Alcohol use disorder treatment and outcomes among hospitalized adults with alcoholic hepatitis

Impact of Social Vulnerability Index on Patients with Alcohol-Related Liver Disease

INTRODUCTION

Alcohol related liver disease (ALD) affects diverse communities with individual and social characteristics that can impact outcomes. The Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) assigns a score between 0 and 1, where higher scores represent an increased risk of social vulnerability. We sought to assess the impact of SVI on outcomes of patients hospitalized with ALD with access to social support services.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Hospitalizations for ALD at our institution between March and August 2019 were reviewed. All patients were assigned an SVI score based on their residential census tract. Per our standard practice, patients were screened by care coordinators to identify needs for rehabilitation counseling, and care coordination after discharge. Demographics, hepatic decompensation, critical care needs, readmission, and mortality were compared.

RESULTS

Among 73 patients admitted for alcoholic hepatitis, 32 had a low SVI and 42 had a high SVI. African American patients were more likely to have a higher SVI (35% vs 0%, p=<0.001). No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted. There were 393 patients admitted for alcoholic cirrhosis including 166 with a low SVI and 227 with a high SVI. Patients that were African American (23.6% vs 5.5%, p=<0.001) or disabled (41.4% vs 29.5%, p=0.008) had a higher SVI. No significant difference in outcomes based on SVI was noted.

CONCLUSION

Most patients admitted for ALD had a high SVI; however, SVI did not impact hospitalization outcomes.

Early living donor liver transplantation for alcohol-associated hepatitis: Status in the era of increasing demand, unmet needs, and future considerations

Hazardous alcohol consumption is the leading cause of liver disease worldwide. Alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) is an acute and serious presentation of alcohol-associated liver disease that is associated with high short-term mortality. Medical management remains limited to corticosteroid therapy and intensive nutrition but improves survival in <50% of individuals. Liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly recognized as a treatment option for many patients with AH and may lead to greater survival benefits than medical management alone. The rate of waitlistings and LTs for AH has doubled in recent years, especially in the United States. Several studies from the West have reported early LT for AH to be successful, where deceased donor LT is the norm. The challenges of LT in living donor centers, particularly for those with AH, are unique and have previously not been discussed in depth. In this review, we aim to discuss the challenges unique to LDLT with respect to candidate and donor selection, ethical considerations, disparities in LDLT, post-LT alcohol relapse, and measures to prevent them while also addressing the definitions and outcomes of early-living donor liver LT for AH.

Medications for alcohol-use disorder and follow-up after hospitalization for alcohol withdrawal: A multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Alcohol withdrawal is a common reason for admission to acute care hospitals. Prescription of medications for alcohol-use disorder (AUD) and close outpatient follow-up are commonly recommended, but few studies report their effects on postdischarge outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of medications for AUD and follow-up appointments on readmission and abstinence.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated veterans admitted for alcohol withdrawal to medical services at 19 Veteran Health Administration hospitals between October 1, 2018 and September 30, 2019. Factors associated with all-cause 30-day readmission and 6-month abstinence were examined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of the 594 patients included in this study, 296 (50.7%) were prescribed medications for AUD at discharge and 459 (78.5%) were discharged with follow-up appointments, including 251 (42.8%) with a substance-use clinic appointment, 191 (32.9%) with a substance-use program appointment, and 73 (12.5%) discharged to a residential program. All-cause 30-day readmission occurred for 150 patients (25.5%) and 103 (17.8%) remained abstinent at 6 months. Medications for AUD and outpatient discharge appointments were not associated with readmission or abstinence. Discharge to residential treatment program was associated with reduced 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 0.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.18-0.82) and improved abstinence (AOR: 2.50, 95% CI: 1.33-4.73).

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission and return to heavy drinking are common for patients discharged for alcohol withdrawal. Medications for AUD were not associated with improved outcomes. The only intervention at the time of discharge that improved outcomes was discharge to residential treatment program, which was associated with decreased readmission and improved abstinence.