Patient requests and provider suggestions for alternative treatments as reported by rural and urban care providers

Complementary Medicine in Acute Care Hospitals: Questionnaire Survey with Heads of Bavarian Hospitals

INTRODUCTION

The demand for complementary medicine (CM) is well studied in the outpatient sector, but representative data on type and extent of inpatient care using CM are missing. Therefore, our aim was to examine the range of CM treatments offered and the types of indications for using CM in acute care hospitals in the German state of Bavaria.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire survey by contacting the medical heads of all 388 Bavarian acute care hospitals between November 2020 and April 2021. The questionnaire included a wide range of CM to assessed availability of CM supply, most frequent indications, and medical specialities. Furthermore, we assessed basic information about the hospital and the participating medical staff.

RESULTS

A total of 101 (26%) hospitals participated in the survey. At least one CM treatment was offered by 92% of the responding hospitals and 75% offered at least 5 therapy modalities (mean of 10 treatments, range: 0-25). These were most commonly massage therapies (68%), relaxation techniques (63%), phytotherapy (60%), mindfulness-based treatments (53%), art, diet, and exercise therapies (each 48%), aromatherapy (46%), acupuncture, and compresses/poultices (both 42%). The most reported medical conditions for CM treatments (in descending order) were chronic pain, mental disorders, degenerative affections, sleep disorders, fatigue syndrome, functional gastrointestinal disorders, and acute pain.

CONCLUSION

According to the Bavarian acute care hospitals that participated in our postal survey, a considerable part offered CM. Further research should include personal interviews and more detailed assessments of indications and attitudes for the use of CM in acute care hospital settings.

Einleitung

Die Nachfrage nach Komplementärmedizinischen Verfahren (CM) ist für den ambulanten Sektor gut untersucht, aber es fehlen Daten über Art und Umfang der komplementärmedizinischen Versorgung im stationären Bereich. Unser Ziel war es daher, das CM-Angebot und die medizinischen Indikationen in Akutkrankenhäusern im Bundesland Bayern zu untersuchen.

Methoden

Wir führten eine Querschnittsbefragung durch, bei der die klinischen Leitungen aller 388 bayerischen Akutkrankenhäuser zwischen November 2020 und April 2021 angeschrieben wurden. Der Fragebogen inkludierte ein breites Spektrum an CM-Verfahren und erfasste deren Verfügbarkeit, die häufigsten Indikationen und Anwendungsgebiete. Ergänzend wurden grundlegende Informationen des Krankenhauses und des medizinischen Personals erfragt.

Ergebnisse

Insgesamt nahmen 101 (26%) Krankenhäuser an der Befragung teil. Die meisten Ausfüllenden hatten mindestens zwei Jahrzehnte klinische Berufserfahrung. Mindestens eine CM Behandlung wurde von 92% der teilnehmenden Krankenhäuser angeboten und 75% boten mindestens 5 Therapiemodalitäten an (Mittelwert: 10 Behandlungen; Spanne: 0–25). Dabei handelte es sich am häufigsten um Massagen (68%), Entspannungstechniken (63%), Phytotherapie (60%), achtsamkeitsbasierte Behandlungen (53%), Kunst-, Ernährungs-und Bewegungstherapie (jeweils 48%), Aromatherapie (46%), Akupunktur und Kompressen/Umschläge (jeweils 42%). Die häufigsten genannten Indikationen für CM-Behandlungen waren (in absteigender Reihenfolge) chronische Schmerzen, psychische Störungen, degenerative Erkrankungen, Schlafstörungen, Erschöpfungssyndrom, funktionelle Magen-Darm-Beschwerden und akute Schmerzen.

Schlussfolgerung

Nach Angaben der bayerischen Akutkrankenhäuser, die an unserer postalischen Umfrage teilgenommen haben, bietet ein erheblicher Teil CM an. Weitere Untersuchungen sollten persönliche Interviews und detailliertere Bewertungen der Indikationen und Einstellungen für den Einsatz von CM in Akutkrankenhäusern umfassen.

Knowledge about complementary, alternative and integrative medicine (CAM) among registered health care providers in Swedish surgical care: a national survey among university hospitals

Background

Previous studies show an increased interest and usage of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in the general population and among health care workers both internationally and nationally. CAM usage is also reported to be common among surgical patients. Earlier international studies have reported that a large amount of surgical patients use it prior to and after surgery. Recent publications indicate a weak knowledge about CAM among health care workers. However the current situation in Sweden is unknown. The aim of this study was therefore to explore perceived knowledge about CAM among registered healthcare professions in surgical departments at Swedish university hospitals.

Method

A questionnaire was distributed to 1757 registered physicians, nurses and physiotherapists in surgical wards at the seven university hospitals in Sweden from spring 2010 to spring 2011. The questionnaire included classification of 21 therapies into conventional, complementary, alternative and integrative, and whether patients were recommended these therapies. Questions concerning knowledge, research, and patient communication about CAM were also included.

Result

A total of 737 (42.0%) questionnaires were returned. Therapies classified as complementary; were massage, manual therapies, yoga and acupuncture. Alternative therapies; were herbal medicine, dietary supplements, homeopathy and healing. Classification to integrative therapy was low, and unfamiliar therapies were Bowen therapy, iridology and Rosen method. Therapies recommended by > 40% off the participants were massage and acupuncture. Knowledge and research about CAM was valued as minor or none at all by 95.7% respectively 99.2%. Importance of possessing knowledge about it was valued as important by 80.9%. It was believed by 61.2% that more research funding should be addressed to CAM research, 72.8% were interested in reading CAM-research results, and 27.8% would consider taking part in such research. Half of the participants (55.8%) were positive to learning such therapy. Communication about CAM between patients and the health care professions was found to be rare.

Conclusion

There is a lack of knowledge about CAM and research about it among registered health care professions in Swedish surgical care. However, in contrast to previous studies the results revealed that the majority perceived it as important to gain knowledge in this field.

A Literature Review of Health Care Professional Attitudes Toward Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Objective. To summarize health care professionals' attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).

Methods. In October 2006, we searched Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED; 1985—2006), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE; 1980—2006), and MED-LINE (1960—2006) for Canadian or US studies of health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM, published in English or French.

Results. A total of 21 surveys of physicians, nurses, public health professionals, dietitians, social workers, medical/nursing school faculty, and pharmacists were included that focused on beliefs about CAM efficacy, personal use, clinical practice use and referrals, communication with patients about CAM, level of knowledge, and the need for information regarding various CAM therapies. Physicians were more negative compared to other health care professionals. Positive attitudes toward CAM did not correlate with CAM referral or prescription patterns. Health care professionals of all disciplines wanted more information about CAM.

Conclusions. Heterogeneity in the CAM definition and questionnaire items precluded summarizing health care professionals' attitudes toward CAM. Providing CAM education to health care professionals may help to integrate CAM into mainstream medical care.