Sesame oil use in ameliorating cough in children: A randomised controlled trial

Sesame oil prevents acute kidney injury induced by the synergistic action of aminoglycoside and iodinated contrast in rats

The aim of the study was to investigate the effect of sesame oil on acute kidney injury induced by the synergistic action of aminoglycoside and iodinated contrast in rats. Acute kidney injury was induced by a 5-day course of daily gentamicin injections (100 mg/kg of body weight, subcutaneously) and then iodinated contrast (4 ml/kg, intravenously) in male specific-pathogen-free Sprague-Dawley rats. Sesame oil (0.5 ml/kg, orally) was given 1 h before iodinated contrast. Renal function and oxidative stress were assessed 6 h after iodinated contrast injection. Renal function was evaluated by measuring serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. Renal oxidative stress was assessed by determining renal lipid peroxidation, myeloperoxidase, hydroxyl radical, superoxide anion, nitrite/nitrate, and inducible nitric oxide synthase levels. Sesame oil significantly prevented the rise of serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels. Furthermore, there was a parallel inhibition of the rise in levels of expression of renal lipid peroxidation, myeloperoxidase, hydroxyl radicals, superoxide anion, nitrite/nitrate, and inducible nitric oxide synthase in rats with gentamicin-plus-iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury. We conclude that sesame oil may attenuate aminoglycoside-plus-iodinated contrast-induced acute kidney injury by inhibiting renal oxidative stress in rats.

Workshop: tuning the 'cough center'

The Workshop considered the mechanisms whereby the 'cough center' could be tuned by various afferent inputs. There were particular presentations on the effects of inputs from the nose, mouth, respiratory tract and lungs, cerebral cortex, somatic tissues and the pharynx. From all these sites cough induced from the lungs could be increased or decreased in its strength or modified in its pattern. Thus 'tuning' of cough could be due to the interaction of afferent inputs, or to the sensitization or desensitization of brainstem neural pathways. The pattern of response depended on the 'type' of cough being studied and, in some instances, on the timing of the sensory input into the brainstem. Cough inputs could also affect various 'non-cough' motor outputs from the brain, although this was not the main theme of the Workshop. The main conclusion was that cough is not a stereotyped output from the medullary 'cough center', but that its pattern and strength depend on many afferent inputs acting on the 'cough center'.

Clinical cough V: complementary and alternative medicine: therapy of cough

We review the actions of complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) in the treatment of cough and of the conditions associated with it; in particular asthma and upper respiratory tract infections. These therapies may work (1) peripherally, at the sites in the airways and lungs at which cough is being activated, (2) in the brainstem, where the neural "cough center" is situated, or (3) at the cerebral cortex, where cough can be initiated, suppressed or modified by conscious or unconscious controls. Of the large number of trials of CAMs against cough, most are inadequate in design. It may be difficult to randomize selection. Blinding is often impossible both for the patient and the therapist, and adequate placebo controls may be difficult to devise. The patient can usually identify the "active" treatment by the taste or smell of a medicine, or from the approach and apparatus being used. Pure chemicals can be extracted from many of the herbs used as antitussives, and can be shown to be effective in randomized, blind, and controlled trials, but it does not follow that the herb itself, used in the recommended formula and shown to be antitussive, acts by this agency unless a placebo effect is ruled out. A few herbs are identified where the evidence points to a true antitussive action. Of nonherbal treatments, the few positive results are usually outweighed by the larger number of negative ones. Thus, in general, CAMs for cough are welcomed enthusiastically by the patient but lack sound evidence for their efficacy. Antitussive chemicals can be extracted from many herbs, but it is no more than a reasonable hypothesis that the herb itself acts through this pathway.