Crouzat A, Gauci PA. Treatment of uterine artery (pseudo)aneurysm during pregnancy: A case report and review of the literature.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2024;
299:240-247. [PMID:
38905967 DOI:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.05.046]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/23/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE
To describe the management of uterine artery (pseudo)aneurysm, ruptured or unruptured, during pregnancy.
METHODS
After reporting a case about this rare pathology, a review of the literature was performed. The search was applied to PubMed databases.
RESULTS
A total of eighteen articles met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients were reported. Eight (44.4 %) patients didn't have prior medical or surgical history. Fifteen (83.3 %) beneficed interventional radiology method during pregnancy including two cases (13.3 %) with repeated embolization because of recanalization of the (pseudo)aneurysm. Nine patients (50 %) beneficed a planned cesarean between 34 and 39 weeks of gestation. One (15.8 %) patient was diagnosed with fetal death before treatment of the uterine artery (pseudo)aneurysm.
CONCLUSION
The decision to proceed to the treatment of the (pseudo)aneurysm must consider several factors, associated or not with a good fetal vitality and a hemodynamically stable patient. Embolization appears to be the method of choice. Mode of delivery and term remain not clear and contraindication of expulsive efforts in case of a uterine artery (pseudo)aneurysm merit further investigations.
Collapse