Effect of foot reflexology on chest pain and anxiety in patients with acute myocardial infarction: A double blind randomized clinical trial

The Multisystem effects of Long COVID Syndrome and Potential Benefits of Massage Therapy in Long COVID Care

Background

A major complication of infection with Severe Acute Respiratory Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the virus responsible for COVID-19, is the potential for Long COVID Syndrome. While the pathophysiology of Long COVID Syndrome has yet to be described, the disease presentation is characterized by long-term symptoms with debilitating effects on human health. A better understanding of Long COVID symptomology may open up new avenues for patient treatment such as massage therapy.

Methods

From the PubMed database, cohort studies that examined post-infection COVID sequelae published between January 1st, 2021 and April 30th, 2021 were selected to investigate patient demographics and symptoms. A review of massage therapy literature since 2000 in conjunction with identified Long COVID symptoms was performed.

Results

This systematic review identified 17 cohort studies across the world that investigated the symptomatology of patients suffering from post-COVID sequelae in multiple organ systems. We identified the pulmonary and nervous systems to be the organ systems most affected with post-COVID sequelae, with PTSD, fatigue, dyspnea, cough, sleep disturbances, loss of smell, abdominal pain, and decreased appetite as the most common symptoms reported by >20% of Long COVID patients. Massage therapy was historically found to provide benefits to patients experiencing similar symptoms to those identified in Long COVID.

Conclusions

Recognizing the need for new approaches to treatment for Long COVID Syndrome, we identify massage therapy as a potential therapeutic treatment to positively impact the organ systems affected by Long COVID, especially the high-incident symptoms, and improve patient quality of life.

Effects of non-pharmacological interventions on pain in wound patients during dressing change: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Changes to the wound dressing frequently cause pain. Some adverse side effects of pharmacologic pain management may cause problems or even impede wound healing. There is no systematic study of non-pharmacologic therapies for pain during wound dressing changes, despite the gradual promotion of non-pharmacologic pain reduction methods.

OBJECTIVES

To give clinical wound pain management a new direction, locating and assessing non-pharmacological interventions regarding pain brought on by wound dressing changes are necessary.

METHOD

The researchers conducted a comprehensive literature review on non-pharmacological interventions for pain during wound dressing changes across five databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library spanning the period from January 2010 to September 2022. The evaluation of literature and data extraction was carried out independently by two researchers, and in cases of disagreement, a third researcher participated in the deliberation. To assess the risk of bias in the literature, the researchers utilised the Cochrane Handbook for Reviews of Interventions, version 5.1.0.

RESULTS

In total, 951 people were involved in 11 investigations covering seven non-pharmacological therapies. For pain triggered by dressing changes, virtual reality (VR) distraction, auditory and visual distractions, foot reflexology, religious and spiritual care, and guided imaging demonstrated partially positive effects, with hypnosis therapy and jaw relaxation perhaps having a weak effect.

CONCLUSION

The key to managing wounds is pain management. According to our review, there is some indication that non-pharmacologic interventions can help patients feel less discomfort when having their wound dressings changed. However, the evidence supporting this view is weak. It needs to be corroborated by future research studies with multicentre and large samples. To promote and use various non-pharmacologic interventions in the future, it is also necessary to build standardised and homogenised paths for their implementation.

Efeitos de Abordagens não Farmacológicas nos Sintomas Físicos de Indivíduos com Câncer Avançado: Revisão Sistemática

Introdução: O câncer e um problema de saúde publica que, em estágios avançados, pode ocasionar desconfortos físicos, psicossociais e espirituais. Assim, abordagens fisioterapêuticas e as Práticas Integrativas e Complementares em Saúde (PICS) surgem como ferramentas importantes para o controle e melhora de sintomas físicos nesses indivíduos. Objetivo: Descrever os efeitos de abordagens não farmacológicas, envolvendo técnicas fisioterapêuticas e PICS, nos sintomas físicos de indivíduos com câncer avançado. Método: Revisão sistemática da literatura composta por ensaios clínicos randomizados que abordassem os efeitos de abordagens fisioterapêuticas ou PICS nos sintomas físicos de indivíduos diagnosticados com câncer avançado. Foram selecionadas as bases de dados PubMed, LILACS, PEDro, Cochrane, SciELO, e a última busca ocorreu em abril de 2021. A avaliação da qualidade metodológica dos estudos foi realizada por meio da escala PEDro. Resultados: Vinte e dois estudos foram incluídos, e demonstraram que ambas as abordagens tem efeitos positivos para os sintomas físicos, como fadiga e dor, na população estudada. Conclusão: A fisioterapia e as PICS tem efeitos positivos nos sintomas físicos em indivíduos com diagnostico de câncer avançado. No entanto, existem poucos estudos com qualidade metodológica suficiente para confirmar a eficácia das duas abordagens nos desfechos estudados para essa população.