1
|
Begeman IJ, Guyer ME, Kang J. Cardiac enhancers: Gateway to the regulatory mechanisms of heart regeneration. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2025; 170:103610. [PMID: 40215762 PMCID: PMC12064385 DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2025.103610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2024] [Revised: 02/17/2025] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025]
Abstract
The adult mammalian heart has limited regenerative capacity. Cardiac injury, such as a myocardial infarction (MI), leads to permanent scarring and impaired heart function. In contrast, neonatal mice and zebrafish possess the ability to repair injured hearts. Cardiac regeneration is driven by profound transcriptional changes, which are controlled by gene regulatory elements, such as tissue regeneration enhancer elements (TREEs). Here, we review recent studies on cardiac injury/regeneration enhancers across species. We further explore regulatory mechanisms governing TREE activities and their associated binding regulators. We also discuss the potential of TREE engineering and how these enhancers can be utilized for heart repair. Decoding the regulatory logic of cardiac regeneration enhancers presents a promising avenue for understanding heart regeneration and advancing therapeutic strategies for heart failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian J Begeman
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Megan E Guyer
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA
| | - Junsu Kang
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53705, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cellini BR, Edachola SV, Faw TD, Cigliola V. Blueprints for healing: central nervous system regeneration in zebrafish and neonatal mice. BMC Biol 2025; 23:115. [PMID: 40307837 PMCID: PMC12044871 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-025-02203-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2025] [Indexed: 05/02/2025] Open
Abstract
In adult mammals, including humans, neurons, and axons in the brain and spinal cord are inherently incapable of regenerating after injury. Studies of animals with innate capacity for regeneration are providing valuable insights into the mechanisms driving tissue healing. The aim of this review is to summarize recent data on regeneration mechanisms in the brain and spinal cord of zebrafish and neonatal mice. We infer that elucidating these mechanisms and understanding how and why they are lost in adult mammals will contribute to the development of strategies to promote central nervous system regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna R Cellini
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | | | - Timothy D Faw
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
- Duke Institute for Brain Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Valentina Cigliola
- Department of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
- Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chen Y, Hou Y, Zeng Q, Wang I, Shang M, Shin K, Hemauer C, Xing X, Kang J, Zhao G, Wang T. Common and specific gene regulatory programs in zebrafish caudal fin regeneration at single-cell resolution. Genome Res 2025; 35:202-218. [PMID: 39809530 PMCID: PMC11789645 DOI: 10.1101/gr.279372.124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Following amputation, zebrafish regenerate their injured caudal fin through lineage-restricted reprogramming. Although previous studies have charted various genetic and epigenetic dimensions of this process, the intricate gene regulatory programs shared by, or unique to, different regenerating cell types remain underinvestigated. Here, we mapped the regulatory landscape of fin regeneration by applying paired snRNA-seq and snATAC-seq on uninjured and regenerating fins. This map delineates the regulatory dynamics of predominant cell populations at multiple stages of regeneration. We observe a marked increase in the accessibility of chromatin regions associated with regenerative and developmental processes at 1 dpa, followed by a gradual closure across major cell types at later stages. This pattern is distinct from that of transcriptomic dynamics, which is characterized by several waves of gene upregulation and downregulation. We identified and in vivo validated cell-type-specific and position-specific regeneration-responsive enhancers and constructed regulatory networks by cell type and stage. Our single-cell resolution transcriptomic and chromatin accessibility map across regenerative stages provides new insights into regeneration regulatory mechanisms and serves as a valuable resource for the community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yujie Chen
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Yiran Hou
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Qinglin Zeng
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Irene Wang
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Meiru Shang
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Kwangdeok Shin
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Christopher Hemauer
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Xiaoyun Xing
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Junsu Kang
- Department of Cell and Regenerative Biology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53705, USA
| | - Guoyan Zhao
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
- Department of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
| | - Ting Wang
- Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA;
- The Edison Family Center for Genome Sciences and Systems Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA
- McDonnell Genome Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Segert JA, Bulyk ML. Histone H4 lysine 20 monomethylation is not a mark of transcriptional silencers. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2025:2025.01.09.632211. [PMID: 39868205 PMCID: PMC11761030 DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.09.632211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2025]
Abstract
Transcriptional silencers are cis-regulatory elements that downregulate the expression of target genes. Although thousands of silencers have been identified experimentally, a predictive chromatin signature of silencers has not been found. H4K20me1 previously was reported to be highly enriched among human silencers, but our reanalysis of those data using an appropriate background revealed that the enrichment is only marginal. We generated H4K20me1 ChIP-seq profiles in Drosophila S2 cells, which similarly showed that H4K20me1 does not mark Drosophila silencers and instead is associated with active transcription. Silencers remain a poorly annotated, difficult to predict class of cis-regulatory elements whose specific chromatin features remain to be identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian A Segert
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Program in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Martha L Bulyk
- Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
- Program in Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
- Department of Pathology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Poss KD, Tanaka EM. Hallmarks of regeneration. Cell Stem Cell 2024; 31:1244-1261. [PMID: 39163854 PMCID: PMC11410156 DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2024.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/22/2024]
Abstract
Regeneration is a heroic biological process that restores tissue architecture and function in the face of day-to-day cell loss or the aftershock of injury. Capacities and mechanisms for regeneration can vary widely among species, organs, and injury contexts. Here, we describe "hallmarks" of regeneration found in diverse settings of the animal kingdom, including activation of a cell source, initiation of regenerative programs in the source, interplay with supporting cell types, and control of tissue size and function. We discuss these hallmarks with an eye toward major challenges and applications of regenerative biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth D Poss
- Duke Regeneration Center and Department of Cell Biology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Elly M Tanaka
- Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (IMBA), Austrian Academy of Sciences, Vienna Biocenter (VBC), 1030 Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|