Imaging findings of unusual anorectal and perirectal pathology: a multi-modality approach

Endorectal Ultrasound and Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Rectal Cancer Staging: A Modern Multimodality Approach

Preoperative staging represents a crucial point for the management, type of surgery, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy in patient with rectal cancer. The most recent clinical guidelines in oncology recommend an accurate preoperative evaluation in order to address early and advanced tumors to different therapeutic options. In particular, potential pitfalls may occur in the assessment of T3 tumors, which represents the most common stage at diagnosis. The depth of tumor invasion is known to be an important prognostic factor in rectal carcinoma; as a consequence, the T3 imaging classification has a substantial importance for treatment strategy and patient survival. However, the differentiation between tumor invasion of perirectal fat and mesorectal desmoplastic reactions remains a main goal for radiologists. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is actually considered as the best imaging modality for rectal cancer staging. Although the endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) is the preferred staging method for early tumors, it could also be useful in identifying perirectal fat invasion. Moreover, the addiction of diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) improves the diagnostic performance of MRI in rectal cancer staging by adding functional information about rectal tumor and adjacent mesorectal tissues. This study investigated the diagnostic performance of conventional MRI alone, in combination with the DWI technique and ERUS in order to assess the best diagnostic imaging combination for rectal cancer staging.

The bottom line: MRI and CT findings of unusual rectal and perirectal pathology

Although common nonspecific symptoms (i.e., rectal bleeding, pelvic pressure, and change in bowel habits) are associated with rectal cancer, occasionally these are related to a different underlying disease. Over the past few years, considerable progress has been made in imaging of the rectum. Specifically, new magnetic resonance techniques and capabilities provide impressive high-resolution assessment of the rectal wall and enable evaluation and characterization of the perirectal tissues. This paper reviews imaging findings of uncommon causes of rectal and perirectal pathology that may be clinically confounded with rectal cancer. Radiologists need to be aware of uncommon pathologies in this region in order to facilitate optimal management decisions.

Review article: the investigation and management of rectal neuroendocrine tumours

BACKGROUND

Rectal neuroendocrine tumours (NETs) are increasingly identified at endoscopy possibly as a result of bowel cancer screening programmes.

AIM

To present a review of the literature to aid clinicians in the diagnosis and management of rectal neuroendocrine tumours.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted through MEDLINE using search terms: rectal, rectum, carcinoid, NET, therapy, endoscopy, mucosal resection, submucosal dissection. Relevant articles were identified through manual review with reference lists reviewed for additional articles.

RESULTS

The incidence of rectal neuroendocrine tumours is approximately 1 per 100 000 population per year with the majority (80-90%) being <1 cm and localised to the submucosa. Metastatic disease is infrequent (<20%) with risk factors including size, atypical appearance, grade and depth of invasion. The primary resection modality influences complete resection rates and the need for secondary therapy. A thorough pre-resection diagnostic work up is required for lesions that are at higher risk of invasion and metastasis. Device-assisted endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection are used to resect localised rectal neuroendocrine tumours <2 cm. Transanal surgery is also used to resect localised 1-2 cm rectal neuroendocrine tumours. Oncological surgical resection is used for rectal neuroendocrine tumours that are >2 cm or with invasion and regional disease. The treatment of advanced disease is multimodal.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term tumour biology of small rectal neuroendocrine tumours remains unclear. There is uncertain impact from bowel cancer screening programmes on rectal neuroendocrine tumour incidence, morbidity and mortality. Referral to neuroendocrine tumour centres for patients with locally advanced disease or metastatic disease is recommended.

Benign and malignant tumors of the rectum and perirectal region

Although most rectal masses are histologically characterized as adenocarcinomas, the rectum and perirectal region can be affected by a wide variety of tumors and tumor-like conditions that can mimic the symptoms caused by rectal adenocarcinoma, including mucosal or submucosal rectal tumors such as lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, leiomyosarcoma, neuroendocrine tumor, hemangioma, and melanoma, as well as tumors of the perirectal region such as developmental cyst, neurogenic tumor, osseous tumor, and other miscellaneous conditions. As a group, tumors of the rectum are considerably different from the group of tumors that arise in the perirectal region: they are most often neoplastic, symptomatic, and malignant, whereas tumors arising in the perirectal region are most commonly congenital, asymptomatic, and benign. Proctoscopy with biopsy is the most important method for the diagnosis of rectal tumors, but this procedure cannot determine the precise intramural extension of a rectal tumor and cannot accurately distinguish submucosal and intramural tumors from extramural tumors. Cross-sectional imaging, especially transrectal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, allows evaluation of the entire bowel wall thickness and the perirectal tissues, helping further characterize these tumors. Recognition of the existence of these masses and their key clinical and imaging features is crucial for clinicians to accurately diagnose and appropriately manage these conditions.

Imaging of presacral masses--a multidisciplinary approach

Our objective is to describe an approach for retrorectal/presacral mass evaluation on imaging with attention to imaging features, allowing for refinement of the differential diagnosis of these masses. Elaborate on clinically relevant features that may affect biopsy or surgical approach, of which the radiologist should be aware. A review of current literature regarding the diagnosis and treatment of retrorectal/presacral masses was performed with attention to specific findings, which may lend refinement to the differential diagnosis of these masses. Cases were obtained by searching through a radiology database at a single institution after Institutional Review Board approval. Recent advances in imaging and treatment methods have led to the increased role of radiology in both imaging and tissue diagnosis of retrorectal masses. Surgical philosophies surrounding the treatment of these masses have not significantly changed in recent years, but there are a few key factors of which the radiologist must be aware. The radiologist can offer refinement of the differential diagnosis of retrorectal masses and can elaborate on salient findings which could alter the need for neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy, pre-surgical tissue diagnosis and surgical approach. This article presents an imaging approach to retrorectal/presacral masses with emphasis on findings which can dictate the ultimate need for neoadjuvant therapy and pre-surgical tissue diagnosis and alter the preferred surgical approach. This article consolidates key findings, so radiologists can become more clinically relevant in the evaluation of these masses.

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal cancer

Since its introduction in the 1980s, total mesorectal excision (TME) has been the standard surgical technique for treating rectal cancer. This procedure involves removing the rectum and the surrounding envelope of fat along the plane of the mesorectal fascia. Resecting this embryological unit reduces the local recurrence rate by removing all local lymph nodes, including those with occult metastatic disease; however, this surgery is associated with mortality and morbidity. Complications include incontinence for patients given an anastomosis, long-term stoma formation, and sexual and bladder dysfunction. Local excision of rectal cancer using the transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) technique is associated with fewer complications, and therefore, is used as an alternative in specific circumstances. We outline the technique, its indications, imaging appearances and complications.

How useful is endorectal ultrasound in the management of early rectal carcinoma?

INTRODUCTION

Endorectal ultrasonography (EUS) is used to T stage early rectal tumours and select patients to whom transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) could be offered. Published papers have shown that EUS can have good accuracy, but there is little literature on how EUS influences patient management. The study aim is to ascertain the value of EUS in the management of early rectal tumours.

METHODS

Patients with adenomas/early rectal carcinoma being considered for TEM were prospectively studied. Each patient underwent EUS. The surgeon recorded the expected T stage, confidence level of the T stage and management plan for each patient on a proforma before and after the ultrasound result was revealed. Comparison was made between the ultrasound stage and final pathological stage where available.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients were referred over 2 years. Nine were out of reach of the rigid probe and were excluded. Proformas were completed on 53/87 patients (age range 28-87 years, mean age 66 years, 30 males/23 females). Forty-eight patients had a pathological report to compare with the EUS T stage. Ultrasound agreed with the pathological T staging in 43 patients (90%). Patient management was changed in five patients. In 30% of (16/53) patients, EUS increased the confidence level for T staging.

CONCLUSION

Although EUS has a high accuracy in predicting the T stage of early rectal cancers, it never changes the management plan for lesions thought to be benign. It seldom changes the pre-operative selection process when clinical examination is considered with other imaging modalities (MRI/CT). EUS should be reserved for answering specific questions in difficult cases rather than for all patients.

What is hiding in the hindgut sac? Looking beyond rectal carcinoma

Objectives

Although rectal cancer is by far and large the most common pathology involving the rectum that needs imaging, there are many other important but less common pathological conditions affecting anorectal region. The objective of this pictorial review is to discuss the cross-sectional imaging features of less common anorectal and perirectal diseases.

Results

Although a specific histological diagnosis cannot usually be made due to considerable overlap in the imaging appearances of anorectal diseases, this review illustrates the cross-sectional imaging findings with emphasis on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) that can help in narrowing down the differentials to a reasonable extent.

Teaching points

• Variety of pathology exists in the anorectum apart from common rectal carcinoma

• Anorectal diseases present as non-specific wall thickening indistinguishable from rectal carcinoma

• Computed tomography (CT) and MRI can help in narrowing down the differentials, although often biopsy is warranted.

Rectum sarcoma: challenging diagnostic and therapeutic modalities

INTRODUCTION

Sarcomas are malignant tumors that arise from mesenchymal tissue at any of the body sites. They incorporate the wide category of GISTs and are classified in various histological types. Histological grading is another indicator of the degree of malignancy, the probability of distant metastases, and survival but remains a poor definition of local recurrence.

DISCUSSION

The size and depth of invasion are the most important prognostic factors. Since they grow within the intestinal wall, the symptoms are usually few or late, leading to delays in diagnosis. Most common signs are rectal bleeding, abdominal or anal pain, diarrhea, tenesmus and weight loss. The diagnostic and staging protocol of stromal tumors of the rectum includes mainly endoscopic surveillance, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. Therefore, rectum sarcoma (RS) consists one of the most biologically virulent cancers and is difficult to cure by conventional procedures. The treatment is primarily surgical, where possible, and should guarantee complete clearance of the tumor, which often requires an aggressive approach. Unfortunately, the minority of patients is eligible to undergo surgical intervention. In addition, surgical removal of RS does not necessarily indicate a patient's long-term recovery. Alternative therapies, such as radio- and chemotherapy, proved insufficient. Elucidation of its molecular basis may prove useful in developing and identifying prognostic biomarkers.

Anorectal opportunistic diseases in human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome patients: spectrum of cross-sectional imaging findings

Patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus, particularly male homosexuals, are prone to develop disorders involving the anorectal and perineal structures. Cross-sectional imaging techniques, such as multidetector computed tomography with multiplanar reformations and magnetic resonance imaging performed with phased-array coils, are increasingly adopted to detect and stage infectious and neoplastic diseases, and to assess posttreatment modifications. Pyogenic perianal sepsis may be usefully investigated with imaging, particularly to assess the presence and topography of abscess collections to allow a correct surgical choice. Rectal inflammatory involvement is frequently detected during intestinal opportunistic infections, such as cytomegalovirus, pseudomembranous, and amebic colitides, including primary and secondary imaging signs consistent with proctocolitis. Anal carcinoma and intestinal lymphoma are increasingly diagnosed; therefore, special attention should be paid to the identification of solid tissue consistent with tumor; furthermore, MRI provides optimal staging and posttreatment follow-up of neoplastic lesions. Knowledge of this varied spectrum of anorectal and perineal opportunistic abnormalities and their imaging appearances should help radiologists to propose appropriate differential diagnoses, suggest correlation with laboratory and microbiological assays or biopsy, and reliably assess therapeutic response.

MRI and CT of anal carcinoma: a pictorial review

BACKGROUND

Squamocellular anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with risk factors.

METHODS

State-of-the-art imaging with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using phased-array coils and volumetric multidetector computed tomography (CT) provides detailed visualisation of anal disorders, identification and extent assessment of neoplastic tissue, detection and characterisation of nodal and visceral metastases. MRI has been recommended by the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) as the preferred modality of choice to stage anal cancer, taking into account the maximum tumour diameter, invasion of adjacent structures and regional lymph node involvement.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional imaging techniques allow the identification of coexisting complications, and differentiation from other perineal abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

Cross-sectional imaging is useful for planning radiotherapy, surgical drainage or salvage abdomino-perineal resection. After chemo-radiotherapy, MRI follow-up provides confident reassessment of therapeutic response, persistent or recurrent disease. TEACHING POINTS : • Anal carcinoma is increasingly diagnosed in patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), anoreceptive intercourse, chronic inflammatory bowel disease. • An established association exists with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and premalignant intra-epithelial dysplasia. • Phased-array MRI is recommended as the preferred imaging modality for regional staging. • Imaging allows detection of infectious complications, planning of radiotherapy or salvage surgery. • Follow-up MRI allows reliable assessment of therapeutic response after chemo-radiotherapy.

MRI findings of rectal submucosal tumors

Rectal submucosal lesions encompass a wide variety of benign and malignant tumors involving the rectum. With optical colonoscopy, any mass-like protrusion covered by normal mucosa, whether the underlying process is intramural or extramural in origin, may be reported as a submucosal lesion. Whereas the assessment of submucosal lesions may be limited with performing optical colonoscopy, cross-sectional imaging such as CT, transrectal ultrasonography and MRI allows the evaluation of perirectal tissues and pelvic organs in addition to the entire thickness of the rectum, and so this is advantageous for the assessment of rectal submucosal tumors. Among these, MRI is the best investigative modality for soft tissue characterization. Therefore, knowledge of the MRI features of rectal submucosal tumors can help achieve accurate preoperative diagnoses and facilitate the appropriate management.

Gd-DTPA-loaded PLGA microbubbles as both ultrasound contrast agent and MRI contrast agent--a feasibility research

OBJECTIVE

To prepare the Gd-DTPA-loaded poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) microbubbles for both ultrasound imaging and MRI imaging.

METHODS

Biodegradable high-molecular-weight poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) was used as an encapsulating vehicle to fabricate a contrast agent composed of gadolinium diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) and fluorocarbon-filled microbubbles by using double emulsion method. The morphology, size, and Gd loading capacity of PLGA microparticles were assessed. The efficacy of the contrast agent for ultrasound and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging was evaluated by in vivo imaging of hepatic vessels and the liver parenchyma of rabbit following injection of the contrast agent. Additionally, the liver and kidney functions were examined before and at 7, 14, 30 days after injection.

RESULTS

Electron microscopy showed Gd loaded PLGA microbubbles were spherical in shape. The mean diameter were 1.47 +/- 0.38 microm and the Gd loading was 25 +/- 2 microg/mg. Right after the injection of the PLGA microbubbles, the ultrasound echo intensity of hepatic vessels and the liver parenchyma was significantly enhanced. Moreover, enhanced signal intensity of the liver parenchyma on MR images was observed for approximately 30 min after injection of the contrast agent. Neither marked changes in the liver and kidney functions nor other severe complications were detected during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Gd-DTPA-loaded PLGA microbubbles could enhance both ultrasound imaging and MRI imaging.

How useful is rectal endosonography in the staging of rectal cancer?

It is essential in treating rectal cancer to have adequate preoperative imaging, as accurate staging can influence the management strategy, type of resection, and candidacy for neoadjuvant therapy. In the last twenty years, endorectal ultrasound (ERUS) has become the primary method for locoregional staging of rectal cancer. ERUS is the most accurate modality for assessing local depth of invasion of rectal carcinoma into the rectal wall layers (T stage). Lower accuracy for T2 tumors is commonly reported, which could lead to sonographic overstaging of T3 tumors following preoperative therapy. Unfortunately, ERUS is not as good for predicting nodal metastases as it is for tumor depth, which could be related to the unclear definition of nodal metastases. The use of multiple criteria might improve accuracy. Failure to evaluate nodal status could lead to inadequate surgical resection. ERUS can accurately distinguish early cancers from advanced ones, with a high detection rate of residual carcinoma in the rectal wall. ERUS is also useful for detection of local recurrence at the anastomosis site, which might require fine-needle aspiration of the tissue. Overstaging is more frequent than understaging, mostly due to inflammatory changes. Limitations of ERUS are operator and experience dependency, limited tolerance of patients, and limited range of depth of the transducer. The ERUS technique requires a learning curve for orientation and identification of images and planes. With sufficient time and effort, quality and accuracy of the ERUS procedure could be improved.