Battalora M, Casey W, Clippinger AJ, Cope R, Goetz A, Hayes AW, Papineni S, Peffer RC, Ramsingh D, Williamson Riffle B, Sanches da Rocha M, Ryan N, Scollon E, Visconti N, Wolf DC, Yan Z, Lowit A. Rethinking chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity assessment for agrochemicals project (ReCAAP): A reporting framework to support a weight of evidence safety assessment without long-term rodent bioassays. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2022; 131:105160. [PMID: 35311659 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2022.105160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Rodent cancer bioassays have been long-required studies for regulatory assessment of human cancer hazard and risk. These studies use hundreds of animals, are resource intensive, and certain aspects of these studies have limited human relevance. The past 10 years have seen an exponential growth of new technologies with the potential to effectively evaluate human cancer hazard and risk while reducing, refining, or replacing animal use. To streamline and facilitate uptake of new technologies, a workgroup comprised of scientists from government, academia, non-governmental organizations, and industry stakeholders developed a framework for waiver rationales of rodent cancer bioassays for consideration in agrochemical safety assessment. The workgroup used an iterative approach, incorporating regulatory agency feedback, and identifying critical information to be considered in a risk assessment-based weight of evidence determination of the need for rodent cancer bioassays. The reporting framework described herein was developed to support a chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity study waiver rationale, which includes information on use pattern(s), exposure scenario(s), pesticidal mode-of-action, physicochemical properties, metabolism, toxicokinetics, toxicological data including mechanistic data, and chemical read-across from similar registered pesticides. The framework could also be applied to endpoints other than chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity, and for chemicals other than agrochemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina M Hilton
- PETA Science Consortium International e.V., Stuttgart, Germany.
| | - Catherine Adcock
- Health Canada, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gregory Akerman
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington DC, USA
| | | | | | - Warren Casey
- Division of the National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | | | - Rhian Cope
- Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority, Armidale, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amber Goetz
- Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | - A Wallace Hayes
- University of South Florida College of Public Health, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | | - Deborah Ramsingh
- Health Canada, Pest Management Regulatory Agency, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | - Natalia Ryan
- Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Greensboro, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Anna Lowit
- United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Heidary DK, Kriger SM, Hachey AC, Glazer EC. A Fluorometric CYP19A1 (Aromatase) Activity Assay in Live Cells. ChemMedChem 2021; 16:2845-2850. [PMID: 34224206 DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.202100326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Inhibition of estrogen synthesis is an integral component of the frontline pharmacologic therapy for the treatment of estrogen receptor positive cancers. However, there is currently no direct, high-throughput-ready assay for aromatase (also known as CYP19A1) that can be performed in live cells. Herein we present a cell-based assay that allows for multiplexed assessment of enzyme activity, protein half-life, cell viability, and identification of inhibitors with slow off-rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K Heidary
- Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 505 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Sarah M Kriger
- Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 505 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Austin C Hachey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 505 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| | - Edith C Glazer
- Department of Chemistry, University of Kentucky, 505 Rose St., Lexington, KY 40506, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
A review of species differences in the control of, and response to, chemical-induced thyroid hormone perturbations leading to thyroid cancer. Arch Toxicol 2021; 95:807-836. [PMID: 33398420 DOI: 10.1007/s00204-020-02961-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Accepted: 11/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This review summarises the current state of knowledge regarding the physiology and control of production of thyroid hormones, the effects of chemicals in perturbing their synthesis and release that result in thyroid cancer. It does not consider the potential neurodevelopmental consequences of low thyroid hormones. There are a number of known molecular initiating events (MIEs) that affect thyroid hormone synthesis in mammals and many chemicals are able to activate multiple MIEs simultaneously. AOP analysis of chemical-induced thyroid cancer in rodents has defined the key events that predispose to the development of rodent cancer and many of these will operate in humans under appropriate conditions, if they were exposed to high enough concentrations of the affecting chemicals. There are conditions however that, at the very least, would indicate significant quantitative differences in the sensitivity of humans to these effects, with rodents being considerably more sensitive to thyroid effects by virtue of differences in the biology, transport and control of thyroid hormones in these species as opposed to humans where turnover is appreciably lower and where serum transport of T4/T3 is different to that operating in rodents. There is heated debate around claimed qualitative differences between the rodent and human thyroid physiology, and significant reservations, both scientific and regulatory, still exist in terms of the potential neurodevelopmental consequences of low thyroid hormone levels at critical windows of time. In contrast, the situation for the chemical induction of thyroid cancer, through effects on thyroid hormone production and release, is less ambiguous with both theoretical, and actual data, showing clear dose-related thresholds for the key events predisposing to chemically induced thyroid cancer in rodents. In addition, qualitative differences in transport, and quantitative differences in half life, catabolism and turnover of thyroid hormones, exist that would not operate under normal situations in humans.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zare Jeddi M, Hopf NB, Viegas S, Price AB, Paini A, van Thriel C, Benfenati E, Ndaw S, Bessems J, Behnisch PA, Leng G, Duca RC, Verhagen H, Cubadda F, Brennan L, Ali I, David A, Mustieles V, Fernandez MF, Louro H, Pasanen-Kase R. Towards a systematic use of effect biomarkers in population and occupational biomonitoring. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 146:106257. [PMID: 33395925 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106257] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Effect biomarkers can be used to elucidate relationships between exposure to environmental chemicals and their mixtures with associated health outcomes, but they are often underused, as underlying biological mechanisms are not understood. We aim to provide an overview of available effect biomarkers for monitoring chemical exposures in the general and occupational populations, and highlight their potential in monitoring humans exposed to chemical mixtures. We also discuss the role of the adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework and physiologically based kinetic and dynamic (PBK/D) modelling to strengthen the understanding of the biological mechanism of effect biomarkers, and in particular for use in regulatory risk assessments. An interdisciplinary network of experts from the European chapter of the International Society for Exposure Science (ISES Europe) and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Occupational Biomonitoring activity of Working Parties of Hazard and Exposure Assessment group worked together to map the conventional framework of biomarkers and provided recommendations for their systematic use. We summarized the key aspects of this work here, and discussed these in three parts. Part I, we inventory available effect biomarkers and promising new biomarkers for the general population based on the H2020 Human Biomonitoring for Europe (HBM4EU) initiative. Part II, we provide an overview AOP and PBK/D modelling use that improved the selection and interpretation of effect biomarkers. Part III, we describe the collected expertise from the OECD Occupational Biomonitoring subtask effect biomarkers in prioritizing relevant mode of actions (MoAs) and suitable effect biomarkers. Furthermore, we propose a tiered risk assessment approach for occupational biomonitoring. Several effect biomarkers, especially for use in occupational settings, are validated. They offer a direct assessment of the overall health risks associated with exposure to chemicals, chemical mixtures and their transformation products. Promising novel effect biomarkers are emerging for biomonitoring of the general population. Efforts are being dedicated to prioritizing molecular and biochemical effect biomarkers that can provide a causal link in exposure-health outcome associations. This mechanistic approach has great potential in improving human health risk assessment. New techniques such as in silico methods (e.g. QSAR, PBK/D modelling) as well as 'omics data will aid this process. Our multidisciplinary review represents a starting point for enhancing the identification of effect biomarkers and their mechanistic pathways following the AOP framework. This may help in prioritizing the effect biomarker implementation as well as defining threshold limits for chemical mixtures in a more structured way. Several ex vivo biomarkers have been proposed to evaluate combined effects including genotoxicity and xeno-estrogenicity. There is a regulatory need to derive effect-based trigger values using the increasing mechanistic knowledge coming from the AOP framework to address adverse health effects due to exposure to chemical mixtures. Such a mechanistic strategy would reduce the fragmentation observed in different regulations. It could also stimulate a harmonized use of effect biomarkers in a more comparable way, in particular for risk assessments to chemical mixtures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maryam Zare Jeddi
- Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardio-Thoraco-Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, Italy
| | - Nancy B Hopf
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Epalinges, Switzerland
| | - Susana Viegas
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Centre, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisbon, Portugal; Comprehensive Health Research Center (CHRC), 1150-090 Lisbon, Portugal; H&TRC-Health & Technology Research Center, ESTeSL-Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde, Instituto Politécnico de Lisboa, 1990-096 Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Anna Bal Price
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Alicia Paini
- European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
| | - Christoph van Thriel
- Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors at the Technical University of Dortmund (IfADo), Ardeystrasse 67, 44139 Dortmund, Germany
| | - Emilio Benfenati
- Laboratory of Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology, Istituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Via La Masa, 19, 20156 Milano, Italy
| | - Sophie Ndaw
- INRS-French National Research and Safety Institute, France
| | - Jos Bessems
- VITO - Flemish Institute for Technological Research, Belgium
| | - Peter A Behnisch
- BioDetection Systems b.v., Science Park 406, 1098 XH Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gabriele Leng
- Currenta GmbH Co. OHG, Institute of Biomonitoring, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Radu-Corneliu Duca
- Unit Environmental Hygiene and Human Biological Monitoring, Department of Health Protection, National Health Laboratory, Dudelange, Luxembourg
| | - Hans Verhagen
- Food Safety & Nutrition Consultancy (FSNConsultancy), Zeist, the Netherlands
| | - Francesco Cubadda
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità-National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Lorraine Brennan
- School of Agriculture and Food Science, Institute of Food and Health, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Imran Ali
- Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Arthur David
- Univ Rennes, Inserm, EHESP, Irset (Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail)-UMR_S 1085, F-35000 Rennes, France
| | - Vicente Mustieles
- University of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Mariana F Fernandez
- University of Granada, Center for Biomedical Research (CIBM), Granada, Spain; Consortium for Biomedical Research in Epidemiology & Public Health (CIBERESP), Madrid, Spain
| | - Henriqueta Louro
- National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Department of Human Genetics, Lisboa and ToxOmics - Centre for Toxicogenomics and Human Health, NOVA Medical School, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Robert Pasanen-Kase
- State Secretariat for Economic Affairs (SECO), Labour Directorate Section Chemicals and Work (ABCH), Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Habib H, Haider MR, Sharma S, Ahmad S, Dabeer S, Yar MS, Raisuddin S. Molecular interactions of vinclozolin metabolites with human estrogen receptors 1GWR-α and 1QKM and androgen receptor 2AM9-β: Implication for endocrine disruption. Toxicol Mech Methods 2020; 30:370-377. [PMID: 32208804 DOI: 10.1080/15376516.2020.1747123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Background: Vinclozolin (VCZ) is a widely used antifungal agent with capability to enter into the human food chain. VCZ metabolizes into seven metabolites M1-M7. Several studies have shown its effects on reprotoxicity. However, there is limited information available on the interaction of VCZ metabolites with nuclear receptors. In silico studies aimed at identifying interaction of endocrine disruptor with nuclear receptors serve a prescreening framework in risk assessment.Methods: We studied interactive potential of VCZ and its metabolites with human estrogen (ER) and androgen receptor (AR) using molecular docking method. Binding potential of VCZ and its metabolites with estrogen receptors 1GWR-α, 1QKM and androgen receptor 2AM9-β was checked by using Schrodinger Maestro 10.5. Estradiol (E2), a natural ligand of ER and AR was taken as a reference.Results: VCZ and its metabolites showed higher or similar binding efficiency on interaction with target proteins when compared with E2. VCZ and its metabolites also exhibited agonistic effect against 1GWR-α, 1QKM and 2AM9-β with strong binding potential to them.Conclusion: Some VCZ metabolites such as M4 and M5 showed higher binding potencies with 1GWR-α, 1QKM and 2AM9-β than E2. Toxicity data of VCZ is well endowed. However, endocrine disrupting potential of VCZ via nuclear receptor mediated pathway is less understood. This in silico study revealing that not only VCZ but its metabolites have potential to interact with 1GWR-α, 1QKM and 2AM9-β offers a platform for further exploration of VCZ in this direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haroon Habib
- Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Medical Elementology & Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Md Rafi Haider
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Shikha Sharma
- Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Medical Elementology & Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Shahzad Ahmad
- Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Medical Elementology & Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Sadaf Dabeer
- Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Medical Elementology & Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Mohammad Shahar Yar
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| | - Sheikh Raisuddin
- Molecular Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Medical Elementology & Toxicology, Jamia Hamdard (Hamdard University), New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Warner GR, Mourikes VE, Neff AM, Brehm E, Flaws JA. Mechanisms of action of agrochemicals acting as endocrine disrupting chemicals. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2020; 502:110680. [PMID: 31838026 PMCID: PMC6942667 DOI: 10.1016/j.mce.2019.110680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/06/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Agrochemicals represent a significant class of endocrine disrupting chemicals that humans and animals around the world are exposed to constantly. Agrochemicals can act as endocrine disrupting chemicals through a variety of mechanisms. Recent studies have shown that several mechanisms of action involve the ability of agrochemicals to mimic the interaction of endogenous hormones with nuclear receptors such as estrogen receptors, androgen receptors, peroxisome proliferator activated receptors, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and thyroid hormone receptors. Further, studies indicate that agrochemicals can exert toxicity through non-nuclear receptor-mediated mechanisms of action. Such non-genomic mechanisms of action include interference with peptide, steroid, or amino acid hormone response, synthesis and degradation as well as epigenetic changes (DNA methylation and histone modifications). This review summarizes the major mechanisms of action by which agrochemicals target the endocrine system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Genoa R Warner
- Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61802, IL, United States
| | - Vasiliki E Mourikes
- Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61802, IL, United States
| | - Alison M Neff
- Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61802, IL, United States
| | - Emily Brehm
- Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61802, IL, United States
| | - Jodi A Flaws
- Department of Comparative Biosciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, 61802, IL, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mansouri K, Kleinstreuer N, Abdelaziz AM, Alberga D, Alves VM, Andersson PL, Andrade CH, Bai F, Balabin I, Ballabio D, Benfenati E, Bhhatarai B, Boyer S, Chen J, Consonni V, Farag S, Fourches D, García-Sosa AT, Gramatica P, Grisoni F, Grulke CM, Hong H, Horvath D, Hu X, Huang R, Jeliazkova N, Li J, Li X, Liu H, Manganelli S, Mangiatordi GF, Maran U, Marcou G, Martin T, Muratov E, Nguyen DT, Nicolotti O, Nikolov NG, Norinder U, Papa E, Petitjean M, Piir G, Pogodin P, Poroikov V, Qiao X, Richard AM, Roncaglioni A, Ruiz P, Rupakheti C, Sakkiah S, Sangion A, Schramm KW, Selvaraj C, Shah I, Sild S, Sun L, Taboureau O, Tang Y, Tetko IV, Todeschini R, Tong W, Trisciuzzi D, Tropsha A, Van Den Driessche G, Varnek A, Wang Z, Wedebye EB, Williams AJ, Xie H, Zakharov AV, Zheng Z, Judson RS. CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2020; 128:27002. [PMID: 32074470 DOI: 10.23645/epacomptox.5176876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling. OBJECTIVES In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP). METHODS The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP's list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays. RESULTS The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set. DISCUSSION The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of ∼875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamel Mansouri
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- ScitoVation LLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicole Kleinstreuer
- National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmed M Abdelaziz
- Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Department für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen, Weihenstephaner Steig 23, 85350 Freising, Germany
| | - Domenico Alberga
- Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vinicius M Alves
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carolina H Andrade
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| | - Fang Bai
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Ilya Balabin
- Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS), Lockheed Martin, USA
| | - Davide Ballabio
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Emilio Benfenati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barun Bhhatarai
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Scott Boyer
- Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Jingwen Chen
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Viviana Consonni
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Sherif Farag
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Denis Fourches
- Department of Chemistry, Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Paola Gramatica
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesca Grisoni
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Chris M Grulke
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Huixiao Hong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Dragos Horvath
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xin Hu
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Ruili Huang
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Jiazhong Li
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Xuehua Li
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | | | - Serena Manganelli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche "Mario Negri", IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Uko Maran
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Gilles Marcou
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Todd Martin
- National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eugene Muratov
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dac-Trung Nguyen
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Orazio Nicolotti
- Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Nikolai G Nikolov
- Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulf Norinder
- Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Ester Papa
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Michel Petitjean
- Computational Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions (CMPLI)-INSERM UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Functional and Adaptative Biology (BFA), Universite de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Geven Piir
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Pavel Pogodin
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry IBMC, 10 Building 8, Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119121, Russia
| | - Vladimir Poroikov
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry IBMC, 10 Building 8, Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119121, Russia
| | - Xianliang Qiao
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Ann M Richard
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Patricia Ruiz
- Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chetan Rupakheti
- National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sugunadevi Sakkiah
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Alessandro Sangion
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Karl-Werner Schramm
- Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Department für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen, Weihenstephaner Steig 23, 85350 Freising, Germany
| | - Chandrabose Selvaraj
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Imran Shah
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sulev Sild
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lixia Sun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Olivier Taboureau
- Computational Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions (CMPLI)-INSERM UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Functional and Adaptative Biology (BFA), Universite de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Yun Tang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Igor V Tetko
- BIGCHEM GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen - German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Roberto Todeschini
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Weida Tong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | | | - Alexander Tropsha
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - George Van Den Driessche
- Department of Chemistry, Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alexandre Varnek
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique-UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Zhongyu Wang
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Eva B Wedebye
- Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Antony J Williams
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hongbin Xie
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Alexey V Zakharov
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Ziye Zheng
- Chemistry Department, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Richard S Judson
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mansouri K, Kleinstreuer N, Abdelaziz AM, Alberga D, Alves VM, Andersson PL, Andrade CH, Bai F, Balabin I, Ballabio D, Benfenati E, Bhhatarai B, Boyer S, Chen J, Consonni V, Farag S, Fourches D, García-Sosa AT, Gramatica P, Grisoni F, Grulke CM, Hong H, Horvath D, Hu X, Huang R, Jeliazkova N, Li J, Li X, Liu H, Manganelli S, Mangiatordi GF, Maran U, Marcou G, Martin T, Muratov E, Nguyen DT, Nicolotti O, Nikolov NG, Norinder U, Papa E, Petitjean M, Piir G, Pogodin P, Poroikov V, Qiao X, Richard AM, Roncaglioni A, Ruiz P, Rupakheti C, Sakkiah S, Sangion A, Schramm KW, Selvaraj C, Shah I, Sild S, Sun L, Taboureau O, Tang Y, Tetko IV, Todeschini R, Tong W, Trisciuzzi D, Tropsha A, Van Den Driessche G, Varnek A, Wang Z, Wedebye EB, Williams AJ, Xie H, Zakharov AV, Zheng Z, Judson RS. CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES 2020; 128:27002. [PMID: 32074470 PMCID: PMC7064318 DOI: 10.1289/ehp5580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/05/2019] [Indexed: 05/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling. OBJECTIVES In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP). METHODS The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP's list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays. RESULTS The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set. DISCUSSION The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of ∼ 875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamel Mansouri
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- ScitoVation LLC, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
- Integrated Laboratory Systems, Inc., Morrisville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Nicole Kleinstreuer
- National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods (NICEATM), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ahmed M. Abdelaziz
- Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Department für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen, Weihenstephaner Steig 23, 85350 Freising, Germany
| | - Domenico Alberga
- Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vinicius M. Alves
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carolina H. Andrade
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling and Drug Design, Faculty of Pharmacy, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Brazil
| | - Fang Bai
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Ilya Balabin
- Information Systems & Global Solutions (IS&GS), Lockheed Martin, USA
| | - Davide Ballabio
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Emilio Benfenati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barun Bhhatarai
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Scott Boyer
- Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Jingwen Chen
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Viviana Consonni
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Sherif Farag
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Denis Fourches
- Department of Chemistry, Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Paola Gramatica
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Francesca Grisoni
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Chris M. Grulke
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Huixiao Hong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Dragos Horvath
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique—UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Xin Hu
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Ruili Huang
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Jiazhong Li
- School of Pharmacy, Lanzhou University, China
| | - Xuehua Li
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | | | - Serena Manganelli
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri”, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Uko Maran
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Gilles Marcou
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique—UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Todd Martin
- National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
| | - Eugene Muratov
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Dac-Trung Nguyen
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Orazio Nicolotti
- Department of Pharmacy-Drug Sciences, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Nikolai G. Nikolov
- Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ulf Norinder
- Swedish Toxicology Sciences Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Södertälje, Sweden
| | - Ester Papa
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Michel Petitjean
- Computational Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions (CMPLI)–INSERM UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Functional and Adaptative Biology (BFA), Universite de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Geven Piir
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Pavel Pogodin
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry IBMC, 10 Building 8, Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119121, Russia
| | - Vladimir Poroikov
- Institute of Biomedical Chemistry IBMC, 10 Building 8, Pogodinskaya st., Moscow 119121, Russia
| | - Xianliang Qiao
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Ann M. Richard
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Patricia Ruiz
- Computational Toxicology and Methods Development Laboratory, Division of Toxicology and Human Health Sciences, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Chetan Rupakheti
- National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Sugunadevi Sakkiah
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Alessandro Sangion
- QSAR Research Unit in Environmental Chemistry and Ecotoxicology, Department of Theoretical and Applied Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Karl-Werner Schramm
- Technische Universität München, Wissenschaftszentrum Weihenstephan für Ernährung, Landnutzung und Umwelt, Department für Biowissenschaftliche Grundlagen, Weihenstephaner Steig 23, 85350 Freising, Germany
| | - Chandrabose Selvaraj
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | - Imran Shah
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sulev Sild
- Institute of Chemistry, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Lixia Sun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Olivier Taboureau
- Computational Modeling of Protein-Ligand Interactions (CMPLI)–INSERM UMR 8251, INSERM ERL U1133, Functional and Adaptative Biology (BFA), Universite de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Yun Tang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China
| | - Igor V. Tetko
- BIGCHEM GmbH, Neuherberg, Germany
- Helmholtz Zentrum Muenchen – German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Roberto Todeschini
- Milano Chemometrics and QSAR Research Group, Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Weida Tong
- Division of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, National Center for Toxicology Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Jefferson, Arkansas, USA
| | | | - Alexander Tropsha
- Laboratory for Molecular Modeling, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - George Van Den Driessche
- Department of Chemistry, Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA
| | - Alexandre Varnek
- Laboratoire de Chémoinformatique—UMR7140, University of Strasbourg/CNRS, Strasbourg, France
| | - Zhongyu Wang
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Eva B. Wedebye
- Division of Risk Assessment and Nutrition, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Antony J. Williams
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hongbin Xie
- School of Environmental Science and Technology, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China
| | - Alexey V. Zakharov
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Ziye Zheng
- Chemistry Department, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Richard S. Judson
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Development of a prioritization method for chemical-mediated effects on steroidogenesis using an integrated statistical analysis of high-throughput H295R data. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2019; 109:104510. [PMID: 31676319 DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2019.104510] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 10/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Synthesis of 11 steroid hormones in human adrenocortical carcinoma cells (H295R) was measured in a high-throughput steroidogenesis assay (HT-H295R) for 656 chemicals in concentration-response as part of the US Environmental Protection Agency's ToxCast program. This work extends previous analysis of the HT-H295R dataset and model by examining the utility of a novel prioritization metric based on the Mahalanobis distance that reduced these 11-dimensional data to 1-dimension via calculation of a mean Mahalanobis distance (mMd) at each chemical concentration screened for all hormone measures available. Herein, we evaluated the robustness of mMd values, and demonstrate that covariance and variance of the hormones measured appear independent of the chemicals screened and are inherent to the assay; the Type I error rate of the mMd method is less than 1%; and, absolute fold changes (up or down) of 1.5 to 2-fold have sufficient power for statistical significance. As a case study, we examined hormone responses for aromatase inhibitors in the HT-H295R assay and found high concordance with other ToxCast assays for known aromatase inhibitors. Finally, we used mMd and other ToxCast cytotoxicity data to demonstrate prioritization of the most selective and active chemicals as candidates for further in vitro or in silico screening.
Collapse
|