Locking plate technology and its use in foot and ankle surgery

Similar Clinical Outcome in Locking and Conventional Plate Osteosynthesis for the Treatment of AO 44-B2 Ankle Fractures

IntroductionBiomechanical studies have proved that locking plates have better primary stability besides versatility regarding fracture pattern while reducing bone contact and bridging the gap, whereas conventional nonlocking plates (plus lag screw) depend on bone-plate compression. The clinical benefit of locking plates over nonlocking plates remains unanswered, however. Therefore, this retrospective cohort study was set up to test the hypothesis that the use of locking plates for unstable ankle fractures will result in fewer re-displacements, superior bony healing, and functional and clinical outcomes better than observed in the nonlocking cohort.MethodsBimalleolar ankle fractures (AO 44-B2) without syndesmotic injury treated with either a locking or a nonlocking plate were included. Groups were compared for complications, bone healing, secondary dislocation, progressions of osteoarthritis, and clinical outcome using patient-reported outcome measures.ResultsData revealed no clinical outcome differences (Olerud-Molander Ankle Score: nonlocking 88.2 ± 14.4, locking 88.8 ± 12.3, P = .69, robust two 1-sided test for equality (RTOST): P = .03; American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score: nonlocking 91.2 ± 12.9, locking 91.8 ± 11.3, P = .96, RTOST: P = .04). Nevertheless, a significant postoperative progression of osteoarthritis was detected in both groups (P = .04). This was independent of implant (P = .16). Although difference was not significant, locking plates were preferred in older (P = .78) and sicker patients (P = .63) and in cases with severer osteoarthritis (P = .16), and were associated with a higher complication rate (P = .42) and secondary dislocation (nonlocking 9.4%, locking 18.2%; P = .42). Re-displacement, however, was not a compelling reason for revision.ConclusionsThe present study shows statistically significant equality of both types of implants. Contrary to our expectation, locking plates seemed to be associated with a higher risk for re-displacement. Overall, the use of either locking or nonlocking plates for unstable AO 44-B2 fractures is safe and successful despite significant progression of osteoarthritis.Level of Evidence:III, Retrospective observational cohort study.

Comparing the risk of reoperation between pneumatic tourniquet and non-tourniquet use in surgical treatment of ankle fractures

Aims

Pneumatic tourniquets are often used during the surgical treatment of unstable traumatic ankle fractures. The aim of this study was to assess the risk of reoperation after open reduction and internal fixation of ankle fractures with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets.

Methods

This was a population-based cohort study using data from the Danish Fracture Database with a follow-up period of 24 months. Data were linked to the Danish National Patient Registry to ensure complete information regarding reoperations due to complications, which were divided into major and minor. The relative risk of reoperations for the tourniquet group compared with the non-tourniquet group was estimated using Cox proportional hazards modelling.

Results

A total of 4,050 ankle fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation between 15 March 2012 and 31 December 2016 were included, with 669 (16.5%) undergoing surgery with a tourniquet and 3,381 (83.5%) without a tourniquet. The overall reoperation risk was 28.2% with an adjusted relative risk of 1.46 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32) for group comparison. The reoperation risk due to major complications was 3.1% with a tourniquet and 4.4% without a tourniquet, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 1.45 (95% CI 0.91 to 2.32). For minor complications, there were 24.7% and 23.9% reoperations, resulting in an adjusted relative risk of 0.99 (95% CI 0.84 to 1.17).

Conclusion

We found no significant difference in the reoperation rate when comparing ankle fractures treated surgically with and without the use of pneumatic tourniquets.

Serum caspase‑1 levels serve as a predictive biomarker for the prognosis of patients undergoing arthroscopic‑assisted locking plate internal fixation in the treatment of high‑energy pilon fractures

The present study aimed to investigate the serum levels of caspase-1 in patients with high-energy pilon fractures, and its correlation with prognosis and clinical results. In this prospective study, 136 patients with high-energy pilon fractures who were treated with a locking plate combined with ankle arthroscopy from July 2015 to July 2020 were included. The treatment efficacy was evaluated according to the Mazur ankle function score. Serum caspase-1, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-1β and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR was used to measure the mRNA expression of caspase-1. Additionally, demographic data and clinical characteristics, such as sex, age, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing time, fracture classification and complications were collected and analyzed. The study revealed that the intraoperative blood loss, proportion of Ruedi-Allgower III and the serum levels of caspase-1 in the poor prognosis group were significantly higher compared with those in the good prognosis group. Additionally, patients with high-energy pilon fractures in the poor prognosis group exhibited significantly higher levels of caspase-1 and IL-1β serum levels at all time points in contrast to those in the good prognosis group. Spearman's analysis revealed a significant association between caspase-1, IL-1β levels and Mazur scores. Furthermore, caspase-1 could serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for poor prognosis of patients with high-energy pilon fractures. Caspase-1, IL-1β, intraoperative blood loss and Ruedi-Allgower grade were the risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with high-energy pilon fractures. In summary, this study demonstrated that serum caspase-1 levels were progressively reduced during the treatment of high-energy pilon fractures patients and prominently lowered in those with a favorable prognosis. These findings could provide novel targets and a comprehensive approach to protecting patients with high-energy pilon fractures.

Risk of Reoperation in Simple Ankle Fracture Surgery When Comparing Locking Plate With Nonlocking Plate

Locking plates were initially designed to provide improved stability to ankle fractures with poor bone quality but are currently widely used. The aim of this study was to compare the reoperation risk when using locking plates compared with nonlocking plates in patients with simple ankle fractures. This study was a population-based register study. Data regarding patients with AO type 44A1/2 and 44B1/2 injuries who were treated with either locking or nonlocking plates were obtained from the Danish Fracture Database. The follow-up period was 24 months. Major complications were defined as complications requiring surgical intervention, with the exception of simple hardware removal 6 weeks after primary surgery, which was defined as a minor complication. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine relative risk (RR), adjusted for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification (ASA)-score, and level of the surgeon's experience. A total of 2177 ankle fractures were included, among which 718 (33%) were treated with locking plates, and 1459 (67%) were treated with nonlocking plates. Data were linked with the Danish National Patient Registry to ensure complete information was obtained regarding reoperations, which were divided into major and minor complications. In both groups, the risks for major and minor complications were 3% and 22%, respectively, resulting in adjusted RRs of 1.00 (0.66; 1.66) for major reoperation comparing locking with nonlocking plates and 0.92 (0.76; 1.11) for minor reoperations. We conclude that no significant association with reoperation exists for locking compared with nonlocking plates among patients with surgically treated simple ankle fractures.

Surgical Reconstruction of Nonunion after Iatrogenic Scarf Osteotomy

We present the case of a young patient, 32 years old, with nonunion in the diaphysis of the first metatarsal after scarf osteotomy for correction of hallux valgus. After removal of the failed osteosynthesis material and preparation of the bone fragments, a calcaneal bone autograft, previously extracted from the patient, was placed in the nonunion area. The new physiological position of the first metatarsal in the three planes was checked intraoperatively, and autograft and fragment fixation was performed using a combination of a low-profile plate with six screws and two interfragmentary screws. The advantage of using an autogenous graft is that it provides corticocancellous bone and great osteogenic capacity with little antigenic capacity. This makes it an excellent option in many situations in foot and ankle surgery. Regarding the fixation method, we used the two most commonly used techniques for osteosynthesis of bone grafts in cases of bone nonunion, combining plates with locking screws and two interfragmentary screws. This provides greater stability of the bone fragments in the three planes and makes it possible to bring forward when the patient starts postsurgical loading.

Comparison of Locking Versus Nonlocking Plates for Distal Fibula Fractures

Locking plates might offer a biomechanical fixation advantage for distal fibula fractures with comminution or osteoporotic bone. In January 2011, our unit introduced a bone-specific locking plate for the distal fibula. The aim of the present study was to compare it against more conventional plating system implants for lateral malleolar fixation in terms of outcomes, crude costs, and complications. We retrospectively reviewed a consecutive cohort of patients with closed ankle fractures who presented within a 24-month period. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were compared among conventional plating using a one-third semitubular plate, a 3.5-mm limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and a 2.7-mm/3.5-mm locking compression distal fibula plate. A total of 145 patients with ankle fractures underwent surgical fixation: 87 (60.0%) with the semitubular plate, 22 (15.2%) with the limited-contact dynamic compression plate, and 36 (24.8%) with the locking compression distal fibula plate. A greater proportion of patients with established osteoporosis or osteoporosis risk factors were in the locking compression distal fibula plate group (27.8% versus 2.3% and 0%). Four patients (2.8%) required washout for infection. No significant differences were found between the sex distribution within the 3 groups (p = .432). No significant difference was found in the complication rate (p = .914) or the reoperation rate (p = .291) among the 3 groups. Although costing >6 times more than a standard fibula fixation construct (implant cost), bone-specific locking compression distal fibula plates add to the portfolio of implants available, especially for unstable fractures with poor bone quality.