Enumerating the decomposable neighbours of a decomposable graph under a simple perturbation scheme

Probabilistic graphical models for genetic association studies

Probabilistic graphical models have been widely recognized as a powerful formalism in the bioinformatics field, especially in gene expression studies and linkage analysis. Although less well known in association genetics, many successful methods have recently emerged to dissect the genetic architecture of complex diseases. In this review article, we cover the applications of these models to the population association studies' context, such as linkage disequilibrium modeling, fine mapping and candidate gene studies, and genome-scale association studies. Significant breakthroughs of the corresponding methods are highlighted, but emphasis is also given to their current limitations, in particular, to the issue of scalability. Finally, we give promising directions for future research in this field.

Accuracy and computational efficiency of a graphical modeling approach to linkage disequilibrium estimation

We develop recent work on using graphical models for linkage disequilibrium to provide efficient programs for model fitting, phasing, and imputation of missing data in large data sets. Two important features contribute to the computational efficiency: the separation of the model fitting and phasing-imputation processes into different programs, and holding in memory only the data within a moving window of loci during model fitting. Optimal parameter values were chosen by cross-validation to maximize the probability of correctly imputing masked genotypes. The best accuracy obtained is slightly below than that from the Beagle program of Browning and Browning, and our fitting program is slower. However, for large data sets, it uses less storage. For a reference set of n individuals genotyped at m markers, the time and storage required for fitting a graphical model are approximately O(nm) and O(n+m), respectively. To impute the phases and missing data on n individuals using an already fitted graphical model requires O(nm) time and O(m) storage. While the times for fitting and imputation are both O(nm), the imputation process is considerably faster; thus, once a model is estimated from a reference data set, the marginal cost of phasing and imputing further samples is very low.