1
|
Civil YA, Jonker LW, Groot Koerkamp MPM, Duvivier KM, de Vries R, Oei AL, Slotman BJ, van der Velde S, van den Bongard HJGD. Preoperative Partial Breast Irradiation in Patients with Low-Risk Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review of Literature. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:3263-3279. [PMID: 36869253 PMCID: PMC10175515 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13233-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative instead of standard postoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has the advantage of reducing the irradiated breast volume, toxicity, and number of radiotherapy sessions and can allow tumor downstaging. In this review, we assessed tumor response and clinical outcomes after preoperative PBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a systematic review of studies on preoperative PBI in patients with low-risk breast cancer using the databases Ovid Medline, Embase.com, Web of Science (Core Collection), and Scopus (PROSPERO registration CRD42022301435). References of eligible manuscripts were checked for other relevant manuscripts. The primary outcome measure was pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS A total of eight prospective and one retrospective cohort study were identified (n = 359). In up to 42% of the patients, pCR was obtained and this increased after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS (0.5-8 months). After a maximum median follow-up of 5.0 years, three studies on external beam radiotherapy reported low local recurrence rates (0-3%) and overall survival of 97-100%. Acute toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1 skin toxicity (0-34%) and seroma (0-31%). Late toxicity was predominantly fibrosis grade 1 (46-100%) and grade 2 (10-11%). Cosmetic outcome was good to excellent in 78-100% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative PBI showed a higher pCR rate after a longer interval between radiotherapy and BCS. Mild late toxicity and good oncological and cosmetic outcomes were reported. In the ongoing ABLATIVE-2 trial, BCS is performed at a longer interval of 12 months after preoperative PBI aiming to achieve a higher pCR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin A Civil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Lysanne W Jonker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maartje P M Groot Koerkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Katya M Duvivier
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ralph de Vries
- Medical Library, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Arlene L Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Laboratory for Experimental Oncology and Radiobiology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental Molecular Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Berend J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Susanne van der Velde
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G Desirée van den Bongard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Biology and Immunology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Five Fraction External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation: A User's Guide. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:16-19. [PMID: 36562691 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000964] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Mature follow up from multiple randomized trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of external beam partial breast irradiation (PBI) for appropriately selected patients with early stage breast cancer. Despite this evidence, external beam PBI remains underutilized. In this user guide we outline patient selection, workflow, and address possible challenges to aid in implementation of evidence-based external beam PBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS Review of the current guidelines for PBI suitability, surgical considerations, treatment technique, simulation, contouring, and treatment planning, citing the latest published literature to support PBI utilization. RESULTS Prospective data supports the use of 30 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with intensity modulated radiation therapy on a daily or every other day basis for a significant proportion of early stage breast cancer patients. The surgical cavity must be clearly visualized on treatment planning scan, recommend 3-5 weeks post-operatively, and the recommended clinical target volume expansion on the surgical cavity is 0.5-1.0 cm. A planning target volume expansion, based on motion management and image guidance, of 0.5-1.0 cm should be used. Organ at risk dose constraints of heart V3Gy ≤10% and contralateral breast Dmax ≤1 Gy are often achievable. CONCLUSIONS Five fraction external beam PBI is a highly effective treatment with very limited toxicity for patients with early stage breast cancer following breast conserving surgery. Commonly utilized intensity modulated treatment planning techniques with plan delivery on standard linear accelerators results significant normal tissue sparing and makes implementation feasible at most radiation oncology centers.
Collapse
|
3
|
Vasmel JE, Groot Koerkamp ML, Mandija S, Veldhuis WB, Moman MR, Froeling M, van der Velden BH, Charaghvandi RK, Vreuls CP, van Diest PJ, van Leeuwen AG, van Gorp J, Philippens ME, van Asselen B, Lagendijk JJ, Verkooijen HM, van den Bongard HD, Houweling AC. Dynamic Contrast-enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Response Evaluation After Single-Dose Ablative Neoadjuvant Partial Breast Irradiation. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100854. [PMID: 35387418 PMCID: PMC8977856 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We aimed to evaluate changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans acquired before and after single-dose ablative neoadjuvant partial breast irradiation (NA-PBI), and explore the relation between semiquantitative MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses. Methods and Materials We analyzed 3.0T DCE and DW-MRI of 36 patients with low-risk breast cancer who were treated with single-dose NA-PBI, followed by breast-conserving surgery 6 or 8 months later. MRI was acquired before NA-PBI and 1 week, 2, 4, and 6 months after NA-PBI. Breast radiologists assessed the radiologic response and breast pathologists scored the pathologic response after surgery. Patients were grouped as either pathologic responders or nonresponders (<10% vs ≥10% residual tumor cells). The semiquantitative MRI parameters evaluated were time to enhancement (TTE), 1-minute relative enhancement (RE1min), percentage of enhancing voxels (%EV), distribution of washout curve types, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Results In general, the enhancement increased 1 week after NA-PBI (baseline vs 1 week median – TTE: 15s vs 10s; RE1min: 161% vs 197%; %EV: 47% vs 67%) and decreased from 2 months onward (6 months median – TTE: 25s; RE1min: 86%; %EV: 12%). Median ADC increased from 0.83 × 10−3 mm2/s at baseline to 1.28 × 10−3 mm2/s at 6 months. TTE, RE1min, and %EV showed the most potential to differentiate between radiologic responses, and TTE, RE1min, and ADC between pathologic responses. Conclusions Semiquantitative analyses of DCE and DW-MRI showed changes in relative enhancement and ADC 1 week after NA-PBI, indicating acute inflammation, followed by changes indicating tumor regression from 2 to 6 months after radiation therapy. A relation between the MRI parameters and radiologic and pathologic responses could not be proven in this exploratory study.
Collapse
|
4
|
OUP accepted manuscript. Br J Surg 2022; 109:237-238. [DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
|
5
|
Zhao DW, Fan WJ, Meng LL, Luo YR, Wei J, Liu K, Liu G, Li JF, Zang X, Li M, Zhang XX, Ma L. Comparison of the pre-treatment functional MRI metrics' efficacy in predicting Locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma response to induction chemotherapy. Cancer Imaging 2021; 21:59. [PMID: 34758876 PMCID: PMC8579637 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00428-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Functional MRI (fMRI) parameters analysis has been proven to be a promising tool of predicting therapeutic response to induction chemotherapy (IC) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The study was designed to identify and compare the value of fMRI parameters in predicting early response to IC in patients with NPC. Methods This prospective study enrolled fifty-six consecutively NPC patients treated with IC from January 2021 to May 2021. Conventional diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) protocols were performed before and after IC. Parameters maps (ADC, MD, MK, Dslow, Dfast, PF, Ktrans, Ve and Kep) of the primary tumor were calculated by the Functool post-processing software. The participants were classified as responding group (RG) and non-responding group (NRG) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. The fMRI parameters were compared before and after IC and between RG with NRG. Logistic regression analysis and ROC were performed to further identify and compare the efficacy of the parameters. Results After IC, the mean values of ADC(p < 0.001), MD(p < 0.001), Dslow(p = 0.001), PF(p = 0.030) and Ve(p = 0.003) significantly increased, while MK(p < 0.001), Dfast(p = 0.009) and Kep(p = 0.003) values decreased dramatically, while no significant difference was detected in Ktrans(p = 0.130). Compared with NRG, ADC-pre(p < 0.001), MD-pre(p < 0.001) and Dslow-pre(p = 0.002) values in RG were lower, while MK-pre(p = 0.017) values were higher. The areas under the ROC curves for the ADC-pre, MD-pre, MK-pre, Dslow-pre and PRE were 0.885, 0.855, 0.809, 0.742 and 0.912, with the optimal cutoff value of 1210 × 10− 6 mm2/s, 1010 × 10− 6 mm2/s, 832 × 10− 6, 835 × 10− 6 mm2/s and 0.799 respectively. Conclusions The pretreatment conventional DWI (ADC), DKI (MD and MK), and IVIM (Dslow) values derived from fMRI showed a promising potential in predicting the response of the primary tumor to IC in NPC patients. Trial registration This study was approved by ethics board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, and registered on January 30, 2021, in Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100042863). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40644-021-00428-0.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da-Wei Zhao
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, No.28 Fuxing Road, Beijing, 100853, China.,Department of Radiology, Pingjin Hospital, Characteristic Medical center of Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Tianjin, China.,Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wen-Jun Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Affiliated Foshan Maternity & Child Healthcare Hospital, Southern Medical University, Foshan, China.,Armed Police Forces Corps Hospital of Henan Province, No.1 Kangfu Road, Zhengzhou, 450052, China
| | - Ling-Ling Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yan-Rong Luo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Wei
- Department of Otolaryngology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Kun Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gang Liu
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jin-Feng Li
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiao Zang
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Li
- Department of Radiology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin-Xin Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, First Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wang C, Padgett KR, Su MY, Mellon EA, Maziero D, Chang Z. Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for treatment response assessment of radiation therapy. Med Phys 2021; 49:2794-2819. [PMID: 34374098 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the modern radiation therapy (RT) workflow. In comparison with computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is the dominant imaging modality in RT, MRI possesses excellent soft-tissue contrast for radiographic evaluation. Based on quantitative models, MRI can be used to assess tissue functional and physiological information. With the developments of scanner design, acquisition strategy, advanced data analysis, and modeling, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), a combination of morphologic and functional imaging modalities, has been increasingly adopted for disease detection, localization, and characterization. Integration of mpMRI techniques into RT enriches the opportunities to individualize RT. In particular, RT response assessment using mpMRI allows for accurate characterization of both tissue anatomical and biochemical changes to support decision-making in monotherapy of radiation treatment and/or systematic cancer management. In recent years, accumulating evidence have, indeed, demonstrated the potentials of mpMRI in RT response assessment regarding patient stratification, trial benchmarking, early treatment intervention, and outcome modeling. Clinical application of mpMRI for treatment response assessment in routine radiation oncology workflow, however, is more complex than implementing an additional imaging protocol; mpMRI requires additional focus on optimal study design, practice standardization, and unified statistical reporting strategy to realize its full potential in the context of RT. In this article, the mpMRI theories, including image mechanism, protocol design, and data analysis, will be reviewed with a focus on the radiation oncology field. Representative works will be discussed to demonstrate how mpMRI can be used for RT response assessment. Additionally, issues and limits of current works, as well as challenges and potential future research directions, will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunhao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kyle R Padgett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA.,Department of Radiology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Min-Ying Su
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Irvine, California, USA.,Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Eric A Mellon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Danilo Maziero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Zheng Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoekstra N, Habraken S, Swaak-Kragten A, Pignol JP, Hoogeman M. Fiducial marker motion relative to the tumor bed has a significant impact on PTV margins in partial breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2021; 163:1-6. [PMID: 34329655 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With the introduction of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and the trend of reducing the number of fractions, the geometric accuracy of treatment delivery becomes critical. APBI patient setup is often based on fiducials, as the seroma is frequently not visible on pretreatment imaging. We assessed the motion of fiducials relative to the tumor bed between planning CT and treatment, and calculated margins to compensate for this motion. METHODS A cohort of seventy patients treated with APBI on a Cyberknife was included. Planning and in-room pretreatment CT scans were registered on the tumor bed. Residual motion of the centers of mass of surgical clips and interstitial gold markers was calculated. We calculated the margins required per desired percentage of patients with 100% CTV coverage, and the systematic and random errors for fiducial motion. RESULTS For a single fraction treatment, a margin of 1.8 mm would ensure 100% CTV coverage in 90% of patients when using surgical clips for patient set-up. When using interstitial markers, the margin should be 2.2 mm. The systematic and random errors were 0.46 mm for surgical clip motion and 0.60 mm for interstitial marker motion. No clinical factors were found predictive for fiducial motion. CONCLUSIONS Fiducial motion relative to the tumor bed between planning CT and APBI treatment is non-negligible and should be included in the PTV margin calculation to prevent geographical miss. Systematic and random errors of fiducial motion were combined with other geometric uncertainties to calculate comprehensive PTV margins for different treatment techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Hoekstra
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Steven Habraken
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Mischa Hoogeman
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Radiation Oncology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Weinfurtner RJ, Raghunand N, Stringfield O, Abdalah M, Niell BL, Ataya D, Williams A, Mooney B, Rosa M, Lee MC, Khakpour N, Laronga C, Czerniecki B, Diaz R, Ahmed K, Washington I, Montejo M. MRI Response to Pre-operative Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SABR) in Early Stage ER/PR+ HER2- Breast Cancer correlates with Surgical Pathology Tumor Bed Cellularity. Clin Breast Cancer 2021; 22:e214-e223. [PMID: 34384695 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2021.06.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study evaluates breast MRI response of ER/PR+ HER2- breast tumors to pre-operative SABR with pathologic response correlation. METHODS Women enrolled in a phase 2 single institution trial of SABR for ER/PR+ HER2- breast cancer were retrospectively evaluated for radiologic-pathologic correlation of tumor response. These patients underwent baseline breast MRI, SABR (28.5 Gy in 3 fractions), follow-up MRI 5 to 6 weeks post-SABR, and lumpectomy. Tumor size and BI-RADS descriptors on pre and post-SABR breast MRIs were compared to determine correlation with surgical specimen % tumor cellularity (%TC). Reported MRI tumor dimensions were used to calculate percent cubic volume remaining (%VR). Partial MRI response was defined as a BI-RADs descriptor change or %VR ≤ 70%, while partial pathologic response (pPR) was defined as %TC ≤ 70%. RESULTS Nineteen patients completed the trial, and %TC ranged 10% to 80%. For BI-RADS descriptor analysis, 12 of 19 (63%) showed change in lesion or kinetic enhancement descriptors post-SABR. This was associated with lower %TC (29% vs. 47%, P = .042). BI-RADS descriptor change analysis also demonstrated high PPV (100%) and specificity (100%) for predicting pPR to treatment (sensitivity 71%, accuracy 74%), but low NPV (29%). MRI %VR demonstrated strong linear correlation with %TC (R = 0.70, P < .001, Pearson's Correlation) and high accuracy (89%) for predicting pPR (sensitivity 88%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, and NPV 50%). CONCLUSION Evaluating breast cancer response on MRI using %VR after pre-operative SABR treatment can help identify patients benefiting the most from neoadjuvant radiation treatment of their ER/PR+ HER2- tumors, a group in which pCR to neoadjuvant therapy is rare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Olya Stringfield
- Post-doctoral Fellow, Quantitative Imaging Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Mahmoud Abdalah
- Post-doctoral Fellow, Quantitative Imaging Core, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Bethany L Niell
- Associate Member of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Dana Ataya
- Assistant Member of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Angela Williams
- Assistant Member of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Blaise Mooney
- Assosciate Member of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Marilin Rosa
- Associate Member of Pathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Marie C Lee
- Associate Member of Breast Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Nazanin Khakpour
- Senior Member of Breast Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Christine Laronga
- Associate Member of Breast Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Brian Czerniecki
- Associate Member of Breast Surgery, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Roberto Diaz
- Senior Member of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Kamran Ahmed
- Assistant Member of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Iman Washington
- Assistant Member of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| | - Michael Montejo
- Assistant Member of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Intrafraction motion during partial breast irradiation depends on treatment time. Radiother Oncol 2021; 159:176-182. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
|
10
|
Chen Y, Wang J, Zhang X, Yang W, Chen H, Bao B, Qiu Y, Tian L. Correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and pathological characteristics of patients with invasive breast cancer. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:143. [PMID: 33569445 PMCID: PMC7867890 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-7746] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
Background There is insufficient research on the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient and clinicopathological characteristics of breast cancer patients. The present study is to investigate the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient and pathological characteristics of patients with invasive breast cancer. Methods From January 2019 to September 2020, 122 cases of invasive breast cancer and 21 cases of benign tumors were retrospectively enrolled. The apparent diffusion coefficient was compared between the two groups, and the correlation between the apparent diffusion coefficient and the pathological characteristics of the patients with invasive breast cancer were analyzed. Results Compared with the benign tumor group, the apparent diffusion coefficient in the invasive breast cancer group was significantly lower (0.89±0.17 vs. 1.47±0.27 10−3 mm2/s, P=0.000). Using the apparent diffusion coefficient to diagnose patients with invasive breast cancer, the area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.966±0.021 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.924–1.000, P=0.000], and the best diagnostic cut-off value was 1.16 (10−3 mm2/s), with sensitivity and specificity of 0.905 and 0.902, respectively. The apparent diffusion coefficient was used to diagnose vascular tumor thrombus in patients with invasive breast cancer. The area under the ROC curve was 0.641±0.068 (95% CI: 0.508–0.774, P=0.047), and the best diagnostic threshold was 0.835 (10−3 mm2/s), with sensitivity and specificity of 0.676 and 0.650, respectively. The apparent diffusion coefficient in patients with high expression of Ki-67 (%) was significantly reduced (0.87±0.17 vs. 1.00±0.16 10−3 mm2/s, P=0.000). The apparent diffusion coefficient was not significantly correlated with age, menopause, lesion size, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, or lymph node metastasis in patients with invasive breast cancer (P>0.05). Conclusions In patients with invasive breast cancer the apparent diffusion coefficient was significantly reduced. It was able to differentiate invasive breast cancer and vascular tumor thrombus, and was also related to Ki-67 (%) high expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhui Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiandong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiuxiu Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wuyao Yang
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongye Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Baoshi Bao
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yue Qiu
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Tian
- Department of General Surgery, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Grégoire V, Guckenberger M, Haustermans K, Lagendijk JJW, Ménard C, Pötter R, Slotman BJ, Tanderup K, Thorwarth D, van Herk M, Zips D. Image guidance in radiation therapy for better cure of cancer. Mol Oncol 2020; 14:1470-1491. [PMID: 32536001 PMCID: PMC7332209 DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2020] [Revised: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The key goal and main challenge of radiation therapy is the elimination of tumors without any concurring damages of the surrounding healthy tissues and organs. Radiation doses required to achieve sufficient cancer‐cell kill exceed in most clinical situations the dose that can be tolerated by the healthy tissues, especially when large parts of the affected organ are irradiated. High‐precision radiation oncology aims at optimizing tumor coverage, while sparing normal tissues. Medical imaging during the preparation phase, as well as in the treatment room for localization of the tumor and directing the beam, referred to as image‐guided radiotherapy (IGRT), is the cornerstone of precision radiation oncology. Sophisticated high‐resolution real‐time IGRT using X‐rays, computer tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or ultrasound, enables delivery of high radiation doses to tumors without significant damage of healthy organs. IGRT is the most convincing success story of radiation oncology over the last decades, and it remains a major driving force of innovation, contributing to the development of personalized oncology, for example, through the use of real‐time imaging biomarkers for individualized dose delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Grégoire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon, France
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department for Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karin Haustermans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jan J W Lagendijk
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Richard Pötter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University, General Hospital of Vienna, Austria
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, The Netherlands
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, UK.,Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|