Combined chemo-radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: current status and future development

Matrices and Affinity Ligands for Antibody Purification and Corresponding Applications in Radiotherapy

Antibodies have become an important class of biological products in cancer treatments such as radiotherapy. The growing therapeutic applications have driven a demand for high-purity antibodies. Affinity chromatography with a high affinity and specificity has always been utilized to separate antibodies from complex mixtures. Quality chromatographic components (matrices and affinity ligands) have either been found or generated to increase the purity and yield of antibodies. More importantly, some matrices (mainly particles) and affinity ligands (including design protocols) for antibody purification can act as radiosensitizers or carriers for therapeutic radionuclides (or for radiosensitizers) either directly or indirectly to improve the therapeutic efficiency of radiotherapy. This paper provides a brief overview on the matrices and ligands used in affinity chromatography that are involved in antibody purification and emphasizes their applications in radiotherapy to enrich potential approaches for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy.

Concurrent versus sequential chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced stage III non-small cell lung cancer: Retrospective analysis in a single United Kingdom cancer centre

INTRODUCTION

Stage III unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a complex disease group with poor long-term survival. Clinical data suggests curative intent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is superior to a sequential (SCRT) approach but comes with additional toxicities. We report real world data regarding overall survival and toxicity to aid clinical decision making in balancing optimal management and treatment tolerability.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of survival data, treatment toxicities, and rates of treatment completion were performed for 241 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC within Leeds Cancer Centre from January 2011 to December 2014.

RESULTS

Median survival was 18.8 months following SCRT compared to 22.7 months following CCRT HR 0.90 (95% CI 0.67-1.20, P = 0.46). Median follow up was 21 months. The clinical benefit rate for CCRT compared to SCRT was 22.7% versus 24%. In the CCRT group 63.8% patients completed treatment compared to 46% in the SCRT arm (P < 0.01). 90-day mortality rates were low in CCRT and SCRT cohorts at 4.3% and 1% respectively. There was greater pulmonary toxicity following CCRT versus SCRT (13.5% versus 1.0%, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

This study provides real world data regarding the radical treatment of unresectable stage III NSCLC. Increased hospital admissions and pneumonitis toxicities did not adversely affect treatment completion for those undergoing CCRT; this was likely due to careful patient selection based on performance status. SCRT still remains an important treatment modality for patients who cannot tolerate the upfront CCRT approach but could still be treated with curative intent.

Validation and optimization of a predictive model for radiation pneumonitis in patients with lung cancer

The aim of the current retrospective study was to validate a predictive model for radiation pneumonitis (STRIPE) in an independent dataset and to investigate whether the addition of other potential risk factors could strengthen the accuracy of the model. Consecutive patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC; n=71) treated with definitive concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy were retrospectively assessed for radiation pneumonitis (RP). The results identified that 16 (23%) patients developed grade ≥2 RP. Furthermore, STRIPE score (intermediate vs. low risk) was independently associated with the development of RP [odds ratio (OR), 3.72; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.00-13.89], whereas current smoking status was found to be protective against RP (OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.78). Similar discriminatory power of the STRIPE score was observed as in the original study. The addition of smoking status strengthened the model's discriminatory ability to predict RP. Thus, the addition of smoking status as a risk factor may strengthen the accuracy of the model for predicting RP in patients with NSCLC.

Soy Isoflavones Promote Radioprotection of Normal Lung Tissue by Inhibition of Radiation-Induced Activation of Macrophages and Neutrophils

INTRODUCTION

Radiation therapy for lung cancer is limited by toxicity to normal lung tissue that results from an inflammatory process, leading to pneumonitis and fibrosis. Soy isoflavones mitigate inflammatory infiltrates and radiation-induced lung injury, but the cellular immune mediators involved in the radioprotective effect are unknown.

METHODS

Mice received a single dose of 10 Gy radiation delivered to the lungs and daily oral treatment of soy isoflavones. At different time points, mice were either processed to harvest bronchoalveolar lavage fluid for differential cell counting and lungs for flow cytometry or immunohistochemistry studies.

RESULTS

Combined soy and radiation led to a reduction in infiltration and activation of alveolar macrophages and neutrophils in both the bronchoalveolar and lung parenchyma compartments. Soy treatment protected F4/80CD11c interstitial macrophages, which are known to play an immunoregulatory role and are decreased by radiation. Furthermore, soy isoflavones reduced the levels of nitric oxide synthase 2 expression while increasing arginase-1 expression after radiation, suggesting a switch from proinflammatory M1 macrophage to an anti-inflammatory M2 macrophage phenotype. Soy also prevented the influx of activated neutrophils in lung caused by radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Soy isoflavones inhibit the infiltration and activation of macrophages and neutrophils induced by radiation in lungs. Soy isoflavones-mediated modulation of macrophage and neutrophil responses to radiation may contribute to a mechanism of resolution of radiation-induced chronic inflammation leading to radioprotection of lung tissue.

New approaches to radiation protection

Radioprotectors are compounds that protect against radiation injury when given prior to radiation exposure. Mitigators can protect against radiation injury when given after exposure but before symptoms appear. Radioprotectors and mitigators can potentially improve the outcomes of radiotherapy for cancer treatment by allowing higher doses of radiation and/or reduced damage to normal tissues. Such compounds can also potentially counteract the effects of accidental exposure to radiation or deliberate exposure (e.g., nuclear reactor meltdown, dirty bomb, or nuclear bomb explosion); hence they are called radiation countermeasures. Here, we will review the general principles of radiation injury and protection and describe selected examples of radioprotectors/mitigators ranging from small-molecules to proteins to cell-based treatments. We will emphasize agents that are in more advanced stages of development.

Axitinib Improves Radiotherapy in Murine Xenograft Lung Tumors

A third of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with un-resectable stage III locally advanced disease and are currently treated by chemo-radiotherapy but the median survival is only about 21months. Using an orthotopic xenograft model of lung carcinoma, we have investigated the combination of radiotherapy with the anti-angiogenic drug axitinib (AG-013736, Pfizer), which is a small molecule receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that selectively targets the signal transduction induced by VEGF binding to VEGFR receptors. We have tested the combination of axitinib with radiotherapy in nude mice bearing human NSCLC A549 lung tumors. The therapy effect was quantitatively evaluated in lung tumor nodules. The modulation of radiation-induced pneumonitis, vascular damage and fibrosis by axitinib was assessed in lung tissue. Lung irradiation combined with long-term axitinib treatment was safe resulting in minimal weight loss and no vascular injury in heart, liver and kidney tissues. A significant decrease in the size of lung tumor nodules was observed with either axitinib or radiation, associated with a decrease in Ki-67 staining and a heavy infiltration of inflammatory cells in tumor nodules. The lungs of mice treated with radiation and axitinib showed a complete response with no detectable residual tumor nodules. A decrease in pneumonitis, vascular damage and fibrosis were observed in lung tissues from mice treated with radiation and axitinib. Our studies suggest that axitinib is a potent and safe drug to use in conjunction with radiotherapy for lung cancer that could also act as a radioprotector for lung tissue by reducing pneumonitis and fibrosis.

Outcomes of chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Historically, long-term survival rates in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been disappointingly low, and treatment toxicities have been significant.

AIMS

To assess survival outcomes, treatment toxicities, patterns of disease recurrence and prognostic variables for patients with locally advanced NSCLC treated with concurrent chemoradiation.

METHODS

Patients who completed treatment with chemotherapy and simultaneous chest irradiation for locally advanced NSCLC at the Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Sydney, Australia) in the period January 1994 to July 2009 were identified. We retrospectively reviewed the patients' medical records to obtain patient demographic data, clinical data, information on tumour characteristics and treatment administered, and outcome data such as survival, treatment toxicities and tumour recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

Our patient cohort consisted largely of urban-dwelling male smokers with good baseline performance status. As of December 2012, 93/105 patients had died. Median overall and progression-free survival was 20 months and 11 months respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 17%. Eight patients had survived longer than 8 years, and 13 patients enjoyed progression-free survival longer than 3 years. Locoregional tumour recurrence occurred most frequently, followed by brain and bone metastases. Adverse effects from chemoradiation included varying degrees of gastrointestinal, pulmonary and haematological toxicity. Three deaths occurred from radiation-induced pneumonitis. Weight loss at presentation was statistically significantly associated with worse overall survival in univariate analyses (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our survival results are consistent with the recent international literature and indicate that a proportion of patients with locally advanced NSCLC can enjoy prolonged survival following treatment with concurrent chemoradiation.

Novel chemoradiotherapy with concomitant boost thoracic radiation and concurrent cisplatin and vinorelbine for stage IIIA and IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death in the world. The results from concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) are still disappointing, although long-term survival can be observed in certain populations of patients. Local control is a critical problem in CRT; dose escalation of thoracic radiation (TRT) in CRT has not been effective.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The authors developed a novel TRT scheme of accelerated hyperfractionation using concomitant boost TRT (ccbRT). Total doses of 64 Gy and 40 Gy were given to the gross tumor volume and elective clinical target volume, respectively, for 20 working days, combined with systemic chemotherapy with cisplatin (day 1) and vinorelbine (days 1, 8) with a 3-week interval (NP regimen). The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of this novel treatment.

RESULTS

From July 2002 to July 2010, 56 patients were enrolled in this study. One patient was excluded from the analysis. All 55 patients completed ccbRT, and 52 patients (94.5%) underwent at least 2 cycles of NP. Grade 3 esophagitis and grade 3 radiation pneumonitis were observed in 18.2% and 3.6% of the patients. Complete response and partial response were achieved in 24.5% and 69.1% of the patients, resulting in a response rate of 93.6%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were 16.7 months and 58.2 months.

CONCLUSION

CRT using ccbRT with concurrent NP is safe and effective for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, with good PFS and excellent OS.

Toxicity of concurrent radiochemotherapy for locally advanced non--small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the literature

Concurrent radiochemotherapy (RCT) is the treatment of choice for patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Two meta-analyses were inconclusive in an attempt to define the optimal concurrent RCT scheme. Besides efficacy, treatment toxicity will influence the appointed treatment of choice. A systematic review of the literature was performed to record the early and late toxicities, as well as overall survival, of concurrent RCT regimens in patients with NSCLC. The databases of PubMed, Ovid, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles on concurrent RCT published between January 1992 and December 2009. Publications of phase II and phase III trials with ≥ 50 patients per treatment arm were selected. Patient characteristics, chemotherapy regimen (mono- or polychemotherapy, high or low dose) and radiotherapy scheme, acute and late toxicity, and overall survival data were compared. Seventeen articles were selected: 12 studies with cisplatin-containing regimens and 5 studies using carboplatin. A total of 13 series with mono- or polychemotherapy schedules--as single dose or double or triple high-dose or daily cisplatin-containing (≤ 30 mg/m(2)/wk) chemotherapy were found. Acute esophagitis ≥ grade 3 was observed in up to 18% of the patients. High-dose cisplatin regimens resulted in more frequent and severe hematologic toxicity, nausea, and vomiting than did other schemes. The toxicity profile was more favorable in low-dose chemotherapy schedules. From phase II and III trials published between 1992 and 2010, it can be concluded that concurrent RCT with monochemotherapy consisting of daily cisplatin results in favorable acute and late toxicity compared with concurrent RCT with single high-dose chemotherapy, doublets, or triplets.

Chemotherapy beyond first-line in stage IV metastatic non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

Platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is considered the standard of care for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, prognosis after recurrent or progressive disease following first-line chemotherapy is usually poor. Maintenance chemotherapy, second line treatment and even third line chemotherapy are available for patients with advanced NSCLC. Unfortunately, few patients are candidates for chemotherapy beyond first line. The present study evaluated characteristics of patients with NSCLC and outcomes of the treatment of their metastatic disease, with emphasis on second and third-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective observational study of 2,673 patients with metastatic, stage IV, non-small cell lung cancer admitted for treatment in two São Paulo institutions. First-line chemotherapy was defined as the first chemotherapeutic approach administered to the patient. Second and third-line chemotherapy were defined as the systemic treatment administered after discontinuing first-line chemotherapy, either for intolerance or for progressive or recurrent disease.

RESULTS

Most patients (57.9%) received first-line chemotherapy, and approximately 23.4% received second-line and 8% third-line regimens. Only 2.5% received fourth-line chemotherapy. Median overall survival (OS) was 8 months (95% CI: 8-9 months). At univariate analyses, gender (p < 0.05), histology, first-line chemotherapy, objective response to first-line chemotherapy and second-line chemotherapy (p < 0.01) were prognostic factors related to overall survival. At multivariate analysis, only performance status (p = 0.04), receiving any second-line chemotherapy (p < 0.01) and response to first-line chemotherapy (p < 0.01) were independent predictors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Second-line chemotherapy is a therapeutic strategy that should be considered for a selected group of patients. Performance status and response to first-line chemotherapy could be determinant characteristics to select patients who might be treated beyond first-line chemotherapy.

Combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in locally advanced NSCLC

The combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is considered to be a standard approach for patients with locally advanced, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer. The current state of the art of combined radiochemotherapy supported by evidence-based data is presented. As shown in the meta-analyses, the concurrent radiochemotherapy gives a superior outcome in terms of survival compared with sequential delivery of both modalities. This is obtained at the expense of higher toxicity, which makes further intensification of radiochemotherapy challenging. Eligibility of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer for such an approach is limited. The new methods to improve treatment results, such as selection of proper strategies, incorporation of molecular agents into combined treatment and radiotherapy technique modifications are discussed.

Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in the elderly

Systemic chemotherapy provides improvement in both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Elderly patients have more comorbidities and tend to tolerate more poorly aggressive chemotherapy and radiation therapy than younger individuals. Our purpose in this article is to summarize recent studies of single-agent chemotherapy and combination regimens with cytotoxic or targeted therapies in the management of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. We have reviewed the available evidence in the literature to gauge the results of therapy for elderly patients with lung cancer. We found that single-agent chemotherapy remains the standard of care for nonselected elderly patients. Retrospective analyses suggest that the efficacy of platinum-based combination chemotherapy is similar in fit older and younger patients, with increased but acceptable toxicity for elderly patients. Therefore, the outcomes in the fit elderly mirror results observed in younger patients, although toxicity is generally greater.