Biliary dyskinesia: A brief review

Cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia: how did we get there?

BACKGROUND

The focus of biliary dyskinesia (BD) shifted within the last 30 years, moving from symptoms after cholecystectomy (CCY) to symptoms with morphological normal gallbladder, but low gallbladder ejection fraction.

METHODS

We searched the pubmed database to systematically review studies focusing on the diagnosis and treatment of gallbladder dysfunction.

RESULTS

Impaired gallbladder contraction can be found in about 20% of healthy controls and an even higher number of patients with various other disorders. Surgery for BD increased after introduction of laparoscopic CCY, with BD now accounting for >20% of CCY in adults and up to 60% in pediatric patients. The majority of cases reported were operated in the USA, which differs from surgical series for cholelithiasis. Postoperative outcomes do not differ between groups with abnormal or normal gallbladder function.

CONCLUSION

Functional gallbladder testing should not be seen as an indicator of relevant biliary tract disease or prognostic marker to identify patients who may benefit from operative intervention. Instead biliary dyskinesia should be considered as a part of a spectrum of functional disorders, which are generally managed conservatively. Small proof of concept studies have demonstrated effects of medical therapy on biliary dysfunction and should thus be never tested in appropriately designed trials.

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia: Which patients have long term benefit?

PURPOSE

Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is described as biliary colic in the absence of gallstones. The diagnosis relies on imaging studies and decreased excretion of bile in response to cholecystokinin during quantitative cholescintigraphy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for relieving symptoms in patients diagnosed with BD and correlate gallbladder ejection fraction (EF) with symptom relief.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed at a single institution of all patients who underwent LC for BD from January 2005 through January 2012. The diagnosis of BD was determined by a normal gallbladder as viewed with ultrasonography and cholescintigraphy with a gallbladder EF less than or equal to 45%. Data collection included demographics, results of imaging studies, pathologic diagnosis, and early postoperative pain relief. Patients were contacted by phone after being discharged from the surgeon's care for evaluation of symptom relief. Data were analyzed with nonparametric statistical methods, including Mann-Whitney U test, receiver operator characteristic, Fisher exact test, and χ(2) test. All data are expressed as median and 25th and 75th percentile range.

RESULTS

There were 126 patients who had a LC for BD during the study period. The median biliary EF was 20% (10-29%). The most common pathologic finding was chronic cholecystitis (n = 95; 75%). Median length of follow-up in the perioperative period was 11 days (8-17), during which time 98 patients (78%) had relief of symptoms. Phone interviews (n = 53; 42%) confirmed 66% (n = 35) of patients remained free of pain. There was no difference in the mean EF among those with resolution of pain 20% (10-29%) compared with patients with persistent pain 23% (11-29%), P = .62. Obese patients were more likely to have persistent symptoms in the perioperative period with a shift to lower body mass index at the time of the phone survey. Receiver operator characteristic characteristic for the association between scintigraphic EF and resolution of postoperative pain demonstrated no association, with the area under the curve equal to 0.47.

CONCLUSION

The majority of patients in this series with BD had resolution of symptoms with LC. However, cholescintigraphy EF did not correlate with outcome. Further studies are needed to better identify patients diagnosed with BD who will benefit from LC.

Preoperative symptom duration predicts success in relieving abdominal pain caused by biliary dyskinesia in a pediatric population

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to identify factors associated with symptom relief in pediatric patients treated with laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for biliary dyskinesia (BD).

METHODS

This was a case-control study of pediatric patients diagnosed with BD between January 2004 and June 2011. Controls were patients with symptom resolution and cases were patients who did not experience symptom relief.

RESULTS

Fifty patients met study eligibility, of whom 43 were controls and 7 were cases. Mean follow-up for the cohort was 26.5months. Unadjusted comparisons suggested no significant differences (p>0.05) between the two groups in the distribution of demographic and clinical variables with the exception of preoperative duration of symptoms and presence of comorbidity. After adjusting for comorbidities, the only significant predictor associated with the resolution of symptoms after surgery was preoperative duration of symptoms (OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.15-0.94); 96% of patients with symptoms<12months had symptom relief versus 70% with symptoms≥12months.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms associated with BD can be successfully relieved with LC. These data suggest patients with preoperative symptoms for less than 12months are the most likely to have symptom relief after surgery.

Evaluation of gastrointestinal pathology and treatment in children with suspected biliary dyskinesia

AIM

Decreased gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) was reported in patients who had abdominal pain and gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. The study aims were to review pathology of GI tract in children with acalculous biliary-type abdominal pain and to evaluate the pain improvement after a 2-week trial of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).

METHODS

Children below 18 years of age with a history of biliary-type abdominal pain by ROME III criteria were evaluated. All underwent an upper endoscopy and their histologic findings of the proximal GI tract were reviewed. Responses to a 2-week trial of PPI and LC were analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixteen were identified with biliary-type abdominal pain with GBEF <35%. Endoscopic and histologic evidence of reflux esophagitis was observed in 11 children those of gastritis in 3 children. A GI pathology of these children is mostly acid-related and four of ten children experienced a complete response to PPIs and did not require LC. Nine children had LC; four had complete and four had partial pain improvement.

CONCLUSION

A trial of PPIs may be cost-effective prior to considering LC in these patients since four of ten children experienced a complete response to PPIs without the requirement of LC, compared with four of nine children who improved completely.

Biliary and gallbladder dyskinesia

Gallbladder and biliary dyskinesia are conditions that are becoming increasingly recognized due to improved technology. They are motility disorders that affect the gallbladder and sphincter of Oddi (SO), respectively. Gallbladder dyskinesia presents with typical biliary pain in the absence of gallstones. Work-up includes laboratory tests and imaging to rule out gallstones. Further investigation leads to a functional radionuclide study to investigate gallbladder ejection fraction. An ejection fraction of less than 40% is considered abnormal, and patients should be referred for cholecystectomy. Symptom relief after the procedure has been seen in 94% to 98% of patients. The term sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD) describes a collection of pain syndromes that are attributed to a motility disorder of the SO. SOD can be further subdivided into biliary and pancreatic SOD. Patients typically have had a prior cholecystectomy and present with episodic biliary pain. The initial work-up includes laboratory tests and imaging to rule out other structural causes of abdominal pain, such as retained gallstones. Imaging and laboratory studies further subdivide patients into types of SOD. SO manometry (SOM) is the gold standard for assessing biliary dyskinesia and can help stratify patients into one of two groups: SO stenosis versus SO dyskinesia. Those with stenosis (type I SOD) are the most likely to respond to treatment with endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy (EBS). As the vast majority of type I patients (>/= 90%) benefit from EBS, SOM is not necessary. Pancreatic SOD patients can be similarly divided into one of three groups. These patients present with recurrent bouts of abdominal pain and/or pancreatitis in the absence of gallstones or other structural abnormalities. Pancreatic sphincter manometry can help distinguish which patients would benefit from endoscopic pancreatic sphincterotomy. Recurrent stenosis of the opening after endoscopic treatment in these patients may necessitate a surgical (open) approach.

Use of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia in the child

BACKGROUND

Biliary dyskinesia (BD) is a consideration as a cause of chronic abdominal pain in the pediatric population. We sought to correlate the results of cholecystokinin-diisopropyl iminodiacetic acid (CCK-DISIDA) scanning, the basis for diagnosis of BD, with outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy from May 2000 through March 2007. The diagnosis of BD was based on CCK-DISIDA scan demonstrating a gallbladder ejection fraction (GBEF) of less than 35% and/or reproduction of pain on CCK administration or no filling of the gall bladder with a normal ultrasound examination. Hospital, General Surgery office, and Gastroenterology Office charts were reviewed for demographic and management data points. We used chi(2) and Mann-Whitney tests for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

For the period of review, 430 patients underwent a laparoscopic cholecystectomy including 75 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of BD. The mean age of the BD population was 14 (range, 9-19) years. Female to male ratio was 2.4:1. The mean body mass index was 24.4 kg/m(2). On average, patients had abdominal symptoms for 15.5 (range, 0.25-72) months. Each patient underwent nearly 2.5 studies (computed tomography, ultrasound, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, or upper gastrointestinal series) before diagnosis by CCK-DISIDA. The mean GBEF was 17.4%. When commented on (n = 41), pain on CCK administration was noted in 25 (61%) patients. Pathology revealed chronic cholecystitis in 44%. After laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 58 (77.33%) patients reported resolution of their abdominal pain (mean follow-up 4 months). Of the 17 patients without improvement, 7 were later diagnosed with other underlying pathology (Crohn's, hiatal hernia, cyclic vomiting). There was no difference in GBEF, age, histopathology, or sex between the two groups. There were no complications.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and effective treatment for the majority of children diagnosed with BD. Although CCK-DISIDA was used to identify biliary dysfunction, it did not correlate with outcome.

Biliary dyskinesia in the pediatric patient

The term biliary dyskinesia commonly describes a motility disorder of the biliary tract that is divided into two main categories: gallbladder dyskinesia (GBD) and sphincter of Oddi dysfunction (SOD). SOD is further subdivided into biliary SOD and pancreatic SOD. GBD causes typical biliary colic without gallstones, whereas SOD typically presents with recurrent pancreatitis or chronic abdominal pain, usually after cholecystectomy. GBD and SOD are uncommon in children. Based on adult experience, this review discusses the diagnosis and treatment of GBD and SOD in the pediatric population.

Prognostic Indicators of Quality of Life after Cholecystectomy for Biliary Dyskinesia

Approximately 30 per cent of patients who undergo cholecystectomy for biliary dyskinesia will continue to have symptoms after surgery. Quality of life has not been evaluated but may be decreased in these patients. The purpose of this study was to measure quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy in these patients to better define optimal treatment of biliary dyskinesia. All patients with biliary dyskinesia (defined as the absence of gallstones, and a gallbladder ejection fraction of <35%) who underwent cholecystectomy at our institution from January 31, 2000 to January 31, 2005 were identified. Preoperative data including ultrasound, biochemical data, and pathology were retrieved by chart review. Postoperative assessment included the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index and a symptom survey. The postoperative quality of life was compared with historic standards. The quality of life was also compared with preoperative variables to determine if any variables predicted outcome. A total of 66 patients were identified as fitting the inclusion criteria. Forty-three patients were reached by phone and 30 agreed to participate. Patients were noted to have good recall as to preoperative symptoms when the retrospective survey of symptoms was compared with the medical record. The mean ± SD postoperative quality of life in the study population was 113 ± 20. This is higher than in historic patients with gallbladder disease before (84 ± 19) and after (102 ± 13) cholecystectomy. Quality of life in the study group was lower than the healthy control (125 ± 13). Patients having both postprandial nausea and vomiting before surgery had a lower quality of life ( P < 0.029) after surgery as compared with those without these preoperative symptoms. When adjusted for nausea and vomiting, the quality of life in study patients (119 ± 14) was similar to normal controls. No other symptom, laboratory, pathologic, or sonographic data were predictive of a lower quality of life. Cholecystectomy is beneficial for most patients with biliary dyskinesia. Nausea and vomiting were negative predictors of quality of life after cholecystectomy. These patients with nausea and vomiting may have a global gastrointestinal motility disorder and are less likely to benefit from cholecystectomy.