First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis; what is the best fixation option? A critical review of the literature

Analysis of the Costs and Complications of First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Comparing Locked and Non-locked Plate Fixation Constructs

BACKGROUND

The ideal fixation method for the first metatarsophalangeal joint (first MTP) remains uncertain. This study compares nonunion and revision surgery rates of first MTP arthrodesis between nonlocking semitubular plates and precontoured locking plates.

METHODS

Demographics, fixation technique, and complications of all patients who underwent primary first MTP arthrodesis between 2013 and 2018 were determined from radiographs and clinical records. Cost data were from a 1-year subset of isolated first MTP fusion surgeries. The primary outcome measures of this study were the nonunion and complication rates, with associated costs of patients undergoing first metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis with either a noncontoured semitubular plate or a precontoured locking plate.

RESULTS

The study included 189 patients, with a mean follow-up of 18.7 months. The overall nonunion rate was 10.1%, with no difference between the locking and nonlocking plates. The prevalence of a painful implant was also similar. Surgeries using locking plates cost an average of $1,500 more than those using nonlocked plates.

CONCLUSIONS

Because there was no difference in revision between locking and nonlocking plate fixation for primary first MTP arthrodesis, routine use of the more expensive locking plates may not be justified.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III (Retrospective cohort study).

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis/fusion: a systematic review of modern fixation techniques

Background

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is commonly performed for symptomatic end-stage hallux rigidus. It has been postulated to produce good results in the literature. Various fixation techniques offer differences in union rates, complications and functional outcomes, stirring debates about which produces the best outcomes for patients. Therefore, this review aims to synthesise and compare the outcomes of modern fixation techniques used for first metatarsophalangeal joint (FMPJ) arthrodesis.

Methods

The electronic database searched were PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. The critical appraisal skills programme tool for cohort study was used. The interventions consisted of screw(s), plate(s), and staple(s). Studies comprising outdated fixation techniques such as suture, metallic wire, external fixation, Rush rods or Steinmann pins were excluded. Participants were adults over 18 years, undergoing FMPJ arthrodesis in the UK. Studies with the population consisting primarily of revision cases, patients with rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes were excluded.

Results

Seven UK studies included 277 feet and a 95.7% overall union rate at a mean union time of 83.5 days. Staples had the highest union rate of 98.2% at mean union time of 84 days, followed by plates (95.2%, 92 days), and finally screws (94.9%, 71 days). The overall complication incidence is 5.8%. All of the fixation techniques produced good functional outcomes postoperatively.

Conclusions

Whilst staple techniques showed the highest union rate, plating techniques are preferable over screws or staples for better results across several outcome measures, including reduced complication incidence, stability, early ambulation, and good functional outcome. The Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire and EuroQol-5Dimensional are recommended as measurement tools to assess functional outcomes following FMPJ arthrodesis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13047-022-00540-9.

First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Arthrodesis Using Memory Staples: Clinical and Functional Results

Background. We present clinical and functional results of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis using Memory staples. Methods. This retrospective observational study reviewed MTPJ arthrodesis with Memory staples from 2012 to 2016. Results. The mean age of 50 patients (55 feet) was 63 years (range 41-77 years). Forty-one feet were in women. Indication was hallux rigidus (n = 49) and hallux valgus (n = 6). The overall union rate was 98.2% (n = 54 of 55), including delayed healing in 3 (5.5%). The average time to union was 12 weeks. At a mean follow-up of 38 months (range 12-73 months), the mean Foot and Ankle Ability Measure score (47 out of 55, 86% response rate) was 87% (interquartile range 78%-100%). Complications included partial laceration of extensor hallucis longus (n = 1), wound infection (n = 4), wound-related (n = 2), lesser metatarsalgia (n = 3), cock up deformity (n = 1), and pain (n = 3). Conclusions. The high union rate, good patient satisfaction scores, and low rate of complications support our use of Memory staples.Levels of Evidence: Therapeutic, Level IV.

Does the IOFix implant improve union rates?

BACKGROUND

First metatarso-phalangeal joint fusion is the current gold standard for severe hallux rigidus. Data regarding the union rate and the re-operation rate when IOFix (an Intra-osseous fixation device, Extremity medical, New Jersey, USA) is used for hallux rigidus fusion is limited but promising. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes with the IOFix implant.

METHODS

We have conducted a retrospective chart review, following the approval of the hospital IRB committee. Exclusion criteria included bilateral operations on the same patient, multiple surgeries, charcot foot or other structural foot abnormalities (except hallux valgus), rheumatoid arthritis and a recent foot trauma. We collected demographic data, physical examination documentation, functional score evaluations (AOFAS), and Plain radiographic studies.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.36 ± 9.12 (range 36 to 77) years, 18 (60%) female patients and 12 (40%) male. Fourteen (53.33%) were left side pathologies. The average follow up period was 36.2 ± 12.31 (range 12 to 54) months. Union was obtained in 28 (93.33%) patients, of whom none had requested a hardware removal due to a prominent hardware during a minimum of 2 year follow up period. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 80.5 ± 10.87 (range 35 to 90). A more stringent inclusion criteria and fusion definitions would have led to an exclusion of two more patients and a dropout of two patients from the "fused" group, which would have led to a fusion rate of 85.71%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest series of hallux rigidus patients that were operated with an IOFix device. The rates of fusion and hardware removal in MTPJ1 arthrodesis performed with an IOFix implant were found to be similar at most when compared to previously described rates that were obtained with other cheaper and more simple fixation devices.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Revision of Failed First Metatarsophalangeal Joint Implant

Revision surgeries, as well as conversions from implants to arthrodesis, can present unique challenges to the foot and ankle surgeon. Proper perioperative planning assists in optimizing the outcome of the procedure. In general, some amount of bone loss and/or shortening of the first metatarsal takes place, leading to the need for augmenting the site with bone graft or a synthetic substitute. Fixation also plays a key role in obtaining a successful conversion. A solid construct combined with bone graft assists the foot and ankle surgeon in achieving an optimal outcome.

Result of IOFIX (Intra Osseous FIXation) device for first metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis: A single surgeon's series

BACKGROUND

Arthrodesis of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) is a common procedure to treat significant first MTPJ arthritis. However, dorsal plates used for this have been associated with high incidence of metalwork removal. The IOFIX (Intra-Osseous FIXation) is a fixed angle device that is noted to provide a more uniform compression over a larger aspect of the fusion surfaces than a screw construct alone with the advantage of minimizing soft tissue irritation which can reduce the need for subsequent implant removal.

METHODS

Twenty one consecutive patients who underwent primary first MTPJ fusion with the IOFIX were reviewed. The mean age of the cohort was 63 years (range 47-81), with 80% female. The ratio of left to right was 9:12. The mean follow up of was 28 months (range 13.4-48.2 months). Outcomes analyzed were rate of fusion, Manchester-Oxford foot questionnaire (MOXFQ) score, patient satisfaction, improvement in the intermetatarsal angle and complications.

RESULTS

Complete fusion of the first MTPJ was achieved in twenty (95%) patients. One patient had a non union and another patient developed a delayed union. The mean preoperative MOXFQ score improved from 49.7 (95% confidence interval: 46-52) to 17.9 (95% confidence interval: 12-22), p<0.05.Improvement gained in all the domains of the MOXFQ score (walking/standing, pain and social) was statistically significant (p<0.05). Eighteen out of 21 patients (85%) were very pleased or fairly pleased with the procedure.

CONCLUSION

Early results show that the rate of fusion achieved by using the IOFIX device for the first MTPJ arthrodesis in our series was found to be comparable to other devices quoted in the literature.

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis in the treatment of hallux valgus

First metatarsophalangeal joint arthrodesis is a reliable procedure with predictable outcomes in the treatment of moderate-to-severe hallux valgus with degenerative changes of the joint. It offers better functional outcome compared to arthroplasty with or without prosthesis in appropriate patient populations. Recent studies have shown that with appropriate fixation, early weight bearing may be initiated without an increase in nonunion.