Revision of the Malaligned Ankle Arthrodesis

Soft Tissue Structures at Risk With a Percutaneous Focal Dome Osteotomy: A Cadaver Study

The focal dome osteotomy allows deformity correction through frontal plane rotation, and if needed, anterior or posterior translation. This percutaneous technique allows extracapsular ankle realignment with minimal soft tissue dissection. While circumventing a standard anterior incision, this technique encounters soft tissue structures that must be considered. Focal dome osteotomies were simulated on 10 fresh-frozen below the knee cadavers. Centered proximal to the tibial plafond at the physeal scar, a radial arm using a 4-hole Rancho cube was used to map the dome. Medial, lateral, and central incisions were made to allow access for drilling and measured to nearby anatomic structures. Among 10 cadavers, the age and weight were 70 ± 7.96 years and 134.7 ± 30.8 pounds, respectively. In all cadavers, the hole below the most proximal posthole provided the ideal position for the creation of the osteotomy. The medial and central incisions were closest to the tibialis anterior tendon measuring 3.37 ± 2.48 mm and 0.43 ± 0.9 mm, respectively. The lateral incision and half-pin used to create the distal axis of rotation were closest to the extensor hallucis longus tendon, measuring 1.97 ± 1.92 mm and 1.27 ± 1.5 mm, respectively. Drilling the second hole from the top on a 4-hole Rancho cube, forming a 2.50 cm radial arm, created the ideal osteotomy arc. Though neurovascular structures were further away from respective incision and half-pin sites compared to tendons, in several specimens, anatomic variations held them closer, warranting preoperative handheld Doppler and mapping. Care should be taken to protect anterior ankle anatomy during dissection, drilling, and completing the osteotomy.

Subtalar Arthrodesis in Patients With Prior Tibiotalar Arthrodesis for Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis

BACKGROUND

The tibiotalar arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis is a surgical procedure that leads to a modification of the kinematics of the adjacent joints and may result in the development of secondary osteoarthritic degeneration of the subtalar joint. It has previously been observed that subtalar arthrodesis in this context shows a lower fusion rate than isolated subtalar arthrodesis. This retrospective study reports the results of subtalar joint arthrodesis with previous ipsilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis and suggests some factors that may compromise the fusion of the joint.

METHODS

Between September 2010 and October 2021, 15 arthrodeses of the subtalar joint with screw fixation were performed in 14 patients, with a fusion of the ipsilateral tibiotalar joint. Fourteen of 15 cases used an open sinus tarsi approach, 13 were augmented with iliac crest bone graft, and 11 had supplemental demineralized bone matrix (DBM). The outcome variables were fusion rate, time to fusion, and revision rate. Fusion was assessed by radiographs and computed tomography scan.

RESULTS

Twelve of the 15 subtalar arthrodeses (80%) fused at the first attempt with an average fusion time of 4.7 months.

CONCLUSION

In this limited retrospective case series, compared to the fusion rate of isolated subtalar arthrodesis reported in the literature, the rate of subtalar fusion in the presence of an ipsilateral tibiotalar arthrodesis was found to be lower.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Reoperation Rates Following Total Ankle Arthroplasty Versus Ankle Arthrodesis for Posttraumatic Indications

AIMS

This studied aimed to compare rates of reoperation for patients who received primary ankle arthrodesis (AA) versus total ankle replacement (TAR) for posttraumatic indications between 2010 and 2016 Q2 using a nationwide claims database.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study analyzing patients who received primary AA or TAR for posttraumatic indications was performed using PearlDiver. Reoperations assessed included prosthetic joint infection (PJI), hardware removal, adjacent joint fusion, and local open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare rates of reoperations at 1 and 2 years postdischarge.

RESULTS

A total of 862 (74%) patients received AA and 318 (26%) patients underwent TAR for a posttraumatic indication. At 1 year, 305 (35.4%) AA patients had at least 1 reoperation compared with 55 (17.3%) TAR patients (OR 2.32; 95% CI, 1.68-3.26). At 2 years, 364 (42.2%) AA patients and 66 (20.8%) TAR patients had at least 1 reoperation (OR 2.51; 95% CI, 1.84-3.45). ORIF, hardware removal, and adjacent joint fusions were more likely for AA patients at both time intervals (all Ps < .05).

CONCLUSION

Patients who received primary AA for posttraumatic indications exhibited higher rates of major reoperations in the short to medium term compared with patients who underwent TAR.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level III: Retrospective cohort study.