Cleft Lip and Palate: LeFort I Distraction with Halo and Hybrid Internal Maxillary Distractors

[Surgical treatment of patients with upper micrognatia caused by cleft lip and palate]

Hypoplasia of the upper jaw to one degree or another inevitably occurs in patients with cleft lip and palate. The most difficult task is to fix skeletal deformity of the upper jaw, especially the discrepancy between its transversal dimensions due to the high risks of recurrence after treatment. One of the key stages of rehabilitation of this group of patients is orthodontics and surgical treatment aimed at eliminating functional and aesthetic problems of the dental system. The variety of treatment protocols illustrates the special approach in the treatment of patients with clefts, however, the development of recommendations to eliminate the imbalance of the upper jaw in these patients should include an interdisciplinary approach when choosing treatment tactics. The search for an effective rehabilitation algorithm continues, and the development of a digital protocol is especially useful in planning and interpreting patient treatment results. The purpose of this literature review was to analyze existing methods of conservative and surgical correction of transversal maxillary discrepancy in adult patients with cleft lip and palate.

Long-Term Outcomes After External Maxillary Distraction Surgery in Patients With Down Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Patients with Down syndrome have severe facial deformities that can precipitate functional consequences and social stigmatization. Craniofacial surgical intervention can play a role in improving these symptoms and patient quality of life. The objective of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgical intervention in patients with Down syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Charts of 3 patients with Down syndrome who were treated with external maxillary distraction osteogenesis were retrospectively reviewed. The patients' caregivers were prospectively interviewed between 10 and 15 years after surgery to determine surgical stability, long-term function, and quality of life status.

RESULTS

All patients and their caregivers reported excellent results with improvements in function and quality of life. Facial skeletal changes have been stable over time. The cephalometric analysis demonstrated significant maxillary advancement in all 3 patients and mandibular changes to correct mandibular prognathism and asymmetry in the patient who underwent finishing orthognathic surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

External maxillary distraction osteogenesis and orthognathic surgery may be considered in select patients with Down syndrome as part of their multidisciplinary health care. These interventions can result in long-term improvements in patient function and quality of life.

A 3-Dimensional Measurements of Bone and Airway Variables After Le Fort I Distraction Osteogenesis in Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate-Induced Midface Hypoplasia: A Retrospective Study

The authors retrospectively analyzed the effects of Le Fort I advancement with distraction osteogenesis on skeletal and airway variables in patients with midfacial hypoplasia induced by cleft lip and/or palate using 3-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions. The authors enrolled 23 subjects with moderate-to-severe midface hypoplasia induced by cleft lip and palate who were treated with Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis (mean age, 19.22±3.48 y; male/female ratio, 20/3); computed tomography images (1 before distraction and another at completion of distraction) were acquired. A 3-dimensional craniometric findings and airway volumes for the nasal cavity, nasopharynx, velopharynx, and upper and lower oropharynx were compared before and after distraction. The relationships between craniofacial morphology and changes in airway volume were also assessed ( P <0.05 was considered significant). Significant increases were observed in airway volumes for the nasal cavity (13.85%), nasopharynx (50.82%), velopharynx (29.57%), and upper oropharynx (36.92%) ( P =0.007, P <0.001, P =0.023, and P <0.001, respectively), whereas no significant changes were observed for the lower oropharynx ( P =0.117). Maxillary horizontal advancement was positively correlated with the airway volumes of the nasopharynx and upper oropharynx after distraction osteogenesis ( rs =+0.451, P =0.031; rs =+0.548, P =0.007); however, no significant correlations were observed for the nasal cavity and velopharynx. The authors' finding indicate that despite rotation of the mandible along with the maxilla, this change does not impact airway volume at the mandibular level. Le Fort I distraction osteogenesis can be feasible for patients with cleft lip and palate-induced midface hypoplasia, with satisfactory appearance and occlusion. Long-term detailed follow-up of the patients postdistraction osteogenesis is warranted.