Risk of bleeding complications and atrial fibrillation associated with ibrutinib treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Efficacy and safety of tirabrutinib monotherapy in relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphomas/leukemia: a meta-analysis

Background

Tirabrutinib is a potent, irreversible, and highly selective Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor that has demonstrated significant therapeutic activity in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma. However, the safety and efficacy of tirabrutinib monotherapy have not been systematically assessed. This meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of tirabrutinib monotherapy in patients with B-cell lymphoma.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive literature search in Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify prospective clinical trials evaluating tirabrutinib monotherapy in B-cell lymphoma. Data on efficacy and safety were extracted and analyzed.

Results

A total of seven studies were included in the meta-analysis. The clinical trials primarily involved patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (WM). The pooled overall response rate (ORR) was 72.5%, with complete response (CR) rate of 18.6%, stable disease (SD) rate of 13.8%, and partial response (PR) rate of 41.1%. The highest median progression-free survival (mPFS) was observed in patients with CLL, reaching 38.5 months. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event (AE), both all grades and grade ≥3. Additionally, a high incidence of skin-related AEs was reported.

Conclusion

Tirabrutinib monotherapy demonstrates a manageable safety profile and promising efficacy in patients with B-cell lymphoma. However, these findings need to be confirmed by larger and higher-quality randomized controlled trials in the future. Further research should also explore the long-term effects and potential benefits of combination therapies involving tirabrutinib.

Systematic Review Registration

Identifier CRD42024552721.

Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients who received pirtobrutinib in the presence or absence of antithrombotic therapy

Clinical bleeding events are reported here from 773 patients with B-cell malignancies receiving pirtobrutinib monotherapy from the phase 1/2 BRUIN study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03740529), either in the presence or absence of antithrombotic therapy (antithrombotic exposed [AT-E], n = 216; antithrombotic nonexposed [AT-NE], n = 557). Among the AT-E cohort, 51.9% received platelet aggregation inhibitors, 36.6% received direct factor Xa inhibitors, 18.5% received heparins, 5.6% received salicylic acid for indications other than platelet aggregation inhibition, and 2.3% received thrombolytics. Warfarin was not permitted. Any-grade bleeding/bruising events occurred in 97 patients (44.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 38.3-51.5) in the AT-E cohort and 181 patients (32.5%; 95% CI, 28.6-36.4) in the AT-NE cohort. Most bleeding/bruising events in both cohorts began within the first 6 months of treatment (AT-E: 65.4%; AT-NE: 72.5%). Contusion was the most common bleeding/bruising event in both cohorts (AT-E: 22.7%; AT-NE: 18.1%). Grade ≥3 bleeding/bruising events were reported in six patients (2.8%) in the AT-E cohort and 11 patients (2.0%) in the AT-NE cohort. Bleeding/bruising events requiring or prolonging hospitalization were reported in 2.3% and 1.6% of patients in the AT-E and AT-NE cohorts, respectively. No bleeding/bruising events led to pirtobrutinib dose reduction or permanent discontinuation in the AT-E cohort, and one patient (0.2%) in the AT-NE cohort experienced an event requiring dose reduction. These data support the safety of pirtobrutinib in patients requiring antithrombotic therapies.

Predictors of ibrutinib-associated atrial fibrillation: 5-year follow-up of a prospective study

Ibrutinib-associated atrial fibrillation (IRAF) emerged among the adverse events of major interests in ibrutinib-treated patients as real-world studies showed a higher incidence compared to clinical trials. We prospectively analyzed predictors of IRAF in 43 single-center consecutive patients affected by chronic lymphocytic leukemia that started therapy with ibrutinib between 2015 and 2017. Key secondary endpoints were to describe the management of IRAF and survival outcomes. During a median follow-up period of 52 months, we registered 45 CV events, with a total of 23 AF events in 13 patients (CI 30.0% (95% CI: 16.5-43.9)). Pre-existent cardiovascular risk factors, in particular hypertension, a previous history of AF and a high Shanafelt risk score emerged as predictors of IRAF. Baseline echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial (LA) dimensions confirmed to predict IRAF occurrence and cut-off values were identified in our cohort: 32 mm for LA diameter and 18 cm2 for LA area. No difference in progression free survival and overall survival emerged in patients experiencing IRAF. Following AF, anticoagulation was started in all eligible patients, and cardioactive therapy was accordingly modified. Echocardiography represents a highly reproducible and widespread tool to be included in the work-up of ibrutinib candidates; the identification of IRAF predictors represents a useful guide to clinical practice.

Efficacy of front-line immunochemotherapy for transplant-ineligible mantle cell lymphoma: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

There is no standard first-line immunochemotherapy regimen for transplant-ineligible patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) currently, and the efficacy of various treatment remains unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) of all eligible randomized controlled trials. Pairwise comparisons and ranking of different first-line treatment options were performed.

RESULTS

Nine studies were included in the NMA, involving a total of 2897 MCL patients. The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen showed the best progression-free survival (PFS), with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 0.89 and probability of being the best treatment (PbBT) of 69%. The VR-CAP regimen was the most potential intervention to improve overall survival (OS), with a SUCRA of 0.89 and PbBT of 63%. Compared with the R-CHOP regimen, the BR regimen achieved a better PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45 [95% credible interval 0.2-0.96]). The BR-Ibrutinib+R regimen (HR 0.14 [0.02-0.99]), BR+R regimen (HR 0.19 [0.034-0.99]), and BR regimen (HR 0.3 [0.08-1.03]) were superior to CHOP regimen with better PFS. The R-FC regimen (HR 2.27 [1.01-5.21]) or FC regimen (HR 3.17 [1.15-8.71]) was inferior to the VR-CAP regimen with a worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study presents the most promising first-line treatment strategy for transplant-ineligible MCL patients in terms of PFS and OS, which provides innovative treatment strategy for MCL treatment.

Impact of atrial fibrillation in onco-hematological patients in Europe: a targeted literature review

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common complication in cancer patients, and the increased risk associated with certain therapies poses a major challenge. The objective was to determine the clinical and economic burden of AF in onco-hematological patients in Europe.

AREAS COVERED

A targeted literature review was completed for observational, retrospective and case studies, and reviews on AF in onco-hematology published between January 2010 and 2022 in PubMed, Science Direct, Medes and IBECS. The search was based on epidemiology, cost, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), disease burden and management, and patient journey. Thirty-one studies fulfilled eligibility criteria. Annual incidence of AF during treatment varies up to 25%, and increased with first-generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). Risk factors include age ≥65, prior AF or hypertension, hyperlipidemia and ibrutinib use. Complications are managed with anticoagulants and/or antiarrhythmics, and regular monitoring. When AF is no longer controllable, dose reduction or discontinuation is recommended. No data on costs, HRQoL and patient journey were identified.

EXPERT OPINION

There is scarce and heterogeneous information on AF in onco-hematology in Europe. Available evidence reports a higher risk of AF associated with first-generation BTKi. Further studies are needed to understand the burden of AF in these patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Monotherapy Compared with Combination Therapy for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia and Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness and safety of combination treatments such as chemoimmunotherapies in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) remain controversial. Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) are an effective therapy for CLL/SLL patients. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of BTKis versus combination therapy in CLL/SLL patients. We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, Medline, and Embase databases through February 2023 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four RCTs (including 1510 patients) were found and met the inclusion criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly improved with BTKis when compared to the combination therapy (hazard ratio (HR), 0.30; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.22–0.40), while a pooled analysis of overall survival did not favor single-agent BTKis over the combination therapy (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.67–1.15). We observed consistent benefits for PFS among patients with high-risk disease characteristics. Although there was no difference in complete response between the two arms (risk ratio (RR), 0.54; 95% CI, 0.20–1.46), BTKi use was related to a better overall response rate (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04–1.16). The risk of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) was comparable between the two arms (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.23). However, the risk of grade ≥3 AEs was significantly lower in the second-generation BTKi group than in the combination therapy group (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.54–0.98). Overall, BTKis have superior efficacy compared to the combination regimens in patients with untreated or treated CLL/SLL without excess toxicity. Further studies are needed to confirm these results and determine the optimal therapy for managing patients with CLL/SLL.

Acalabrutinib Versus Investigator’s Choice in Relapsed/Refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Final ASCEND Trial Results

Acalabrutinib is a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). ASCEND is the pivotal phase 3 study of acalabrutinib versus investigator’s choice of idelalisib plus rituximab (IdR) or bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL. In the primary ASCEND analysis (median 16.1-month follow-up), acalabrutinib showed superior efficacy with an acceptable tolerability profile versus IdR/BR; here, we report final ~4 year follow-up results. Patients with R/R CLL received oral acalabrutinib 100 mg twice daily until progression or unacceptable toxicity, or investigator’s choice of IdR or BR. A total of 310 patients (acalabrutinib, n = 155; IdR, n = 119; BR, n = 36) were enrolled. At median follow-up of 46.5 months (acalabrutinib) and 45.3 months (IdR/BR), acalabrutinib significantly prolonged investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) versus IdR/BR (median, not reached [NR] vs 16.8 months; P < 0.001); 42-month PFS rates were 62% (acalabrutinib) versus 19% (IdR/BR). Median overall survival (OS) was NR (both arms); 42-month OS rates were 78% (acalabrutinib) versus 65% (IdR/BR). Adverse events led to drug discontinuation in 23%, 67%, and 17% of patients in the acalabrutinib, IdR, and BR arms, respectively. Events of clinical interest (acalabrutinib vs IdR/BR) included all-grade atrial fibrillation/flutter (8% vs 3%), all-grade hypertension (8% vs 5%), all-grade major hemorrhage (3% vs 3%), grade ≥3 infections (29% vs 29%), and second primary malignancies excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer (7% vs 2%). At ~4 years follow-up, acalabrutinib maintained favorable efficacy versus standard-of-care regimens and a consistent tolerability profile in patients with R/R CLL.

Management of front line chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Treatment options with targeted agents have changed the treatment landscape of CLL profoundly. Besides chemoimmunotherapy, treatment regimen approved for frontline therapy include continuous treatment with BTK inhibitors like ibrutinib and acalabrutinib or fixed-duration regimen like venetoclax-obinutuzumab with the approval of venetoclax-ibrutinib to be awaited. Although these agents have usually manageable side effects, toxicities might limit choices for the individual patient. We here discuss latest trial data and propose a treatment algorithm for frontline treatment of CLL according to fitness and relevant genetic risk factors like IGHV mutational status and TP53 aberrations.

Zanubrutinib in lymphoproliferative disorders: a comprehensive review

The availability of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has brought about a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with B-cell lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. BTK was clinically validated as a target by the efficacy of the first-in-class inhibitor ibrutinib. The extended survival conferred by BTK inhibitors has brought long-term tolerability to the foreground. To minimize toxicities thought to be attributable to off-target kinase inhibition, a next generation of BTK inhibitors with greater selectivity was developed. In the United States, zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, has been approved for treating adults with mantle cell lymphoma who have received at least one prior therapy, for adults with Waldenström macroglobulinemia, and for adults with relapsed or refractory marginal zone lymphoma who have received at least one anti-CD20-based therapy. Because few head-to-head comparative trials of BTK inhibitors have so far been reported, no BTK 'inhibitor of choice' can be identified. Zanubrutinib has promising efficacy in its approved indications and appears to have reduced cardiac toxicities, particularly atrial fibrillation, which may influence the choice of BTK inhibitor treatment by prescribers. Further studies are needed to inform on optimal treatment sequencing of zanubrutinib and its combination with other agents. Here, we summarize existing clinical evidence for its efficacy and safety in mantle cell lymphoma, Waldenström macroglobulinemia, marginal zone lymphoma, chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, and other B-lymphoproliferative indications.

Plain Language Summary

Zanubrutinib is a drug that was shown to effectively treat cancer of B cells without causing excessive serious side effects Patients with certain B-cell malignancies (cancers of white blood cells) benefit from treatment with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, drugs that block the BTK protein and keep cancer from growing and spreading. Patients experience extended survival with ibrutinib, the first-generation BTK inhibitor approved by US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); however, one in five patients quit treatment because of harmful side effects. Ibrutinib-related side effects such as increased risk of bleeding, atrial fibrillation (abnormal heart rhythm), and high blood pressure are thought to be caused by ibrutinib blocking other proteins besides the intended target protein BTK. To reduce these side effects, zanubrutinib, a next-generation BTK inhibitor, was designed to block BTK more specifically than ibrutinib. Results of clinical studies on zanubrutinib treatment appear promising in patients with several types of B-cell malignancies, including mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and small lymphocytic lymphoma. There are not yet enough clinical data to determine which BTK inhibitor is most effective in treating B-cell malignancies without causing harmful side effects. Early data from the phase 3 ALPINE clinical study suggest that zanubrutinib works better than ibrutinib, and fewer patients experience side effects and quit treatment. Zanubrutinib is currently approved for use for treatment of adult patients with MCL who have received at least one prior therapy, for adults with WM, and for adults with MZL who have received at least one anti-CD20-based therapy.

Clinical Trials of the BTK Inhibitors Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib in Human Diseases Beyond B Cell Malignancies

The BTK inhibitors ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are FDA-approved drugs for the treatment of B cell malignances. Both drugs have demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety profiles superior to chemoimmunotherapy regimens in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Mounting preclinical and clinical evidence indicates that both ibrutinib and acalabrutinib are versatile and have direct effects on many immune cell subsets as well as other cell types beyond B cells. The versatility and immunomodulatory effects of both drugs have been exploited to expand their therapeutic potential in a wide variety of human diseases. Over 470 clinical trials are currently registered at ClinicalTrials.gov to test the efficacy of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib not only in almost every type of B cell malignancies, but also in hematological malignancies of myeloid cells and T cells, solid tumors, chronic graft versus host disease (cGHVD), autoimmune diseases, allergy and COVID-19 (http:www.clinicaltrials.gov). In this review, we present brief discussions of the clinical trials and relevant key preclinical evidence of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib as monotherapies or as part of combination therapies for the treatment of human diseases beyond B cell malignancies. Adding to the proven efficacy of ibrutinib for cGVHD, preliminary results of clinical trials have shown promising efficacy of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib for certain T cell malignancies, allergies and severe COVID-19. However, both BTK inhibitors have no or limited efficacy for refractory or recurrent solid tumors. These clinical data together with additional pending results from ongoing trials will provide valuable information to guide the design and improvement of future trials, including optimization of combination regimens and dosing sequences as well as better patient stratification and more efficient delivery strategies. Such information will further advance the precise implementation of BTK inhibitors into the clinical toolbox for the treatment of different human diseases.

Multifaceted Immunomodulatory Effects of the BTK Inhibitors Ibrutinib and Acalabrutinib on Different Immune Cell Subsets - Beyond B Lymphocytes

The clinical success of the two BTK inhibitors, ibrutinib and acalabrutinib, represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and has also revolutionized the treatment options for other B cell malignancies. Increasing evidence indicates that in addition to their direct effects on B lymphocytes, both BTK inhibitors also directly impact the homeostasis, phenotype and function of many other cell subsets of the immune system, which contribute to their high efficacy as well as adverse effects observed in CLL patients. In this review, we attempt to provide an overview on the overlapping and differential effects of ibrutinib and acalabrutinib on specific receptor signaling pathways in different immune cell subsets other than B cells, including T cells, NK cells, monocytes, macrophages, granulocytes, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, dendritic cells, osteoclasts, mast cells and platelets. The shared and distinct effects of ibrutinib versus acalabrutinib are mediated through BTK-dependent and BTK-independent mechanisms, respectively. Such immunomodulatory effects of the two drugs have fueled myriad explorations of their repurposing opportunities for the treatment of a wide variety of other human diseases involving immune dysregulation.

Assessing the pharmacokinetics of acalabrutinib in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia

INTRODUCTION

The first-in-class BTK inhibitor ibrutinib has substantially changed the therapeutic landscape of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The next-generation BTK inhibitor acalabrutinib is more selective and may have less off-target toxicities as compared to ibrutinib. Acalabrutinib has demonstrated safety and efficacy in CLL and has been approved to treat CLL.

AREAS COVERED

Current clinical trials investigated acalabrutinib monotherapy or acalabrutinib-based combination therapies in relapsed/refractory and treatment-naive CLL. Data on the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib in clinical trials were summarized in this review. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data of acalabrutinib were also discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

Acalabrutinib selectively inhibits BTK by covalent binding and shows rapid absorption and elimination. Acalabrutinib does not inhibit EGFR, TEC, or ITK and shows fewer off-target toxicities. Completed phase 3 trials have demonstrated that acalabrutinib improves the outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL and patients with treatment-naive CLL. The phase 3 trial that evaluates acalabrutinib versus ibrutinib has met its primary endpoint. Early phase studies suggested the combinations of acalabrutinib with a CD20 antibody and venetoclax led to high rates of undetectable minimal residual disease in the bone marrow in CLL patients and might provide a fixed-duration therapeutic option for patients with CLL.