1
|
Kurane K, Lin N, Dan I, Tanaka H, Tsuji Y, Ito W, Yanagida S, Monden Y. Visualizing changes in cerebral hemodynamics in children with ADHD who have discontinued methylphenidate: A pilot study on using brain function for medication discontinuation decisions. Brain Dev 2024; 46:373-382. [PMID: 39394011 DOI: 10.1016/j.braindev.2024.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/09/2024] [Indexed: 10/13/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study undertook neuropharmacological research on the clinical course of controlled medication discontinuation to guide practitioners who are considering stopping medications for youths with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS This study analyzed the data for 14 ADHD children (12 male and 2 female) in two datasets: The children prescribed methylphenidate (MPH) were at an initial mean age of 7.5 years (SD = 1.70, range: 6-11) with a mean ADHD-Rating Score (ADHD-RS) of 26.6 (SD = 8.64, range 15-40). The children who discontinued MPH based on clinical judgment were at a mean age of 12.21 years (SD = 2.12, range: 8-15) with a mean ADHD-RS of 15.9 (SD = 6.86, range 5-27). The go/no-go task was used to assess response inhibition, while functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) was used to measure cerebral hemodynamics. Oxygenated hemoglobin (Oxy-Hb) values from fNIRS data were analyzed for each subject, focusing on past and current measurements. Baseline was set at 10 s pre-task, with interval means from 4 to 24 s analyzed. One-sample t-tests were used to evaluate brain activity magnitude. RESULTS The results of the study demonstrate that the children who had discontinued the medication exhibited activation in specific brain regions including the frontopolar cortex and the right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Activation (t = 2.363, p = 0.034, Cohen's d = 0.632) was found especially in the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex during the performance of the go/no-go task. These activated areas were consistent with those observed in a previous study comparing brain activity during a go/no-go task between children with ADHD and healthy children. CONCLUSION The present study showed differences in cerebral hemodynamics before and after discontinuation of MPH in ADHD children whose ADHD symptoms did not recur after MPH was discontinued. In the near future, further investigations that include control groups will be conducted to demonstrate the effects of MPH prior to discontinuation based on the changes in cerebral blood flow in the right prefrontal cortex, which is involved in behavioral inhibition, as observed in this study. This and future research will facilitate the development of criteria for discontinuing treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koyuru Kurane
- Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| | - Niannian Lin
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ippeita Dan
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Hikari Tanaka
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuki Tsuji
- Institute of Cultural Sciences, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan; Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wakana Ito
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiho Yanagida
- Applied Cognitive Neuroscience Lab, Chuo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yukifumi Monden
- Department of Pediatrics, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lv Q, Wang X, Wang X, Ge S, Lin P. Connectome-based prediction modeling of cognitive control using functional and structural connectivity. Brain Cogn 2024; 181:106221. [PMID: 39250856 DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2024.106221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2024] [Revised: 08/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cognitive control involves flexibly configuring mental resources and adjusting behavior to achieve goal-directed actions. It is associated with the coordinated activity of brain networks, although it remains unclear how both structural and functional brain networks can predict cognitive control. Connectome-based predictive modeling (CPM) is a powerful tool for predicting cognitive control based on brain networks. METHODS The study used CPM to predict cognitive control in 102 healthy adults from the UCLA Consortium for Neuropsychiatric Phenomics dataset and further compared structural and functional connectome characteristics that support cognitive control. RESULTS Our results showed that both structural (r values 0.263-0.375) and functional (r values 0.336-0.503) connectomes can significantly predict individuals' cognitive control subcomponents. There is overlap between the functional and structural networks of all three cognitive control subcomponents, particularly in the frontoparietal (FP) and motor (Mot) networks, while each subcomponent also has its own unique weight prediction network. Overall, the functional and structural connectivity that supports different cognitive control subcomponents manifests overlapping and distinct spatial patterns. CONCLUSIONS The structural and functional connectomes provide complementary information for predicting cognitive control ability. Integrating information from both connectomes offers a more comprehensive understanding of the neural underpinnings of cognitive control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiuyu Lv
- Center for Mind & Brain Sciences and Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University, Hunan, Changsha, 410081, China; Medical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Xiangya), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Xuanyi Wang
- Center for Mind & Brain Sciences and Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University, Hunan, Changsha, 410081, China
| | - Xiang Wang
- Medical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China; China National Clinical Research Center for Mental Disorders (Xiangya), Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Sheng Ge
- Key Laboratory of Child Development and Learning Science, Ministry of Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, 211189, China
| | - Pan Lin
- Center for Mind & Brain Sciences and Institute of Interdisciplinary Studies, Hunan Normal University, Hunan, Changsha, 410081, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Thunberg C, Wiker T, Bundt C, Huster RJ. On the (un)reliability of common behavioral and electrophysiological measures from the stop signal task: Measures of inhibition lack stability over time. Cortex 2024; 175:81-105. [PMID: 38508968 DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Revised: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Response inhibition, the intentional stopping of planned or initiated actions, is often considered a key facet of control, impulsivity, and self-regulation. The stop signal task is argued to be the purest inhibition task we have, and it is thus central to much work investigating the role of inhibition in areas like development and psychopathology. Most of this work quantifies stopping behavior by calculating the stop signal reaction time as a measure of individual stopping latency. Individual difference studies aiming to investigate why and how stopping latencies differ between people often do this under the assumption that the stop signal reaction time indexes a stable, dispositional trait. However, empirical support for this assumption is lacking, as common measures of inhibition and control tend to show low test-retest reliability and thus appear unstable over time. The reasons for this could be methodological, where low stability is driven by measurement noise, or substantive, where low stability is driven by a larger influence of state-like and situational factors. To investigate this, we characterized the split-half and test-retest reliability of a range of common behavioral and electrophysiological measures derived from the stop signal task. Across three independent studies, different measurement modalities, and a systematic review of the literature, we found a pattern of low temporal stability for inhibition measures and higher stability for measures of manifest behavior and non-inhibitory processing. This pattern could not be explained by measurement noise and low internal consistency. Consequently, response inhibition appears to have mostly state-like and situational determinants, and there is little support for the validity of conceptualizing common inhibition measures as reflecting stable traits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Thunberg
- Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Thea Wiker
- Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Research Center for Developmental Processes and Gradients in Mental Health, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Department of Psychiatric Research, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Carsten Bundt
- Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - René J Huster
- Multimodal Imaging and Cognitive Control Lab, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Cognitive and Translational Neuroscience Cluster, Department of Psychology, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhao C, Tapera TM, Bagautdinova J, Bourque J, Covitz S, Gur RE, Gur RC, Larsen B, Mehta K, Meisler SL, Murtha K, Muschelli J, Roalf DR, Sydnor VJ, Valcarcel AM, Shinohara RT, Cieslak M, Satterthwaite TD. ModelArray: An R package for statistical analysis of fixel-wise data. Neuroimage 2023; 271:120037. [PMID: 36931330 PMCID: PMC10119782 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Diffusion MRI is the dominant non-invasive imaging method used to characterize white matter organization in health and disease. Increasingly, fiber-specific properties within a voxel are analyzed using fixels. While tools for conducting statistical analyses of fixel-wise data exist, currently available tools support only a limited number of statistical models. Here we introduce ModelArray, an R package for mass-univariate statistical analysis of fixel-wise data. At present, ModelArray supports linear models as well as generalized additive models (GAMs), which are particularly useful for studying nonlinear effects in lifespan data. In addition, ModelArray also aims for scalable analysis. With only several lines of code, even large fixel-wise datasets can be analyzed using a standard personal computer. Detailed memory profiling revealed that ModelArray required only limited memory even for large datasets. As an example, we applied ModelArray to fixel-wise data derived from diffusion images acquired as part of the Philadelphia Neurodevelopmental Cohort (n = 938). ModelArray revealed anticipated nonlinear developmental effects in white matter. Moving forward, ModelArray is supported by an open-source software development model that can incorporate additional statistical models and other imaging data types. Taken together, ModelArray provides a flexible and efficient platform for statistical analysis of fixel-wise data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenying Zhao
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Bioengineering, School of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Tinashe M Tapera
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Joëlle Bagautdinova
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Josiane Bourque
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Sydney Covitz
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Raquel E Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Ruben C Gur
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Bart Larsen
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kahini Mehta
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Steven L Meisler
- Program in Speech and Hearing Bioscience and Technology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
| | - Kristin Murtha
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - John Muschelli
- Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - David R Roalf
- Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Valerie J Sydnor
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Alessandra M Valcarcel
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Russell T Shinohara
- Penn Statistics in Imaging and Visualization Center, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Matthew Cieslak
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Theodore D Satterthwaite
- Lifespan Informatics and Neuroimaging Center (PennLINC), Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Penn/CHOP Lifespan Brain Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Research Institute, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Center for Biomedical Image Computation and Analytics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|