Investigating best practice for specimen preparation for biological testing of root canal sealers

Biocompatibility, bioactivity and immunomodulatory properties of three calcium silicate-based sealers: an in vitro study on hPDLSCs

OBJECTIVES

To assess the biocompatibility, bioactivity, and immunomodulatory properties of three new calcium silicate cement-based sealers: Ceraseal (CS), Totalfill BC Sealer (TFbc) and WellRoot ST (WR-ST) on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HPDLSCs were isolated from extracted third molars from healthy patients. Eluates (1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 ratio) and sample discs of CS, TFbc and WR-ST after setting were prepared. A series of assays were performed: cell characterization, cell metabolic activity (MTT assay) cell attachment and morphology (SEM assay), cell migration (wound-healing assay), cytoskeleton organization (phaloidin-based assay); IL-6 and IL-8 release (ELISA); differentiation marker expression (RT-qPCR assay), and cell mineralization (Alizarin Red S staining). HPDLSCs cultured in unconditioned (negative control) or osteogenic (positive control) culture media were used as a comparison. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

All the tested sealers exhibited similar results in the cytocompatibility assays (cell metabolic activity, migration, attachment, morphology, and cytoskeleton organization) compared with a negative control group. CS and TFbc exhibited an upregulation of at least one osteo/cementogenic marker compared to the negative and positive control groups. CS and TFbc also showed a significantly higher calcified nodule formation than the negative and positive control groups. Both the marker expression and calcified nodule formation were significantly higher in CS-treated cells than TFbc treated cells. WR-ST exhibited similar results to the control group. CS and TFbc-treated cells exhibited a significant downregulation of IL-6 after 72 h of culture compared to the negative control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

All the tested sealers exhibited an adequate cytocompatibility. CS significantly enhances cell differentiation by upregulating the expression of key genes associated with bone and cementum formation. Additionally, CS was observed to facilitate the mineralization of the extracellular matrix effectively. In contrast, the effects of TFbc and WR-ST on these processes were less pronounced compared to CS. Furthermore, both CS and TFbc exhibited an anti-inflammatory potential, contributing to their potential therapeutic benefits in regenerative endodontics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study to compare the biological properties and immunomodulatory potential of Ceraseal, Totalfill BC Sealer, and WellRoot ST. The results act as supporting evidence for their use in root canal treatment.

Comparative bioactivity and immunomodulatory potential of the new Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic sealer: An in vitro study on hPDLSCs

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cytocompatibility, bioactivity, and anti-inflammatory potential of the new pre-mixed calcium silicate cement-based sealers Bioroot Flow (BrF) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer (AHPbcs) on human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) compared to the epoxy resin-based sealer AH Plus (AHP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Standardized discs and 1:1, 1:2, and 1:4 eluates of BrF, AHPbcs and AHP after setting were prepared. The following assays were performed: cell attachment and morphology via SEM, cell viability via a MTT assay, cell migration/proliferation via a wound-healing assay, cytoskeleton organization via immunofluorescence staining; cytokine release via ELISA; osteo/cemento/odontogenic marker expression via RT-qPCR, and cell mineralized nodule formation via Alizarin Red S staining. HPDLSCs were isolated from extracted third molars from healthy patients. Comparisons were made with hPDLSCs cultured in unconditioned (negative control) or osteogenic (positive control) culture media. Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Both BrF and AHPbcs showed significantly positive results in the cytocompatibility assays (cell metabolic activity, migration, attachment, morphology, and cytoskeleton organization) compared with a negative control group, while AHP showed significant negative results. BrF exhibited an upregulation of at least one osteo/cementogenic marker compared to the negative and positive control groups. BrF showed a significantly higher calcified nodule formation than AHPbcs, the negative and positive control groups, while AHPbcs was higher than the negative control group. Both were also significantly higher than AHP group.

CONCLUSION

BrF and AHPbcs exhibit adequate and comparable cytocompatibility on hPDLSCs. BrF also promoted the osteo/cementogenic differentiation of hPDLSCs. Both calcium silicate-based sealers favored the downregulation of the inflammatory cytokine IL-6 and the calcified nodule formation from hPDLSCs. BrF exerted a significantly higher influence on cell mineralization than AHPbcs.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This is the first study to elucidate the biological properties and immunomodulatory potential of Bioroot Flow and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer. The results act as supporting evidence for their use in root canal treatment.