Thermal bile duct and duodenal protection during pancreatic cryoablation

Acute Phase Response and Postprocedural Evaluation of Open and Laparoscopic Cryoablation Procedures in Porcine Pancreases

OBJECTIVES

Cryoablation is a potentially less invasive locoregional ablation modality. Although cryoablation has been used to treat malignancy in various organs, a limited application of this modality in the pancreas has been reported.

METHODS

Acute phase response assessments and postprocedural course evaluations of 2 experimental locoregional ablation methods were conducted. In one method, open and laparoscopic cryoablation of a porcine pancreas using an argon-helium gas-based cryoablation system and monitoring of tissue temperature during the procedure were performed. In the other method, open cryoablation of a porcine pancreas using liquid nitrogen was performed. The animals were evaluated postoperatively.

RESULTS

The size of the cryolesion was larger in the second treatment than in the first. Laparoscopic cryoablation was associated with the formation of an iceball, which possibly affected the surrounding structures. The ablated region was adequately cooled with 10 minutes of freeze/repeat cycles. The area cooled to a temperature of less than -40°C was approximately half the size of the cryolesion in diameter. The swine used for the evaluation of the postprocedural course survived 3 weeks after the procedure with a temporal elevation of the serum lipase level.

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation of the pancreas was experimentally practicable without severe complications under direct or laparoscopic vision.

Safety and Efficacy of Percutaneous Cryoablation for Small Hepatocellular Carcinomas Adjacent to the Heart

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of percutaneous cryoablation for treatment of the left subdiaphragmatic small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) adjacent to the heart.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between September 2013 and March 2018, 189 consecutive patients underwent cryoablation for small HCCs (≤3 cm); 70 patients (mean: 61.3 ± 10.6 years of age; range: 40-82 years) with left hepatic tumors (22 juxtacardiac and 48 nonjuxtacardiac tumors) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into juxtacardiac and nonjuxtacardiac tumor groups (tumor margins: ≤10 mm and >10 mm, respectively, from the heart border). The rates of technical success, complete ablation, complications, and local tumor recurrence (LTR) were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant intergroup differences were observed in the mean diameter of the tumor (17.9 ± 5.5 mm vs. 17.5 mm ± 5.2, respectively; P = 0.781) and of the ablation zone (41.3 ± 4.2 mm vs. 43.5 ± 5.8 mm, respectively; P = 0.115). Technical success was achieved in all patients. No procedure-related major complications occurred in either group. The median follow-up period was 15 months (range: 3.1-49.6 months). No statistically significant intergroup differences were observed in the rates of complete ablation (90.9% vs. 93.8%, respectively; P = 0.646) and LTR (20% vs. 15.6%, respectively; P = 0.725).

CONCLUSIONS

Cryoablation is a safe treatment modality for patients with juxtacardiac small HCCs, without an increased risk of cardiac complications compared to treatment of HCCs that are nonjuxtacardiac, and with comparable efficacy.

Comparison of percutaneous cryoablation with microwave ablation in a porcine liver model

We compared imaging and pathological changes between argon-helium cryosurgical (AH) and microwave (MW) ablation in a porcine liver model. Immediately after ablation, computed tomography (CT) imaging showed that the area affected by MW ablation was considerably greater than that affected by AH ablation; moreover, the surface area of necrotic tissue was considerably greater in the AH group, whereas the depth of the necrotic area was similar. Seven days after ablation, the affected area had not changed much in the AH group, but it had significantly increased in the MW group; similarly, the surface and depth of the necrotic areas had not changed much in the AH group, but they had increased significantly in the MW group. The pathological findings showed similar definitive areas for both groups at both time points. The findings indicated that long time after both therapies, complete tissue necrosis can be achieved, but the extent and depth of necrosis differ: necrosis foci after AH ablation could be predicted by ice ball under CT image, and necrosis foci after MW ablation will increase obviously. MW ablation might therefore be suitable for tumors with a larger volume and simple anatomical structures, and AH ablation might be suitable for tumors with complex anatomical structures or those located near important organs. These two methods could therefore be used in combination in clinical settings, but details of the procedure need to be studied.