Visual Pigments: Trading Noise for Fast Recovery

Optogenetic approaches to vision restoration

Inherited retinal disease (IRD) affects about 1 in 3000 to 1 in 5000 individuals and is now believed to be the most common cause of blindness registration in developed countries. Until recently, the management of such conditions had been exclusively supportive. However, advances in molecular biology and medical engineering have now seen the rise of a variety of approaches to restore vision in patients with IRDs. Optogenetic approaches are primarily aimed at rendering secondary and tertiary neurons of the retina light-sensitive in order to replace degenerate or dysfunctional photoreceptors. Such approaches are attractive because they provide a "causative gene-independent" strategy, which may prove suitable for a variety of patients with IRD. We discuss theoretical and practical considerations in the selection of optogenetic molecules, vectors, surgical approaches and review previous trials of optogenetics for vision restoration. Optogenetic approaches to vision restoration have yielded promising results in pre-clinical trials and a phase I/II clinical trial is currently underway (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02556736). Despite the significant inroads made in recent years, the ideal optogenetic molecule, vector and surgical approach have yet to be established.

Protein fluctuations as the possible origin of the thermal activation of rod photoreceptors in the dark

Efficient retinal photoisomerization, signal transduction, and amplification contribute to single-photon electrical responses in vertebrates visual cells. However, spontaneous discrete electrical signals arising in the dark, with identical intensity and time profiles as those generated by genuine single photons (dark events), limit the potential capability of the rod visual system to discern single photons from thermal noise. It is accepted that the light and the thermal activation of the rod photoreceptor rhodopsin (Rho) triggers the light and the dark events, respectively. However the activation barrier for the dark events (80-110 kJ/mol) appears to be only half of the barrier for light-dependent activation of Rho (> or =180 kJ/mol). On the basis of these observations, it has been postulated that both processes should follow different pathways, but the molecular mechanism for the thermal activation process still remains an open question and subject of debate. Here, performing infrared difference spectroscopy measurements, we found that the -OH group of Thr118 from bovine Rho exhibits a slow but measurable hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) under native conditions. Given the location of Thr118 in the X-ray structures, isolated from the aqueous phase and in steric contact with the buried retinal chromophore, we assume that a protein structural fluctuation must drive the retinal binding pocket (RBP) transiently open. We characterized the kinetics (rate and activation enthalpy) and thermodynamics (equilibrium constant and enthalpy) of this fluctuation from the global analysis of the HDX of Thr118-OH as a function of the temperature and pH. In parallel, using HPLC chromatography, we determined the kinetics of the thermal isomerization of the protonated 11-cis retinal in solution, as a model for retinal thermal isomerization in an open RBP. Finally, we propose a quantitative two-step model in which the dark activation of Rho is triggered by thermal isomerization of the retinal in a transiently opened RBP, which accurately reproduced both the experimental activation barrier and the rate of the dark events. We conclude that the absolute sensitivity threshold of our visual system is limited by structural fluctuations of the chromophore binding pocket rather than in the chromophore itself.

Phototransduction and the evolution of photoreceptors

Photoreceptors in metazoans can be grouped into two classes, with their photoreceptive membrane derived either from cilia or microvilli. Both classes use some form of the visual pigment protein opsin, which together with 11-cis retinaldehyde absorbs light and activates a G-protein cascade, resulting in the opening or closing of ion channels. Considerable attention has recently been given to the molecular evolution of the opsins and other photoreceptor proteins; much is also known about transduction in the various photoreceptor types. Here we combine this knowledge in an attempt to understand why certain photoreceptors might have conferred particular selective advantages during evolution. We suggest that microvillar photoreceptors became predominant in most invertebrate species because of their single-photon sensitivity, high temporal resolution, and large dynamic range, and that rods and a duplex retina provided primitive chordates and vertebrates with similar sensitivity and dynamic range, but with a smaller expenditure of ATP.

Spam and the evolution of the fly's eye

The open rhabdoms of the fly's eye enhance absolute sensitivity but to avoid compromising spatial acuity they require precise optical geometry and neural connections.1 This neural superposition system evolved from the ancestral insect eye, which has fused rhabdoms. A recent paper by Zelhof and co-workers shows that the Drosophila gene spacemaker (spam) is necessary for development of open rhabdoms, and suggests that mutants revert to an ancestral state. Here I outline how open rhabdoms and neural superposition may have evolved via nocturnal intermediates, and discuss the implications for the role of spam in insect phylogeny.

The vertebrate phototransduction cascade: amplification and termination mechanisms

The biochemical cascade which transduces light into a neuronal signal in retinal photoreceptors is a heterotrimeric GTP-binding protein (G protein) signaling pathway called phototransduction. Works from psychophysicists, electrophysiologists, biochemists, and geneticists over several decades have come together to shape our understanding of how photon absorption leads to photoreceptor membrane hyperpolarization. The insights of phototransduction provide the foundation for a mechanistic account of signaling from many other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) found throughout nature. The application of reverse genetic techniques has strengthened many historic findings and helped to describe this pathway at greater molecular details. However, many important questions remain to be answered.