Computer-Assisted Design and Manufacturing in Combined Orthognathic and Temporomandibular Joint Surgery

Extended total temporomandibular joint reconstruction prosthesis: A comprehensive analysis

Alloplastic total temporomandibular joint replacement (TMJR) is the treatment of choice for end-stage temporomandibular joint diseases. Extended TMJR (eTMJR) is a modification of the standard alloplastic fossa-condyle joint that includes components extending further to the skull base or the mandible. The aim of this study is to review the use of the eTMJR prosthesis for the treatment of large craniomaxillofacial defects. Data mining was performed according to the PRISMA statement using online search in databases such as PubMed (Medline), Google Scholar, Dimensions, Semantic Scholar and Web of Science. A total of 19 case reports, 08 case series and 03 retrospective studies were identified. A total of 49 patients were presented in the case reports and case series, who were implanted with 56 eTMJR prostheses (07 bilateral and 42 unilateral procedures). The mean age of the patients was 36.02±16.54 years, the male to female patient ratio was 1:1.72 and the mean follow-up time was 23.74 ± 19.83 months. The eTMJR prosthesis was most frequently used to treat ameloblastoma and hemifacial microsomia. Analysis of the retrospective studies was performed in three domains: the baseline characteristic of patients, treatment outcomes in terms of functional variables and complications after eTMJR prostheses implantation. This study concluded that the implantion of the eTMJR prosthesis was uncommon, that appropriate class of eTMJR prosthesis was not reported, and that the width of the mandibular component (like the length) of eTMJR prosthesis has substantial variations.

Do Case Reports on Total Mandibular, Extended, and Bilateral Total Temporomandibular Joint Reconstruction Prostheses Adhere to the Surgical CAse REport Guidelines?

PURPOSE

The Surgical CAse REport (SCARE) guidelines are a standardized format for reporting surgical cases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the completeness of case reports documenting alloplastic reconstruction of large craniomaxillofacial defects involving total mandibular, bilateral, and extended temporomandibular joint in major high-quality craniomaxillofacial journals, based on the SCARE guidelines.

METHODS

An extensive online search was performed according to the Priority Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Dimensions databases to identify relevant case reports. Each selected case report was assessed on 16 topics (38 items) of the SCARE guidelines, using a scoring scale of "0" (No/noncompliance), "1" (Yes/compliance), and 2" (unclear). The completeness of reporting (COR) score was calculated as the ratio of "yes" responses to "total" (ie, yes + no + unclear) responses. Adequacy of case reporting was denoted by a COR score of 70% or more.

RESULTS

A total of 35 case reports were selected, where the male to female patients ratio was 3:4 cases, mean ± standard deviation (SD) age: 34.9 ± 16.7 years, mean ± SD follow-up duration: 17.0 ± 12.9 months, and number of patients with left, right, and bilateral temporomandibular joint reconstruction prostheses were 16, 10, and 09, respectively. The mean ± SD COR score for all 35 case reports and the individual item of the SCARE guidelines was 70.2 ± 10.5% and 66.5 ± 31.2%, respectively. The minimum and maximum COR score was found for "Keywords" (0.0%) and "Introduction" (100%) and "Clinical Findings" (100%), respectively. Adequate reporting was found for 20/35 (57%) case reports.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed that case reports in major high-quality craniomaxillofacial journals suffer from insufficient reporting. Widespread adoption of available standards, such as SCARE guidelines, is proposed to improve the quality and robustness of case reporting.