The lumbar artery perforator flap: clinical review and guidance on image reporting

A Guide to Perforator Flap Selection for Buttock Pressure Sore Reconstruction

ABSTRACT

Perforator flaps have been increasingly used to repair stage IV buttock pressure ulcers. However, no one has proposed an approach for stage IV buttock pressure ulcers repairing based on the subregion of buttock pressure ulcers. This study aims to evaluate the effect of perforator flaps in the repair of stage IV buttock pressure ulcers, and flap selection was based on the location of the pressure ulcers. Over the past 5 years, we evaluated 65 cases of stage IV buttock pressure ulcers repaired using perforator flaps. Flap selection was based on the subregion of each buttock pressure ulcer, following our approach. A total of 87 perforator flaps were used for 65 cases, including 42 superior gluteal artery perforator flaps, 19 fourth lumbar artery perforator flaps, and 26 descending inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps. All patients showed satisfactory reconstruction. The authors' approach can support surgeons in selecting the appropriate flaps to repair stage IV buttock pressure ulcers and achieve excellent reconstructive outcomes. This method makes the selection of flaps for pressure ulcer repair systematic, simple, and highly feasible and thus is worthy of promotion.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps in Autologous Breast Reconstruction

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap should be considered for autologous breast reconstruction when a patient's abdomen is unavailable as a donor site. The LAP flap can be harvested with dimensions and volume of distribution that facilitate the restoration of a naturally shaped breast with a sloping upper pole and maximal projection in the lower one-third. Harvest of LAP flaps lifts the buttocks and narrows the waist and, consequently, aesthetic improvement in body contour is generally achieved with these procedures. Although technically challenging, the LAP flap is a valuable tool in the practice of autologous breast reconstruction.

Lumbar Artery Perforator Flaps: A Systematic Review of Free Tissue Transfers and Anatomical Characteristics

BACKGROUND

The lumbar artery perforator (LAP) flap has gained popularity as a versatile flap in reconstructive surgery; however, few studies have analyzed salient characteristics of this flap. We set out to provide a comprehensive appraisal of free tissue transfers of LAP flaps with specific attention to anatomic features and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Using preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines, we identified clinical, radiographic, and cadaveric studies of LAP flaps and assessed outcomes, complications, and anatomic parameters, such as pedicle length, diameter, location, and course.

RESULTS

A total of 254 articles were initially reviewed, of which 18 met the final inclusion criteria. Ten studies were primarily concerned with anatomic characteristics, and most clinical studies related to breast reconstruction. The operative durations varied between 4.8 and 9.2 hours. Partial and total flap losses were estimated at 2.6% and 7.6%, respectively. Acute revision rates ranged from 16% to 24% related to hematoma, arterial thrombus, and venous thrombus. Donor-site seromas were frequently encountered in breast reconstruction with an incidence of 17% to 78%.

CONCLUSIONS

The LAP flap has demonstrated favorable outcomes in various reconstructive scenarios. The caudal perforators generally offer more pedicle length, greater pedicle diameter, and septocutaneous course and may be better suited for flap design. For breast reconstruction, the LAP flap is a useful alternative to abdominal-based flaps, and special attention should be given to optimizing pedicle length using interposition grafts and methods that minimize seroma formation at the donor site.

[Perforator-based keystone flap in the reconstruction of extensive tissue defects after lumbosacral spondylodesis]

BACKGROUND

Prolonged surgical site infections after spinal fusion surgery may lead to exposure of the implant due to the formation of extensive tissue defects and endanger the clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to enlighten the role of the keystone perforator flap method in the reconstruction of lumbar soft tissue defects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective study included 11 consecutive patients with a wound dehiscence of over 6 × 6 cm defect area persisting for 2 weeks after spinal fusion. The keystone perforator flap was applied for the reconstruction of tissue defects, whereas the arterial blood supply of the flaps was based on the intramuscular and intermuscular perforating branches of the dorsal branches of the lumbar arteries.

RESULTS

The median age of our cohort was 58 years. The median body mass index (BMI) and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) were 29.9 and 3.4, respectively. In eight cases a lumbosacral was carried out whereas in the remaining series a lumbar fusion was performed. In the course of the subsequent wound revision, on average 4 applications of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) were performed. The average defect size was 7.5 cm in width and 16.5 cm in length. The microbiological analysis of the tissue samples obtained intraoperatively after repeated NPWT revealed positive evidence of pathogenic bacteria in all cases. The average duration of inpatient treatment after flap surgery was 15 days, which was significantly shorter than the NPWT management of the open defect wounds (15.5 ± 2.5 vs. 37 ± 16.5, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The keystone perforator flap offers a stable coverage for soft tissue defects and supports infection control after spinal fusion.

Alternative flaps in autologous breast reconstruction

The gold standard for autologous reconstruction in the post-mastectomy patient remains the deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap, although many women may not be candidates for abdominally based free tissue transfer. In this scenario, there are several other donor site options based from the thigh (transverse and diagonal upper gracilis flaps, profunda artery perforator flap, lateral thigh flap) and trunk (lumbar artery perforator flap, superior and inferior gluteal artery perforator flaps). This study will review the history, relevant anatomy, surgical technique and outcomes for alternative flaps in autologous reconstruction. Additionally, preoperative imaging (CTA, MRA) and novel applications (stacking flaps, neurotization) in breast reconstructive microsurgery will be discussed.