The updated network meta-analysis of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer

Predictors of successful neoadjuvant treatment in HER2‑positive breast cancer

The prognosis of local or locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer after a complete response from neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAT) is excellent. However, some of the patients succumb to their disease, so novel predictive factors to identify these patients at risk are needed. Retrospective data from 119 patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Helsinki, Finland) were collected. All patients had in situ hybridization-confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer and underwent NAT with a curative intention. The primary tumours were relatively large, most patients had cytologically confirmed lymph node metastases and the treatments used were current regimens. A total of 63 (52.1%) patients had a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy. Achieving pCR predicted longer disease-free survival (DFS; P=0.0083) but not overall survival (P=0.061). The patients with a pCR had an estimated DFS rate of 96.8% at 5 years, compared with only 59.7% of the patients with non-pCR. Radiological complete response (CR) was associated with pCR (P=0.00033), although imaging yielded 30.4% false-negative and 36.9% false-positive results. The association between the radiological CR and pCR was more obvious in oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. Moderate (compared with strong) immunohistochemical HER2 expression predicted a lower chance of pCR (P=0.0078) and worse breast cancer-specific survival (P=0.0015). In conclusion, pCR after NAT served as an important prognostic factor in women with high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer. The patients with only moderate immunohistochemical HER2 expression had a lower chance of reaching a pCR, as well as a shorter breast cancer-specific survival.

Complete pathological response in patients with HER2 positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant therapy in Colombia

Introduction

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the leading cause of death by cancer in women in Colombia. Approximately 15 to 20% of breast cancers overexpress HER2.

Objective

To analyze the relationship between multiple clinical and histological variables and pathological complete response in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy in a specialized cancer center in Colombia.

Materials and methods

We performed a retrospective analysis of non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer patients who received neoadjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2020 at the Instituto de Cancerología Las Americas Auna (Medellín, Colombia). Assessed parameters were tumor grade, proliferation index, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER2 status, type of neoadjuvant therapy, pathologic complete response rates, and overall survival.

Results

Variables associated with low pathologic complete response rates were tumor grades 1-2 (OR = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.37-0.81; p = 0.03), estrogen receptor positivity (OR =0.65; 95%; CI = 0.43-0.97; p=0.04), and progesterone receptor positivity (OR = 0.44; 95% CI = 0.29-0.65; p = 0.0001). HER2 strong positivity (score 3+) was associated with high pathological complete response rates (OR = 3.3; 95% CI = 1.3-8.35; p=0.013). Five-year overall survival was 91.5% (95% CI = 82.6-95.9) in patients with pathological complete response and 73.6% (95% CI = 66.4-79.6) in patients who did not achieve pathological complete response (p = 0.001). Additionally, the pathological complete response rate was three times higher in patients receiving combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anti-HER2 therapy than in those with chemotherapy alone (48% versus 16%).

Conclusions

In patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, tumor grade 3, estrogen receptor negativity, progesterone receptor negativity, strong HER2 positivity (score 3+), and the use of the neoadjuvant trastuzumab are associated with higher pathological complete response rates.

Determining the Optimal (Neo)Adjuvant Regimen for Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer Regarding Survival Outcome: A Network Meta-Analysis

Background

The optimal (neo)adjuvant regimen for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer regarding survival outcomes remains unclear.

Methods

We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials systematically to find out randomized controlled studies, up to January 2022, that compared different anti-HER2 regimens in the (neo)adjuvant setting. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). We used a Bayesian statistical model to combine direct and indirect comparisons and used odds ratios (ORs) to pool effect sizes and performed the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) curves to estimate the ranking probabilities of various regimens. For survival outcomes, we performed two parallel analyses, one based on data from both neoadjuvant and adjuvant studies and the other specific to adjuvant studies. All statistics were two-sided.

Results

Fifteen studies were finally enrolled. Regarding DFS, the overall analysis indicated that the top two regimens for HER2-positive breast cancer were chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with lapatinib, and chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with pertuzumab (SUCAR of 81% and 79%, respectively), with the OR of 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.59 to 1.54]; the parallel analysis specific to adjuvant trials indicated that the top two regimens were chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with sequential neratinib, and chemotherapy plus trastuzumab with pertuzumab (SUCRA of 80% and 76%, respectively), with the OR of 1.04 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.73). The dual-target therapy that combines trastuzumab and pertuzumab showed the highest risk of inducing cardiac events, with an SUCRA of 92%.

Conclusions

Chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab might be the optimal regimen for HER2-positive breast cancer in improving the survival rate. However, the cardiotoxicity of this dual-target therapy should be taken care of.

A Canadian national guideline on the neoadjuvant treatment of invasive breast cancer, including patient assessment, systemic therapy, and local management principles

Purpose

The neoadjuvant treatment of breast cancer (NABC) is a rapidly changing area that benefits from guidelines integrating evidence with expert consensus to help direct practice. This can optimize patient outcomes by ensuring the appropriate use of evolving neoadjuvant principles.

Methods

An expert panel formulated evidence-based practice recommendations spanning the entire neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment journey. These were sent for practice-based consensus across Canada using the modified Delphi methodology, through a secure online survey. Final recommendations were graded using the GRADE criteria for guidelines. The evidence was reviewed over the course of guideline development to ensure recommendations remained aligned with current relevant data.

Results

Response rate to the online survey was almost 30%; representation was achieved from various medical specialties from both community and academic centres in various Canadian provinces. Two rounds of consensus were required to achieve 80% or higher consensus on 59 final statements. Five additional statements were added to reflect updated evidence but not sent for consensus.

Conclusions

Key highlights of this comprehensive Canadian guideline on NABC include the use of neoadjuvant therapy for early stage triple negative and HER2 positive breast cancer, with subsequent adjuvant treatments for patients with residual disease. The use of molecular signatures, other targeted adjuvant therapies, and optimal response-based local regional management remain actively evolving areas. Many statements had evolving or limited data but still achieved high consensus, demonstrating the utility of such a guideline in helping to unify practice while further evidence evolves in this important area of breast cancer management.

Neoadjuvant Treatment with HER2-Targeted Therapies in HER2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Simple Summary

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer causes more aggressive progression of disease and poorer outcomes for patients. HER2-targeted medicines used as neoadjuvant systemic therapy could improve clinical outcomes in early-stage or locally advanced breast cancer patients. The purpose of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to identify the neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy with the best balance between efficacy and safety. We found that trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab + chemotherapy had a high pathologic complete response with a low risk of adverse events compared to other neoadjuvant anti-HER2 regimens, while the pertuzumab + trastuzumab + chemotherapy regimen showed the highest disease-free survival. However, further trial data on neoadjuvant regimens with trastuzumab emtansine are needed to confirm these findings.

Abstract

This systematic review aimed to identify neoadjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) therapies with the best balance between efficacy and safety. Methods: A network meta-analysis was applied to estimate the risk ratios along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for pathological complete response (pCR) and serious adverse events (SAE). A mixed-effect parametric survival analysis was conducted to assess the disease-free survival (DFS) between treatments. Results: Twenty-one RCTs with eleven regimens of neoadjuvant anti-HER2 therapy (i.e., trastuzumab + chemotherapy (TC), lapatinib + chemotherapy (LC), pertuzumab + chemotherapy (PC), pertuzumab + trastuzumab (PT), trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab (T-DM1P), pertuzumab + trastuzumab + chemotherapy (PTC), lapatinib + trastuzumab + chemotherapy (LTC), trastuzumab emtansine + lapatinib + chemotherapy (T-DM1LC), trastuzumab emtansine + pertuzumab + chemotherapy(T-DM1PC), PTC followed by T-DM1P (PTC_T-DM1P), and trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1)) and chemotherapy alone were included. When compared to TC, only PTC had a significantly higher DFS with a hazard ratio (95% CI) of 0.54 (0.32–0.91). The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) suggested that T-DM1LC (91.9%) was ranked first in achieving pCR, followed by the PTC_T-DM1P (90.5%), PTC (74.8%), and T-DM1PC (73.5%) regimens. For SAEs, LTC, LC, and T-DM1LC presented with the highest risks (SUCRA = 10.7%, 16.8%, and 20.8%), while PT (99.2%), T-DM1P (88%), and T-DM1 (83.9%) were the safest regimens. The T-DM1PC (73.5% vs. 71.6%), T-DM1 (70.5% vs. 83.9%), and PTC_T-DM1P (90.5% vs. 47.3%) regimens offered the optimal balance between pCR and SAE. Conclusions: The T-DM1PC, T-DM1, and PTC_T-DM1P regimens had the optimal balance between efficacy and safety, while DFS was highest for the PTC regimen. However, these results were based on a small number of studies, and additional RCTs assessing the efficacy of regimens with T-DM1 are still needed to confirm these findings.

Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive early breast cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aims:

Currently, there are many approaches available for neoadjuvant therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer that improve therapeutic efficacy but are also controversial. We conducted a two-step Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare odds ratios (ORs) for pathologic complete response (PCR) and safety endpoints.

Methods:

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and online abstracts from the American Society of Clinical Oncology and San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium were searched comprehensively and systematically. Phase II/III randomised clinical trials for targeted therapy in at least one arm were included.

Results:

A total of 9779 published manuscripts were identified, and 36 studies including 10,379 patients were finally included in our analysis. The NMA of PCR showed that dual-target therapy is better than single-target therapy and combination chemotherapy is better than monochemotherapy. However, anthracycline did not bring extra benefits, whether combined with dual-target therapy or single-target therapy. On the other hand, the addition of endocrine therapy in the HER2-positive, hormone receptor (HR)-positive subgroup might have additional beneficial effects but without significant statistical difference. By performing a conjoint analysis of the PCR rate and safety endpoints, we found that ‘trastuzumab plus pertuzumab’ and ‘T-DM1 containing regimens’ were well balanced in terms of efficacy and toxicity in all target regimens.

Conclusion:

In summary, trastuzumab plus pertuzumab-based dual-target therapy with combination chemotherapy regimens showed the highest efficacy of all optional regimens. They also achieved the best balance between efficacy and toxicity. As our study showed that anthracycline could be replaced by carboplatin, we strongly recommended TCbHP as the preferred choice for neoadjuvant treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. We also look forward to the potential value of T-DM1 in improving outcomes, which needs further study in future trials.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy, Endocrine Therapy, and Targeted Therapy for Breast Cancer: ASCO Guideline

PURPOSE

To develop guideline recommendations concerning optimal neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer.

METHODS

ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature on neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer and provide recommended care options.

RESULTS

A total of 41 articles met eligibility criteria and form the evidentiary basis for the guideline recommendations.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy should be managed by a multidisciplinary care team. Appropriate candidates for neoadjuvant therapy include patients with inflammatory breast cancer and those in whom residual disease may prompt a change in therapy. Neoadjuvant therapy can also be used to reduce the extent of local therapy or reduce delays in initiating therapy. Although tumor histology, grade, stage, and estrogen, progesterone, and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression should routinely be used to guide clinical decisions, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of other markers or genomic profiles. Patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have clinically node-positive and/or at least T1c disease should be offered an anthracycline- and taxane-containing regimen; those with cT1a or cT1bN0 TNBC should not routinely be offered neoadjuvant therapy. Carboplatin may be offered to patients with TNBC to increase pathologic complete response. There is currently insufficient evidence to support adding immune checkpoint inhibitors to standard chemotherapy. In patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive (HR-positive), HER2-negative tumors, neoadjuvant chemotherapy can be used when a treatment decision can be made without surgical information. Among postmenopausal patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative disease, hormone therapy can be used to downstage disease. Patients with node-positive or high-risk node-negative, HER2-positive disease should be offered neoadjuvant therapy in combination with anti-HER2-positive therapy. Patients with T1aN0 and T1bN0, HER2-positive disease should not be routinely offered neoadjuvant therapy.Additional information is available at www.asco.org/breast-cancer-guidelines.

Dual HER2 Blockade in Neoadjuvant Treatment of HER2+ Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Review

Background:

To investigate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rates of dual human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer.

Methods:

We searched randomized clinical trials (RCTs) using dual HER2 blockade in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Embase and ClinicalTrials.gov up to July 5, 2020, and all included studies were assessed according to the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing the risk of bias of RCTs, and the statistical analyses were performed using STATA 14.0 software.

Results:

A total of 9 RCTs involving 2758 patients were included. Meta-analysis indicated that the pCR rates of lapatinib/pertuzumab/neratinib plus trastuzumab versus trastuzumab [relative risk (RR) = 1.31; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.21-1.43; p < 0.001)] and lapatinib plus trastuzumab versus lapatinib (RR = 1.39; 95%CI: 1.25-1.53; p < 0.001) showed a significant statistical difference between dual HER2-blockade treatment and single-agent treatment in a neoadjuvant setting for HER2+ breast cancer. Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in disease-free survival (HR = 0.72; 95% CI: 0.47-1.09; p = 0.123), incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs) (RR = 1.04; 95%CI: 0.81-1.33; p = 0.778) and cardiotoxicity(RR = 1.30; 95%CI: 0.81-2.08; p = 0.280), and the pCR rate was unaffected by hormone receptor status.

Conclusions:

The pCR rate of neoadjuvant dual-target therapy for HER2+ breast cancer was significantly higher than that of single-target therapy. Furthermore, the results indicated that the safety of dual-target therapy is similar to that of single-target therapy.

Dual HER2 Blockade versus a Single Agent in Trastuzumab-Containing Regimens for HER2-Positive Early Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Purpose

Although trastuzumab is the standard of care for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)- positive early breast cancer (EBC), drug resistance and disease relapse occur. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab-containing dual anti-HER2 therapy compared to trastuzumab alone.

Methods

A systematic search was performed to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Main outcomes including event-free survival/invasive disease-free survival (EFS/iDFS), overall survival (OS), and safety were considered.

Results

Ten RCTs were included (15,284 patients). Significant improvements were observed in both EFS/iDFS (HR 0.86, p=0.0003) and OS (HR 0.86, p=0.02) with trastuzumab-based dual anti-HER2 therapy, especially in adjuvant treatment, while in the neoadjuvant setting, dual-targeted therapy also achieved a substantial pathological complete response (pCR) benefit (HR 1.34, p=0.0002). Subgroup analysis revealed that the EFS/iDFS benefit was slightly higher with trastuzumab plus pertuzumab or plus neratinib than trastuzumab plus lapatinib, while OS benefit was significant with trastuzumab plus lapatinib, but there were no subgroup differences (interaction test, p=0.80 and 0.24, resp.). In addition, EFS/iDFS benefit was unrelated to hormone receptor status but pronounced in the lymph node-positive (LN+) subgroup, which should be interpreted cautiously for lacking interaction (p=0.18). Besides, patients receiving dual therapy, especially with the lapatinib-containing regimen, experienced more toxicity, but no increase in cardiotoxicity.

Conclusions

Despite being associated with more toxicity, trastuzumab-containing dual anti-HER2 therapy is superior to trastuzumab single agent for HER2-positive EBC independent of hormone receptor status. The correlation between survival and LN status needs further verification. Trastuzumab plus pertuzumab or plus neratinib is the preferred regimen with substantial efficacy and lower toxicity.

New advance in breast cancer pathology and imaging

The improvement of knowledge concerning the pathology of breast cancer could provide the rationale for the development of new imaging diagnostic protocols. Indeed, as for the microcalcifications, new histopathological markers can be used as target for in vivo early detection of breast cancer lesions by using molecular imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography. Specifically, the mutual contribution of these medical specialties can ‘nourish’ the dream of a personalized medicine that takes into account the intrinsic variability of breast cancer. In this review, we report the main discoveries concerning breast cancer pathology highlighting the possible cooperation between the departments of anatomic pathology and imaging diagnostics.

Novel insights into breast cancer progression and metastasis: A multidisciplinary opportunity to transition from biology to clinical oncology

According to the most recent epidemiological studies, breast cancer shows the highest incidence and the second leading cause of death in women. Cancer progression and metastasis are the main events related to poor survival of breast cancer patients. This can be explained by the presence of highly resistant to chemo- and radiotherapy stem cells in many breast tumor tissues. In this context, numerous studies highlighted the possible involvement of epithelial to mesenchymal transition phenomenon as biological program to generate cancer stem cells, and thus participate to both metastatic and drug resistance process. Therefore, the comprehension of mechanisms (both cellular and molecular) involved in breast cancer occurrence and progression can lay the foundation for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutical protocols. In this review, we reported the most important findings in the field of breast cancer highlighting the most recent data concerning breast tumor biology, diagnosis and therapy.

Epigenetic silencing of TGFBI confers resistance to trastuzumab in human breast cancer

Background

Acquired resistance to trastuzumab is a major clinical problem in the treatment of HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer patients. The selection of trastuzumab-resistant patients is a great challenge of precision oncology. The aim of this study was to identify novel epigenetic biomarkers associated to trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ BC patients.

Methods

We performed a genome-wide DNA methylation (450K array) and a transcriptomic analysis (RNA-Seq) comparing trastuzumab-sensitive (SK) and trastuzumab-resistant (SKTR) HER2+ human breast cancer cell models. The methylation and expression levels of candidate genes were validated by bisulfite pyrosequencing and qRT-PCR, respectively. Functional assays were conducted in the SK and SKTR models by gene silencing and overexpression. Methylation analysis in 24 HER2+ human BC samples with complete response or non-response to trastuzumab-based treatment was conducted by bisulfite pyrosequencing.

Results

Epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis revealed the consistent hypermethylation and downregulation of TGFBI, CXCL2, and SLC38A1 genes in association with trastuzumab resistance. The DNA methylation and expression levels of these genes were validated in both sensitive and resistant models analyzed. Of the genes, TGFBI presented the highest hypermethylation-associated silencing both at the transcriptional and protein level. Ectopic expression of TGFBI in the SKTR model suggest an increased sensitivity to trastuzumab treatment. In primary tumors, TGFBI hypermethylation was significantly associated with trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer patients.

Conclusions

Our results suggest for the first time an association between the epigenetic silencing of TGFBI by DNA methylation and trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ cell models. These results provide the basis for further clinical studies to validate the hypermethylation of TGFBI promoter as a biomarker of trastuzumab resistance in HER2+ breast cancer patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13058-019-1160-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Optimal use of anthracycline-free perioperative chemotherapy in HER2-positive breast cancer patients

PURPOSE

In adjuvant settings of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer, anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by taxane and trastuzumab is a standard regimen. Recent studies have reported the use of anthracycline-free adjuvant chemotherapy in selected HER2-positive breast cancer patients. We conducted a single-center retrospective study to identify the characteristics of HER2-positive breast cancer patients for whom anthracyclines can be safely omitted.

METHODS

A total of 238 women were diagnosed with HER2-positive breast cancer and treated with neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2015 at Keio University Hospital. They were divided in two cohorts: an "anthracycline" cohort of 112 anthracycline-treated women and a "no anthracycline" cohort of 126 anthracycline-untreated women. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

The 3-year disease-free survival rates in the no-anthracycline and anthracycline cohorts were 91.3% and 93.1%, respectively (P = 0.692). After using a statistical method with inverse probability of treatment weighting to minimize the selection bias, no significant differences were observed between the two cohorts (adjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival: 1.042; P = 0.909). Stratified by tumor size, no significant differences were observed between the two cohorts in the cT1N0 and cT2N0 subsets (P = 0.516 and P = 0.579, respectively). The recurrence rate was low among patients who achieved pathological complete response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without anthracyclines.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that anthracyclines can be safely omitted in selected patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, who have cT1N0 or cT2N0 and achieved pathological complete response after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.