Systemic therapy for older patients with early breast cancer

Unfavorable Prognostic Impact of HER2 2+/FISH-Negativity in Older Patients with HER2-Negative and High-Risk Breast Cancer

Purpose

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low breast cancer, consisted of carcinomas with HER2 protein 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification, has been considered a biologically heterogeneous disease. Limited research separately investigated the prognostic significance of HER2 2+ without gene amplification, and no evidence can be identified in older patients. In this dedicated cohort of older patients with HER2-negative and high-risk breast cancer, we analyzed the real-world prognosis after standard adjuvant chemotherapy, and investigated the associations of survival with HER2 2+ without gene amplification.

Patients and Methods

From January 2016 to December 2021, older patients (≥65 years) with breast cancer were reviewed, and HER2-negative/high-risk disease receiving standard adjuvant chemotherapy was included. HER2-negativity was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) score 0, 1+ or 2+ without gene amplification by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to assess the associations of HER2 2+/FISH-negativity with disease-free survival (DFS), which was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the Log rank test.

Results

This cohort consisted of 121 consecutive older patients. With a median follow-up of 46 months, 12 patients had a DFS event. By univariate and multivariate analyses, HER2 2+/FISH-negativity was the only independent predictor for worse DFS (hazard ratio 5.56; P=0.046). Patients with HER2 2+/FISH-negativity had significantly poorer DFS compared with those with HER2 0 or 1+ (Log rank test, P=0.029). In both hormone receptor (HR)-positive (Log rank test, P=0.052) and HR-negative (Log rank test, P=0.125) subgroups, HER2 2+/FISH-negativity showed a marginally significant adverse influence on DFS.

Conclusion

In older patients with HER2-negative/high-risk breast cancer undergoing standard adjuvant chemotherapy, our findings suggest that HER2 2+/FISH-negativity has an independent negative impact on prognosis.

Invasive papillary carcinoma of the breast: A case report

Invasive papillary carcinoma (IPC) of the breast is a rare form of cancer. The current report documents a case of IPC characterized by a large tumor size and skin involvement. Surgical exploration revealed no evidence of axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer. Due to financial constraints, the patient opted solely for anastrozole endocrine therapy at a dosage of 1 mg/day for a period of 5 years post-surgery, foregoing other treatments such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Since discharge, 2.5 years have passed, during which the patient has been followed up via phone every 3 months, showing a good prognosis. A literature review indicated that IPC is prevalent amongst the elderly population and can be misdiagnosed due to its morphological, cytomorphological and immunophenotypic overlap with other types of papillary neoplasms. This tumor exhibits a more favorable prognosis compared with IDC, primarily attributed to its advantageous gene and molecular expression patterns, coupled with its decreased invasiveness. Despite limited evidence-based research on the treatment of IPC, the present case report, albeit with limitations, underscores the importance of avoiding over-treatment and suggests the feasibility of combining surgery with endocrine therapy for IPC.

Reporting of older subgroups in registration breast cancer trials 2012-2021

INTRODUCTION

Adequate reporting of data specific to older populations enrolled to breast cancer trials is critical, given the high incidence of the disease among this demographic. This study aimed to examine the completeness of reporting of older subgroups among patients recruited to registration clinical trials investigating systemic treatments for breast cancer.

METHODS

Clinical trials leading to a US food and drug administration (FDA) approval in breast cancer between 2012 and 2021 were included. Primary study reports and and all available secondary publications were systematically and objectively assessed with regard to the availability of data regarding efficacy, baseline characteristics, safety, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes among older subgroups.

RESULTS

27 trials and 216 publications were assessed. 20.3% of patients were aged ≥65. 70.0% of patients had an eastern cooperative oncology group (ECOG) performance status of 0. Although complete reporting of primary endpoints was adequate (72.7%), most protocol-defined primary endpoints were surrogate endpoints (84.8%). Overall survival data among older populations was unavailable in 50.0% of studies. Reporting was poor for secondary efficacy endpoints (81.8% unreported), baseline characteristics (70.4% unreported), toxicity (55.6% unreported), and health-related quality of life outcomes (87.5% unreported).

CONCLUSION

The findings underline significant deficits in the reporting of age-specific data in breast cancer registration trials. The underreporting of key efficacy, safety, and HRQOL outcomes highlights the need for mandatory reporting standards and a dedicated emphasis on older populations' priorities and needs in the reporting of registration clinical trials.

Perspectives on Aging and Quality of Life

The aging of the world's population and the health problems accompanying it are becoming increasingly severe. Healthcare policies in developed countries focus on how to prevent and treat diseases associated with aging and how to maintain quality of life. Typical age-related diseases include deafness, cataracts, osteoarthritis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, and dementia. Although the mechanisms by which these diseases develop differ, they are all caused by the accumulation of molecular and cellular damage over time. In addition, age-related diseases can cause a decline in physical and mental functions and the ability to perform activities of daily living, as well as the loss of roles in society and a sense of fulfillment in life. Therefore, there is a need for treatment and measures to accurately grasp and maintain quality of life. This review aims to introduce areas and representative papers expected to be contributed to the special issue of "Aging and Quality of Life".

Treatment and survival outcomes in older women with primary breast cancer: A retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Changes in biological features and functional status make management decisions in older women with primary breast cancer complicated. We aimed to provide an overview of the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of older breast cancer patients based on the current treatment strategies.

METHODS

Female patients diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Centre from 2008 to 2016 were included. Patients were divided into a younger group (<65 years) and older group (≥65 years). Propensity score matching was utilised to generate balanced cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 13,707 patients met the study criteria. Compared with younger patients, older patients had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (p < 0.001), less lymph node metastasis (p = 0.009), more advanced tumour stage (p = 0.038), and a larger proportion of estrogen receptor-positive (p < 0.001) and epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (p < 0.001) tumours. Older patients were likely to receive mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection in addition to a lower proportion of adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy (HR [hazard ratio] 0.69, p = 0.039) was independently correlated with better overall survival in the older patients. This survival benefit (HR 0.58, p = 0.041) was confirmed in matched cohorts. Among the older patients with larger tumours (HR 0.48, p = 0.038) and more lymph node involvement (HR 0.44, p = 0.040), adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit.

CONCLUSION

Older breast cancer patients showed less aggressive biological characteristics, intensive surgical and moderate medical preferences. The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for older patients, especially for patients with large tumours and more lymph node involvement.

Geriatric Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients in Low-risk Population: Omitting Chemotherapy Based on Nomogram

BACKGROUND

Considering old age and comorbidities, the actual benefit of chemotherapy in older patients with early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains uncertain. We aimed to select appropriate patients who could avoid chemotherapy in this population.

METHODS

A total of 6482 patients more than 65 years old with T1-2N0-1M0 TNBC in 2010-2015 were extracted from SEER program. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify independent factors associated with chemotherapy usage. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests. Independent prognostic factors were identified by multivariate Cox analysis. A nomogram predicting breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and a risk stratification model were constructed.

RESULTS

A total of 3379 (52.13%) patients received chemotherapy while 3103 (47.87%) did not. Age, married status, grade, T-stage, N-stage, radiation and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) were significantly associated with chemotherapy usage (all P < .05). Chemotherapy significantly improved OS (HR = 0.606, P < .001) and BCSS (HR = 0.763, P = .006) in the entire population. A nomogram was built by incorporating independent risk factors (age, T-stage, N-stage, grade and radiation). Based on the score of the nomogram, the risk stratification model demonstrated that chemotherapy improved OS (P < .001) and BCSS (P < .001) of patients in the high-risk group (score >180), but not in the low-risk group (score ≤75).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy is beneficial for geriatric patients with T1-2N0-1M0 TNBC in this study, and the risk stratification model indicates the feasibility of sparing chemotherapy in low-risk subgroup without sacrificing survival, providing clinicians tools to weigh the risk-benefit of chemotherapy and customize the individualized treatment accordingly.

The association between guideline adherence, age and overall survival among women with non-metastatic breast cancer: A systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Conformity with treatment guidelines should benefit patients. Studies have reported variation in adherence to breast cancer (BC) guidelines, particularly among older women. This study investigated (i) whether adherence to treatment guideline recommendations for women with non-metastatic BC improves overall survival (OS), (ii) whether that relationship varies by age.

METHODOLOGY

MEDLINE and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies on guideline adherence and OS in women with non-metastatic BC, published after January 2000, which examined recommendations on breast surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy or endocrine therapy. Study results were summarised using narrative synthesis.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. The recommendations for each treatment covered were similar, but studies differed in their definitions of adherence. 5-year OS rates among patients having compliant treatment ranged from 91.3% to 93.2%, while rates among patients having non-compliant treatment ranged from 75.9% to 83.4%. Six studies reported an adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) for non-compliant treatment compared with compliant treatment; all concluded OS was worse among patients whose overall treatment was non-compliant (aHR range: 1.52 [1.30-1.82] to 2.57 [1.96-3.37]), but adjustment for potential confounders was limited. Worse adherence among older women was reported in 12/16 studies, but they did not provide consistent evidence on whether OS was associated with treatment adherence and age.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual studies reported that better adherence to guidelines improved OS among women with non-metastatic BC, but the evidence base has weaknesses including inconsistent definitions of adherence. More precise and consistent research designs, including the evaluation of barriers to adherence across the spectrum of healthcare practice, are required to fully understand guideline compliance, as well as the relationship between compliance and OS following a BC diagnosis.