Is transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) indicated in patients with previous extensive pelvic surgeries? A case report

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES): a new chapter in vaginal surgical innovation

Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) is a novel minimal invasive technique which employs the vaginal orifice for surgical access, after which endoscopic instruments are introduced, thus obviating the need for any external skin incisions. This approach has gained traction as it is associated with reduced morbidity, improved cosmesis, lower pain scores and decreased length of hospital stay, with no increase in adverse events, when compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery. Initially limited to hysterectomy and adnexectomy, its role has now expanded to include indications such as urogynaecology, oncology and fertility. Clinicians wishing to implement vNOTES need to undergo appropriate training and appreciate judicious governance. Further randomised controlled trials will allow us to better understand if this newer technique will offer well-evidenced preferable outcomes and become the preferred surgical approach.

Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) in Benign Gynaecology: A Systematic Review of Adnexal, Myomectomy and Prolapse Procedures

OBJECTIVE

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) is utilised for gynecological procedures globally, however evidence to support its application aside from hysterectomy is lacking. A systematic review to determine feasibility and safety profile of vNOTES for benign gynaecology was conducted.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL was conducted, including all types of studies reporting vNOTES for gynecological indications. After excluding cases with concurrent hysterectomy, the review focuses on procedures for benign indications and oncological procedures are reported separately. Patient characteristics and perioperative outcomes were reported, with pooled analysis for sufficiently powered categories.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Fifty-four articles were analyzed, including 7 comparative studies (n = 439) and 1 RCT (n = 34), reporting 2469 cases of vNOTES, including adnexal (tubal and/or ovarian) (43 articles, n = 2261), myomectomy (10 articles, n = 136) and prolapse repair (6 articles, n = 72) in predominantly premenopausal women with BMI <30 kg/m2 on pooled analysis.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION AND RESULTS

The overall conversion rate was low (1.38%, n = 34) with procedure specific conversion rates of 0.45 to 6.8% for adnexal procedures, 1.47% for myomectomy and none reported for prolapse repair. Overall complication rates were low (3.44%, n = 85) with no associated mortality. Five (0.20%) adhesion-related rectal injuries at colpotomy were noted, all repaired intraoperatively without long-term sequelae.

CONCLUSION

vNOTES appears feasible based on limited evidence, for uterine-sparing gynecological indications, despite a notable rate of rectal injury at colpotomy. There is a negligible risk of rectal injury observed at conventional laparoscopy and robotically assisted surgery, but similar rate of entry-related gastrointestinal injury. This may be due to the learning-curve or suboptimal case selection, necessitating careful training, assessment, and appropriate patient selection. Surgeons should continue registering prospective vNOTES cases via iNOTESs, to evaluate emerging perioperative trends with global uptake of this novel technique.

Feasibility and safety of vNOTES for gynecological procedures in obese patients

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to determine the feasibility and safety of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) to treat benign and malign gynecological conditions in obese patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed data from 79 obese patients with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 Kg/m2 operated by vNOTES for gynecological conditions between May 2020 and April 2023. The primary outcome was the feasibility of performing the surgery as initially planned. Data were presented for subgroups of patients with obesity class I (BMI 30.1 - 34.9 Kg/m2), class II (BMI 35.0 - 39.9 Kg/m2), and class III (BMI ≥ 40.0 Kg/m2).

RESULTS

Patients presented obesity class I in 39 cases (49.4 %), class II in 27 cases (34.2 %), and class III in 13 cases (16.4 %). Fifty-two patients (65.8 %) underwent vNOTES hysterectomy, 26 patients (32.9 %) underwent procedures limited to the adnexa, and 1 patient (1.3 %) underwent myomectomy. The conversion rate was 0 %, 11.1 %, and 7.7 % in obesity class I, II, and III, respectively. Intraoperative bladder injury was observed in 1 case (1.3 %) and rectal serosal tear in 2 cases (2.5 %). Postoperatively, we observed 3 cases (3.8 %) of wound infection, 2 cases (2.5 %) of cystitis, and 1 case (1.3 %) of deep vein thrombosis.

DISCUSSION

This study demonstrated the feasibility and safety of performing gynecological vNOTES procedures in obese patients. However, obesity could be associated with longer and more complex interventions, especially in obesity class II and III patients.

Sentinel Node Biopsy for Endometrial Cancer by Retroperitoneal Transvaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study

Objective

The primary objective was to determine the intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) by retroperitoneal transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES). The secondary objective was to assess the feasibility of this surgical technique.

Methods

This was a descriptive study realized in a non-university hospital in Switzerland. Seven patients with endometrial cancer or endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia underwent surgical staging with SLNB by retroperitoneal vNOTES using an indocyanine green-based near-infrared fluorescence imaging technique (October 2021-February 2022).

Results

The median operative time was 113 (81-211) minutes. The median estimated blood loss was 20 (20-400) mL. The overall bilateral detection rate was 100% (7/7). Upon histopathological examination, 5 patients presented an endometrial adenocarcinoma, and we found endometrial complex atypical hyperplasia in 2 cases. We successfully completed all procedures without significant intraoperative complications, but 1 case required conversion to conventional laparoscopy. The median postoperative stay was 2 (2-4) days, and we observed no postoperative complications during this period. We observed 1 case of postoperative deep vein thrombosis and an asymptomatic vaginal vault hematoma in the same patient.

Conclusions

Our preliminary study suggests that retroperitoneal vNOTES could be a feasible, safe, and valuable approach to perform SLNB in endometrial cancer. However, strong evidence of its feasibility, the effective benefits, and the long-term oncological outcomes is needed before expanding the use of vNOTES in endometrial cancer outside study settings.