Assessment of nicotine delivery and uptake in users of various tobacco/nicotine products

A validated single-step saliva and serum sample extraction LC-MS/MS method for the analysis of nicotine, cotinine and 3'-hydroxycotinine for clinical vaping studies

INTRODUCTION

Quantifying low nicotine and metabolite concentrations in biofluids is challenging due environmental nicotine contamination. However, accurate quantification of low concentrations is crucial for studies on electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) using e-liquids with varying nicotine content.

METHODS

We developed an LC-MS/MS method to quantify nicotine, cotinine, and 3'-hydroxycotinine (3-OH-cotinine) in serum and saliva for pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses and large studies.

RESULTS

For reliable chromatography and to limit bench work, C18 chromatography was used with single-step extraction using methanol and 0.1 M ZnSO4 (4:1, v/v) in serum and 80 % methanol in saliva. Environmental nicotine contamination was addressed through implementation of a C18 delay column, which separated the environmentally abundant nicotine present in the mobile phases from sample nicotine peaks. Total run-time was 6 min and lower limits of quantification were 0.5, 0.25 and 0.5 ng/ml for nicotine, cotinine and 3-OH-cotinine, respectively, in serum and 3, 1 and 2 ng/ml in saliva. The standard curves in both biofluids ranged up to 1000 ng/ml with R-values > 0.995. The within- and between-run accuracy ranged from 97.1 % to 106.9 % with a precision of ≤ 10.8 %. Cross-validation of serum samples with another laboratory showed good agreement with a bias of 0.56, -3.0 and -6.5 ng/ml for nicotine, cotinine and 3-OH-cotinine, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of a delay column into the LC-MS/MS method mitigated the interference from environmental nicotine and facilitated the quantification of very low nicotine concentrations and two of its major metabolites in saliva and serum. C18 chromatography and single-step sample extraction make the method stable and suitable for large sample loads.

The rodent electronic nicotine delivery system: Apparatus for voluntary nose-only e-cigarette aerosol inhalation

Tobacco use is the leading cause of death globally and in the United States. After decades of decline, driven by decreases in combusted tobacco use, nicotine product use has increased due to electronic nicotine delivery systems, also known as e-cigarettes or vapes. Preclinical models of nicotine self-administration can serve as important lodestars in the search for effective intervention and prevention tactics. Current variants of the preclinical models have substantial limitations, however. Therefore, we created the rodent electronic nicotine delivery system (RENDS), a novel low-cost nonproprietary nose-only preclinical model of nicotine aerosol self-administration. We confirmed that RENDS sequesters nicotine aerosol in the nose port by measuring fine particulate matter (PM <2.5 microns) generated by e-cigarettes. We also showed that rats robustly self-administer flavored nicotine aerosol, resulting in high blood levels of cotinine (the major nicotine metabolite) and spontaneous somatic withdrawal symptoms. Thus, we provide validation of the operation and function of the RENDS, opening the door to an open-source preclinical aerosol model of nicotine self-administration that is relatively low in cost. Four existing operant chambers can be retrofitted with the RENDS for less than $325/chamber. All RENDS diagrams and plans for custom-designed components are on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/x2pqf/?view_only=775b55435b8e428f98e6da384ef7889d).

The Rodent Electronic Nicotine Delivery System: Apparatus for Voluntary Nose-Only E-Cigarette Aerosol Inhalation

Tobacco use is the leading cause of death globally and in the U.S. After decades of decline, driven by decreases in combusted tobacco use, nicotine product use has increased due to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems, also known as e-cigarettes or vapes. Preclinical models of nicotine self-administration can serve as important lodestars in the search for effective intervention and prevention tactics. Current variants of the task have substantial limitations, however. Therefore, we created the Rodent Electronic Nicotine Delivery System, a novel low-cost non-proprietary nose-only preclinical model of nicotine aerosol self-administration. We confirmed that RENDS sequesters nicotine aerosol in the nose port by measuring fine particulate matter (PM < 2.5 microns) generated by e-cigarettes. We also showed that rats robustly self-administer flavored nicotine aerosol, resulting in high blood levels of cotinine (the major nicotine metabolite) and spontaneous somatic withdrawal symptoms. Thus, we provide strong validation of the operation and function of the RENDS, opening the door to an open-source preclinical aerosol model of nicotine self-administration that is relatively low cost. Four existing operant chambers can be retrofitted with the RENDS for less than $325/chamber. All RENDS diagrams and plans for custom designed components are on Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/x2pqf/?view_only=775b55435b8e428f98e6da384ef7889d).

Association of Smokeless Tobacco Use With Perioperative Complications and Revision Surgery After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Tobacco use is a known modifiable risk factor for postoperative complications and revision surgery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Previous studies focus on tobacco as a broad categorization of traditional smoking, smokeless tobacco, and other forms of nicotine use. It is unclear if differences in the type of nicotine used lead to similar adverse outcomes after ACLR.

PURPOSES

To (1) assess the incidence of postoperative complications among ACLR patients who use smokeless tobacco and (2) compare these outcomes with those of patients who do not use tobacco and those who smoke tobacco.

STUDY DESIGN

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study utilizing the PearlDiver database was conducted. Patients undergoing primary ACLR with a minimum 2-year follow-up were included. Smokeless tobacco users (n = 898), cigarette smokers (n= 22,062), and non-tobacco users (n= 207,462) were matched based on patient variables and comorbidities. Postoperative complications within 90 days of surgery and subsequent knee surgery within 2 years were compared among groups. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to control for confounding variables.

RESULTS

Compared with nonusers, smokeless tobacco users demonstrated an increased risk of pneumonia (odds ratio [OR], 3.36; 95% CI, 1.41-7.90), acute kidney injury (OR, 12.7; 95% CI, 3.77-52.8), and emergency department (ED) utilization (OR, 6.29; 95% CI, 3.70-10.9) within 90 days of the ACLR. Additionally, smokeless tobacco users had an increased risk of ACLR (OR, 4.75; 95% CI, 3.60-6.26) and meniscal surgery (OR, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.23-3.73) within 2 years. When compared with cigarette smokers, smokeless tobacco users showed an increased risk of pneumonia (OR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.33-7.78), acute kidney injury (OR, 7.63; 95% CI, 2.72-22.5), and ED visits (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.26-1.90) within 90 days and subsequent ACLR (OR, 4.81; 95% CI, 3.58-6.47) and meniscal surgery (OR, 3.23; 95% CI, 2.45-4.26) within 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Smokeless tobacco use was associated with an increased risk of medical complications, ED utilization, and subsequent procedures compared with nonuser controls and traditional smokers. These findings highlight the importance of considering specific forms of tobacco use in preoperative screening for patients undergoing ACLR.

Oral health risks in adults who use electronic nicotine delivery systems and oral nicotine pouches: a critical review of the literature and qualitative synthesis of the available evidence

BACKGROUND

Use of combustible cigarettes (CCs) and smokeless oral tobacco products are well documented risk factors for a variety of oral diseases. However, the potential oral health risks of using recently introduced (since about 2000) non-combustible tobacco/nicotine products (NCPs: electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs) and oral nicotine pouches (ONPs), remain poorly established.

METHODS

This review evaluates published human studies on detrimental oral health effects in people who use NCPs compared to those smoking cigarettes and those not using any tobacco/nicotine product (NU). We identified 52 studies, predominantly focusing on adults who used electronic cigarettes as an NCP. The studies exhibited significant heterogeneity regarding design, populations, endpoints and quality. Reported outcomes, based on both single and grouped endpoints were qualitatively evaluated by comparing people who use NCPs with NU and with people smoking CCs. Significant increases (indicating a worsening in oral health), significant decreases (indicating a lower level of detrimental effects) and no significant difference between groups were assigned scores of + 1, -1 and 0, respectively. Scores from studies belonging to the same single or grouped endpoints were averaged to a summary score ranging from - 1 to + 1.

RESULTS

The qualitative meta-analysis revealed that comparisons of EC versus NU groups yielded mean scores of 0.29 for pre-cancerous lesions (N = 14 observations), 0.27 for inflammatory processes (N = 83), 0.43 for oral clinical parameters (N = 93) and 0.70 for shifts in the oral microbiome (N = 10). The corresponding values for the EC versus CC group comparisons amounted to -0.33 (N = 15), -0.14 (N = 76), -0.27 (N = 78) and 0.57 (N = 7). Most studies had significant limitations regarding group sizes, duration of NCP use (mostly only a few years) and validity of self-reported exclusive NCP use. Notably, the implications of dual use (EC + CC) and prior CC use were often not adequately considered.

CONCLUSIONS

The evaluated studies suggest that use of ECs is associated with relatively fewer detrimental oral health effects compared to smoking, yet oral health status remains poorer compared to not using any tobacco/nicotine products. These results have to be interpreted with caution due to a number of limitations and uncertainties in the underlying studies, particularly the potential biases and confounding factors inherent in cross-sectional study designs.

Identification of Specific Hemoglobin Adduct Patterns in Users of Different Tobacco/nicotine Products by Nontargeted GC-MS/MS Analysis

Tobacco smoke contains several electrophilic constituents which are capable of forming adducts with nucleophilic sites in DNA and proteins like hemoglobin (Hb) and albumin. New nicotine and tobacco products are discussed as less harmful forms of tobacco use compared to smoking combustible cigarettes (CC) due to reduced exposure to harmful constituents. Hence, the adduct profile in users of various tobacco/nicotine products is expected to differ characteristically. In this article, we present a novel nontargeted screening strategy using GC-MS/MS for Hb adducts based on the analysis of the respective derivatized N-terminal valine adducts after modified Edman degradation. We analyzed blood samples from a clinical study with habitual users of CCs, electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco, nicotine replacement therapy products and nonusers of any tobacco/nicotine products. Our nontargeted approach revealed significant differences in the Hb adduct profiles of the investigated tobacco/nicotine product user groups. Adduct identification was performed by means of an internal database, retention time estimations based on the theoretical boiling points, as well as in-house synthesized reference compounds. Several chemicals that form adducts with Hb could be identified: methylating and ethylating agents, ethylene oxide, acrylonitrile, acrylamide, glycidamide and 4-hydroxybenzaldehyde. Levels were elevated in smokers compared to all other groups for Hb adducts from methylating agents, ethylene oxide, acrylonitrile, acrylamide and glycidamide. Our approach revealed higher concentrations of Hb adducts formed by ethylation, acrylamide and glycidamide in users of HTPs compared to nonusers. However, concentrations for the latter two were still lower than in smokers. Due to their long half-lives, Hb adducts related to acrylonitrile, acrylamide (glycidamide), and ethylene oxide exposure may be useful for the biochemical verification of subjects̀ compliance in longitudinal and cross-sectional studies with respect to smoking and HTP use/abstinence.

Statistical analyses plan for "MAGnItude of cigarette substitutioN after initiation oF e-cigarettes and its ImpaCt on biomArkers of exposure and potenTial harm in dual users": MAGNIFICAT trial

Background

The substitution of combustible cigarettes (CC) with non-combustible nicotine alternatives, such as e-cigarettes (EC), significantly lowers exposure to harmful chemicals. However, many individuals who use ECs continue smoking CCs, becoming dual users and remaining at increased risk of toxin exposure. This study will examine how the reduction in cigarettes smoked per day (CPD) after switching to ECs correlates with changes in biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and potential harm (BoPH) to evaluate the extent of harm in dual users.

Methods

The study is a prospective, non-randomised, observational, longitudinal cohort study in which 250 CC smokers will be invited to use EC as part of a smoking reduction/cessation strategy. Participants will be grouped in five dual use categories based on the change from baseline in CPD at 1, 3 and 6 months, based on self-reported use in the preceding 30 days. The primary outcome of interest is the mean absolute urinary 2-cyanoethyl mercapturic acid (2CyEMA), a well-validated BoE, also assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months. Other BoE will be assessed, together with exploration of the association between varying intensities of dual use and BoPH. The association between the dual use category and levels of BoE will be evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA), in order to understand which BoE are best suited to identifying different levels of dual use. Exploratory assessment of the value of BoPH will similarly be evaluated, to assess whether their predictive power extends from the binary smoker/non-smoker categorization to a more nuanced dual use categorization. The specific details of the own-brand CC will be available once smokers' enrollment in the study is complete. The EC used in the study will be the KIWI 2 Pen refillable pod system, with participants given the option to choose from three different flavored e-liquids: LEAF, MIDWAY, and GLACIAL, all containing 0.9 % nicotine. For specialized equipment used for biomarker analysis please refer our previous publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38584934/.

Conclusion

EC are increasingly adopted as a harm reduction strategy in CC smokers who wish to quit smoking, the outlined Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) provides a robust approach to understand the impact of EC on CC use and to quantify the impact of dual use on clinical outcomes using BoPH. For statistical calculations we will use R software.

A comprehensive non-targeted approach for the analysis of biomarkers in exhaled breath across different nicotine product categories

In the context of the evolving landscape of nicotine consumption, the assessment of biomarkers plays a crucial role in understanding the health impact of different product categories. Exhaled breath (EB) emerges as a promising, non-invasive matrix for biomarker analysis, complementary to conventional urine and plasma data. This study explores distinctive EB biomarker profiles among users of combustible cigarettes (CC), heated tobacco products (HTP), electronic cigarettes (EC), smokeless/oral tobacco (OT), and oral/dermal nicotine products (NRT). We have successfully developed and validated a non-targeted GC-TOF-MS method for the analysis of EB samples across the aforementioned product categories. A total of 66 compounds were identified, with significantly elevated levels in at least one study group. The study found that CC users had higher levels of established VOCs associated with smoking, which supports the proof-of-concept of the method. Breathomic analysis identified increased levels of p-cymene and α-pinene in EC users, while HTP users showed potential biomarker candidates like γ-butyrolactone. This study underscores the utility of EB biomarkers for a comprehensive evaluation of diverse nicotine products. The unique advantages offered by EB analysis position it as a valuable tool for understanding the relationship between exposure and health outcomes.

Development of an LC-HRMS non-targeted method for comprehensive profiling of the exposome of nicotine and tobacco product users - A showcase for cigarette smokers

The global prevalence of electronic cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and other smokeless alternatives has grown significantly in the last ten years. These products have been suggested as combustion-free alternatives for conventional tobacco products like cigarettes, aiming to reduce the negative health impacts associated with smoking. However, the impact of those products on the health and safety of the general population are still unclear, as the absolute exposure from those products has not been thoroughly studied, yet. In this project, a non-targeted LC-HRMS method was developed comprising four different analytical modes for the investigation of the exposure profile in urine of the product users. The method is characterized by its high sensitivity and reproducibility, as shown during method validation. As a proof of concept, we first applied this method to detect significant differences in biomarkers of exposure (BoEs) between smokers and non-smokers. We observed a total of 171 BoEs significantly elevated in smokers, including several well-known biomarkers of smoke exposure like nicotine and its metabolites, mercapturic acid derivatives, and phenolic compounds. Some of the detected biomarkers are present at low ng/mL concentrations in urine, proving the high sensitivity needed for a holistic exploration of the exposome. Moreover, we were able to identify BoEs that have not been reported previously for smoking, such as 2,6-dimethoxyphenol and 7-methyl-1-naphthol glucuronide.

The Smoky Impact of Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors on Testicular Function

Smoking habits (from classic cigarettes to e-cigarettes and heated tobacco) are a relatively common finding in the medical histories of couples referred to fertility centers. Tobacco smoke and e-cigarettes may deliver many substances with known harmful effects on both general and reproductive health, including nicotine. Nicotinic Acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) form a heterogeneous family of ion channels that are differently expressed in different tissues. According to the homomeric or heteromeric combination of at least five different subunits (named from α to ε), they have peculiar pharmacological and biophysical properties. nAChRs respond to the neurotransmitter acetylcholine, which influences a number of physiological functions not restricted to neurons and plays an important role in the structure and function of non-neuronal tissues such as the testis. nAChRs are also the target of Nicotine, the active element responsible for tobacco addiction. This review summarizes recent findings on the involvement of nAChRs in testicular physiology, highlighting the effects of nicotine exposure observed in animal studies and clinical settings. We will discuss the latest data on fertility outcomes and the implications for understanding nAChR functions in reproductive health.

A Scoping Review of Behavioural Studies on Heated Tobacco Products

Heated tobacco products (HTPs) are electronic devices that heat tobacco sticks to temperatures much lower than those which cause pyrolysis and combustion in cigarettes. While this electrical heating causes the formation of an inhalable aerosol which contains nicotine, the aerosol from HTPs contains significantly fewer and lower levels of the harmful and potentially harmful chemicals found in cigarette smoke. As a result, HTP use potentially conveys reduced risks to health compared to cigarette smoking. While this relative reduction in individual health risk is becoming clearer, what is less certain is the impact of HTPs on overall population‑level health, taking into account both the potential positive impact on adult smokers who completely switch to using HTPs and any unintended impacts such as use by tobacco non‑users and particularly by youth. The aim of this scoping review was to collate and evaluate the published scientific evidence to date, with a cut‑off of 1 January 2024, investigating the impact of HTPs on population‑level health. This evaluation suggests that HTP use is almost exclusively observed among those with a history of cigarette smoking, and there is a growing body of evidence for the ability of HTPs to provide support for adult smokers to transition away from cigarette smoking, in the absence of any significant "gateway" into tobacco use initiation. Many studies have reported a significant degree of dual use of cigarettes and HTPs, and efforts to assess the reasons for such patterns of use, whether these provide overall exposure reductions, and whether dual use acts as a bridge towards a complete transition away from cigarette smoking, requires further investigation. In addition, correction of the widespread and increasing misperceptions of HTPs among adult smokers is recommended to promote HTP uptake as a potentially less harmful alternative to smoking in this population.

The Product Science of Electrically Heated Tobacco Products: An Updated Narrative Review of the Scientific Literature

Heated tobacco products represent a novel category of tobacco products in which a tobacco consumable is heated to a temperature that releases nicotine from the tobacco leaf but not to a temperature sufficient to cause combustion. Heated tobacco products may therefore have the potential to be a less harmful alternative for adult smokers who would otherwise continue to smoke cigarettes, as their use should result in exposure to substantially fewer and lower levels of toxicants. This update represents a two-year extension to our previous narrative review, which covered peer-reviewed journal articles published up to August 31, 2021. The scientific evidence published between 2021 and 2023 continues to indicate that aerosols produced from heated tobacco products contain fewer and substantially lower levels of harmful and potentially harmful constituents and that these observed reductions consistently translate to reduced biological effects in both in vitro and in vivo toxicological studies. Biomarker and clinical data from studies in which product use is controlled within a clinical setting continue to suggest changes in levels of biomarkers of exposure, biomarkers of potential harm, and clinical endpoints indicating the potential for reduced harm with switching to exclusive use of heated tobacco products in adult smokers. Overall, the available peer-reviewed scientific evidence continues to indicate that heated tobacco products offer promise as a potentially less harmful alternative to cigarettes, and as such, the conclusions of our original narrative review remain valid.

Comparison of urinary mercapturic acid excretions in users of various tobacco/nicotine products

Urinary mercapturic acids (MAs) are detoxification products for electrophiles occurring in the human body. They are suitable biomarkers of exposure to directly acting electrophilic chemicals or to chemicals which generate the electrophile during its metabolism. We determined the urinary excretion of 19 MAs in habitual users of combustible cigarettes (CCs), electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) products, and nonusers (NUs) of any tobacco/nicotine products. The 19 MAs are assumed to be physiologically formed primarily from 15 toxicants with three of them belonging to IARC Group 1 (human carcinogen), seven to Group 2A (probable human carcinogen), four to Group 2B (possible human carcinogen), and one to Group 3 (not classifiable as carcinogen). Smoking (CC) was found to be associated with significantly elevated exposure to ethylene oxide (or ethylene), 1,3-butadiene, benzene, dimethylformamide, acrolein, acrylamide, styrene, propylene oxide, acrylonitrile, crotonaldehyde, and isoprene compared with the other user groups and NU. Users of HTPs revealed slight elevation in the MAs related to acrolein, acrylamide, and crotonaldehyde compared with the other non-CC groups. Vaping (EC) was not found to be associated with any of the MAs studied. In conclusion, the determination of urinary MAs is a useful tool for assessing the exposure to toxicants (mainly potential carcinogens) in users of various tobacco/nicotine products. Our data also give cause to clarify the role of vaping (EC) in urinary excretion of DHPMA (precursor: glycidol).

Changes in Biomarkers of Exposure and Potential Harm in Smokers Switched to Vuse Vibe or Vuse Ciro Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems

Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) have the potential to provide nicotine to tobacco consumers while reducing exposure to combustion-related toxicants. Here, we report changes in biomarkers of exposure (BoE) and biomarkers of potential harm (BoPH) in smokers who completely switched to Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro ENDS products, or to smoking abstinence in a randomized, controlled clinical study. Thirteen BoE (12 urinary and one blood) that indicate exposure to harmful and potentially harmful toxicants (HPHCs) were evaluated at baseline on day 5. Urinary BoPH linked to oxidative stress, platelet activation, and inflammation were also assessed at baseline, and on day 5 and day 7. Nicotine exposure was lower in Vuse Vibe and Vuse Ciro groups compared to baseline values. Urinary non-nicotine BoE decreased significantly (52.3-96.7%) in the Vuse ENDS groups, and the reductions were similar in magnitude to those observed in the abstinence group. Blood carboxyhemoglobin decreased 52.8-55.0% in all study groups. Decreases (10-50%) in BoPH were observed in all study groups. Thus, smokers who switch exclusively to Vuse Vibe or Vuse Ciro products or completely abstain from smoking are exposed to substantially lower levels of HPHCs, and experience improvements in BoPH of oxidative stress and inflammation pathways.

Assessment of the Exposure to Aromatic Amines in Users of Various Tobacco/Nicotine Products

Aromatic amines such as ortho-toluidine (o-Tol), 2-aminonaphthalene (2-AN), and 4-aminobiphenyl (4-ABP) are human bladder carcinogens and occur at various workplaces, in ambient air, in food products, as well as in tobacco smoke. In a clinical study comprising a period of 74 h under confinement, we investigated the exposure to these three aromatic amines as well as to 3-aminobiphenyl (3-ABP) by measuring them in urine of habitual users of combustible cigarettes (CCs), electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). Non-users (NU) of any tobacco/nicotine products served as (negative) control group. Smokers (CC) exhibited the highest levels for all four aromatic amines measured, significantly elevated compared to NU and non-CC users. Urinary levels in users of EC, HTP, NRT (mostly nicotine gum), and OT (mostly snus) were not significantly different from those in NU. Users of HTP showed slightly elevated urinary excretion levels of o-Tol, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP compared to some other non-CC groups. Dose markers such as daily consumption, urinary nicotine equivalents (Nequ), and plasma cotinine (CotP) were found to be consistently and significantly correlated with the excretion of aromatic amines for smokers (CC) only. Excretion levels of 3- and 4-ABP in smokers were significantly lower in the urine collected overnight compared to that collected during the day, which is just the opposite of what we observed for other biomarkers in this study. The possible reason for this observation is discussed. In conclusion, in contrast to smoking of CCs, the use of ECs, HTPs, nicotine gum, and oral tobacco was not observed to be associated with significant exposure to the aromatic amines o-Tol, 2-AN, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP. The observed slight increase in o-Tol, 3-ABP, and 4-ABP excretions in HTP users has to be verified in larger studies.

Assessment of the exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in users of various tobacco/nicotine products by suitable urinary biomarkers

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) occur naturally (bitumen and oils) and are formed during all incomplete combustions of organic materials. PAH exposure sources are manifold and include specific workplaces, ambient air, various foodstuffs, tobacco smoke and some medications. At least four members of this class of chemicals have been classified as proven or probable human carcinogens. Assessment of the exposure to PAHs with suitable methods is of importance, particularly in users of new-generation tobacco/nicotine products, which are intended to replace combustible cigarettes (CCs), a major source of non-occupational exposure to PAHs. In a clinical study comprising a period of 74 h under confinement, we investigated the exposure to naphthalene (Nap), fluorene (Flu), phenanthrene (Phe), pyrene (Pyr) and benzo[a]pyrene (BaP) by measuring urinary monohydroxy-PAH (OH-PAH) derived from these parent compounds in habitual users of CCs, electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). Non-users (NU) of any tobacco/nicotine products served as (negative) control group. Smokers exhibited the highest levels for all PAH biomarkers measured, almost all of which were significantly different from the NU and user groups of all other products investigated. CC smokers were the only group which showed a significant relationship between almost all PAH biomarkers and dose markers such as daily consumption, urinary nicotine equivalents (Nequ) and plasma cotinine (CotP). The ratios in urinary OH-PAH between CC and all other groups were dependent on the biomarker and range from < 2 to > 10. These ratios could at least partly be explained by the enzymes involved, their region-selectivity and inducibility by smoking. In conclusion, cigarette smokers (CC) were the only group, which showed product use dependent exposure to PAHs, whereas users of EC, HTP, NRT and OT were not distinguishable from NU of any tobacco/nicotine products.

Assessment of the Exposure to Tobacco-Specific Nitrosamines and Minor Tobacco Alkaloids in Users of Various Tobacco/Nicotine Products

Tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs), in particular, the human carcinogens 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone (NNK) and N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), are important toxicants in tobacco and also (as contaminants) in nicotine products. In a clinical study comprising a period of 74 h under confinement, we investigated the exposure to NNK, NNN, N'-nitrosoanabasine (NAB), and N'-nitrosoanatabine (NAT) as well as to the minor tobacco alkaloids anabasine (AB) and anatabine (AT) by measuring suitable biomarkers in habitual users of combustible cigarettes (CCs), electronic cigarettes (ECs), heated tobacco products (HTPs), oral tobacco (OT), and nicotine replacement therapy products (NRTs). Non-users (NU) of any tobacco/nicotine products served as the (negative) control group. Smokers exhibited the highest levels for all biomarkers measured, except for AB in urine, which was found to be highest in OT users. Somewhat elevated levels compared to NU, EC, and NRT groups were also observed in the users of HTPs. In the users of tobacco-containing products (CC, HTP, and OT), most frequently the biomarkers significantly correlated with the dose markers such as daily consumption, urinary nicotine equivalents (Nequ), and plasma cotinine (CotP). In conclusion, except for smokers (CC) and OT users, exposure of users of ECs, HTPs, and NRTs to TSNAs as well as the minor tobacco alkaloids AB and AT is marginal and statistically not distinguishable from that of NU. Finally, our results for NNN in the saliva provide preliminary evidence for the formation of NNN from the precursor nornicotine in the presence of thiocyanate as a catalyst. The latter hypothesis requires experimental verification.