Harnessing virus tropism for dendritic cells for vaccine design

Enteroviruses Activate Cellular Innate Immune Responses Prior to Adaptive Immunity and Tropism Contributes to Severe Viral Pathogenesis

Numerous innate immune mechanisms have been shown to be activated during viral infections, including pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) functioning outside and inside the cell along with other sensors promoting the production of interferon and other cytokines. Innate cells, including NK cells, NKT cells, γδ T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and even neutrophils, have been shown to respond to viral infections. Several innate humoral responses to viral infections have also been identified. Adaptive immunity includes common cell-mediated immunity (CMI) and humoral responses. Th1, Th2, and Tfh CD4+ T cell responses have been shown to help activate cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) and to help promote the class switching of antiviral antibodies. Enteroviruses were shown to induce innate immune responses and the tropism of the virus that was mediated through viral attachment proteins (VAPs) and cellular receptors was directly related to the risk of severe disease in a primary infection. Adaptive immune responses include cellular and humoral immunity, and its delay in primary infections underscores the importance of vaccination in ameliorating or preventing severe viral pathogenesis.

PEDV promotes the differentiation of CD4+T cells towards Th1, Tfh, and Treg cells via CD103+DCs

Porcine epidemic diarrhea virus (PEDV) can infect all ages of pigs, particularly newborn piglets with a mortality almost reaching to 80-100%, causing significant economic losses to the global pig industry. The mucosal immune response is crucial for PEDV prevention, in which specific dendritic cells (DCs) and differentiated T cells play vital roles. In this study, CD103+DCs were differentiated successfully with retinoic acid (RA) treatment in vitro. PEDV could not replicate efficiently in differentiated CD103+DCs but could promote maturation of CD103+DCs by up-regulating the expression of SLA-DR, CD1a, CD86, and cytokines of IL-1β and IL-10. In addition, PEDV-infected CD103+DCs and CD4+T cells were co-cultured, and the results showed that the differentiation of CD4+T cells toward Th1, Tfh, and Treg, but not Th2. These results demonstrate that PEDV-infected CD103+DCs could promote the differentiation of CD4+T cells, which provided the basis for further study of mucosal response induced by PEDV via CD103+DCs.

Engaging Pattern Recognition Receptors in Solid Tumors to Generate Systemic Antitumor Immunity

Malignant tumors frequently exploit innate immunity to evade immune surveillance. The priming, function, and polarization of antitumor immunity fundamentally depends upon context provided by the innate immune system, particularly antigen presenting cells. Such context is determined in large part by sensing of pathogen specific and damage associated features by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). PRR activation induces the delivery of T cell priming cues (e.g. chemokines, co-stimulatory ligands, and cytokines) from antigen presenting cells, playing a decisive role in the cancer immunity cycle. Indeed, endogenous PRR activation within the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been shown to generate spontaneous antitumor T cell immunity, e.g., cGAS-STING mediated activation of antigen presenting cells after release of DNA from dying tumor cells. Thus, instigating intratumor PRR activation, particularly with the goal of generating Th1-promoting inflammation that stokes endogenous priming of antitumor CD8⁺ T cells, is a growing area of clinical investigation. This approach is analogous to in situ vaccination, ultimately providing a personalized antitumor response against relevant tumor associated antigens. Here I discuss clinical stage intratumor modalities that function via activation of PRRs. These approaches are being tested in various solid tumor contexts including melanoma, colorectal cancer, glioblastoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Their mechanism (s) of action relative to other immunotherapy approaches (e.g., antigen-defined cancer vaccines, CAR T cells, dendritic cell vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade), as well as their potential to complement these approaches are also discussed. Examples to be reviewed include TLR agonists, STING agonists, RIG-I agonists, and attenuated or engineered viruses and bacterium. I also review common key requirements for effective in situ immune activation, discuss differences between various strategies inclusive of mechanisms that may ultimately limit or preclude antitumor efficacy, and provide a summary of relevant clinical data.

The Rise of Vectored Vaccines: A Legacy of the COVID-19 Global Crisis

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a milestone in vaccine research and development in a global context. A worldwide effort, as never seen before, involved scientists from all over the world in favor of the fast, accurate and precise construction and testing of immunogens against the new coronavirus, SARS-CoV-2. Among all the vaccine strategies put into play for study and validation, those based on recombinant viral vectors gained special attention due to their effectiveness, ease of production and the amplitude of the triggered immune responses. Some of these new vaccines have already been approved for emergency/full use, while others are still in pre- and clinical trials. In this article we will highlight what is behind adeno-associated vectors, such as those presented by the immunogens ChaAdOx1, Sputnik, Convidecia (CanSino, Tianjin, China), and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson, New Jersey, EUA), in addition to other promising platforms such as Vaccinia virus MVA, influenza virus, and measles virus, among others.