Non-surgical management of metacarpal fractures

Clinical, Radiologic, and Functional Outcomes following Bone Grafting for Metacarpal Non-Unions: A Systematic Review

Objectives: Metacarpal non-unions are complex hand defects that can lead to severe hand impairment. Treatment may require the use of artificial or autologous bone grafts. This systematic review aims to describe the outcomes of bone grafting following metacarpal non-union in an attempt to establish an optimal therapeutic protocol for this complication. Methods: A systematic review was conducted in adherence with PRISMA guidelines. Data collection and analysis were performed in duplicate and confirmed by a third investigator. Our primary outcomes focused on radiological time to bone fusion and rates of non-union. Additionally, functional outcomes and complications were analyzed as means of central tendency. Results: Eighteen studies were included in the systematic review, accounting for a total of 47 patients. The average follow-up time was 12.4 months. Fourteen studies analyzed radiological outcomes, with atrophic non-union representing the most common type. The time to bone fusion, assessed radiologically, following bone graft was an average of 6.9 months (n = 14), with a 100% rate of union in 42 patients. Regarding patient-reported pain improvement, 76% of patients experienced pain relief. Moreover, all patients reported a complete subjective return to baseline hand function. Adverse events, limited to hematoma and seroma, were seen in three patients, representing a complication rate of 11.8% in the examined population. Conclusions: Metacarpal non-union can be treated successfully via vascularized and non-vascularized bone grafting. Based on the available evidence, bone grafts demonstrate favorable union rates, post-operative pain reduction, hand function recovery, earlier bone fusion times, and minimal complications in the context of metacarpal non-union management.

[Translated article] Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde vs. antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma centre in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilisation with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilisation with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Closed reduction and intramedullary fixation of fifth metacarpal neck fractures: Retrograde vs. anterograde technique. Prospective study

INTRODUCTION

The fifth metacarpal fracture is a frequent pathology that can cause deformity and functional impairment for the adequate grip of the hand. Reintegration into daily or working activities is related to the treatment received and rehabilitation. In fractures of the neck of the fifth metacarpal, internal fixation with a Kirschner's wire is a conventional treatment method with variants that affect its outcome.

AIM OF THE STUDY

To compare the functional and clinical results of the treatment of fifth metacarpal fracture with the use of retrograde versus antegrade Kirschner wires.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Comparative, longitudinal, prospective study at a third-level trauma center in patients with a fifth metacarpal neck fracture, with clinical, radiographic and Quick DASH scale follow-up at the 3rd, 6th, and 8th postoperative week.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included (58 men, 2 women), age of 29.63±10.15 years, with a fifth metacarpal fracture, treated by closed reduction and stabilization with a Kirschner wire. The antegrade approach showed a metacarpophalangeal flexion range at 8 weeks of 89.11° (p<0.001; 95% CI [-26.81; -11.42]), a DASH scale value of 18.17 (p<0.001; 95% CI [23.45; 39.12]), and an average of 27.35 days to return to work (p=0.002; 95% CI [16.22; 62.14]), compared with the retrograde approach.

CONCLUSION

Stabilization with antegrade Kirschner wire showed superior functional results, and metacarpophalangeal range of motion, compared to those operated via retrograde approach.

Comparison of the radiological and functional results of a plaster splint and dynamic stabilization splint for Boxer's fractures: A prospective randomized controlled study

PURPOSE

This study compared the clinical and radiological results of fifth metacarpal neck fractures treated with a short-arm plaster splint (SAPS) versus a dynamic metacarpal stabilization splint (DMSS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The 119 patients were referred to our institute between 2018 and 2019 and treated with SAPS or DMSS after appropriate initial closed reduction. Follow-up examinations were conducted at days 10 and 20, and at 1, 2, and 3 months after treatment. Alignment of the fracture, range of motion (ROM), and complications were evaluated during each visit. Grip strength was evaluated using a dynamometer. Self-care, usual daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were evaluated using the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) and a VAS.

RESULTS

Of the 119 patients, 103 completed all follow up examinations. In total, 51 patients were treated with SAPS and 52 with DMSS. Skin lesions were detected in five patients in the DMSS group, but none in the SAPS group (p = 0.008). The grip strength of patients in the DMSS group was statistically better at the 1-, 2-month and 3-month follow-up visits (p < 0.001). ROM of the interphalangeal and metacarpophalangeal joints were statistically better in the DMSS group at the 1-month visit (p < 0.001) but similar at the 3-month visit (p = 0.27). Wrist ROM was statistically higher in the DMSS group at the 3-month visit (p < 0.05). Self-care, usual daily activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression were statistically better in the DMSS group at all follow-up visits (p < 0.05), as determined by the EQ-5D-5L.

CONCLUSION

Dynamic stabilization of a stable boxer's fracture with DMSS is as effective as static stabilization with SAPS for maintaining the reduction and ensuring union. However, DMSS provides better early ROM, comfort, and muscle strength, as well as an earlier return to usual daily activities despite the occasional skin lesions happened.

Agreement between hand therapists and hand surgeons in the management of adults with closed metacarpal fractures

BACKGROUND

Hand therapists often work in roles which require an advanced level of experience as Advanced Scope Practitioners (ASP). However, it is not known whether clinical decisions are similar between hand therapists and surgeons when managing simple hand fractures.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the level of agreement between (i) a hand therapist and five hand surgeons and (ii) three hand therapists, for the management of adults with closed metacarpal fracture(s).

DESIGN

A prospective, blinded, crossover inter-rater reliability study.

METHOD

Patient volunteers with closed metacarpal fracture(s) were assessed independently in the first study (n = 90) by a hand therapist and one of five hand surgeons and in the second study (n = 57) by three hand therapists in a randomised order, with each practitioner recording whether the patient participant should be managed conservatively, trialled with conservative or offered surgical treatment. The level of agreement between the hand therapist and hand surgeons was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficient and between the three hand therapists by calculating Fleiss' Kappa. The observed agreement was also calculated as the proportion of cases for which the assessors had agreement for management.

RESULTS

There was good agreement between the hand therapist and surgeons (k = 0.68; 95% CI: 0.537-0.831) and amongst the three hand therapists (k = 0.663; 95% CI: 0.554-0.773) in determining the management of adults with closed metacarpal fracture(s).

CONCLUSIONS

Hand therapists and surgeons make similar management decision for patients with metacarpal fractures supporting the role of hand therapists as ASP.

Minimally Invasive Procedure for Correcting Extra-Articular Malunions of Metacarpals and Phalanges

PURPOSE

Extra-articular malunions of metacarpals and phalanges may cause palmar pain, finger scissoring, and splaying, and interfere with function. Current treatment involves open osteotomy and fixation with plates and screws. We present a minimally invasive method using cannulated headless screws for correction of malunions and examine the outcomes in a series of patients.

METHODS

Twenty malunions were operated on in 17 patients. In 16 cases, the malunion involved the metacarpal and in 4 it involved the proximal phalanx. All proximal phalanx and 3 metacarpal malunions were malrotation types, while the rest of the metacarpal malunions were dorsal angulations. The operation consisted of an opening wedge osteotomy in 8 patients; closing wedge osteotomy in 5; and a transverse osteotomy and derotation in the rest. Concomitant surgery to release tendon adhesions or contracted joints or to perform adipofascial flaps was performed in 8 cases. Fixation was achieved by means of a cannulated headless screw. Immediate range of motion was permitted in all cases.

RESULTS

Correction of the malunion and osteotomy union was achieved in all cases. One patient required manipulation of a digit that was found rotated at the first follow-up visit. Eleven fingers achieved more than 280° of total active motion. In 9 digits, the total active motion was less than 280° after the operation, yet improved 76° (range, 140°-30°) from their preoperative total active motion. The mean single-assessment numeric evaluation score for the whole group was 9.1.

CONCLUSIONS

The fixation provided by the cannulated headless screw is sufficient to permit immediate range of motion. Due to the minimal tissue disruption, this approach may be a reasonable alternative to the standard approach.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Phalangeal and Metacarpal Fractures of the Hand: Preventing Stiffness

Fractures of the phalangeal or metacarpal bones of the hand are common. Many of these fractures are treated without surgery. However, both conservative and operative management of fractures of the hand can result in stiffness. Stiffness is the most common complication in the management of hand fractures. The key to preventing stiffness is early range of motion exercises. This article challenges many of the current treatment regimens offered to patients with the so-called unstable fractures. The evaluation of the patients' function is the primary factor that should determine the course of conservation versus operative management. X-rays do not demonstrate function and therefore act as an adjunct only to the care of the patient. The goal of treating hand fractures is to restore function. Early motion may not only improve healing but may also hasten the return to normal hand function. The tenets of how to prevent stiffness are described in this review.

The Nonoperative Management of Hand Fractures in United Kingdom

Hand fractures (excluding small avulsion fractures and scaphoid fractures) almost always unite with bone. The role of the hand surgeon is not to achieve bone union but to achieve stability in an adequate position, often with some displacement, and maintenance of good soft tissue gliding. This article establishes that many fractures treated operatively do no better and often could not realistically do better than with good nonoperative treatment. Yet many are treated surgically to satisfy surgical egos, the desire to produce excellent radiographs, or just the mistaken belief that current surgical techniques can improve on nonoperative treatment.

Fracture-dislocations of the carpometacarpal joints of the ring and little finger

We report the functional and radiographic results of 16 patients with fracture-dislocations of the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints and 23 cases with fracture-dislocations of only the little finger carpometacarpal joint treated between 2006 and 2012. The above two cohort populations of patients were treated with either open reduction and pin fixation or closed reduction and pin fixation. These patients were followed for a mean of 13 months (range 9 to 48). The DASH scores for patients with fracture-dislocations of the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints were 6.0 and of the little finger carpometacarpal joint 7.2. We found no functional differences in term of DASH scores after treatment between patients with fracture-dislocations of only the little finger carpometacarpal joint and both the ring and little finger carpometacarpal joints.