1
|
Foldi J, Connolly JA, Takano E, Breitling R. Synthetic Biology of Natural Products Engineering: Recent Advances Across the Discover-Design-Build-Test-Learn Cycle. ACS Synth Biol 2024; 13:2684-2692. [PMID: 39163395 DOI: 10.1021/acssynbio.4c00391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
Advances in genome engineering and associated technologies have reinvigorated natural products research. Here we highlight the latest developments in the field across the discover-design-build-test-learn cycle of bioengineering, from recent progress in computational tools for AI-supported genome mining, enzyme and pathway engineering, and compound identification to novel host systems and new techniques for improving production levels, and place these trends in the context of responsible research and innovation, emphasizing the importance of anticipatory analysis at the early stages of process development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Foldi
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Jack A Connolly
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Eriko Takano
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom
| | - Rainer Breitling
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Manchester, Manchester M1 7DN, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Burbano DA, Kiattisewee C, Karanjia AV, Cardiff RAL, Faulkner ID, Sugianto W, Carothers JM. CRISPR Tools for Engineering Prokaryotic Systems: Recent Advances and New Applications. Annu Rev Chem Biomol Eng 2024; 15:389-430. [PMID: 38598861 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-chembioeng-100522-114706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
In the past decades, the broad selection of CRISPR-Cas systems has revolutionized biotechnology by enabling multimodal genetic manipulation in diverse organisms. Rooted in a molecular engineering perspective, we recapitulate the different CRISPR components and how they can be designed for specific genetic engineering applications. We first introduce the repertoire of Cas proteins and tethered effectors used to program new biological functions through gene editing and gene regulation. We review current guide RNA (gRNA) design strategies and computational tools and how CRISPR-based genetic circuits can be constructed through regulated gRNA expression. Then, we present recent advances in CRISPR-based biosensing, bioproduction, and biotherapeutics across in vitro and in vivo prokaryotic systems. Finally, we discuss forthcoming applications in prokaryotic CRISPR technology that will transform synthetic biology principles in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Alba Burbano
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - Cholpisit Kiattisewee
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - Ava V Karanjia
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - Ryan A L Cardiff
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - Ian D Faulkner
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - Widianti Sugianto
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| | - James M Carothers
- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Molecular Engineering & Sciences Institute and Center for Synthetic Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sword TT, Dinglasan JLN, Abbas GSK, Barker JW, Spradley ME, Greene ER, Gooden DS, Emrich SJ, Gilchrist MA, Doktycz MJ, Bailey CB. Profiling expression strategies for a type III polyketide synthase in a lysate-based, cell-free system. Sci Rep 2024; 14:12983. [PMID: 38839808 PMCID: PMC11153635 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61376-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Some of the most metabolically diverse species of bacteria (e.g., Actinobacteria) have higher GC content in their DNA, differ substantially in codon usage, and have distinct protein folding environments compared to tractable expression hosts like Escherichia coli. Consequentially, expressing biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) from these bacteria in E. coli often results in a myriad of unpredictable issues with regard to protein expression and folding, delaying the biochemical characterization of new natural products. Current strategies to achieve soluble, active expression of these enzymes in tractable hosts can be a lengthy trial-and-error process. Cell-free expression (CFE) has emerged as a valuable expression platform as a testbed for rapid prototyping expression parameters. Here, we use a type III polyketide synthase from Streptomyces griseus, RppA, which catalyzes the formation of the red pigment flaviolin, as a reporter to investigate BGC refactoring techniques. We applied a library of constructs with different combinations of promoters and rppA coding sequences to investigate the synergies between promoter and codon usage. Subsequently, we assess the utility of cell-free systems for prototyping these refactoring tactics prior to their implementation in cells. Overall, codon harmonization improves natural product synthesis more than traditional codon optimization across cell-free and cellular environments. More importantly, the choice of coding sequences and promoters impact protein expression synergistically, which should be considered for future efforts to use CFE for high-yield protein expression. The promoter strategy when applied to RppA was not completely correlated with that observed with GFP, indicating that different promoter strategies should be applied for different proteins. In vivo experiments suggest that there is correlation, but not complete alignment between expressing in cell free and in vivo. Refactoring promoters and/or coding sequences via CFE can be a valuable strategy to rapidly screen for catalytically functional production of enzymes from BCGs, which advances CFE as a tool for natural product research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien T Sword
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Jaime Lorenzo N Dinglasan
- Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA
- Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Ghaeath S K Abbas
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
- School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - J William Barker
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Madeline E Spradley
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular, and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Elijah R Greene
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Damian S Gooden
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Scott J Emrich
- Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Michael A Gilchrist
- Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA
| | - Mitchel J Doktycz
- Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN, USA.
- Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
| | - Constance B Bailey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
- Graduate School of Genome Science and Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, USA.
- School of Chemistry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sword TT, Dinglasan JLN, Abbas GS, William Barker J, Spradley ME, Greene ER, Gooden DS, Emrich SJ, Gilchrist MA, Doktycz MJ, Bailey CB. Profiling Expression Strategies for a Type III Polyketide Synthase in a Lysate-Based, Cell-free System. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.11.30.569483. [PMID: 38077034 PMCID: PMC10705458 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.30.569483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2023]
Abstract
Some of the most metabolically diverse species of bacteria (e.g., Actinobacteria) have higher GC content in their DNA, differ substantially in codon usage, and have distinct protein folding environments compared to tractable expression hosts like Escherichia coli. Consequentially, expressing biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) from these bacteria in E. coli frequently results in a myriad of unpredictable issues with protein expression and folding, delaying the biochemical characterization of new natural products. Current strategies to achieve soluble, active expression of these enzymes in tractable hosts, such as BGC refactoring, can be a lengthy trial-and-error process. Cell-free expression (CFE) has emerged as 1) a valuable expression platform for enzymes that are challenging to synthesize in vivo, and as 2) a testbed for rapid prototyping that can improve cellular expression. Here, we use a type III polyketide synthase from Streptomyces griseus, RppA, which catalyzes the formation of the red pigment flaviolin, as a reporter to investigate BGC refactoring techniques. We synergistically tune promoter and codon usage to improve flaviolin production from cell-free expressed RppA. We then assess the utility of cell-free systems for prototyping these refactoring tactics prior to their implementation in cells. Overall, codon harmonization improves natural product synthesis more than traditional codon optimization across cell-free and cellular environments. Refactoring promoters and/or coding sequences via CFE can be a valuable strategy to rapidly screen for catalytically functional production of enzymes from BCGs. By showing the coordinators between CFE versus in vivo expression, this work advances CFE as a tool for natural product research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien T. Sword
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Jaime Lorenzo N. Dinglasan
- Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN USA)
- Graduate School of Genome Science & Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Ghaeath S.K. Abbas
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- University of Sydney, School of Chemistry (Sydney, NSW, Australia)
| | - J. William Barker
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Madeline E. Spradley
- Department of Biochemistry, Cellular, and Molecular Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Elijah R. Greene
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Damian S. Gooden
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Scott J. Emrich
- Graduate School of Genome Science & Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Michael A. Gilchrist
- Graduate School of Genome Science & Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Mitchel J. Doktycz
- Biosciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (Oak Ridge, TN USA)
- Graduate School of Genome Science & Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
| | - Constance B. Bailey
- Department of Chemistry, University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- Graduate School of Genome Science & Technology, University of Tennessee-Knoxville Knoxville (Knoxville, TN USA)
- University of Sydney, School of Chemistry (Sydney, NSW, Australia)
| |
Collapse
|