Pre-operative chemo-radiotherapy improves 3-year survival in people with resectable oesophageal cancer

AKT expression is associated with degree of pathologic response in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus treated with neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has become standard in the treatment of locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with survival correlated to degree of pathologic response. The phosphatidyl inositol 3 kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mTOR pathway plays an important role in tumorgenesis and resistance. We sought to elucidate the role of this pathway in patients with EAC who received NCRT.

METHODS

After IRB approval, a prospective trial was initiated in which patients with EAC underwent endoscopic biopsies of normal and tumor tissue prior to instituting NCRT. Patients then proceeded to esophagectomy. The pre-treatment tissues underwent gene expression profiling. SAM method was used to analyze expression of AKT within normal and tumor tissue. Expression was then correlated to degree of pathologic response.

RESULTS

One-hundred patients were consented for the study, of which 67 met final eligibility. Nineteen patient's tumors ultimately underwent gene expression profiling via microarray. The differential expression of all AKT isoforms in tumor tissue was markedly overexpressed compared to normal tissue (P=6×10(-5)). There were 3 patients designated as pNR, 6 as pPR, and 10 as pCR. Partial and non-responders had higher expressions of AKT compared to pCR with the non-responders consistently illustrated the highest expression of AKT (P=0.02). There was a significant correlation between individual isoforms of AKT-1, AKT-2, and AKT-3 and degree of pathologic response (P=0.002, 0.04, and 0.04 respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

AKT is overexpressed in patients with AC of the esophagus. Moreover, pathologic response to NCRT may be correlated with degree of AKT expression. Additional data is needed to clarify this relationship to potentially add targeted therapies to the neoadjuvant regimen.

Chemoradiotherapy, with adjuvant surgery for local control, confers a durable survival advantage in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal cancer usually presents with systemic disease, necessitating systemic therapy. Neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy improves short-term survival, but its long-term impact is disputed because of limited accrual, treatment-protocol heterogeneity and a short follow-up of randomised trials.

AIMS

Long-term results of two simultaneous randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing neo-adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy and surgery (MMT) with surgical monotherapy were examined, and the response of adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) to identical regimens compared.

METHODS

Between 1990 and 1997, two RCTs were undertaken on 211 patients. Patients with AC (n=113) or SCC (n=98) were separately-randomised to identical protocols of MMT or surgical monotherapy.

RESULTS

211 patients were followed to 206 months; 104 patients were randomised to MMT (58 AC and 46 SCC, respectively) and 107 to surgery. MMT provided a significant survival-advantage over surgical monotherapy for AC (P=0.004), SCC (P=0.01). There was a 54% relative risk-reduction in lymph-node metastasis following MMT, compared with surgery (64% versus 29%, P<0.001). MMT produced a pathologic complete response (pCR) in 25% and 31% of AC and SCC, respectively. Survival advantage accrued to MMT, pCR and node-negative patients: AC pCR versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.001); residual disease following MMT versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.008); SCC pCR versus surgical monotherapy (P=0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

A survival advantage for MMT persisted long-term in AC and was replicated in SCC. MMT produced loco-regional tumour down-staging to extinction in 25-31% of patients, potentially permitting personalised treatment in this cohort that avoids the morbidity and mortality associated with resection. Node-negative patients with residual localised disease following MMT had a survival advantage over node-negative patients following surgery alone, supporting a systemic effect on micro-metastatic disease.

Pathologic nonresponders after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for esophageal cancer demonstrate no survival benefit compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation (NCRT) has become the preferred treatment for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Survival often is correlated to degree of pathologic response; however, outcomes in patients who are found to be pathologic nonresponders (pNR) remain uninvestigated. This study was designed to evaluate survival in pNR to NCRT compared with patients treated with primary esophagectomy (PE).

METHODS

Using our comprehensive esophageal cancer database, we identified patients treated with NCRT and deemed pNR along with patients who proceeded to PE. Clinical and pathologic data were compared using Fisher's exact and χ(2), whereas Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 63 patients treated with NCRT and were found to have a pNR, and 81 patients who underwent PE. Disease-free (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly decreased in the pNR group compared with those treated with PE (10 vs. 50 months (0-152), P < 0.001 and 13 vs. 50 months (0-152), P < 0.001, respectively). For patients with stage II disease, DFS and OS were similarly decreased in pathologic nonresponders (13 vs. 62 months (0-120), P < 0.001 and 31 vs. 62 months (0-120), P = 0.024, respectively). There were no differences in DFS or OS for patients with stage III disease (10 vs. 14 months (0-152), P = 0.29 and 10 vs. 19 months (0-152), P = 0.16, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Pathologic nonresponders to NCRT for esophageal cancer receive no benefit in DFS or OS compared with patients treated with PE. For patients with stage II disease, DFS and OS are, in fact, significantly decreased in the pNR.

Pathologic response after neoadjuvant therapy is the major determinant of survival in patients with esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer remains a malignancy with high morbidity and mortality despite improvements to diagnosis, staging, chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) may improve oncologic outcome in many patients, however the degree to which patients benefit remains unclear. We examined the relationship between pathologic response to NT and magnitude of benefit in patients with esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Using a comprehensive esophageal cancer database, we identified patients who underwent esophagectomy between 1994 and 2008. Pathologic response was denoted as complete (pCR), partial (pPR), and nonresponse (NR). Clinical and pathologic data were compared using Fisher's exact and chi-square when appropriate, while Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 347 patients who underwent esophagectomy, and 262 (75.5%) were treated with NT. The median age was 66 years (28-86 years) with median follow-up of 20 months (1-177 months). There were 106 (40.5%) patients exhibiting pCR, 95 (36.3%) with pPR, and 61 (23.3%) with NR. The rate of R0 resections was higher amongst pCR (100%) compared with 94.7% in pPR (P = 0.02) and 87.5% in NR (P = 0.0007). There were 15 (14.2%) recurrences in pCR, 22 (23.7%) in pPR, and 17 (28.8%) in NR (P = 0.04). Patients achieving pCR had 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 52% and 52%, respectively, compared with 36% and 38% in pPR and 22% and 19% in NR (P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal cancer patients frequently succumb to their disease. However, patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy who achieve pCR have a higher rate of R0 resections, fewer recurrences, and improved 5-year OS and DFS.

Decreased expression of gene cluster at chromosome 1q21 defines molecular subgroups of chemoradiotherapy response in esophageal cancers

PURPOSE

Resistance to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CTXRT) in 75% of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) underscores the need for identification of biomarkers of CTXRT response. We previously noted an association between decreased expression of epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) genes S100A2 and SPRR3 at chromosome 1q21 and CTXRT resistance. In the current study, we did an in-depth investigation of the expression of 1q21-1q25 region genes to uncover the role of the EDC and its flanking genes in CTXRT response.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We compared 19 pretreatment EAC specimens with normal squamous mucosa for the expression of 517 genes at chromosome 1q21-1q25 and selected target genes based on their differential expression. Using the pathologic complete-response (pathCR) status of the resected specimens as a representation of CTXRT sensitivity, we assessed the association between the expression of target genes and CTXRT response and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

On the basis of the expression levels of IVL, CRNN, NICE-1, S100A2, and SPPR3, genes within and in close proximity to the EDC, cancers were segregated into high (subgroup I) or low (subgroup II) expressers. Four of the five pathCRs were high expressers. Thus, low expressers, with one exception, were all nonresponders. Patients in subgroup I also had longer survival than those in subgroup II, although this result was not statistically significant owing to the small study number.

CONCLUSIONS

The expression levels of genes mapping within and close to the EDC define CTXRT response subgroups in EACs.