Factors associated with mentor satisfaction among teaching and learning curriculum program participants

Residents' assessment of mentoring received on lecture performance in a teaching and learning curriculum program

INTRODUCTION

This study evaluated residents' assessment of the mentorship received and how it impacted lecture performance as part of a teaching and learning curriculum (TLC) program.

METHODS

An anonymous survey was emailed to residents completing the Virginia Commonwealth University (VCU) School of Pharmacy's TLC during 2018-2019 and 2019-2020. The survey collected information about: the type of mentorship received, residents' self-perceived lecture performance, and residents' desire to be involved in academia post-residency. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Fisher's exact tests investigated the association between residents' self-perceived lecture enhancement due to mentorship and: mentors' involvement, residents' confidence in understanding the lecture topic, mentors' affiliation with VCU, and semester when the lecture occurred. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using thematic analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-two of 86 residents (48.8%) completed the survey. Residents who were part of the TLC but did not deliver a lecture (n = 7) or taught practitioners instead of students (n =  2) were excluded, resulting in 33 participants. The majority of residents (87.9%) agreed or strongly agreed that mentorship enhanced their lecture. Mentors' level of involvement was significantly associated with residents' perception that the mentorship they received enhanced their lecture (P < .008). Residents' confidence in understanding the lecture topic, mentor affiliation, and semester when the lecture occurred were not associated with residents' self-perceived lecture enhancement due to mentorship.

CONCLUSIONS

Active mentorship was associated with better self-perceived lecture performance. The best criteria for lecture mentorship should be established in the future to help prepare residents to give lectures.

Standardized evaluation of satisfaction within urology residents during clinical training: Implementation of a new urological residency rotation program at the university hospital Frankfurt

Background

Structured curricula are demanded to improve training programs of future urologists. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptance of the newly implemented residency rotation program at the University Hospital Frankfurt. Primary endpoint was resident's satisfaction with the current residency rotation program. Secondary endpoint was the fulfilment of the objectives and expectations by residents.

Methods

A standardized 15-item, online-based survey was sent to every urologic resident of the University Hospital Frankfurt, completing their rotation between August 2020 and August 2022. In addition to baseline characteristics, training and working conditions were assessed. Descriptive statistics were applied.

Results

In total 15 rotations of the Residency Rotation Program at the University Hospital Frankfurt were evaluated, including urologic practice (5/15), Intermediate Care Unit (4/15), urooncology (4/15) and clinical exchange to St. Gallen (2/15). Overall, the majority were very (67%) or rather satisfied (2%) with their rotation. Of the pre-rotation defined objectives, 71% were fulfilled, 18% partially fulfilled and 8% not fulfilled. With respect to the expectations, 67% were fulfilled, 19% partly fulfilled and 4% were not fulfilled. All residents would recommend their respective rotations.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrate that the residency rotation program at the University Hospital Frankfurt enjoys a high level of acceptance as well as a positive impact on urologic training. Satisfaction with the completed rotation was convincing, most of the expectations and objectives for the respective rotation could be fulfilled. These results help to ensure the quality of urologic curricula and to improve the structure of training programs for future urologists.