1
|
Duron V, Schmoke N, Ichinose R, Stylianos S, Kernie SG, Dayan PS, Slidell MB, Stulce C, Chong G, Williams RF, Gosain A, Morin NP, Nasr IW, Kudchadkar SR, Bolstridge J, Prince JM, Sathya C, Sweberg T, Dorrello NV. Delphi Process for Validation of Fluid Treatment Algorithm for Critically Ill Pediatric Trauma Patients. J Surg Res 2024; 295:493-504. [PMID: 38071779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.11.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While intravenous fluid therapy is essential to re-establishing volume status in children who have experienced trauma, aggressive resuscitation can lead to various complications. There remains a lack of consensus on whether pediatric trauma patients will benefit from a liberal or restrictive crystalloid resuscitation approach and how to optimally identify and transition between fluid phases. METHODS A panel was comprised of physicians with expertise in pediatric trauma, critical care, and emergency medicine. A three-round Delphi process was conducted via an online survey, with each round being followed by a live video conference. Experts agreed or disagreed with each aspect of the proposed fluid management algorithm on a five-level Likert scale. The group opinion level defined an algorithm parameter's acceptance or rejection with greater than 75% agreement resulting in acceptance and greater than 50% disagreement resulting in rejection. The remaining were discussed and re-presented in the next round. RESULTS Fourteen experts from five Level 1 pediatric trauma centers representing three subspecialties were included. Responses were received from 13/14 participants (93%). In round 1, 64% of the parameters were accepted, while the remaining 36% were discussed and re-presented. In round 2, 90% of the parameters were accepted. Following round 3, there was 100% acceptance by all the experts on the revised and final version of the algorithm. CONCLUSIONS We present a validated algorithm for intavenous fluid management in pediatric trauma patients that focuses on the de-escalation of fluids. Focusing on this time point of fluid therapy will help minimize iatrogenic complications of crystalloid fluids within this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Duron
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York.
| | - Nicholas Schmoke
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Rika Ichinose
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Steven Stylianos
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons/NewYork-Presbyterian Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Steven G Kernie
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Peter S Dayan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, NewYork-Presbyterian/Columbia University Valegos College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York
| | - Mark B Slidell
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Casey Stulce
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Grace Chong
- Division of Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Chicago Medicine Comer Children's Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Regan F Williams
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Le Bonheur Children's Hospital, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Ankush Gosain
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado, Denver, Colorado
| | - Nicholas P Morin
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee
| | - Isam W Nasr
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sapna R Kudchadkar
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jeff Bolstridge
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jose M Prince
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Chethan Sathya
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - Todd Sweberg
- Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Cohen Children's Medical, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, New York
| | - N Valerio Dorrello
- Department of Pediatrics, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Do Chest Compresses with Mustard or Ginger Affect Warmth Regulation in Healthy Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial. EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE 2022; 2022:5034572. [PMID: 35899230 PMCID: PMC9313983 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5034572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Background Chest compresses with mustard (MU) or ginger (GI) are a complementary treatment option for respiratory tract infections. However, little is known about their specific thermogenic qualities. This study examines the short-term effects of MU, GI, and chest compresses with warm water only (WA) on measurable and self-perceived body warmth in healthy adults. Methods This was a single-center, randomized controlled trial with cross-over design (WA versus MU versus GI). 18 participants (23.7 ± 3.4 years; 66.7% female) received MU, GI, and WA in a random order on three different days with a mean washout period of 13.9 days. Chest compresses were applied to the thoracic back for a maximum of 20 minutes. The primary outcome measure was skin temperature of the posterior trunk (measured by infrared thermography) immediately following removal of the compresses (t1). Secondary outcome measures included skin temperature of the posterior trunk 10 minutes later (t2) and several parameters of self-perceived warmth at t1 and t2 (assessed with the Herdecke Warmth Perception Questionnaire). Results Skin temperature of the posterior trunk was significantly higher with MU compared to WA and GI at t1 (p < 0.001 for both, primary outcome measure) and t2 (WA versus MU: p=0.04, MU versus GI: p < 0.01). Self-perceived warmth of the posterior trunk was higher with MU and GI compared to WA at t1 (1.40 ≥ d ≥ 1.79) and remained higher with GI at t2 (WA versus GI: d = 0.74). The overall warmth perception increased significantly with GI (d = 0.69), tended to increase with MU (d = 0.54), and did not change with WA (d = 0.36) between t0 and t1. Conclusions Different effects on warmth regulation were observed when ginger and mustard were applied as chest compresses. Both substances induced self-perceived warming of the posterior trunk, but measurable skin temperature increased only with MU. Further research is needed to examine the duration of these thermogenic effects and how chest compresses with ginger or mustard might be incorporated into practice to influence clinical outcomes in respiratory tract infections.
Collapse
|