Successful reintroduction and continuation of nivolumab in a patient with immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid

The Use of Biologic Agents for the Treatment of Cutaneous Immune-Related Adverse Events from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Review of Reported Cases

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events encompass a spectrum of dermatological manifestations, including lichenoid reactions, psoriasiform eruptions, eczematous dermatitis, immunobullous disorders, granulomatous reactions, pruritus, vitiligo, and severe cutaneous adverse reactions such as Stevens-Johnson syndrome. The conventional approach to treating high-grade or refractory cutaneous immune-related adverse events has involved high-dose systemic corticosteroids. However, their use is limited owing to the potential disruption of antitumor responses and associated complications. To address this, corticosteroid-sparing targeted immunomodulators have been explored as therapeutic alternatives. Biologic agents, commonly employed for non-cutaneous immune-related adverse events such as colitis, are increasingly recognized for their efficacy in treating various patterns of cutaneous immune-related adverse events, including psoriasiform, immunobullous, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome-like reactions. This review consolidates findings from the English-language literature, highlighting the use of biologic agents in managing diverse cutaneous immune-related adverse event patterns, also encompassing maculopapular, eczematous, and lichenoid eruptions, pruritus, and transient acantholytic dermatosis (Grover disease). Despite the established efficacy of these agents, further research is necessary to explore their long-term effects on antitumor responses.

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

Importance

Dupilumab is a theoretically novel therapy for bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, its effectiveness and safety have yet to be confirmed in a large-scale study.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with BP and evaluate factors that potentially affect short-term and long-term outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 24.6 (11.5-38.4) weeks. This multicenter study was performed in 6 dermatology departments of the National Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Cooperative Group of China. Adult patients with BP that received 300 mg of dupilumab every 2 weeks following an initial dose of 600 mg were included. Patients were eligible if they had a clinical presentation of BP combined with immunological or pathological evidence. Patients with drug-induced BP, with less than 4 weeks of follow-up, and who received dupilumab or any other biologics within 6 months were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved disease control within 4 weeks. Disease control was defined as the absence of new lesions and pruritus, combined with the healing of existing lesions. Complete remission rates, relapse rates, changes in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) scores, itching numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, laboratory results within 64 weeks, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

Results

Among 146 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [64-85] years; 86 [58.9%] male patients) included in the study, 127 (87.0%) patients achieved disease control within 4 weeks, with a median (IQR) time of 14 (7-14) days. A total of 52 (35.6%) patients achieved complete remission, and 13 (8.9%) patients relapsed during the observation period. The complete remission rate and cumulative relapse rate at week 64 were 62.5% (5 of 8) and 30.9%, respectively. There was rapid and sustained improvement in clinical indicators and laboratory examination results after dupilumab treatment, including BPDAI scores, itching NRS scores, serum anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies, total IgE levels, and eosinophil count. Of these 146 patients, 107 (73.3%) did not report any AEs. The most common AEs were infections and eosinophilia. Serum anti-BP180 antibody levels of greater than 50 relative units (RU)/mL (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.97-12.61; P = .045) were associated with 4-week disease control, and male patients were more likely to relapse (HR, 10.97; 95% CI, 1.42-84.92; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study, dupilumab treatment was associated with improved clinical symptoms in patients with BP. The safety profile was favorable, although concurrent infection and eosinophilia might pose potential concerns. This study suggests that patients with anti-BP180 antibody levels of at least 50 RU/mL and female sex may respond better.

Management of immune-related cutaneous adverse events with dupilumab

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) target the PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 pathways and allows the immune system to deliver antitumor effects. However, it is also associated with well-documented immune-related cutaneous adverse events (ircAEs), affecting up to 70-90% of patients on ICI. In this study, we describe the characteristics of and patient outcomes with ICI-associated steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent ircAEs treated with dupilumab. Patients with ircAEs treated with dupilumab between March 28, 2017, and October 1, 2021, at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center were included in this retrospective study, which assessed the rate of clinical response of the ircAE to dupilumab and any associated adverse events (AEs). Laboratory values were compared before and after dupilumab. All available biopsies of the ircAEs were reviewed by a dermatopathologist. Thirty-four of 39 patients (87%, 95% CI: 73% to 96%) responded to dupilumab. Among these 34 responders, 15 (44.1%) were complete responders with total ircAE resolution and 19 (55.9%) were partial responders with significant clinical improvement or reduction in severity. Only 1 patient (2.6%) discontinued therapy due to AEs, specifically, injection site reaction. Average eosinophil counts decreased by 0.2 K/mcL (p=0.0086). Relative eosinophils decreased by a mean of 2.6% (p=0.0152). Total serum immunoglobulin E levels decreased by an average of 372.1 kU/L (p=0.0728). The most common primary inflammatory patterns identified on histopathological examination were spongiotic dermatitis (n=13, 33.3%) and interface dermatitis (n=5, 12.8%). Dupilumab is a promising option for steroid-refractory or steroid-dependent immune-related cutaneous adverse events, particularly those that are eczematous, maculopapular, or pruritic. Among this cohort, dupilumab was well-tolerated with a high overall response rate. Nonetheless, prospective, randomized, controlled trials are warranted to confirm these observations and confirm its long-term safety.

Mechanisms of dermatologic toxicities to immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapies

The discovery of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) sparked a revolution in the era of targeted anticancer therapy. While monoclonal antibodies targeting the CTLA-4 and PD-1 axes have improved survival in patients with advanced cancers, these immunotherapies are associated with a wide spectrum of dermatologic immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Several publications have addressed the clinical and histopathologic classification of these skin-directed irAEs, their impact on antitumor immunity and survival, and the critical role of supportive oncologic dermatology in their management. Here, we review the current understanding of the mechanistic drivers of immune-related skin toxicities with a focus on inflammatory, immunobullous, melanocyte/pigment-related reactions. We detail the specific immune-based mechanisms that may underlie different cutaneous reactions. We also discuss potential mechanisms as they relate to non-cutaneous irAEs and potential overlap with cutaneous irAEs, techniques to study differences in immune-related versus de novo skin reactions, and how treatment of these adverse events impacts cancer treatment, patient quality of life, and overall survival. An improved understanding of the mechanistic basis of cutaneous irAEs will allow us to develop and utilize blood-based biomarkers that could help ultimately predict onset and/or severity of these irAEs and to implement rational mechanistic-based treatment strategies that are targeted to the irAEs while potentially avoiding abrogating anti-tumor effect of ICIs.

Association of Bullous Pemphigoid With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review

Importance

There is limited information on immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid (ICI-BP) in patients with cancer, with most existing studies being case reports or small case series from a single institution. Prior review attempts have not approached the literature in a systematic manner and have focused only on ICI-BP secondary to anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy. The current knowledge base of all aspects of ICI-BP is limited.

Objective

To characterize the risk factors, clinical presentation, diagnostic findings, treatments, and outcomes of ICI-BP in patients with cancer as reported in the current literature.

Evidence Review

A systematic review was performed using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Articles reporting data on individual patients who met preestablished inclusion criteria were selected, and a predefined set of data was abstracted. When possible, study results were quantitatively combined.

Findings

In total, 70 studies reporting data on 127 individual patients undergoing ICI therapy for cancer (median [IQR] age, 71 [64-77] years; 27 women [21.3%]) were included. In pooled analyses, patients ranged in age from 35 to 90 years. Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced bullous pemphigoid often occurred during the course of anti-PD-1, PD-L1, or cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 therapy but was also found to develop up to several months after treatment cessation. Prodromal symptoms, such as pruritus or nonspecific skin eruptions, were found in approximately half of the patient population. Histopathologic or serologic testing, when undertaken, was a helpful adjunct in establishing diagnosis. Treatment with immunotherapy was discontinued after ICI-BP development in most patients. The most common treatments were systemic and topical corticosteroids. Steroid-sparing therapies, such as antibiotics and other systemic immunomodulators, were also used as adjuvant treatment modalities. Biologic and targeted agents, used predominantly in cases refractory to treatment with corticosteroids, were associated with marked symptomatic improvement in most patients.

Conclusions and Relevance

The results of this systematic review suggest that ICI-BP often poses a therapeutic challenge for patients with cancer who are receiving immunotherapy. Further research on the early recognition, diagnosis, and use of targeted treatment modalities will be essential in developing more personalized treatment options for affected patients while minimizing morbidity and mortality.

Biologic therapies for checkpoint inhibitor-induced cutaneous toxicities: a single-institution study of 17 consecutively treated patients

PURPOSE

Treatment options for corticosteroid-refractory and/or high-grade checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)-induced cutaneous adverse events (CAEs) are limited; however, anecdotal reports of biologic therapies have been successful. We aim to characterize the appropriate treatment scenarios and safety and efficacy profiles of biologics used to treat patients with CPI-induced CAEs at a single institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of patients from January 1st, 2015 to October 20th, 2020, with CPI-induced CAEs who were treated with biologics at a single cancer center. Patients were identified using institutional electronic medical record who underwent CPI therapy with subsequent CAEs that necessitated biologic therapy. Diagnostic criteria utilized for CAEs were based on documentation by four board-certified dermatologists, in combination with detailed chart reviews and pathology findings. Primary study outcome measurements include CAE response, tumor response, and adverse events during biologics treatment.

RESULTS

We identified 17 patients who fit study criteria. Sixteen patients experienced some degree of CAE improvement on biologics, with 10 of 10 patients reaching CAE resolution at 6 months post biologics. Eight patients needed new systemic treatment post biologics treatment, while 9 patients received no further treatment or stayed on the CPI. Thirteen patients tolerated biologics well with no significant adverse events or blood abnormalities, with only 2 patients experiencing biologic dose delays.

CONCLUSION

In our cohort, biologics appear to be extremely efficacious in the treatment of severe-grade and/or steroid refractory CAEs. They also appeared to be well-tolerated without overtly negative effects on tumor response. In patients with limited cancer treatment options and good tumor response to CPIs, biologics should be considered for severe-grade and/or refractory CAEs.