The best strategy for RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients in first-line treatment: A classic and Bayesian meta-analysis

The impact of PARP inhibitors in the whole scenario of ovarian cancer management: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin is still the cornerstone of the first-line treatment in advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (aEOC) management and the clinical response to platinum-derived agents remains the major predictor of long-term outcomes.

PATIENT AND METHODS

We aimed to identify the best treatment of the aEOC in terms of efficacy and safety, considering all treatment phases. A systematic literature search has been done to compare all treatments in aEOC population. Randomized trials with available survival and safety data published in the 2011-2022 timeframe were enclosed. Only trials reporting the BRCA or HRD (Homologous Recombination Deficiency) status were considered.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

A ranking of treatment schedules on the progression-free survival (PFS) endpoint was performed. The random-effect model was used to elaborate and extract data. The Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) by Bayesian model was performed by STATA v17. Data on PFS were extracted in terms of Hazard ratio with relative confidence intervals.

RESULTS

This NMA involved 18 trials for a total of 9105 patients. Within 12 treatment groups, we performed 3 different sensitivity analyses including "all comers" Intention to Treat (ITT) population, BRCA-mutated (BRCAm), and HRD subgroups, respectively. Considering the SUCRA-reported cumulative PFS probabilities, we showed that in the ITT population, the inferred best treatment was niraparib plus bevacizumab with a SUCRA of 96.7. In the BRCAm subgroup, the best SUCRA was for olaparib plus chemotherapy (96,9). The HRD population showed an inferred best treatment for niraparib plus bevacizumab (SUCRA 98,4). Moreover, we reported a cumulative summary of PARPi toxicity, in which different 3-4 grade toxicity profiles were observed, despite the PARPi "class effect" in terms of efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering all aEOC subgroups, the best therapeutical option was identified as PARPi plus chemotherapy and/or antiangiogenetic agents, suggesting the relevance of combinatory approaches based on molecular profile. This work underlines the potential value of "chemo-free" regimens to prolong the platinum-free interval (PFI).

First-line systemic treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

The rapid development of novel therapeutic options for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) has generated some uncertainty about the rational choice of the systemic upfront treatment. So far, a variety of therapeutic strategies have been investigated, including the combination of immunecheckpoint inhibitors and anti-VEGF. To identify the treatment that should be preferred as front-line approach, we compared the efficacy and toxicity of a variety of therapeutic strategies. With this aim, we performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. OS, PFS, ORR and tolerability outcomes were considered, and for each outcome the treatment ranking was evaluated by the surface under the cumulative rankings (SUCRAs). Combination of Camrelizumab + Rivoceranib scored the best in OS, followed by Sintilimab + Bevacizumab, whereas Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab showed higher probability to be the best treatment in PFS and Sintilimab + Bevacizumab performed best in ORR. Finally, Durvalumab is the most tolerated treatment.

Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop recommendations for treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of relevant studies and develop recommendations for clinical practice.

RESULTS

Five systematic reviews and 10 randomized controlled trials met the systematic review inclusion criteria.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Doublet chemotherapy should be offered, or triplet therapy may be offered to patients with previously untreated, initially unresectable mCRC, on the basis of included studies of chemotherapy in combination with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibodies. In the first-line setting, pembrolizumab is recommended for patients with mCRC and microsatellite instability-high or deficient mismatch repair tumors; chemotherapy and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair left-sided treatment-naive RAS wild-type mCRC; chemotherapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy is recommended for microsatellite stable or proficient mismatch repair RAS wild-type right-sided mCRC. Encorafenib plus cetuximab is recommended for patients with previously treated BRAF V600E-mutant mCRC that has progressed after at least one previous line of therapy. Cytoreductive surgery plus systemic chemotherapy may be recommended for selected patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases; however, the addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy is not recommended. Stereotactic body radiation therapy may be recommended following systemic therapy for patients with oligometastases of the liver who are not considered candidates for resection. Selective internal radiation therapy is not routinely recommended for patients with unilobar or bilobar metastases of the liver. Perioperative chemotherapy or surgery alone should be offered to patients with mCRC who are candidates for potentially curative resection of liver metastases. Multidisciplinary team management and shared decision making are recommended. Qualifying statements with further details related to implementation of guideline recommendations are also included.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.

Ibrutinib and panitumumab used in combination safely in a patient with metachronous colorectal cancer and chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Ibrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor used in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Panitumumab, an mAb for epidermal growth factor receptor, is used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We wanted to present our case where we used ibrutinib and panitumumab in combination in a patient with metachronous CLL and CRC. A 58-year-old male patient with a diagnosis of CLL was receiving ibrutinib treatment and primary rectal cancer was detected. FOLFOX + panitumumab were started when metastasis was detected in the lung after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. The patients used ibrutinib and panitumumab in combination. There was no cumulative or unexpected toxicity due to the combination of both antineoplastic agents. The most important point to be considered in the use of combined drugs is the evaluation of drug-drug interactions. Toxic effects of the combination of ibrutinib and cetuximab have been reported in a patient with metastatic CRC. We used ibrutinib together with panitumumab in our case and we did not encounter any cumulative or unexpected side effects during the treatment.

Synthesizing studies for comparing different treatment sequences in clinical trials

With advances in cancer treatments and improved patient survival, more patients may go through multiple lines of treatment. It is of clinical importance to choose a sequence of effective treatments (eg, lines of treatment) for individual patients with the goal of optimizing their long-term clinical outcome (eg, survival). Several important issues arise in cancer studies. First, cancer clinical trials are usually conducted by each line of treatment. For a treatment sequence, we may have first line and second line treatment data from two different studies. Second, there is typically a treatment initiation period varying from patient to patient between progression of disease and the start of the second line treatment due to administrative reasons. Additionally, the choice of the second line treatment for patients with progression of disease may depend on their characteristics. We address all these issues and develop semiparametric methods under the potential outcome framework for the estimation of the overall survival probability for a treatment sequence and for comparing different treatment sequences. We establish the large sample properties of the proposed inferential procedures. Simulation studies and an application to a colorectal clinical trial are provided.

Shared decision-making and patient decision aids in choosing first-line targeted therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer in Taiwan

INTRODUCTION

In Taiwan, given the discrepancy between current treatment guidelines and reimbursement options, patients might require a tool to support their decision-making process when selecting a regimen for metastatic colorectal cancer, especially therapeutic strategies, and subsequent costs, along with efficacy and safety outcomes. Therefore, we developed a patient decision aid (PDA) to support patients in choosing between treatment options recommended based on the current evidence and those reimbursed by the Taiwanese National Health Insurance.

METHODS

By carefully reviewing the updated data and then interpreting the clinical tool, we conducted a needs assessment using a serial questionnaire to test for a step-by-step adjustment of the PDA.

RESULTS

Patients, their relatives, and medical team members were most concerned about outcomes, such as overall survival, progression-free survival, objective response rate, tumor shrinkage to resectable status, total medical cost, severe gastrointestinal perforation, and severe skin reaction. After a serial alpha test for quality, we performed quantitative evaluation and beta tests, revealing average scores of more than 4 points (on a scale of 1-5) for both perceptibility and utility.

CONCLUSIONS

The present findings suggest that PDAs are useful and supplement the shared decision-making practice, helping patients make decisions about preferences and consider the pros and cons of treatment regimens, along with insurance reimbursement options.

Relationships Between Köhne Category/Baseline Tumor Load and Early Tumor Shrinkage, Depth of Response, and Outcomes in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there are limited data on associations between early tumor shrinkage (ETS), depth of response (DpR), and patient characteristics.

METHODS

Data from patients with RAS wild-type mCRC who had participated in the PRIME (NCT00364013) and PEAK (NCT00819780) studies were analyzed retrospectively. ETS and DpR were assessed by baseline Köhne category/BRAF status (PRIME) and baseline tumor load (pooled PRIME and PEAK).

RESULTS

Analysis populations included 436 to 665 patients. Patients' chances of achieving ETS of 30% or greater were 63.8%, 50.4%, and 41.9% in the low-, medium-, and high-risk Köhne categories, and 21.7% in those with BRAF mutations. Corresponding percentages for the highest DpR classification (71%-100%) were 47.7% (low risk), 23.6% (medium risk), 10.0% (high risk), and 4.2% (BRAF mutant). No clear relationship was observed between baseline tumor load and ETS or DpR. An ETS of 30% or greater and higher DpR values were associated with statistically significant prolongation of median progression-free survival and overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mCRC categorized at baseline by the Köhne criteria as high risk or with BRAF mutations have lower chances of achieving an ETS of 30% or greater or a high DpR. Baseline tumor load was not predictive of ETS or DpR. Favorable ETS or DpR is associated with improved progression-free and overall survival.

Canadian guidelines on the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases

Modern management of colorectal cancer (crc) with peritoneal metastasis (pm) is based on a combination of cytoreductive surgery (crs), systemic chemotherapy, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (hipec). Although the role of hipec has recently been questioned with respect to results from the prodige 7 trial, the role and benefit of a complete crs were confirmed, as observed with a 41-month gain in median survival in that study, and 15% of patients remaining disease-free at 5 years. Still, crc with pm is associated with a poor prognosis, and good patient selection is essential. Many questions about the optimal management approach for such patients remain, but all patients with pm from crc should be referred to, or discussed with, a pm surgical oncologist, because cure is possible. The objective of the present guideline is to offer a practical approach to the management of pm from crc and to reflect on the new practice standards set by recent publications on the topic.

Integrated characterization and validation of the prognostic significance of microRNA-200s in colorectal cancer

Background

Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that microRNA-200s (miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-200c) could serve as promising molecular biomarkers for cancer prognosis. Nevertheless, the associations between miR-200s expression and colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis remain controversial.

Methods

We applied two mainstream approaches combining meta-analysis and bioinformatics analysis to answer whether miR-200s were associated with the prognosis of CRC patients and why miR-200s could be used as prognostic biomarkers for CRC.

Results

Consequently, low expression of miR-200s was associated with unfavorable overall survival (OS) in CRC patients (HR: 1.09; 95% CI 1.01–1.17; P = 0.025). According to the subgroup analysis, the prognostic role of miR-200s was more significant for tissue samples, large samples, American patients and miR-200a subgroups. Then the target genes of miR-200s were predicted and applied for functional enrichment analyses. The results showed that the target genes of miR-200s were mainly enriched into some vital ontology subjects such as regulation ability, key cell structures and binding function. Moreover, a series of important signaling pathways were identified, which were significantly linked with the initiation and progression of CRC. Additionally, a protein‑protein interaction (PPI) network of miR-200s targets was constructed to screen hub genes and modules. The identified hub genes and modules were validated to be highly involved in the occurrence and development of CRC.

Conclusions

Current evidences revealed that miR-200s could be promising biomarkers for CRC prognosis. However, the findings still need to be validated with more larger-scale prospective studies and biological experiments before miR-200s could be applied into clinical application.

RAS and BRAF in the foreground for non-small cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: Similarities and main differences for prognosis and therapies

Lung and colorectal cancer are included in the most tremendously threatening diseases in terms of incidence and death. Although they are located in completely different organs and differ in various characteristics they do share some common features, especially regarding their molecular mutational profile. Among several commonly mutated genes KRAS and BRAF are spotted to be highly associated with patient's poor disease outcome and resistance to targeted therapies mostly in liaison with other mutant activated genes. Many studies have shed light in these mechanisms for disease progression and numerous preclinical models, clinical trials and meta-analysis reports investigate the impact of specific treatments or combination of therapies. The present review is an effort to compare the mutational imprint of these genes between the two diseases and their impact in prognosis, current therapy, mechanisms of therapy resistance and future therapeutic plans and provide a spherical perspective regarding the systemic molecular profile of cancer.

Targeting EGFR and RAS/RAF Signaling in the Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: From Current Treatment Strategies to Future Perspectives

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and RAS/RAF signaling pathway plays pivotal roles in tumor progression via proliferation, survival, invasion, and immune evasion. Two anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies, cetuximab and panitumumab, have become essential components in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Treatment with these anti-EGFR antibodies has shown definite benefits when administered in all treatment lines and is strongly recommended as the preferred regimen to prolong survival, especially when administered in the first- and third-lines. Recent efforts have revealed not only mechanisms responsible for resistance to anti-EGFR antibodies, including expanded RAS mutations as a negative predictive biomarker, but also the possibility of continuing anti-EGFR antibody treatment in combination with chemotherapy. Furthermore, the challenges associated with the pharmaceutical development of treatments for patients with mutant-type BRAF mCRC are ongoing. In this review, we provide an overview of the EGFR and RAS/RAF signaling pathway and antitumor activity, focusing on practical aspects such as established treatments including patient selection, treatment strategies, and future perspectives for drug development targeting the EGFR and RAS/RAF signaling pathway.

Tumor sidedness and efficacy of first-line therapy in patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis

We conducted a systemic search of several databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that reported efficacy and safety outcomes of drugs for left-sided and right-sided metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), to identify the best available treatment. A network meta-analysis with mixed comparisons was created to interpret the best treatment option using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. In the left-sided rat sarcoma (RAS) wild-type (WT) mCRC patients, bevacizumab, panitumumab, or cetuximab with chemotherapy groups showed a significantly better objective response rate than the chemotherapy alone group. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival were better with panitumumab or cetuximab with chemotherapy than with chemotherapy alone. In the right-sided RAS WT mCRC patients, PFS for bevacizumab with chemotherapy was significantly better than that for cetuximab with chemotherapy. Cetuximab, closely followed by panitumumab, is the most effective treatment in left-sided RAS WT mCRC. Bevacizumab is more effective in right-sided mCRC.