How far we have come targeting BRAF-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

Current Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-The Molecular Pathologist's Perspective

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in tissue-based biomarkers have significantly enhanced diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in NSCLC, enabling precision medicine strategies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the molecular pathologist's practical approach to assessing NSCLC biomarkers across various specimen types (liquid biopsy, broncho-alveolar lavage, transbronchial biopsy/endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy, and surgical specimen), including challenges such as biological heterogeneity and preanalytical variability. We discuss the role of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry in predicting immunotherapy response, the practice of histopathological tumor regression grading after neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy, and the application of DNA- and RNA-based techniques for detecting actionable molecular alterations. Finally, we emphasize the critical need for quality management to ensure the reliability and reproducibility of biomarker testing in NSCLC.

Real-world efficacy of the dabrafenib-trametinib (D-T) combination in BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): Results from the IFCT-2004 BLaDE cohort

BACKGROUND

BRAF V600E mutations occur in 2-5 % of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The dabrafenib-trametinib (D-T) combination was associated with improved and durable OS in patients in phase II. This study (IFCT-2004 BLaDE study) reported the efficacy of D-T combination in a large retrospective French real-world multicenter cohort of patients with advanced BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC.

METHOD

Patients with advanced BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC diagnosed between 01.01.2016 and 31.12.2019 and treated with D-T in combination, regardless of the treatment line, were included. The primary endpoint was the 12-month OS rate (%) in patients receiving D-T as a second-line therapy or beyond.

RESULTS

A total of 163 patients were included: 50.3 % were female, 30.2 % were never smokers, 95.1 % had adenocarcinoma, and 78.2 % had a PDL1 ≥ 1 %. The median age was 68.3 years. At D-T initiation, 80.8 % of patients had a PS of 0/1, 78.6 % had stage IV disease, and 20.9 % had brain metastasis. At the cutoff, the median follow-up was 27.4 months. The 12-month OS rate in patients receiving D + T as a second-line therapy or beyond (n = 119) was 67.4 %, with a median progression-free survival (mPFS) of 10.4 months. Among the 44 patients who received D + T as a first-line therapy, the 12-month OS rate was 67.4 %, with an mPFS of 18.2 months. D-T discontinuation for toxicity was reported in 10.3 % of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the largest retrospective cohort of BRAF-mutated patients reported. The findings confirmed the significant efficacy of D-T in combination with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic NSCLC in pretreated and untreated patients. These results under real-world conditions are consistent with those of other registered studies.

Vaccine-based therapeutic interventions in lung cancer management: A recent perspective

The incidence of lung cancer continues to grow globally, contributing to an ever-increasing load on healthcare systems. Emerging evidence has indicated lowered efficacy of conventional treatment strategies, such as chemotherapy, surgical interventions and radiotherapy, prompting the need for exploring alternative interventions. A growing focus on immunotherapy and the development of personalized medicine has paved the way for vaccine-based delivery in lung cancer. With various prominent targets such as CD8+T cells and PD-L1, immune-targeted, anti-cancer vaccines have been evaluated in both, pre-clinical and clinical settings, to improve therapeutic outcomes. However, there are a number of challenges that must be addressed, including the scalability of such delivery systems, heterogeneity of lung cancers, and long-term safety as well as efficacy. In addition to this, natural compounds, in combination with immunotherapy, have gained considerable research interest in recent times. This makes it necessary to explore their role in synergism with immune-targeted agents. The authors of this review aim to offer an overview of recent advances in our understanding of lung cancer pathogenesis, detection and management strategies, and the emergence of immunotherapy with a special focus on vaccine delivery. This finding is supported with evidence from testing in non-human and human models, showcasing promising results. Prospects for phytotherapy have also been discussed, in order to combat some pitfalls and limitations. Finally, the future perspectives of vaccine usage in lung cancer management have also been discussed, to offer a holistic perspective to readers, and to prompt further research in the domain.

Immunotherapy in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Under-Represented by Clinical Trials

Since the initial US FDA approval of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) for the treatment of non-oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) nine years ago, this therapeutic strategy has been cemented as a crucial component of treatment for most of these patients. However, there is a clear efficacy-effectiveness gap whereby patients in the 'real world' seem to have more modest clinical outcomes compared to those enrolled in landmark clinical trials. This gap may be driven by the under-representation of important patient populations, including populations defined by clinical or molecular characteristics. In this review, we summarize the data outlining the evidence of ICIs in patients with poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), underlying autoimmune disease (AID), older age, active brain metastases (BMs), and molecular aberrations such as EGFR mutations, ALK fusions, BRAF mutations and ROS1 fusions.

In vivo vulnerabilities to GPX4 and HDAC inhibitors in drug-persistent versus drug-resistant BRAFV600E lung adenocarcinoma

The current targeted therapy for BRAFV600E-mutant lung cancer consists of a dual blockade of RAF/MEK kinases often combining dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T). This regimen extends survival when compared to single-agent treatments, but disease progression is unavoidable. By using whole-genome CRISPR screening and RNA sequencing, we characterize the vulnerabilities of both persister and D/T-resistant cellular models. Oxidative stress together with concomitant induction of antioxidant responses is boosted by D/T treatment. However, the nature of the oxidative damage, the choice of redox detoxification systems, and the resulting therapeutic vulnerabilities display stage-specific differences. Persister cells suffer from lipid peroxidation and are sensitive to ferroptosis upon GPX4 inhibition in vivo. Biomarkers of lipid peroxidation are detected in clinical samples following D/T treatment. Acquired alterations leading to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) reactivation enhance cystine transport to boost GPX4-independent antioxidant responses. Similarly to BRAFV600E-mutant melanoma, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors decrease D/T-resistant cell viability and extend therapeutic response in vivo.

Hepatotoxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor - tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs)

Drug-induced liver injury (DILI) is one of the most frequently adverse reactions in clinical drug use, usually caused by drugs or herbal compounds. Compared with other populations, cancer patients are more prone to abnormal liver function due to primary or secondary liver malignant tumor, radiation-induced liver injury and other reasons, making potential adverse reactions from liver damage caused by anticancer drugs of particular concernduring clinical treatment process. In recent years, the application of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) has changed the treatment status of a series of solid malignant tumors. Unfortunately, the increasing incidence of hepatotoxicitylimits the clinical application of EGFR-TKIs. The mechanisms of liver injury caused by EGFR-TKIs were complex. Despite more than a decade of research, other than direct damage to hepatocytes caused by inhibition of cellular DNA synthesis and resulting in hepatocyte necrosis, the rest of the specific mechanisms remain unclear, and few effective solutions are available. This review focuses on the clinical feature, incidence rates and the recent advances on the discovery of mechanism of hepatotoxicity in EGFR-TKIs, as well as rechallenge and therapeutic strategies underlying hepatotoxicity of EGFR-TKIs.

Personalized therapy guided by longitudinal liquid biopsies for treatment of leptomeningeal disease from lung adenocarcinoma: A case report

Molecular-based targeted therapies have significantly benefited certain patients with cancer; however, those with leptomeningeal disease (LMD) persistently exhibit a poor prognosis and are often excluded from clinical trials. Tumor-derived cell-free (cf)DNA, found in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with LMD, can assist in diagnosis and tracking of disease progression. However, the utilization of CSF to direct targeted cancer therapy has yet to be extensively explored. The present study reported the case of a patient with lung adenocarcinoma and LMD who was monitored by performing a series of liquid biopsies of CSF and blood. Targeted sequencing was performed on cfDNA from the CSF and plasma, and the variant allele frequencies (VAFs) of BRAF and NRAS mutations were assessed and analyzed in conjunction with the clinical presentation of the patient. The patient then underwent serial chemotherapy, radiation therapy, immunotherapy and targeted treatment based on the results of the liquid biopsies. Upon the LMD diagnosis, a BRAF p.V600E mutation was detected in plasma cfDNA. Consequently, the patient was treated with vemurafenib and responded favorably to this consolidation treatment for 13 months. After a relapse in July 2018, both BRAF p.V600E and NRAS p.Q61K mutations were detected in CSF supernatant and sediment cell samples, suggesting drug resistance. Therefore, the treatment strategy for the patient changed to cobimetnib plus vemurafenib. Notably, the changes of VAF in the CSF supernatant samples were associated with the clinical status of the patient. The patient survived for 33 months post-LMD diagnosis. The present case report highlights the potential use of liquid biopsy in personalized therapy, as it was instrumental in informing the combinational treatment plan of the patient, which ultimately proved beneficial.

Resistance to BRAF inhibition explored through single circulating tumour cell molecular profiling in BRAF-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Resistance mechanisms to combination therapy with dabrafenib plus trametinib remain poorly understood in patients with BRAFV600E-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We examined resistance to BRAF inhibition by single CTC sequencing in BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC.

METHODS

CTCs and cfDNA were examined in seven BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC patients at failure to treatment. Matched tumour tissue was available for four patients. Single CTCs were isolated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting following enrichment and immunofluorescence (Hoechst 33342/CD45/pan-cytokeratins) and sequenced for mutation and copy number-alteration (CNA) analyses.

RESULTS

BRAFV600E was found in 4/4 tumour biopsies and 5/7 cfDNA samples. CTC mutations were mostly found in MAPK-independent pathways and only 1/26 CTCs were BRAFV600E mutated. CTC profiles encompassed the majority of matched tumour biopsy CNAs but 72.5% to 84.5% of CTC CNAs were exclusive to CTCs. Extensive diversity, involving MAPK, MAPK-related, cell cycle, DNA repair and immune response pathways, was observed in CTCs and missed by analyses on tumour biopsies and cfDNA. Driver alterations in clinically relevant genes were recurrent in CTCs.

CONCLUSIONS

Resistance was not driven by BRAFV600E-mutant CTCs. Extensive tumour genomic heterogeneity was found in CTCs compared to tumour biopsies and cfDNA at failure to BRAF inhibition, in BRAFV600E-mutant NSCLC, including relevant alterations that may represent potential treatment opportunities.

Is there a prognostic difference among stage I lung adenocarcinoma patients with different BRAF-mutation status?

BACKGROUND

The data of the prognostic role of V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF) mutations in early-stage lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients is scarce. This study aimed to investigate the proportion, clinicopathological features, and prognostic significance of patients with stage I LUAD carrying BRAF mutations.

METHODS

We collected 431 patients with pathological stage I LUAD from cBioPortal for Cancer Genomics and 1604 LUAD patients tested for BRAF V600E and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations from Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. Survival curves were drawn by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models, propensity-score matching (PSM), and overlap weighting (OW) were performed in this study. The primary endpoint was recurrence-free survival (RFS).

RESULTS

The proportion of BRAF mutations was estimated at 5.6% in a Caucasian cohort. BRAF V600E mutations were detected in six (1.4%) patients in Caucasian populations and 16 (1.0%) patients in Chinese populations. Two BRAF V600E-mutant patients were detected to have concurrent EGFR mutations, one for 19-del and one for L858R. For pathological stage I LUAD patients, BRAF mutations were not significantly associated with worse RFS than wild-type BRAF patients (HR = 1.111; p = 0.885). After PSM and OW, similar results were presented (HR = 1.352; p = 0.742 and HR = 1.246; p = 0.764, respectively). BRAF V600E mutation status also lacked predictive significance for RFS (HR, 1.844; p = 0.226; HR = 1.144; p = 0.831 and HR = 1.466; p = 0.450, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we demonstrated that BRAF status may not be capable of predicting prognosis in stage I LUAD patients. There is a need for more data to validate our findings.

Advances in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Treatment-A Paradigm Shift in Oncology

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) management remains a formidable challenge in the field of oncology, representing a significant global health burden [...].

Investigating the clinical role and prognostic value of genes related to insulin-like growth factor signaling pathway in thyroid cancer

BACKGROUND

Thyroid cancer (THCA) is the most common endocrine malignancy having a female predominance. The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) pathway contributed to the unregulated cell proliferation in multiple malignancies. We aimed to explore the IGF-related signature for THCA prognosis.

METHOD

The TCGA-THCA dataset was collected from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for screening of key prognostic genes. The limma R package was applied for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and the clusterProfiler R package was used for the Gene Ontology (GO) and KEGG analysis of DEGs. Then, the un/multivariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) Cox regression analysis was used for the establishment of RiskScore model. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to verify the model's predictive performance. CIBERSORT and MCP-counter algorithms were applied for immune infiltration analysis. Finally, we analyzed the mutation features and the correlation between the RiskScore and cancer hallmark pathway by using the GSEA.

RESULT

We obtained 5 key RiskScore model genes for patient's risk stratification from the 721 DEGs. ROC analysis indicated that our model is an ideal classifier, the high-risk patients are associated with the poor prognosis, immune infiltration, high tumor mutation burden (TMB), stronger cancer stemness and stronger correlation with the typical cancer-activation pathways. A nomogram combined with multiple clinical features was developed and exhibited excellent performance upon long-term survival quantitative prediction.

CONCLUSIONS

We constructed an excellent prognostic model RiskScore based on IGF-related signature and concluded that the IGF signal pathway may become a reliable prognostic phenotype in THCA intervention.

Nanomedicine Combats Drug Resistance in Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is the second most prevalent cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Surgery, chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy are currently available as treatment methods. However, drug resistance is a significant factor in the failure of lung cancer treatments. Novel therapeutics have been exploited to address complicated resistance mechanisms of lung cancer and the advancement of nanomedicine is extremely promising in terms of overcoming drug resistance. Nanomedicine equipped with multifunctional and tunable physiochemical properties in alignment with tumor genetic profiles can achieve precise, safe, and effective treatment while minimizing or eradicating drug resistance in cancer. Here, this work reviews the discovered resistance mechanisms for lung cancer chemotherapy, molecular targeted therapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, and outlines novel strategies for the development of nanomedicine against drug resistance. This work focuses on engineering design, customized delivery, current challenges, and clinical translation of nanomedicine in the application of resistant lung cancer.

Therapeutic strategies for BRAF mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a review

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths. Among the two broad types of lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer accounts for 85% of the cases. The study of the genetic alteration has facilitated the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. Some of the molecular alterations which are important targets for drug therapy include Kirsten rat sarcoma (KRAS), Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), V-RAF murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF), anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK). In the setting of extensive on-going clinical trials, it is imperative to periodically review the advancements and the newer drug therapies being available. Among all mutations, BRAF mutation is common with incidence being 8% overall and 1.5 - 4% in NSCLC. Here, we have summarized the BRAF mutation types and reviewed the various drug therapy available - for both V600 and nonV600 group; the mechanism of resistance to BRAF inhibitors and strategies to overcome it; the significance of comprehensive profiling of concurrent mutations, and the role of immune checkpoint inhibitor in BRAF mutated NSCLC. We have also included the currently ongoing clinical trials and recent advancements including combination therapy that would play a role in improving the overall survival and outcome of NSCLC.

BRAF V600E Mutation of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Korean Patients

Background and Objectives: BRAF mutational status in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Korean population is poorly understood. We explored BRAF (particularly BRAF V600E) mutational status among Korean patients with NSCLC. Materials and Methods: This study included 378 patients with resected primary NSCLC who were enrolled from January 2015 to December 2017. The authors obtained formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue blocks and performed peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-clamping polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for detecting BRAF V600, real-time PCR for detecting BRAF V600E, and immunohistochemical analyses using the mutation-specific Ventana VE1 monoclonal antibody. For positive cases in any methods mentioned above, direct Sanger sequencing was additionally performed. Results: The PNA-clamping method revealed the BRAF V600 mutation in 5 (1.3%) of the 378 patients. Among these five patients, real-time PCR, direct Sanger sequencing detected BRAF V600E mutations in three (0.8%) patients. Thus, two cases showed differences in their PNA-clamping and the others. Direct Sanger sequencing of PNA-clamping PCR product was performed for two cases showing negative results on direct Sanger sequencing; both contained BRAF mutations other than V600E. All patients harboring BRAF mutations had adenocarcinomas, and all patients with V600E mutation exhibited minor micropapillary components. Conclusions: Despite the low incidence of the BRAF mutation among Korean patients with NSCLC, lung adenocarcinoma patients with micropapillary components should be prioritized in terms of BRAF mutation testing. Immunohistochemical staining using Ventana VE1 antibody may serve as a screening examination for BRAF V600E.

Discovery of a Potent and Oral Available Complex I OXPHOS Inhibitor That Abrogates Tumor Growth and Circumvents MEKi Resistance

Targeting oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy for cancer therapy. Here, we discovered a 1H-1,2,3-triazole derivative HP661 as a highly potent and orally available OXPHOS inhibitor that effectively blocked the activity of mitochondrial complex I. HP661 specifically compromised the mitochondrial oxygen consumption of high-OXPHOS lung cancer cells but not that of low-OXPHOS lung cancer cells or normal cells in the low nanomolar range. Notably, mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor (trametinib)-resistant lung cancer cells with high levels of OXPHOS also showed marked sensitivity to HP661, as indicated by decreased clonogenic growth and increased cell apoptosis upon treatment. In a mouse model of high-OXPHOS lung cancer, HP661 treatment not only significantly suppressed tumor growth but also augmented the therapeutic efficacy of trametinib by impairing tumor mitochondrial respiration. In summary, we identified HP661 as a highly effective OXPHOS inhibitor to abrogate the growth of high OXPHOS-dependent tumors and conquer high OXPHOS-mediated drug resistance.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Targeted and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Based Systemic Therapy in BRAF Mutation-Positive NSCLC

Introduction

BRAF mutations (present in 2%-3% of NSCLC) are a known oncogenic driver and emerging therapeutic target. There is a scarcity of real-world data describing the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and effectiveness of targeted BRAF-inhibiting and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based systemic therapies, yet this is required for appropriate treatment decisions that optimize patient outcome.

Methods

Demographic, clinical, treatment, and outcome data of patients with BRAF mutation-positive NSCLC diagnosed between 2018 and 2022 were identified from the Glans-Look Lung Cancer Research database and included in this analysis.

Results

A total of 53 BRAF mutation-positive patients were identified (V600E, n = 35; non-V600E, n = 18). Furthermore, 46 patients (87%) were diagnosed with metastatic disease, of whom 61% were treated with systemic anticancer therapy, which significantly improved overall survival (34.1 versus 2.2 mo, p = 0.01). ICI-based regimens were found to have effectiveness in the first-line setting for both V600E and non-V600E cohorts (objective response rate: 38%-43%; real-world calculations of median progression-free survival: 10.5-10.8 mo, respectively). Dual-targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition was also found to have effectiveness in the first-line setting for V600E patients (objective response rate: 33%, real-world calculations of median progression-free survival: 15.2 mo).

Conclusions

This study of real-world patients with BRAF mutations confirms the importance of effective systemic therapies. Both dual-targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition and ICI-based regimens have evidence of benefit in this population revealing that real-world populations can experience similar clinical response and outcome to clinical trial cohorts on these treatment regimens. Future studies to clarify the role of co-mutations on response to both dual-targeted BRAF/MEK inhibition and ICI-based regimens may be important to treatment selection and optimization of patient outcome.

At the crossroads of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted subsets of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a paradigm of precision medicine, with the discovery of numerous disease subtypes defined by specific oncogenic driver mutations leading to the development of a range of molecularly targeted therapies. Over the past decade, rapid progress has also been made in the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially antagonistic antibodies targeting the PD-L1-PD-1 axis, for the treatment of NSCLC. Although many of the major oncogenic drivers of NSCLC are associated with intrinsic resistance to ICIs, patients with certain oncogene-driven subtypes of the disease that are highly responsive to specific targeted therapies might also derive benefit from immunotherapy. However, the development of effective immunotherapy approaches for oncogene-addicted NSCLC has been challenged by a lack of predictive biomarkers for patient selection and limited knowledge of how ICIs and oncogene-directed targeted therapies should be combined. Therefore, whether ICIs alone or with chemotherapy or even in combination with molecularly targeted agents would offer comparable benefit in the context of selected oncogenic driver alterations to that observed in the general unselected NSCLC population remains an open question. In this Review, we discuss the effects of oncogenic driver mutations on the efficacy of ICIs and the immune tumour microenvironment as well as the potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited to overcome the challenges of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Recent progress in targeted therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The high morbidity and mortality of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have always been major threats to people's health. With the identification of carcinogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer and the clinical application of targeted drugs, the prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer patients has greatly improved. However, in a large number of non-small cell lung cancer cases, the carcinogenic driver is unknown. Identifying genetic alterations is critical for effective individualized therapy in NSCLC. Moreover, targeted drugs are difficult to apply in the clinic. Cancer drug resistance is an unavoidable obstacle limiting the efficacy and application of targeted drugs. This review describes the mechanisms of targeted-drug resistance and newly identified non-small cell lung cancer targets (e.g., KRAS G12C, NGRs, DDRs, CLIP1-LTK, PELP1, STK11/LKB1, NFE2L2/KEAP1, RICTOR, PTEN, RASGRF1, LINE-1, and SphK1). Research into these mechanisms and targets will drive individualized treatment of non-small cell lung cancer to generate better outcomes.

Case report: Major pathologic response induced by neoadjuvant treatment using BRAF and MEK inhibitors in a patient with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma harboring BRAF V600E-mutation

Targeted therapy has achieved great success in advanced non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) with driver genes, and neoadjuvant-targeted therapy is increasingly being investigated. Although neoadjuvant-targeted therapy with EGFR-TKI and ALK-TKI showed good efficacy, there is no report of neoadjuvant-targeted therapy to BRAF V600E mutation on NSCLC so far. Here, we report the first case of a successful neoadjuvant-targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors followed by radical surgical excision with major pathologic response (MPR) in a patient with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) harboring BRAF V600E mutation. The case informs us that targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors could be administrated as a neoadjuvant strategy for selected cases of NSCLC harboring BRAF V600E mutation.

Multicenter Observational Study on Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring BRAF Mutations: Focus on Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Outcome of V600E and Non-V600E Subgroups

INTRODUCTION

BRAF mutation involved 2-4% of lung adenocarcinoma. Differences in clinicopathologic features and patient outcome exist between V600E and non-V600E BRAF mutated NSCLC. Thus, we sought to assess the frequency and clinical relevance of BRAF mutations in a real-life population of advanced-NSCLC, investigating the potential prognostic significance of distinct genetic alterations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present multicenter Italian retrospective study involved advanced BRAF mutant NSCLC. Complete clinicopathologic data were evaluated for BRAF V600E and non-V600E patients.

RESULTS

A total of 44 BRAFmut NSCLC patients were included (V600E, n = 23; non-V600E, n = 21). No significant differences in survival outcome and treatment response were documented, according to V600E vs. non-V600E mutations, although a trend towards prolonged PFS was observed in the V600E subgroup (median PFS = 11.3 vs. 6.0 months in non-V600E). In the overall population, ECOG PS and age significantly impacted on OS, while bone lesions were associated with shorter PFS. Compared to immunotherapy, first-line chemotherapy was associated with longer OS in the overall population, and especially in the BRAF V600E subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

Here, we report on real-life data from a retrospective cohort of advanced-NSCLC harboring BRAF alterations. Our study offers relevant clues on survival outcome, therapeutic response, and clinicopathologic correlations of BRAF-mutant NSCLC.