1
|
Ma K, Shafique N, Tortorello G, Dheer A, Keele LJ, Karakousis GC, Ming ME. Significance of Prognostic Factors across Tumor Thicknesses in Melanoma: A National Cohort Study. J Invest Dermatol 2025:S0022-202X(25)00321-5. [PMID: 40086503 DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2025.02.146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2024] [Revised: 02/10/2025] [Accepted: 02/12/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Ma
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA
| | - Neha Shafique
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Gabriella Tortorello
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Anushka Dheer
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Luke J Keele
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Giorgos C Karakousis
- Department of Surgery, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael E Ming
- Department of Dermatology, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hamid O, Lewis KD, Weise A, McKean M, Papadopoulos KP, Crown J, Kim TM, Lee DH, Thomas SS, Mehnert J, Kaczmar J, Lakhani NJ, Kim KB, Middleton MR, Rabinowits G, Spira AI, Yushak M, Mehmi I, Fang F, Chen S, Mani J, Jankovic V, Wang F, Fiaschi N, Brennan L, Paccaly A, Masinde S, Salvati M, Fury MG, Kroog G, Lowy I, Gullo G. Phase I Study of Fianlimab, a Human Lymphocyte Activation Gene-3 (LAG-3) Monoclonal Antibody, in Combination With Cemiplimab in Advanced Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2928-2938. [PMID: 38900987 PMCID: PMC11328921 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.02172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/22/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Coblockade of lymphocyte activation gene-3 (LAG-3) and PD-1 receptors could provide significant clinical benefit for patients with advanced melanoma. Fianlimab and cemiplimab are high-affinity, human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies, targeting LAG-3 and PD-1, respectively. We report results from a first-in-human phase-I study of fianlimab and cemiplimab safety and efficacy in various malignancies including advanced melanoma. METHODS Patients with advanced melanoma were eligible for enrollment into four cohorts: three for patients without and one for patients with previous anti-PD-1 therapy in the advanced disease setting. Patients were treated with fianlimab 1,600 mg and cemiplimab 350 mg intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 51 weeks, with an optional additional 51 weeks if clinically indicated. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. RESULTS ORRs were 63% for patients with anti-PD-1-naïve melanoma (cohort-6; n = 40; median follow-up 20.8 months), 63% for patients with systemic treatment-naïve melanoma (cohort-15; n = 40; 11.5 months), and 56% for patients with previous neo/adjuvant treatment melanoma (cohort-16; n = 18, 9.7 months). At a median follow-up of 12.6 months for the combined cohorts (6 + 15 + 16), the ORR was 61.2% and the median progression-free survival (mPFS) 13.3 months (95% CI, 7.5 to not estimated [NE]). In patients (n = 13) with previous anti-PD-1 adjuvant therapy, ORR was 61.5% and mPFS 12 months (95% CI, 1.4 to NE). ORR in patients with previous anti-PD-1 therapy for advanced disease (n = 15) was 13.3% and mPFS 1.5 months (95% CI, 1.3 to 7.7). Treatment-emergent and treatment-related adverse events ≥grade 3 (G3) were observed in 44% and 22% of patients, respectively. Except for increased incidence of adrenal insufficiency (12%-G1-4, 4%-G3-4), no new safety signals were recorded. CONCLUSION The current results show a promising benefit-risk profile of fianlimab/cemiplimab combination for patients with advanced melanoma, including those with previous anti-PD-1 therapy in the adjuvant, but not advanced, setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omid Hamid
- The Angeles Clinical and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Karl D. Lewis
- University of Colorado Denver Cancer Center, Aurora, CO
| | | | - Meredith McKean
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | | | - John Crown
- St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tae Min Kim
- Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Sajeve S. Thomas
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center at Orlando Health, Orlando, FL
| | - Janice Mehnert
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | | | | | - Kevin B. Kim
- Center for Melanoma Research and Treatment, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark R. Middleton
- Department of Oncology, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Melinda Yushak
- Department of Hematology and Medical Oncology at Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
| | - Inderjit Mehmi
- The Angeles Clinical and Research Institute, a Cedars-Sinai Affiliate, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Fang Fang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY
| | | | | | | | - Fang Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Glenn Kroog
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY
| | - Israel Lowy
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Saeidi Z, Giti R, Rostami M, Mohammadi F. Nanotechnology-Based Drug Delivery Systems in the Transdermal Treatment of Melanoma. Adv Pharm Bull 2023; 13:646-662. [PMID: 38022807 PMCID: PMC10676549 DOI: 10.34172/apb.2023.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The incidence rate of melanoma is dramatically increasing worldwide, raising it to the fifth most common cancer in men and the sixth in women currently. Resistance generally occurs to the agents used in chemotherapy; besides their high toxicity destroys the normal cells. This study reviewed a detailed summary of the structure, advantages, and disadvantages of nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems in the treatment of melanoma, as well as some nanocarrier applications in animal models or clinical studies. Respective databases were searched for the target keywords and 93 articles were reviewed and discussed. A close study of the liposomes, niosomes, transferosomes, ethosomes, transethosomes, cubosomes, dendrimers, cyclodextrins, solid lipid nanoparticles, and carbon nanotubes (CNTs) was conducted. It was found that these nanocarriers could inhibit metastasis and migration of melanoma cells and decrease cell viability. Conclusively, some nanocarriers like liposomes, niosomes, and transferosomes have been discussed as superior to conventional therapies for melanoma treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zahra Saeidi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Rashin Giti
- Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mehdi Rostami
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| | - Farhad Mohammadi
- Department of Pharmaceutics, School of Pharmacy, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Choby G, Geltzeiler M, Almeida JP, Champagne PO, Chan E, Ciporen J, Chaskes MB, Fernandez-Miranda J, Gardner P, Hwang P, Ji KSY, Kalyvas A, Kong KA, McMillan R, Nayak J, O’Byrne J, Patel C, Patel Z, Peris Celda M, Pinheiro-Neto C, Sanusi O, Snyderman C, Thorp BD, Van Gompel JJ, Young SC, Zenonos G, Zwagerman NT, Wang EW. Multicenter Survival Analysis and Application of an Olfactory Neuroblastoma Staging Modification Incorporating Hyams Grade. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 149:837-844. [PMID: 37535372 PMCID: PMC10401389 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2023.1939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/04/2023]
Abstract
Importance Current olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) staging systems inadequately delineate locally advanced tumors, do not incorporate tumor grade, and poorly estimate survival and recurrence. Objective The primary aims of this study were to (1) examine the clinical covariates associated with survival and recurrence of ONB in a modern-era multicenter cohort and (2) incorporate Hyams tumor grade into existing staging systems to assess its ability to estimate survival and recurrence. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective, multicenter, case-control study included patients with ONB who underwent treatment between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2021, at 9 North American academic medical centers. Intervention Standard-of-care ONB treatment. Main Outcome and Measures The main outcomes were overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) as C statistics for model prediction. Results A total of 256 patients with ONB (mean [SD] age, 52.0 [15.6] years; 115 female [44.9%]; 141 male [55.1%]) were included. The 5-year rate for OS was 83.5% (95% CI, 78.3%-89.1%); for DFS, 70.8% (95% CI, 64.3%-78.0%); and for DSS, 94.1% (95% CI, 90.5%-97.8%). On multivariable analysis, age, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, involvement of bilateral maxillary sinuses, and positive margins were associated with OS. Only AJCC stage was associated with DFS. Only N stage was associated with DSS. When assessing the ability of staging systems to estimate OS, the best-performing model was the novel modification of the Dulguerov system (C statistic, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.76), and the Kadish system performed most poorly (C statistic, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.63). Regarding estimation of DFS, the modified Kadish system performed most poorly (C statistic, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.51-0.66), while the novel modification of the AJCC system performed the best (C statistic, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.80). Regarding estimation of DSS, the modified Kadish system was the best-performing model (C statistic, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.70-0.94), and the unmodified Kadish performed the worst (C statistic, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.51-0.68). The ability for novel ONB staging systems to estimate disease progression across stages was also assessed. In the novel Kadish staging system, patients with stage VI disease were approximately 7 times as likely to experience disease progression as patients with stage I disease (hazard ratio [HR], 6.84; 95% CI, 1.60-29.20). Results were similar for the novel modified Kadish system (HR, 8.99; 95% CI, 1.62-49.85) and the novel Dulguerov system (HR, 6.86; 95% CI, 2.74-17.18). Conclusions and Relevance The study findings indicate that 5-year OS for ONB is favorable and that incorporation of Hyams grade into traditional ONB staging systems is associated with improved estimation of disease progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garret Choby
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mathew Geltzeiler
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | | | - Erik Chan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jeremy Ciporen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Mark B. Chaskes
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - Paul Gardner
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Peter Hwang
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Keven Seung Yong Ji
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | | | - Keonho A. Kong
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Ryan McMillan
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Jayakar Nayak
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jamie O’Byrne
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chirag Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Loyola University, Maywood, Illinois
| | - Zara Patel
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Maria Peris Celda
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Carlos Pinheiro-Neto
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Olabisi Sanusi
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | - Carl Snyderman
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Brian D. Thorp
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
| | | | - Sarah C. Young
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Georgios Zenonos
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Nathan T. Zwagerman
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Eric W. Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang X, Zhang X, Li H, Zhang M, Liu Y, Li X. Application of machine learning algorithm in prediction of lymph node metastasis in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:8759-8768. [PMID: 37127828 PMCID: PMC10374763 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-04816-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aims to establish the best prediction model of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) through machine learning (ML), and provide the guideline of accurate clinical diagnosis and precise treatment for clinicals. METHODS A total of 24,470 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa were included in this study. Multivariate logistic regression model was used to screen the independent risk factors of LNM. At the same time, six algorithms, namely random forest (RF), naive Bayesian classifier (NBC), xgboost (XGB), gradient boosting machine (GBM), logistic regression (LR) and decision tree (DT) are used to establish risk prediction models. Based on the best prediction performance of ML algorithm, a prediction model is established, and the performance of the model is evaluated from three aspects: area under curve (AUC), sensitivity and specificity. RESULTS In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T stage, PSA, Gleason score and bone metastasis were independent predictors of LNM in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa. By comprehensively comparing the prediction model performance of training set and test set, GBM model has the best prediction performance (F1 score = 0.838, AUROC = 0.804). Finally, we developed a preliminary calculator model that can quickly and accurately calculate the regional LNM in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa. CONCLUSION T stage, PSA, Gleason and bone metastasis were independent risk factors for predicting LNM in patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa. The prediction model established in this study performs well; however, the GBM model is the best one.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangrong Wang
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| | - Xiangxiang Zhang
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| | - Hengping Li
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| | - Mao Zhang
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| | - Yang Liu
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| | - Xuanpeng Li
- Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Prediction of Central Lymph Node Metastasis in cN0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by CT Radiomics. Acad Radiol 2022:S1076-6332(22)00493-7. [PMID: 36220726 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To explore the feasibility of the preoperative prediction of pathological central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) status in patients with negative clinical lymph node (cN0) papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) using a computed tomography (CT) radiomics signature. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 97 PTC cN0 nodules with CLNM pathology data (pN0, with CLNM, n = 59; pN1, without CLNM, n = 38) in 85 patients were divided into a training set (n = 69) and a validation set (n = 28). For each lesion, 321 radiomic features were extracted from nonenhanced, arterial and venous phase CT images. Minimum redundancy and maximum relevance and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator were used to find the most important features with which to develop a radiomics signature in the training set. The performance of the radiomics signature was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis . RESULTS Three nonzero the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator coefficient features were selected for radiomics signature construction. The radiomics signature for distinguishing the pN0 and pN1 groups achieved areas under the curve of 0.79 (95% CI 0.67, 0.91) in the training set and 0.77 (95% CI 0.55, 0.99) in the validation set. The calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between the radiomics score-predicted probability and the pathological results in the two sets (p= 0.399, p = 0.191). The decision curve analysis curves showed that the model was clinically useful. CONCLUSION This radiomic signature could be helpful to predict CLNM status in cN0 PTC patients.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li W, Liu Y, Liu W, Tang ZR, Dong S, Li W, Zhang K, Xu C, Hu Z, Wang H, Lei Z, Liu Q, Guo C, Yin C. Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis Among Osteosarcoma Patients. Front Oncol 2022; 12:797103. [PMID: 35515104 PMCID: PMC9067126 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.797103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2021] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Regional lymph node metastasis is a contributor for poor prognosis in osteosarcoma. However, studies on risk factors for predicting regional lymph node metastasis in osteosarcoma are scarce. This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS A total of 1201 patients, with 1094 cases from the surveillance epidemiology and end results (SEER) (the training set) and 107 cases (the external validation set) admitted from four medical centers in China, was included in this study. Independent risk factors for the risk of lymph node metastasis were screened by the multifactorial logistic regression models. Six ML algorithms, including the logistic regression (LR), the gradient boosting machine (GBM), the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), the random forest (RF), the decision tree (DT), and the multilayer perceptron (MLP), were used to evaluate the risk of lymph node metastasis. The prediction model was developed based on the bestpredictive performance of ML algorithm and the performance of the model was evaluatedby the area under curve (AUC), prediction accuracy, sensitivity and specificity. A homemade online calculator was capable of estimating the probability of lymph node metastasis in individuals. RESULTS Of all included patients, 9.41% (113/1201) patients developed regional lymph node metastasis. ML prediction models were developed based on nine variables: age, tumor (T) stage, metastasis (M) stage, laterality, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, bone metastases, and lung metastases. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, T and M stage, surgery, and chemotherapy were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis. In the six ML algorithms, XGB had the highest AUC (0.882) and was utilized to develop as prediction model. A homemade online calculator was capable of estimating the probability of CLNM in individuals. CONCLUSIONS T and M stage, surgery and Chemotherapy are independent risk factors for predicting lymph node metastasis among osteosarcoma patients. XGB algorithm has the best predictive performance, and the online risk calculator can help clinicians to identify the risk probability of lymph node metastasis among osteosarcoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenle Li
- Department of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
| | - Yafeng Liu
- School of Medicine, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China
- Affiliated Cancer Hospital, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, China
| | - Wencai Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhi-Ri Tang
- School of Physics and Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Shengtao Dong
- Department of Spine Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Wanying Li
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
| | - Chan Xu
- Clinical Medical Research Center, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
| | - Zhaohui Hu
- Department of Spine Surgery, Liuzhou People’s Hospital, Liuzhou, China
| | - Haosheng Wang
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Second Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China
| | - Zhi Lei
- Chronic Disease Division, Luzhou Center for Dcontrol and Prevention, Luzhou, China
| | - Qiang Liu
- Department of Orthopedics, Xianyang Central Hospital, Xianyang, China
| | - Chunxue Guo
- Biostatistics Department, Hengpu Yinuo (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd, Beijing, China
| | - Chengliang Yin
- Faculty of Medicine, Macau University of Science and Technology, Macau, Macau SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|