Gene regulation at-a-distance in E. coli: new insights

Modulation of sol mRNA expression by the long non-coding RNA Assolrna in Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum affects solvent formation

Solvents such as butanol are important platform chemicals and are often produced from petrochemical sources. Production of butanol and other compounds from renewable and sustainable resources can be achieved by solventogenic bacteria, such as the hyper-butanol producer Clostridium saccharoperbutylacetonicum. Its sol operon consists of the genes encoding butyraldehyde dehydrogenase, CoA transferase, and acetoacetate decarboxylase (bld, ctfA, ctfB, adc) and the gene products are involved in butanol and acetone formation. It is important to understand its regulation to further optimize the solvent production. In this study, a new long non-coding antisense transcript complementary to the complete sol operon, now called Assolrna, was identified by transcriptomic analysis and the regulatory mechanism of Assolrna was investigated. For this purpose, the promoter-exchange strain C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum ΔP_asr::P_asr^** was constructed. Additionally, Assolrna was expressed plasmid-based under control of the native P_asr promoter and the lactose-inducible P_bgaL promoter in both the wild type and the promoter-exchange strain. Solvent formation was strongly decreased for all strains based on C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum ΔP_asr::P_asr^** and growth could not be restored by plasmid-based complementation of the exchanged promoter. Interestingly, very little sol mRNA expression was detected in the strain C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum ΔP_asr::P_asr^** lacking Assolrna expression. Butanol titers were further increased for the overexpression strain C. saccharoperbutylacetonicum [pMTL83151_asr_P_bgaL] compared to the wild type. These results suggest that Assolrna has a positive effect on sol operon expression. Therefore, a possible stabilization mechanism of the sol mRNA by Assolrna under physiological concentrations is proposed.

Hill kinetics as a noise filter: the role of transcription factor autoregulation in gene cascades

An intuition based on deterministic models of chemical kinetics is that population heterogeneity of transcription factor levels in cells is transmitted unchanged downstream to the target genes. We use a stochastic model of a two-gene cascade with a self-regulating upstream gene to show that, counter to the intuition, there is no simple mapping (bimodal to bimodal, unimodal to unimodal) between the shapes of the distributions of transcription factor numbers and target protein numbers in cells. Due to the presence of the two regulations, the system contains two nonlinear transfer functions, defined by the Hill kinetics of transcription factor binding. The transfer function of the regulator can "interfere" with the transfer function of the target, converting the bimodal input into a unimodal output or vice versa. We show that this effect can be predicted by a geometric construction. As an example application of the method, we present a case study of a system of several downstream genes of different sensitivities, controlled by a common transcription factor which also regulates its own transcription. We show that a single regulator can induce qualitatively different patterns (binary or graded) of responses to a signal in different downstream genes, depending on whether the sensitivity regions of the transfer functions of the upstream and downstream genes overlap or not. Alternatively, the same model can be interpreted as describing a single downstream gene that has different sensitivities in different cell lines due to mutations. Our model shows, therefore, a possible kinetic mechanism by which different genes can interpret the same biological signal in a different manner.

DNA recognition by a σ(54) transcriptional activator from Aquifex aeolicus

Transcription initiation by bacterial σ(54)-polymerase requires the action of a transcriptional activator protein. Activators bind sequence-specifically upstream of the transcription initiation site via a DNA-binding domain (DBD). The structurally characterized DBDs from activators all belong to the Fis (factor for inversion stimulation) family of helix-turn-helix DNA-binding proteins. We report here structures of the free and DNA-bound forms of the DBD of NtrC4 (4DBD) from Aquifex aeolicus, a member of the NtrC family of σ(54) activators. Two NtrC4-binding sites were identified upstream (-145 and -85bp) from the start of the lpxC gene, which is responsible for the first committed step in lipid A biosynthesis. This is the first experimental evidence for σ(54) regulation in lpxC expression. 4DBD was crystallized both without DNA and in complex with the -145-binding site. The structures, together with biochemical data, indicate that NtrC4 binds to DNA in a manner that is similar to that of its close homolog, Fis. The greater sequence specificity for the binding of 4DBD relative to Fis seems to arise from a larger number of base-specific contacts contributing to affinity than for Fis.

DNA looping in prokaryotes: experimental and theoretical approaches

Transcriptional regulation is at the heart of biological functions such as adaptation to a changing environment or to new carbon sources. One of the mechanisms which has been found to modulate transcription, either positively (activation) or negatively (repression), involves the formation of DNA loops. A DNA loop occurs when a protein or a complex of proteins simultaneously binds to two different sites on DNA with looping out of the intervening DNA. This simple mechanism is central to the regulation of several operons in the genome of the bacterium Escherichia coli, like the lac operon, one of the paradigms of genetic regulation. The aim of this review is to gather and discuss concepts and ideas from experimental biology and theoretical physics concerning DNA looping in genetic regulation. We first describe experimental techniques designed to show the formation of a DNA loop. We then present the benefits that can or could be derived from a mechanism involving DNA looping. Some of these are already experimentally proven, but others are theoretical predictions and merit experimental investigation. Then, we try to identify other genetic systems that could be regulated by a DNA looping mechanism in the genome of Escherichia coli. We found many operons that, according to our set of criteria, have a good chance to be regulated with a DNA loop. Finally, we discuss the proposition recently made by both biologists and physicists that this mechanism could also act at the genomic scale and play a crucial role in the spatial organization of genomes.

Escherichia coli genome-wide promoter analysis: identification of additional AtoC binding target elements

Background

Studies on bacterial signal transduction systems have revealed complex networks of functional interactions, where the response regulators play a pivotal role. The AtoSC system of E. coli activates the expression of atoDAEB operon genes, and the subsequent catabolism of short-chain fatty acids, upon acetoacetate induction. Transcriptome and phenotypic analyses suggested that atoSC is also involved in several other cellular activities, although we have recently reported a palindromic repeat within the atoDAEB promoter as the single, cis-regulatory binding site of the AtoC response regulator. In this work, we used a computational approach to explore the presence of yet unidentified AtoC binding sites within other parts of the E. coli genome.

Results

Through the implementation of a computational de novo motif detection workflow, a set of candidate motifs was generated, representing putative AtoC binding targets within the E. coli genome. In order to assess the biological relevance of the motifs and to select for experimental validation of those sequences related robustly with distinct cellular functions, we implemented a novel approach that applies Gene Ontology Term Analysis to the motif hits and selected those that were qualified through this procedure. The computational results were validated using Chromatin Immunoprecipitation assays to assess the in vivo binding of AtoC to the predicted sites. This process verified twenty-two additional AtoC binding sites, located not only within intergenic regions, but also within gene-encoding sequences.

Conclusions

This study, by tracing a number of putative AtoC binding sites, has indicated an AtoC-related cross-regulatory function. This highlights the significance of computational genome-wide approaches in elucidating complex patterns of bacterial cell regulation.

Gene insulation. Part II: natural strategies in vertebrates

The way a gene is insulated from its genomic environment in vertebrates is not basically different from what is observed in yeast and Drosophila (preceding article in this issue). If the formation of a looped chromatin domain, whether generated by attachment to the nuclear matrix or not, has become a classic way to confine an enhancer to a specific genomic domain and to coordinate, sequentially or simultaneously, gene expression in a given program, its role has been extended to new networks of genes or regulators within the same gene. A wider definition of the bases of the chromatin loops (nonchromosomal nuclear structures or genomic interacting elements) is also available. However, whereas insulation in Drosophila is due to a variety of proteins, in vertebrates insulators are still practically limited to CTCF (the CCCTC-binding factor), which appears in all cases to be the linchpin of an architecture that structures the assembly of DNA-protein interactions for gene regulation. As in yeast and Drosophila, the economy of means is the rule and the same unexpected diversion of known transcription elements (active or poised RNA polymerases, TFIIIC elements out of tRNA genes, permanent histone replacement) is observed, with variants peculiar to CTCF. Thus, besides structuring DNA looping, CTCF is a barrier to DNA methylation or interferes with all sorts of transcription processes, such as that generating heterochromatin.

Avoiding transcription factor competition at promoter level increases the chances of obtaining oscillation

BACKGROUND

The ultimate goal of synthetic biology is the conception and construction of genetic circuits that are reliable with respect to their designed function (e.g. oscillators, switches). This task remains still to be attained due to the inherent synergy of the biological building blocks and to an insufficient feedback between experiments and mathematical models. Nevertheless, the progress in these directions has been substantial.

RESULTS

It has been emphasized in the literature that the architecture of a genetic oscillator must include positive (activating) and negative (inhibiting) genetic interactions in order to yield robust oscillations. Our results point out that the oscillatory capacity is not only affected by the interaction polarity but by how it is implemented at promoter level. For a chosen oscillator architecture, we show by means of numerical simulations that the existence or lack of competition between activator and inhibitor at promoter level affects the probability of producing oscillations and also leaves characteristic fingerprints on the associated period/amplitude features.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with non-competitive binding at promoters, competition drastically reduces the region of the parameters space characterized by oscillatory solutions. Moreover, while competition leads to pulse-like oscillations with long-tail distribution in period and amplitude for various parameters or noisy conditions, the non-competitive scenario shows a characteristic frequency and confined amplitude values. Our study also situates the competition mechanism in the context of existing genetic oscillators, with emphasis on the Atkinson oscillator.